Secondary Interventions: Setting the Foundation for Intensive Support The National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) This document was produced under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Response to Intervention
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Multidisciplinary Teams
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention Developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention and RMC Research RTI Integrity Framework: A Tool.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
An Introduction to Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Center Director October 2012.
Who, What, When, Where, Why, & How of Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D., Center Director Joe Wehby, Ph.D., Senior Advisor Rebecca Zumeta, Ph.D.,
Evaluating Implementation of Intensive Intervention with NCII’s The DBI Implementation Rubric Rebecca O. Zumeta, Ph.D. Deputy Director, NCII
Getting Ready to Implement Intensive Intervention Infrastructure for Data-Based Individualization Presenter’s Name Position Month 20XX.
An Introduction to - PBIS in Roseburg Public Schools: RTI, Professional Learning Communities and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn.
Response to Intervention
Strand A: How Can We Make Intensive Intervention Happen? Considerations for Knowledge Development, Implementation, and Policy Session 3: From Know-How.
Addressing the Needs of Students with Reading Difficulties through Supplemental Interventions Course Enhancement Module: Reading K–5, Part 4 H325A
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Supplemental Behavioral Interventions H325A
Digging Deeper LKSD Principal Inservice Feb. Our approach for our time together…
Strand A: How Can We Make Intensive Intervention Happen? Considerations for Knowledge Development, Implementation, and Policy Session 2: Practical Solutions—Using.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Supplemental Behavioral Interventions H325A
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Response To Intervention Framework Greg Frederick 6/4/2011.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Brief Overview of the PA Model* ALL RtI provides ALL students with: Standards-aligned concepts and competencies Data-driven.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Response to Intervention Activity: Selecting the ‘Best of the Best’ Tier I Intervention Ideas.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC July 21, 2008 Tools for Bridging the Research to Practice Gap Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI International.
Response to Intervention By Kristy Shinaver. What is Response to Intervention (RtI)?  A multi-tiered method of service delivery in which all students.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Tier 3 Intervention The Most Intense Level of Intervention!!!
SRBI/PBIS Implementation: Considerations George Sugai & Jen Freeman Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
We will start shortly. Feel free to relax and chat while you wait for class to begin. Our agenda for tonight’s seminar is to discuss Response to Intervention,
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Module 4: Multi-Tiered System of Support for High School.
National Center on Intensive Intervention Overview and Resources April 8, 2014 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Is Intensive Intervention Special Education
Improving MTSS Implementation and Outcomes through Problem Solving
Secondary Interventions: Setting the Foundation for Intensive Support
Tiered Instruction and Interventions
Strand G, Session 2 Boots on the Ground
Hello. Welcome to “What Does it Really Take
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
CEEDAR Center: ceedar.org & NCII: intensiveintervention.org
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Secondary Interventions: Setting the Foundation for Intensive Support The National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H326Q Celia Rosenquist serves as the project officer. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this document is intended or should be inferred.

1.Introduction 2.Rationale for Secondary Interventions 3.Elements of Secondary Interventions a)Evidence Base b)Fidelity 4.Beyond Secondary Interventions In Today’s Session… 2

Introduction 3

 Standardized, evidence-based interventions designed for at-risk students. Often referred to as… – Tier 2 intervention – Strategic intervention – Remedial curriculum Common examples – Wilson Just Words – Check-in/Check-out – Corrective Math What Are Secondary Interventions? 4

Rationale for Secondary Interventions 5

Secondary Interventions in the Context of Multi-Tiered Supports 6

DESCRIPTION FOCUSAll students INSTRUCTIONDistrict curriculum and instructional practices that are research based, are aligned with state or district standards and incorporate differentiated instruction SETTINGGeneral education ASSESSMENTSScreening, continuous progress monitoring, and outcome measures or summative assessments (used sparingly) Primary Tier (aka Tier 1, Core Instruction) 7

DESCRIPTION FOCUSStudents identified through screening as at risk for poor learning outcomes *Typically 15–20% of student population INSTRUCTIONTargeted, evidence-based supplemental instruction delivered to small groups SETTINGGeneral education classroom or other regular education location within the school ASSESSMENTSProgress monitoring, diagnostic, screening Secondary Tier (aka Tier 2 or Secondary Intervention) 8

DESCRIPTION FOCUSStudents who have not responded to primary or secondary level prevention, or with very low performance levels *Typically 3–5% of student population INSTRUCTIONIndividualized instruction delivered to small groups or individually and intensified by making adaptations based on student data SETTINGGeneral education or special education setting ASSESSMENTSProgress monitoring, diagnostic, screening Intensive Tier (aka Tier 3 or Tertiary Intervention) 9

Secondary (Tier 2)Intensive (Tier 3) INSTRUCTION Follow standardized evidence- based programs as designed Use standardized evidence-based program as a platform, but adapt instruction based on student data Duration and timeframe Use duration and timeframe defined by developer Increase frequency and/or duration to meet student needs Group size 3–7 students (as defined by developer) Decrease group size to meet student needs (no more than 3 (elementary level) Progress Monitoring At least once per monthWeekly Population served At-risk (typically 15–20% of student population) Significant and persistent learning and/or behavior needs (typically 3–5% of student population) Distinction Between Secondary and Intensive Intervention 10

