Welcome to the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration Bhuv Jain, Steve Kahn, Tony Tyson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

Campus Improvement Plans
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Experiential Learning Cycle
Dark Energy with Clusters with LSST Steve Allen Ian Dell’Antonio.
Automation (21-541) Sharif University of Technology Session # 5
W5HH Principle As applied to Software Projects
Some thoughts on major challenges ahead for AGIS 27 June 2008 AGIS Collaboration Meeting Rene Ong.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
CEP Welcome September 1, Matthew J. Koehler September 1, 2005CEP Cognition and Technology Who’s Who?  Team up with someone you don’t.
Lecture 2b: Software Project Management CSCI102 - Introduction to Information Technology B ITCS905 - Fundamentals of Information Technology.
Administrivia Lifecycle Architecture (LCA) group assignment will go out later today. Informal feedback meetings with LCO groups EasyShare: Mon, 2:45pm-3:15pm,
Course Project Brief Guideline. 2 Start With The Results  You will need to deliver: A report, documenting your results [For the purpose of this course.
Purpose of the Standards
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, 2011 Analysis Overview Bhuv Jain and Jeff Newman.
Welcome to the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration Bhuv Jain, Steve Kahn, Tony Tyson.
Innovative Schools toolkit
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Input Paper Funding Mechanisms: Mapping of Latin American Programs and Financing Mechanisms supporting International Cooperation in ICT Research and Innovation,
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
1 New Frontiers with LSST: leveraging world facilities Tony Tyson Director, LSST Project University of California, Davis Science with the 8-10 m telescopes.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Governance Document.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Launch of the.
1. IASC Operational Guidance on Coordinated Assessments (session 05) Information in Disasters Workshop Tanoa Plaza Hotel, Suva, Fiji June
1 Chapter 7 Developing Models and Prototypes: Projects and People Skills.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 G4MICE Design Iteration Malcolm Ellis MICE Video Conference 21 st April 2004.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DOE/NSF Review of DES 2 Science (SC1) Andy Albrecht (UC Davis) & Nicholas Suntzeff (Texas A&M) 2.2 Findings.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
LSST: Preparing for the Data Avalanche through Partitioning, Parallelization, and Provenance Kirk Borne (Perot Systems Corporation / NASA GSFC and George.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.
Ajh January 2007 CCSDS “Books” Adrian J. Hooke CMC Meeting, Colorado Springs 26 January 2007.
17/9/2009 Nakato Ruth Chapter one Introduction and review of strategic management.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DETF Recommendations I 2.1Science (Charge questions 1, 2, 7) Andy Albrecht & Nicholas Suntzeff 2.1.2Comments.
HPC Centres and Strategies for Advancing Computational Science in Academic Institutions Organisers: Dan Katz – University of Chicago Gabrielle Allen –
Exploring Action Learning for Group Development
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: The power of wide-field imaging Michael Strauss, Princeton University.
HST ACS data LSST: ~40 galaxies per sq.arcmin. LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, LSST will achieve percent level statistical.
LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, 2011 Draft White Paper Outline Steve Kahn.
Midwest Big Data Hub Letters of Intent for NSF Edward Seidel Director, NCSA Founder Prof. of Physics, Prof of Astronomy On behalf of the Midwest.
Photometric Redshifts: Some Considerations for the CTIO Dark Energy Camera Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
CDM Construction Design and Management
©© 2013 SAP AG. All rights reserved. Product Development Scenario Overview Open Legend Project Manager Scenario Description The following business roles.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering RDCR ARB CS 577b Software Engineering II Supannika Koolmanojwong.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
TR33 in the Light of the US- Dark Energy Task Force Report Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Holger Israel Emmy Noether Research Group Argelander-Institut.
Gina Moraila University of Arizona April 21, 2012.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
1 2 Assessing Pupils’ Progress Spring term 2009.
SCT Project Management Issues
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
Standards and Certification Training
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Product Development Scenario Overview
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Using State and Local Data to Improve Results
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration Bhuv Jain, Steve Kahn, Tony Tyson

Logistics for the Penn meeting People who can help you: Mike Reilly, Jean O’Boyle & Joseph Clampitt, Vinu Vikram, Tim Eifler, Masao Sako, Gary Bernstein Drinks this evening: 6pm at World Music Café Dinner tonight: you’re on your own. I recommend going across the river into Center City: –$$$: Continental Midtown, Parc, Alma de Cuba –$$: Fuji Mountain, Dmitri’s, Pietro’s pizza Tuesday morning: Coffee at 8:30, 1st talk at 8:45! WiFi information: on the back of your name tag

