CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Welcome 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
The Biggest Experiment in History. Well, a tiny piece of it at least… And a glimpse 12bn years back in time To the edge of the observable universe So.
Personal reflections, Belgrade, November 30,2009 Markus Nordberg, CERN/ATLAS.
Randall Sobie The ATLAS Experiment Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN Laboratory ATLAS.
Discovering the Unknown at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Amy Gladwin University of Arizona.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Particle Accelerators and Detectors
New Dimensions Collider Physics with the ATLAS Detector The LHC is designed to accelerate protons to near light speeds, then guide clockwise and counter-clockwise.
Mechanical and fluidic integration of scintillating microfluidic channels into detector system 1 Davy Brouzet 10 th September 2014.
Optical Fibre Dosimetry First Thoughts. Goal Target Measuring dose in a distributed way using optical fibres (“active”) Constraints: – Mixed-Radiation.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
LCG Milestones for Deployment, Fabric, & Grid Technology Ian Bird LCG Deployment Area Manager PEB 3-Dec-2002.
1 Chasing the Higgs boson with a worldwide distributed trigger system Sander Klous NIKHEF VENI proposal 2006.
RADWG 6 TH TH OCTOBER 2012 G. Spiezia (EN/STI/ECE)
CERN Probably one of the most incredible experiments in the world!
The Large Hadron Collider is the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
ESA/ESTEC CERN Visit December 9/10 th 2014 ITN (Marie-Curie) CERN/IES Proposal.
Status Report for Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group
Recreating the Big Bang with the World’s Largest Machine Prof Peter Watkins Head of Particle Physics Group The University of Birmingham Admissions Talk.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
The European Strategy Group (ESG) The remit of the ESG is to establish a proposal for an Update of the medium and long- term European Strategy for Particle.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
An exciting Opportunity to…. Enhance your Physics studies Develop Key Communication Skills Make personal links with Research staff at a leading University.
ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Peter Watkins, Head of Particle Physics Group, University of Birmingham, UK
CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal December 4 th 2014 international competitiveness requires faster lead times, lower costs- future projects need the.
ESFRI & e-Infrastructure Collaborations, EGEE’09 Krzysztof Wrona September 21 st, 2009 European XFEL.
Nov 28, 2013 Power Converters Availability for post-LS1 LHC TE-EPC-CCE.
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
3 November 2008 D.Acosta 1 Most Powerful Solenoid Magnet u 18kA, 3.8T solenoid u 3m radius, 15m length u 2.5 GJ stored energy u Can be discharged in a.
ENLIGHT,12/2/20021 Health and Science, can CERN contribute? The Mission of CERN (1954): “The Organization shall provide for collaboration among European.
LHC Computing, CERN, & Federated Identities
( name in progress) Kick-Off meeting August 28, 2013 Markus Nordberg Marzio Nessi Chris Thomas Harri Toivonen Tuuli Utriainen Introduction:
R2E Availability October 15 th 2014 Experience from Past LHC and Injector Operation and scaling to the future G. Spiezia.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
05 Novembre years of research in physics European Organization for Nuclear Research.
PS-EA Update RadWG August 23 rd 2012 Radiation 2 Electronics (R2E) LHC Activities RadWG August 23 rd 2012 PS East Area Update M. Brugger on behalf of the.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
M.C. Vetterli; SFU/TRIUMF Simon Fraser ATLASATLAS SFU & Canada’s Role in ATLAS M.C. Vetterli Simon Fraser University and TRIUMF SFU Open House, May 31.
EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.
First discussions regarding new EU AIDA project EUROnu WP5 Meeting 8 September 2009 Paul Soler.
R2E Mitigation Project Review November 21 st – 24 th 2011 Intense program (link)link A few facts/highlights per session/task Calculations & Monitoring.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
R2E Workshop Preparations RadWG Meeting March 25 th.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
Follow-Ups and Project Structure R2E Meeting September 8th Project / Study Group / RadWG R2E Mitigation Project:  Responsible of development and implementation.
Lucio Rossi The High Luminosity LHC Project Distinguished Lecturer 2013.
The New Radiation test facility at CERN: CHARM December 8 th 2014 CERN R2E project ESA/CERN meeting - December 8 th 2014 The new radiation tests facility.
R2E/Availability Workshop Report - RadWG October 22 nd 2014 R2E/Availability Workshop 2014 October th 2014 R2E/Availability Workshop RadWG - Brief.
New Irradiation Test Facility : CHARM June 10 th 2014 CERN R2E project CHARM Introduction June 10 th 2014 New CERN Irradiation facility : CHARM !!! Many.
News and Introduction from CERN June 15th, 2005
Technical Services: Unavailability Root Causes, Strategy and Limitations Data and presentation in collaboration with Ronan LEDRU and Luigi SERIO.
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Plan and Safeguard Service Package for SAP S/4HANA
HSE rules & regulations
Ways to industry participation in CLIC 24th October, 2017
European Detector R&D: AIDA
nuSTORM and the Physics Beyond Colliders workshop
CERN The world’s largest Particle Physics Research Center in Geneva
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Welcome 1

