Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Design of an Information Substrate for Measurement, Monitoring and Inference Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 1 August 30, 2010 GENI Shadownet Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Kentucky, AT&T Research, and.
Advertisements

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 1 Optical Access Nets and S3I Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University at Buffalo PI: Chunming Qiao Students.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation WIMXUWI Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Wisconsin-Madison PI: Suman Banerjee Staff: Ben Willard.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation The Hive Mind: Applying a Security Sensor Network to GENI Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of California,
Preparing a Grant Proposal: Some Basics
Best Practices Proposal Preparation University Research Center Administrators Ellen Feldman June, 2010.
October 7, 1999 Freeze Grant Accounts Overview University of Pennsylvania Office of Research Services.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation LAMP Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Delaware PI: Martin Swany Staff: Eric Boyd, Jason Zurawski,
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Project PrimoGENI Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Florida International University PI: Jason Liu;
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 1 August 30, 2010 INSTOOLS Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Kentucky PIs: James Griffioen and.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
EAS 299 Writing research papers
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation netKarma Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Indiana University Beth Plale (PI) School of Informatics and Computing.
What You Really, Really Need to Know About Effort Certification Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation BGP Mux Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Georgia Tech PI: Nick Feamster Students: Valas Valancius, Yogesh.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation TIED Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review USC/ISI PI: John Wroclawski Staff: Ted Faber, Mike Ryan August 30, 2010.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation IMF Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Lead PI: Rudra Dutta Co-PI: George Rouskas Students: Anjing Wang, Can.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation KanseiGenie Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Ohio State University, Wayne State University PI: Anish Arora.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation The Quilt GENI Operations Workshop Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review The Quilt PI: Jen Leasure August 31, 2010.
GIS as Applied to Disaster Management in Outlying and Non-Metro Illinois Counties James Cueno 596 A Peer Presentation - Spring 2 ‘15.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation PlanetLab and PLFED Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Princeton University PI: Larry Peterson Staff: Andy Bavier,
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation OppWireless Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Howard University PI: Jiang Li Staff: Sankardas Roy (part-time.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Comprehensive GENI Security Program Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review National Center for Supercomputing Applications.
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Davis Social Links Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of California, Davis PI: S. Felix Wu, Chen-Nee.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation GENI Meta-Operations Center Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review GlobalNOC at Indiana University PI: Jon-Paul.
GEC3 – October 28-30, 20081www.geni.net1 Substrate WORKING GROUP System Engineering Report John Jacob SWG System Engineer groups.geni.net GENI working.
On Preparing Proposals: Comments from Both Inside and Outside NSF Xiaodong Zhang The Ohio State University.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Embedded Measurement Framework (ERM) Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review PI: Keren Bergman Students: Michael.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Semantic Cyberinfrastructure for Knowledge and Information Discovery (SCiKID) Proposal Principle Investigator: Eric Rozell Tetherless World Constellation.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation PGTools Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Utah PI: John Regehr, Co-PI: Robert Ricci Staff: Leigh.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Policies and Procedures for Summer Supplements on Federal Awards April
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation GENI Security Architecture Toolkit (GSAT) Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review SPARTA, Inc. PI: Stephen Schwab.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Campus Trials of Enterprise GENI: Georgia Tech Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Georgia Tech PI: Russ Clark,
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation GENI Registry Services, a.k.a. Digital Object Registry Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review CNRI PI: Larry Lannom.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
The GENI Meta-Operations Center (GMOC) If it’s research, why do we care about operations?
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 1 Click to edit Master subtitle style Million Node GENI / Seattle Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
March 2, 2008 – GEC #2 Newcomerswww.geni.net1 The GPO Solicitation Process Feedback encouraged Chip Elliott GENI Project Director Clearing.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Distributed Identity & Authorization Mechanisms Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review SPARTA, Inc. PI: Stephen.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Embedded Measurement Framework (ERM) PI: Keren Bergman Senior Researcher: Dr. Balagangadhar Bathula Students:
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Internet2 OpenFlow Backbone Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Internet2 PI: Eric Boyd Co-PI: Matt Zekauskas.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation CMUlab Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Carnegie Mellon University PI: Dave Andersen Staff: Pat Gunn Students:
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review PI: Staff: Students: Date Project Graphic and/or Photo.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Federating a CRON into ProtoGENI Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Louisiana State University PI: Seung-Jong.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation OpenFlow Campus Trials at Clemson (OFCLEM) Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Clemson University PI: Kuang-Ching.
FY 2010 Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grant Application.
Inter-American Institute (IAI) Proposal Evaluation Paul E. Filmer National Science Foundation Second IAI Summer Institute, July 2000 University of Miami.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Measurement System Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Wisconsin, Colgate University, Boston University.
Arlington, VA March 31, 2004 Presentation for the Advisory Committee for Business & Operations Effective Practices Research Overview For Merit Review This.
The Sigma-Kuali Student Project Proposals April 25, 2012 Board Presentation.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Rutgers University PI: Dipankar Raychaudhuri WINLAB, Rutgers University Co-PI:
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Raven Provisioning Service Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Department of Computer Science University of Arizona.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Scalable, Extensible, and Safe Monitoring of GENI Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review PI: Sonia Fahmy, Purdue.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Internet-Scale Overlay Hosting Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Washington University PI: Jon Turner (5%)
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation OKGems Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Oklahoma State University and University of Florida PI: Xiaolin (Andy)
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation WiMAX Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Rutgers University PI: Dipankar Raychaudhuri, WINLAB Rutgers University.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation OpenFlow: Princeton Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Princeton University PIs: Michael Freedman, Jennifer.
The GENI Meta-Operations Center (GMOC) Jon-Paul Herron Global Research NOC.
Finding funding Fall 2015.
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
SPONSORED PROGRAM SERVICES OVERVIEW
Presentation transcript:

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Design of an Information Substrate for Measurement, Monitoring and Inference Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review Institution: MIT PI: Karen Sollins Staff: none Students: none August 27,2010, 2pm

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 2 Project Summary Observations about management –Measurement and monitoring are critical (not exclusively) to effective network management –Measurement and monitoring lead to information management –Measurement and monitoring require resources Computation Storage Communication Others? –Duplicate measurement and monitoring is wasteful –Longevity of information often important –Information may be about “something”, but may be multi-purpose Conclusion: an information substrate would make a valuable contribution to more effective network management Design criteria –Framework for saving information (including decisions about NOT saving) –Self-describing information for extensible (re)usability: typing (or ontology) and meta-data (e.g. provenance) –Storage and access –Access control framework Work in 2 phases for Management Information Substrate –Architectural and design challenges –Design proposal August 27, 2010, 2pm

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 3 Milestone & QSR Status IDMilestoneStatusOn Time?On Wiki? GPO signoff? S2.aSystem design issues for the GENI Information plane V1.0 Paper was deliveredOn time, to V.Thomas Waiting for BBN S2.bSystem design issues for the GENI Information plane V2.0 Due 9/30/10 QSR: 4Q2009 QSR: 1Q2010 QSR: 2Q2010 August 27, 2010

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 4 Accomplishments 1: Advancing GENI Spiral 2 Goals …and Management Continuous Experimentation –Effective management of supporting resources –Presentation of resource options –Provisioning prediction improvement Integration –Framework for integrating across management of sets of resources Instrumentation and Measurement –Example of management capabilities –Demonstrates lack of integration across layers Interoperability –Federation as key constraint/driver –Cooperation and coordination –Access restraints and control AUGUST 27, 2010

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 5 Accomplishments 2: Other Project Accomplishments Related funded research: a series of NSF grants, each to work on different aspects of the Knowledge Plane concept. –Previous grant: work on computational framework for widely distributed, multiple-domain network management (2 PhDs, a number of papers) –Current grant: work on information substrate for widely distributed, multiple-domain network management. (3 Master’s students in progress) –Paper published in ReArch, 2009 on an architecture for network management: overview AUGUST 27, 2010

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 6 Issues Contracting: –Prior to submitting: with GENI office about the fact that the budgeting and expectations were designed for large contracts and made no sense for small ones. Issue 1: funding barely covers 1 month of PI time, which is days. Issue 2: attending 3 GECs takes at least 9 days including travel, depending on location of the days Issue 3: Travel to a GEC and registration fee costs $ $2000 per trip, plus overhead, e.g approximately $ $3600 per trip, so aproximately $9,000 of the $30,000 total Conclusion: attending 3 GECs per year leaves the PI with about 1/3 less money to pay for time and uses more than one third of the original time, thus leaving the PI with approximately 5-6 of paid days to do the work. Consensus: 1 trip per year. –This was discussed and understood prior to the GENI Spiral 2 submissions were due –When the contract came through, all had been forgotten and took MANY discussions to make some sense out of this – just about travel to GECs! –Conclusion: there is little institutional memory about things like this, which make for significant amount of wasted time and work in repeating them Timeliness –Original start date, intended for Oct. 1, 2009 –Many, slow rounds, first to reach an understanding and then to get it consistently into the contract. –Result: contract for 1 year was signed on April 20, 2010 to end Sept. 30, 2010, ostensibly for a year’s worth of work. AUGUST 27, 2010

Sponsored by the National Science Foundation 7 Plans Plans for the remainder of Spiral 2: –Complete final version of the architectural challenges paper: Sept. 30, 2011 –Write first draft of design paper, target date of May 30, 2012 –Write final version of design paper: Sept. 30, 2012 Looking toward Spiral 3 –Requirement for an architected approach to the combined problems for layering (appropriately) and federation: critically important and happening –A coherent and architected framework for multi-layer, federated management is critical to keeping an infrastructure such as GENI both operating and evolving: critically important, not happening –Given the funding model (and my experience with contracting) it would be impossible for me to propose this in the GENI framework I do not have other funding to build something like this I do not have a “team” in place who could do this GENI seems dependent on people building elements of the system, who only need supplemental money to do the work, because they already have other sources of funding using only supplemental funding I am happy to review, advise, etc. on this subject I am willing to attend GECs with travel support from BBN. AUGUST 27, 2010