Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Plan.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Plan Stage Develop Improvement Plan.
™ Goals Management Overview For ISD/RESA Support Personnel and NCA Field Consultants February 11, 2011 Carrie Finke Professional Learning Division AdvancED.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Campus Improvement Plans
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Program Evaluation and Improvement Planning The MDE Program Evaluation Student Achievement Strategy/Program/Initiative Implementation Impact.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
LEA Planning Cycle March 4, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Collect Data & Build Profile.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Set Goals, Set Measurable Objectives and Research Best Practices.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) DO.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
The MDE Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
“Successes, Challenges and Technical Assistance: A Dialog with State Teams” Lisa Stooksberry – AACTE David Paradise – CTQ Kathleen Paliokas –CTQ Michele.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Overview.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
February 21-22, 2018.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
LEA Planning Cycle.
Presentation transcript:

Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

2 Continuous School Improvement Process

3 Guided Conversations STUDY WHY:Why do we analyze the data? HOW: How do we identify student needs? How do we use the data analysis to inform what we do? How does the vision guide the process? How do we assess how our students are doing? What:What process do we use to share this info with stakeholders? What are the student achievement needs?

4 Study Vocabulary Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) Achievement Data Demographic Data Perception Data Process Data School Data Analysis (SDA) School Process Profile (SPP) Self Assessment (SA) Interim Self Assessment (Interim SA) Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement

5 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

6 Continuous School Improvement Process Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

7 Supported by: School Data Analysis

8 At what level are our students achieving? How does this compare to where we want them to be? What factors influence student achievement? What does this information tell us about our greatest area of need? What are the areas of concern over which we have control?

9 Achievement Analyze Achievement Data Achievement data paints a picture of student performance. How has student achievement changed in the last five years? When comparing the school with the district and state, which content area would the staff identify as a challenge area for the school?

10 Demographic Analyze Demographic Data Demographic data describes the students who are included in the achievement data as well as the staff who teach them. What patterns or trends in enrollment need to be addressed? What implications do the data present for the school in the following areas: staffing, fiscal resource allocations, facility planning, parent involvement, professional development, public relations, and/or recruitment?

11 Perception Analyze Perception Data Perception data gives us a look at opinions of students, parents, and staff. What are the perceptions of students regarding the quality of the instructional program? What are the perceptions of parents regarding support for student learning? What are the perceptions of teachers/staff regarding school climate?

12 Process Analyze Process Data (School Process Rubrics/Interim SA/SA) Process data helps us understand how the quality of school processes might impact student achievement. What processes are used to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of research-based strategies being used in the classroom? How do staff members demonstrate high expectations for all students? Which indicators could your school further develop to improve student achievement?

13 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

14 Continuous School Improvement Process Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

15 Goals Goal Statement Academic or Organizational Goal Measurable Objective Statement Who is the target population? What do they need to achieve? How much success will be measured? When will they achieve it? Strategy Name How it will work Research Activity Name Activity Type Activity Description Beginning Date Ending Date Funding Source Funding Amount Responsible Staff

16 Set Goals Schools are encouraged to write 3-5 goals Schools are required to write a goal in any content area for which they do not meet their annual measureable objectives (AMOs) Title I schools must address any content area identified as a need through their comprehensive needs assessment

17 Set Goals Goal statements: Are based on a careful analysis of data Align with challenges identified in the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Are linked to identified student academic learning needs Broadly state that all students will be successful learners in a specific area of the content.

18 Set Goals In the Goal section of ASSIST, schools are asked to identify the following: Goal Statement – “All students will be proficient in (reading, writing, math, science or social studies)” Academic or organizational

19 Use multiple data sources Gap Identification Gap When considering the percent proficient on MEAP, there is a 10% gap between current performance by all students and the 100% goal. In addition, there is a 21% difference between students without disabilities and students with disabilities. READING Students without disabilities Students with disabilities Male Female

20 Causes for the Gap In what strands might students be underperforming? Are there subgroups in which students are underperforming their counterparts? Are there school processes that are weak as identified in the process data? Are there perceptions by students, parents, or staff that are limiting achievement?

21 Why are … ? Why? Why? Why? Why? Causes for the Gap IMPACT DEGREE OF CONTROL

22 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

23 Continuous School Improvement Process Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

24 Goals Goal Statement Academic or Organizational Goal Measurable Objective Statement Who? What do they need to achieve? How much success will be measured? When will they achieve it? Strategy Name How it will work Research Activity Name Activity Type Activity Description Beginning Date Ending Date Funding Source Funding Amount Responsible Staff

25 Develop School Improvement Plan Goals Management Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement Strategy Statement Activities

26 Set Measurable Objectives

27 Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practices

28 What research-based strategies will we use to ensure that students make progress toward meeting the goal and the measureable objective? Research-Based Best Practices

29 Right Thing Is this the Right Thing to do? Does the practice align to our need? Will the practice be a good fit with other district/school needs/priorities? Research Based Best Practices

30 Right Way Can we do it the Right Way? (Implement with Fidelity) How similar to the research situation is our situation? If our situation is not the same, can we still implement the practice with fidelity, possibly with acceptable adjustments? Can we build the level of commitment/readiness and successfully address resistance? Can we develop the necessary technical and adaptive skills in leadership? Can we put the right people in the right place to implement the strategy? Can we build the capacity, knowledge, and skills of those charged with implementation and provide on-going support for implementation, e.g. coaching? Can we put the required organizational/structural structures in place/remove barriers? Can we commit the necessary financial resources, e.g. fiscal, personnel, technology? Can we commit the necessary processes and mechanisms to monitor fidelity of adult implementation and student impact? Research Based Best Practices

Right Thing Is this the Right Thing to do?  No – choose something else.  Yes – proceed to “Can we do it the right way?” Right Way Can we do it the Right Way?  No – choose something else  Yes – proceed to developing action plan

32 Continuous School Improvement Process

33 Study Vocabulary Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) Achievement Data Demographic Data Perception Data Process Data School Data Analysis (SDA) School Process Profile (SPP) Self Assessment (SA) Interim Self Assessment (Interim SA) Goal Statement Measurable Objective Statement

34 Guided Conversations WHY:Why do we analyze the data? STUDY HOW: How do we identify student needs? How do we use the data analysis to inform what we do? How does the vision guide the process? How do we assess how our students are doing? What:What process do we use to share this info with stakeholders? What are the student achievement needs?

35 Questions/Comments? Please contact:  Renie Araoz  Diane Fleming  Diane Joslin-Gould Or visit the MDE - School Improvement websiteMDE - School Improvement

36 Renie Araoz – MDE/AdvancED Michigan Deb Asano - Marquette-Alger RESA Lisa Bannon - Wexford-Missaukee ISD Ben Boerkoel - Kent ISD Elizabeth Brophy - Calhoun ISD Deb Dunbar - Bay-Arenac ISD Scott Felkey - Oakland Schools Diane Fleming - MDE Linda Forward - MDE Lisa Guzzardo Asaro - Macomb ISD These training materials and resources were developed by the Michigan Continuous School Improvement Team. We deeply appreciate their time and support. Carrie Haubenstricker - Tuscola ISD Fiona Hinds - AdvancED Michigan Diane Joslin-Gould - MDE Scott Koziol - Michigan Center Public Schools Kathleen Miller - Shiawassee RESD Carolyn Rakotz - Wayne RESA Dodie Raycraft - St Joseph County ISD Karen Ruple – MDE Jennifer Sell-Sabsook - Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Kathy Sergeant - AdvancED Michigan