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 CERN R2E Project & IES Montpellier RADSAFE Kick-Off Meeting September 19 th 2014 ITN (Marie-Curie) CERN/IES Proposal

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 A New Idea An Industrial Requirement A Training Requirement & Opportunity Identified & Interested Partners An Effective Network with common interests/deliverables To Discuss a Marie-Curie ITN Proposal Why are we here today! 3

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 A few slides about CERN & R2E What is at stake? Why this ITN? Technical & Scientific Expertise & New Opportunity to Qualify/Test! The RADSAFE proposal Discussion points for the ITN implementation & the Airbus/CERN/IES partnership Overview 4

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 CERN Geographic Situation CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research)  The worldwide biggest physics laboratory Geneva Lake LHC FRANCE SWITZERLAND 5

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 CERN CORE Activity  Fundamental research:  Accelerators  powerful complex installations accelerating particles to very high energies before being colliding them at experiments or fixed- targets  Experiments/Detectors  gigantic instruments that record particle collisions  Computer farms, Grid, …  to collect, store, distribute and analyze enormous quantities of data generated by detectors  A Simplified view:  all these very complex systems can be assimilated to a powerful microscope capable looking inside matter at the level of nucleus and beyond. 6

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 ACCELERATOR LHC Overview LHC a 27km Tunnel installed at 100m below ground level  Thousands of equipments installed in the tunnel and its galleries  Experiments: where particles collide 7

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 LHC EXPERIMENTS: ATLAS  ATLAS: big as a 5 floors building 8

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 LHC EXPERIMENTS: CMS  CMS: heavier than the Eiffel Tower 9

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th The LHC Challenge LHC is a proton-proton (or ion/ion) collider  2 proton beams at 7 TeV of 3×10 14 p + each  Stored for hours in collision  Total stored energy of 0.7 GJ Sufficient to melt 1 ton of Cu  ~5000 superconducting magnets  Tiny fractions of the stored beam suffice to quench a superconducting LHC magnet or even to destroy parts of the accelerators.  Single particles can impact essential electronics and stop operation Destroyer

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th Reliability & Radiation

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th Only Satellites and Accelerators? © R. Baumann Radiation Level Failure Probability Number of Devices

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th “Everyday”-life Examples  French rail system  power converter failure in original implementation.  SEE confirmed, de-ratting applied for mitigation  Airborne systems  Malfunction caused a release of oxygen masks – likely caused be SEE  Attitude regulation system -> quite catastrophic  Medical: Sudden discharge of the pacemaker batteries  Reliability problem with personal safety impact (“In 2005, Canadian-based St. Jude Medical issued an advisory to doctors, warning that SEUs to the memory of its implantable cardiac defibrillators could cause excessive drain on the unit’s battery. … In 1998 Bradley and Normand already reported on the incidence of SEUs in implantable cardiac defibrillators.” From Biomocore.com“)

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Equipment Failure Example 14 P. Supply 24VDC 5A Vacuum system PLC (LHC_UJ76)

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th  Premature Beam Dump & LHC Downtime SEE : Power-Converter (LHC_RR) Equipment Failure Example

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 In a “Simple” Way  Sensitive components in complex Environments  Reliability & Radiation Risk (natural, artificial) & #of components/systems  Single Event Effects (SEEs) in combination with standard reliability constraints affect component/system integrity  Important to qualify, quantify & mitigate 16  Failure Impact with important consequences (maintenance, repair, costs, etc.) Reliability Competitiveness & Costs Risk

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Expertise & Opportunity 17

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Calculations Radiation Tests Production & Implementation Radiation Monitoring IES/CERN R2E Building Blocks Developments Test Facilities 18

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 You Ever Thought of Testing: components at once? -a car or avionic control system? -all at once in a fully representative environment!