 Meet the needs of at-risk students  Efficient use of time and resources  Identification for intensive intervention  Specific learning disability identification Why Are Secondary Interventions So Important? 11

Elements of Secondary Interventions 12

1.Evidence-Based Intervention 2.Fidelity a)Adherence b)Student Engagement c)Program Specificity d)Quality of Delivery e)Exposure Elements of Secondary Interventions 13

1.Evidence-Based Intervention 2.Fidelity a)Adherence b)Student Engagement c)Program Specificity d)Quality of Delivery e)Exposure Elements of Secondary Interventions 14

Varying Evidence Standards Recommended for primary prevention across subjects Components have been researched and found to be generally effective Curriculum materials have not been rigorously evaluated as a package Recommended for secondary and tertiary prevention Materials evaluated using rigorous research design Evidence of positive effects for students who received the intervention Research-Based CurriculaEvidence-Based Intervention

Varying Evidence Standards (Examples)

 Type/Source  Population  Desired Outcomes  Effects What to Look For When Examining the Evidence Base 17 NCII Interventions Tools Chart nstructional-intervention-tools What Works Clearinghouse spx Best Evidence Encyclopedia

Resource: Richland School District Literacy Intervention Matrix

 Optional activity for teams Purpose: practice identifying evidence-based secondary interventions to meet the needs of a sample student. Time: 30–60 minutes Activity : Selecting Evidence-Based Interventions 19

 Use them when available and consider augmenting current offerings, if feasible.  Also consider: Remediation materials that came with your core program materials Expert recommendations (if evidence-based programs are not available) Standards-aligned materials  Collect data to determine whether most students are profiting. What If Evidence-Based Interventions Aren’t Available? 20

Elements of Secondary Interventions 1.Evidence-Based Intervention 2.Fidelity a)Adherence b)Student Engagement c)Program Specificity d)Quality of Delivery e)Exposure 21

 Degree to which the program is implemented the way intended by program developer.  Fidelity = Consistency and Accuracy  Fidelity = Integrity What Is Fidelity? 22 Gersten et al., 2005; Mellard & Johnson, 2007; Sanetti & Kratochwill, 2009

 Ensures that instruction has been implemented as intended  Allows us to link student outcomes to instruction  Helps in the determination of intervention effectiveness and instructional decision-making  Positive student outcomes depend on level of fidelity of intervention implementation Why Is Fidelity Important? 23 (Pierangelo & Giuliani, 2008)

Five Elements of Fidelity 24 (Dane & Schneider, 1998; Gresham et al., 1993; O’Donnell, 2008) Adherence: How well do we stick to the plan, curriculum, or assessment? Exposure/Duration: How often does a student receive an intervention? How long does an intervention last? Quality of Delivery: How well is the intervention, assessment, or instruction delivered? Do you use good teaching practices? Program specificity: How well is the intervention defined and different from other interventions? Student Engagement: How engaged and involved are the students in this intervention or activity?

Beyond Secondary Interventions 25

What Should I Do If Secondary Interventions Aren’t Sufficient? 26

How do secondary interventions fit into the DBI process? 27

Why Are Secondary Interventions So Important?  Poor implementation Strain on resources and efficiency Teacher burn-out 28

Examples of intensification strategies:  Decrease group size.  Increase frequency or duration of sessions.  Change interventionist to someone with greater expertise.  Break tasks into smaller steps, compared to less intensive levels of instruction or intervention.  Provide concrete learning opportunities (including role play and use of manipulatives).  Use explicit instruction and modeling with repetition to teach a concept or demonstrate steps in a process. Intensifying Secondary Interventions 29

 NCII Module Topics : Introduction to Data-based Individualization Academic and Behavioral Progress Monitoring for Intensive Interventions Academic and Behavioral Diagnostic Assessment Designing and Delivering Intensive Intervention in Academics and Behavior To Learn More About Intensive Intervention and DBI… 30

 Complete the “Secondary Interventions Needs Inventory” to guide reflection on current secondary intervention practices in your school or district. Share responses as a team Prioritize and plan for next steps with district or school leadership or coach Prioritizing Your Next Steps… 31

Secondary Interventions…  Set the foundation for intensive intervention.  Should be evidence based, and implemented with fidelity.  Have important implications for identification. In Summary 32

This module was produced under the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H326Q Celia Rosenquist serves as the project officer. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the Education Department. No official endorsement by the Education Department of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned in this website is intended or should be inferred. Disclaimer 33

Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., & Noell, G. H. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257–263. Mellard, D. F., & Johnson, E. (2007). RTI: A practitioner’s guide to implementing response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84. References 34

PBS Newshour. (2008). ‘Checklist manifesto’ author pairs simplicity with lifesaving. Retrieved from 08.html Pierangelo, R., & Giuliani, G. (2008). Frequently asked questions about response to intervention: A step-by-step guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Richland School District. (2010). Richland School District Math Intervention Matrix. Retrieved from Sanetti, L., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38(4), Zingmark, London, Smart, Rumsey, & Bolz (2008). Richland School District Literacy Intervention Matrix. Richland School District. Retrieved from References 35

National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) 1050 Thomas Jefferson St. NW Washington, DC