Special Administrative Board Meeting St. Louis Public School District May 9, 2013 Dr. Nicole Williams, Deputy Superintendent for Academic Services Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Advertisements

How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
OKLAHOMA SIG SCHOOLS State Profile – Cohort 1 Tier I SIG Schools: 8 – Cohort 2 Tier I and II SIG Schools: 3 Total SIG Schools: 11 Total Funding Awards.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
RACHEL HANSEN How Can Special Educators Best Support Response To Intervention Practices within the General Educational Setting?
A Century of Academic Excellence and Achievement DELANO HIGH SCHOOL.
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Chapter 6: Student Services Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
Highline Public Schools Scaling-Up District-wide PBIS Improving Social and Academic Outcomes for All Students District PBIS Coordinator & Implementation.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Secondary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator November 13, 2013.
Jefferson-Houston School Transformation Update: May 23, 2013.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
North Santiam School District Scaling Up! April 30, 2010 Michael Ann McIlvenny, Associate Superintendent Jeri Harbison, Intervention Coach.
Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator October 30, 2013.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Keys to being an effective principal Mike Miles July 2009.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Mission The Kentucky Department of Education’s mission is to prepare all Kentucky students for next-generation learning, work and citizenship by engaging.
Response to Intervention Teaching and Learning February 19, 2015 Michelle Coconate.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Dr. Neil Guthrie Assistant Superintendent
TTIPS Model Overview.
Sr. Director Intervention Services
Huntsville City Schools Student Performance Trends
Hope-Hill ES.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
RTI: Response To Instruction
Colchester Public Schools
Beecher Hills Elementary School (Mays Cluster)
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Special Administrative Board Meeting St. Louis Public School District May 9, 2013 Dr. Nicole Williams, Deputy Superintendent for Academic Services Office of Innovation Team Members: Mrs. Rosemary Martin, Associate Superintendent Turnaround Coordinators: Arnetta Fraction, Romney Edwards, Carmen Hill, Lance Jones

 Purpose of the Grant  Schools Impacted  Core Components  Framework for Sustainability  Next Steps Agenda

The Missouri School Improvement Grant (MOSIG) is a three year initiative that engages the lowest 5% of performing schools by restructuring processes to support Closure, Restart, Turnaround, and Transformation models that ultimately improve student learning and academic success. Missouri School Improvement Grant (MOSIG)

SLPS Eleven School Improvement Grant Schools Schools Year 1 ( )Year 2 ( )Year Award Per School Amount Per Pupil Award Per School Amount Per Pupil Anticipated Award Actual Award Per School Amount Per Pupil Ashland ES (Turnaround Model) $335,737.00$1,702.00$306,775.00$989.00$280,311.38$367,431.00$1, Columbia ES (Turnaround Model) $356,608.00$1,758.00$316,623.00$1,749.00$281,121.35$377,379.00$1, Fanning MS (Transformation Model) $444,175.00$1,366.00$302,772.00$865.00$206,384.61$363,528.00$1, Hamilton ES (Turnaround Model) $363,928.00$1,151.00$328,256.00$1,094.00$296,080.55$389,012.00$1, Jefferson ES (Transformation Model) $340,193.00$1,440.00$297,412.00$1,389.00$260,010.93$358,168.00$1, Langston MS (Transformation Model) $436,579.00$1,500.00$306,667.00$849.00$215,412.67$367,423.00$1, L'Ouverture MS (Transformation Model) $441,804.00$1,800.00$306,667.00$1,369.00$212,865.09$367,423.00$1, Mann ES (Turnaround Model) $380,419.00$1,683.00$327,387.00$1,046.00$281,747.88$388,143.00$1, Sigel ES (Turnaround Model) $382,436.00$1,262.00$327,673.00$1,046.00$280,751.80$388,429.00$1, Vashon HS (Turnaround Model) $399,827.00$727.00$317,780.00$546.00$252,569.56$378,536.00$ Walbridge ES (Turnaround Model) $377,942.00$1,044.00$334,714.00$1,097.00$296,430.30$395,470.00$1, DISTRICT TOTAL/AVG PER PUPIL $4,277,648.00$1,264.00$3,472,726.00$1,128.00$2,819,265.60$4,140,942.00$1, Total Award to SLPS (Year 1-3) $11,891,316.00($10,569, Anticipated)

Positions (50.84 positions funded by SIG) Technology Professional Development Extended Learning Turnaround Coordinator* Instructional Support Coordinator*** Behavior Support Specialist* Family Educator*** Math Specialist*** Counselor*** Social Worker*** Secretary* Scholastic Reading Suite (3-tiered intervention)* AimsWeb (progress monitoring for grades K-6)* Netbooks and Mobile Laptop Carts*** Desktop Computers*** Listening Stations* Printers* iPads*** RtI workshops/Character Education*** Culturally Responsive Classroom/Behavior Management*** Leadership Training*** Differentiated Instruction*** Depth Of Knowledge/Questioning*** MAP/EOC Prep*** Writing/Literacy Strategies*** Before and After School*** Saturday School** Spring Break Academy** Summer Academy*** *One-time funding for the initiative (SIG) **School continues funding (depending on identified priorities/needs) ***District continues with a different funding source

Identify Priorities Develop an Action Plan Assess Academic Return on Investments Abandon High Cost/Low Impact Initiatives Link Key Strategies Use Data to Assess Impact Identify Key Turnaround Strategies and Programs Conduct Needs Assessment Building Capacity: Improving the Instructional Core, Attendance, and Discipline Building Capacity: Improving the Instructional Core, Attendance, and Discipline Identify Funding Gap

 Provide High-Quality Leadership  Stabilize the Systems Supporting the Schools  Embed Professional Development  Strengthen Core Instruction and Interventions  Use Data to Align Assessments  Implement Collaborative Planning Time  Ensure Singular Instructional Focus (i.e., Literacy)