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th CHARM Cern High Energy AcceleRator Mixed Field/Facility We’d also Other Good Options, (Cern High Energy Radiation Facility) … But CHER (French = expensive) New CERN Mixed-Facility

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 CHARM in Practice CHARM shielding: 2.2kt iron, ~4.5kt concrete 21

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Unique radiation test facility Various representative test environments (Ground, Aviation, High-Altitude, Accelerator & Low-Earth-Orbit) Detailed calibration through various monitoring systems and MC calculations Component, Batch and System tests Range of dose rates (ELDRS up to high dose rates) and dimensions (~1x1x2m, 1.5t) Available as from October 2014 CHARM – In short 22

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 The Core of the ITN Proposal 23

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Based on R2E Experience UNIVERSITIES TEST FACILITIES RESEARCH LABORATORIES INDUSTRY 24

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014RADSAFESAGATHE AVIATION Planes, Drones, High-Altitude Flights,, SPACE Satellites, Space Station, Missions, Cars, Trains, Communication, GROUND Medical, Industrial, Research, ACCELERATORS

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Scientific/Technical Radiation effects and qualification procedures Impact on component selection & system integration Test/Monitoring requirements & Facilities Industrial impact Quantify the radiation impact in connection to competitiveness Study mitigation/optimisation measures Social impact Reliability of transport, medical and space industry Training Requirement Today no standardized training exists Global ITN Objectives 26

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Submission: January 9 th 2015 Last check: December 14 th All support documents collected: December 1 st Ready for proof reading: November 1 st Second meeting in Montpellier: mid-October First complete draft assembled: October 6 th Training and mobility plan defined: September 19 th First meeting at CERN: September 12 th Work-package selection: September 5 th Network partners agreed upon: August 2014 Project and work-package definition: July/August Time-Line – Tight! 27

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th full partners (hosting students) Network of ~10-20 partners 15 Students (450 man-months) Budget volume of ~3.5 MEUR 3-4 work packages with 2-3 projects (mostly 2 students shifted within 48m) A strong network What we aim for: 28

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Confirmed interest? Full or Associated Partner Project proposal & work- package input Industrial support Feedback! What do we need 29

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Discussion Points 30

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Over the last years CERN has successfully coordinated and hosted numerous ITN and other EU-projects CERN has a support team for EU-proposals CERN’s finance and budget group also supports these activities For this ITN proposal, CERN is available as coordinator (internal approval already obtained) CERN & Marie-Curie 31

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 All results should be published and derived in the context of a thesis (authors those who contributed) Project/application needs to be non-military (should be stated in the proposal) Country/Sector balance to be considered Minimum three different countries (FP) One industrial partner needs to be FP Other aspects 32

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 A unique ITN opportunity High industrial impact, thus significant probability of EU approval/support A very effective network with partners to profit from in the mid/long-term Network could/should also lead to a parallel CERN collaboration agreement Could/Should form the basis of a future full- prone EU-project request (after respective lobbying for one of the next calls) In Summary 33

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 a.o.b. 34

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Identified Partners

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Other Links Institutions: ESA Conferences/Workshops: RadSol, RADECS

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Situation of Switzerland – PSI as partner -> clarified -> ok! 'Gretchen Question‘: What happens if we don't do it! International competitiveness Need of expertise/people being trained which are key for industry Key European partners are part of the game (Airbus, Renault [Zoe as series full electric car])! Required Clarifications 37

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 BACKUP 38

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 CERN Radiation Levels 39 Avionic Sea Level ISS R2E Single-Event Effects R2E Cummulative Damage Material Damage COTS Systems Hardened Electronics Electronics Damage Custom Boards with COTS Space & Deep Space

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 higher grade of integration study of standard reliability/life-time as well as radiation induced failures are expected to be key for competitiveness of European products Maintenance costs possibly linked to radiation failures costs of ‘plane on ground’ could be calculated with respect to initial investment non resolved failure cases Effort require to mitigate radiation failures on the system/redundancy level optimization margins/options Few detailed points 40

CERN/IES Marie-Curie Project Proposal September 19 th 2014 Radiation failures in complex radiation environments Characterization of mixed beam test facilities Development of a respective radiation test guideline for electronic testing in representative environments Monitoring in mixed radiation environments Component and system quality assurance based on COTS Mitigation techniques to be applied Development of predictive tools Test facility comparison, benchmarking and qualification Reliability assurance and respective quantification of radiation impact Definition of test and qualification procedures Possible Deliverables 41