Station mapping Eionet-Water vs. Water Framework Directive (WFD) Hermann Peifer, EEA Jørgen Nørrevang Jensen, ICES Eionet Workshop for Marine and Coastal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 WISE SoE TCM data reporting - data processing and QC issues Event: 2013 Marine & Coastal Eionet Workshop, September Author: Jørgen Nørrevang Jensen,
Advertisements

Date/ event: Author: Overview of ETC Water data outputs 2010 Miroslav Fanta ETC Water data manager WISE TG Meeting Madrid Miroslav Fanta.
WISE SOE reporting on Transitional and Coastal waters Beate Werner.
1 MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY MSFD Metadata Catalogue 19.3 reporting analysis Document: DIKE TSG1 WP3 follow-up.
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
EEA 2012 State of water assessments Ecological and chemical status and pressures Peter Kristensen Project manager – Integrated Water Assessments, EEA Based.
Date/ event: Author: WISE-SoE / WFD station matching for SW and GW Miroslav Fanta ETC Water Freshwater EIONET Workshop – Copenhagen, October 2009 Miroslav.
International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (4), Brussels, 14/10/2008 slide 1 Agenda Item 6.2 : (a) New data collection. Overview of the new.
Introduction to the training dataset Alexander Mack.
European Commission DG Environment Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry MSFD Article 12 assessment Follow-up on geographic issues WG DIKE
CIS-Workshop on „WFD and Hydropower“ June 2007 Berlin, Germany - First Workshop under Phase II ( ) of the EU activity „Water Framework Directive.
Water.europa.eu Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group Update as of Marco Gasparinetti, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission.
Gender Equality is key towards the eradication of Violence against Women.
All Roads Lead to Rome Km 923 Km 489 Km 0 Km 989 Km 518 Km 898 Km 811
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
Digital maps UA
EU Water Framework Directive
Readiness for e-submissions Veterinary medicines agencies
Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets under the WFD Jens Arle, Ulrich Claussen & Patrick Müller Federal.
Results of Questionnaire 24 Nov 2011
Delivering electronic Natura 2000 data via Reportnet CDR
The development of WISE and the status of WfD Art.8 submission
Natura 2000 – SCI Union Lists
Delivering electronic Natura 2000 data via Reportnet CDR
State of legal transposition (1)
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Update on the status of RBMP reporting
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
State of play Article 5 reports
1.
EU Water Framework Directive
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
MSFD Article 12 assessment Follow-up on geographic issues
State of progress with transition to new Standard Data Form
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group
2a. Status of WFD reporting
2b. Status of WFD reporting
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
(More) Latest developments in WISE
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
MSFD Article 11 reporting Monitoring programmes
Date/ event: EEA Drafting group meeting SoE guidance, Copenhagen
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group
Update on the status of RBMP reporting
Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
Matching locations of monitoring stations of NiD/SoE/WFD for SW and GW
WFD River Basin Management Plans :
2015 Update of Union Lists of Sites of Community Interest
Update on legal issues Strategic Co-ordination Group 7-8 May 2009
Legal and implementation issues update
Meeting of Water Directors State of transposition and implementation
IC remaining gaps: overview and way forward
Water scarcity & droughts
State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)
WISE Main Rivers & Main Lakes (MR & ML)
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
Update on status of reporting and validation process
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016
Transposition and implementation of WFD
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Station mapping Eionet-Water vs. Water Framework Directive (WFD) Hermann Peifer, EEA Jørgen Nørrevang Jensen, ICES Eionet Workshop for Marine and Coastal Environment May 2008, EEA, Copenhagen

What is the issue? a)Transitional and coastal stations reported under Eionet data collection b)Transitional and coastal stations reported under the Water Framework Directive Question: In how far are we able to map the 2 sets of stations reported under a) and b) in order to ensure consistency between delivered stations and monitoring data?

Water Framework Directive: River Basin Districts

WFD Art. 8 Monitoring Stations Rivers Lakes Transitional Coastal

33 BE 13 BG 8 CY 92 DE 51 DK 55 EE 1894 ES 67 FI 169 FR 117 IE 2793 IT 65 LV 50 NL 54 PT 247 SE 6 SI 1115 UK total WFD Art. 8 Coastal and transitional stations for 17 countries

Done in 2007: Mapping of river, lake and ground- water stations

Mapping of Coastal and Transitional stations Mapping technique Visual Basic script: That match each station in one station table (WFD) with the best closest matching station in a second station table (e.g. EIONET Calculates the distance between the stations in this match

Mapping WFD CT stations against EIONET CT stations Only 15 stations maps exactly Using a 1 km range 1336 WFD stations gets a match in the EIONET station table Some stations marked as EIONET stations in WFD do not match any station

Mapping WFD CT stations against ICES Station dictionary (OSPAR) stations Only 2 stations maps exactly Using a 1 km range 319 WFD stations gets a match in the Station dictionary table

The ideal situation A common list of stations with: Nominal coordinates and unique names Information on which monitoring programme these stations belongs to (e.g. stations in Kattegat belongs often to both OSPAR and HELCOM, and maybe also to WFD) Information on the acceptable geographic range around these station (in case the nominal coordinates are not used)

Question to NRCs If a national overview of station-belonging (to, e.g., the WFD, EIONET, OSPAR, HELCOM, or MEDPOL) exists for your country, what are the default/nominal positions and the accepted range of positions for those stations? (If e.g. the default position is x longitude and y latitude, is the actual coordinate of x ± 0.1 and y ± 0.1 acceptable for this station?).