What is LSST? LSST is an ~8m telescope with a 3 Gigapixel camera and a ~10 square degree field of view. It will carry out a 10-year survey of 20,000 square degrees of the southern sky in 6 filters. It will image each patch of sky several hundred times in each filter. It will obtain stacked images of galaxies out to z~2-3 and time-varying phenomena such as Supernovae. A “Gold Sample” of 3 billion galaxies with shapes and photometric redshifts. It aims to carry out cosmological studies, with the nature of dark energy as a primary focus. Techniques: Weak Lensing, Large Scale Structure, Supernovae, and others. LSST is being built via a partnership between DOE and NSF. It has passed CD1 and other reviews; the next big milestone would be approval by the National Science Board in July. It aims for first light around 2019.

Planning the dark energy analysis for LSST: guiding principles Identify a set of systematics that could dominate the error budget for dark energy (at the statistical level that LSST will achieve). Collaborate with the LSST team. –Two categories: 1. systematics that will need to be controlled significantly better than for Stage III surveys, 2. those that Stage III surveys have not addressed at all. –Develop a science risk reduction plan focused on likely sources of error: LSST camera/telescope, photometric and photo-z calibration, observing strategy, astrophysical uncertainties, and analysis algorithms themselves. Identify simulation and computational needs (ImSim and cosmological) to include relevant physics, test measurement algorithms and develop methodology for controlling systematics. Stage III surveys aim to make order of magnitude advances on the techniques LSST will use. So develop a plan of work that is synergistic and relies on interactions with precursor surveys that are mutually beneficial.

Planning the dark energy analysis for LSST: what makes sense for a Task List? In the first phase of work, we are not aiming to be comprehensive. A carefully chosen set of “interesting” tasks across the science areas will be chosen. We hope the young cosmologists in the audience will lead the selection and implementation of the work plan! See discussion in 3:30 session today.

Planning the dark energy analysis for LSST: challenges Why Dark Energy? Why Now? Why Us?

Planning the dark energy analysis for LSST: challenges in implementation How does DESC connect with the project, especially Data Management and Science Collaborations, leveraging ongoing systematics work? What kind of connections to precursor or corollary surveys are feasible? How do we keep track of the evolving state of the field –What does “dark energy” cover? Connections to funding agencies? How do we find individuals with expertise and FTEs in this era of multiple Stage III surveys? How should Computing, Simulation & Software efforts interface with Analysis? What if NRO already has an 8m, wide-field telescope? Or 4? For answers to all these and other questions: Steve Kahn and Tony Tyson!

What do we hope to achieve in this meeting? First, we must “establish” this collaboration, ie come up with reasonable definitions of: –What the collaboration is (clear statement of goals). –Who is part of it (initial membership and rules for adding members). –How it will function (governance model). Second, we must agree on the outline of a “white paper” that describes the above, and maps out a clear plan of research for the next three years. –“Near final” draft of the completed white paper will be due by mid-August. –We probably need to get initial writing assignments settled at this meeting. Third, we need to come to some understanding of “who will do what” (both institutionally and individually) over the next three years. –Ideally, the white paper will contain a matrix, showing institution against task. –Clearly, we want to encourage cooperation and collaboration, but we need to avoid redundancy. –This is NOT “mind control”. We are not trying to adopt only one way of doing things. But we need to understand how different approaches will be pursued in parallel, and how we will intercompare them and bring them together at the appropriate time.

Primary purpose of this meeting is discussion, not presentation There will be plenty of time later to lecture to one another. Let’s use the time here effectively to air major differences in point of view, and ensure that we leave here all on the same page as to where we are heading. However, let’s avoid long philosophical debates if we can. Some issues (publication policy, details of the membership policy, etc.) may not converge quickly. We can table some of these, and appoint a committee to come back later with a draft plan. We do not have to resolve all of these by the time of the white paper submission. This should be an “action-oriented” meeting. We will keep a running list of actions, with assignments, which we can review collectively at the end of each day.

Relation of DESC to LSST Project The eleven LSST science collaborations were set up to enable LSST science: –Make science cases: LSST Science Book –Interact with LSST R&D Project to assure science mission –~50% of the original R&D was in-kind –Similar important role during construction and commissioning This LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration: –Formed via projection of relevant collaborations onto dark energy mission –Leverages LSST Project dark energy relevant work –Broad interactions with Project encouraged

Modes of Interaction with LSST LSST PROJECT LSST DARK ENERGY SCIENCE COLLABORATION DESC students work with existing LSST R&D groups Help validate algorithms, develop new algorithms Help ensure Simulator fidelity Help test the Simulator and System Components Explore cadence scenarios and systematics LSST PROJECT STUDENTS