Smart grid energy business

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westar Energy Smart Grid
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Honeywell Smart Grid Perspective
NAESB Smart Grid Task Force PAP 03 Update Robert B. Burke – NAESB Task Force Co-Chair Jim Northey.
Lets Get Ready, South Florida Power Center for Utility Exploration (PCUE)
© USCL Corporation - All Rights Reserved USCL Corporation 2737 Eastern Avenue Sacramento, California A managed approach to the successful.
1 Capacity mechanisms - IFIEC position June 12 th 2012.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 André Postma – Netherlands – RT.1b SM components "Smart Grid Components"
The future Role of VPPs in Europe Pan European Balancing Market: EU-FP7-Project eBadge Workshop on DSM Potentials, Implementations and Experiences 20 th.
Development and Operation of Active Distribution Networks: Results of CIGRE C6.11 Working Group (Paper 0311) Dr Samuel Jupe (Parsons Brinckerhoff) UK Member.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Kick-off Stakeholder Workshop "Post 2020 framework in a liberalised electricity market with large share of Renewable Energy Sources" 28 April 2014, Brussels.
SMART Devices in Utilities Béla Bakos Innovation advisor
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
EU Commission Task Force for Smart Grids Expert Group 3: Roles and Responsibilities of Actors involved in the Smart Grids Deployment Samia Benrachi-Maassam.
RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID 14 May 2012 Presented by: PATRICIA DE SUZZONI ADVISOR TO THE CHAIR OF CRE (French Energy.
2015 World Forum on Energy Regulation May 25, 2015
E.ON on the Romanian Energy Market ZF Power Summit Bucharest, February 27, 2013 Frank Hajdinjak CEO E.ON România.
EU policy objectives and European research on Smart Grids European Commission, DG Research Henrik Dam Research Programme Officer ADDRESS international.
Sustainable Cities and Infrastructure –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Low Carbon Manufacturing, Technology Innovation and the Quality Standard.
1 Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) “Utility of the Future” Tom Mimnagh Consolidated Edison Co of New York New York Energy Week April 23, 2015.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
The role of ICT and telecommunication companies as service providers
Microgeneration and new end-use technologies in ADDRESS, INCA and SEESGEN-ICT Jussi Ikäheimo (VTT) (& Regine Belhomme, Giovanni Valtorta) IEA DSM 17 workshop.
Andrea Ricci - ISIS Brussels, 12 April 2012 Smart Grids: Overview of the study and main challenges 1.
Smart Grid - Developments and Implementations Prof. Gady Golan – HIT, Israel Dr. Yuval Beck – HIT, Israel , Electricity 2012, Eilat.
Dr. Ion LUNGU AFEER President. DRIVERS FOR INVESTMENTS Demand; Fuel availability; Market signals; Production costs; Energy mix; Environmental concerns;
Smart Metering and the Smart Grid How does it work and what can it do? Will Chaney 1Energy Awareness Week, 3-8 May 2010.
1 IFIEC Energy Forum 22 November 2011 Electricity.
Prof. Valeria Termini AEEGSI Commissioner CEER Vice-President CEER DSO WG co-Chair The Future Role of European DSOs 1.
An Overview of the Smart Grid David K. Owens Chair, AABE Legislative Issues and Public Policy Committee AABE Smart Grid Working Group Webinar September.
Communicating a Smarter Future Keynote at Network th annual distribution network strategy conference 16 February 2012 Sandy Sheard Deputy Director.
Consumer Empowerment Consumer Empowerment May 15, 2012 Presented by: Alparslan Bayraktar Commissioner Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EPDK)
Samordningsrådet med kunskapsplattform för smarta elnät Smart Grid and Smart Metering - Swedish Experiences Karin Widegren, Director Swedish Coordination.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ICT4SMARTDG ICT Solutions to enable Smart Distributed Generation WP3 - Executive Summary 20th May 2011.
Brussels Workshop Use case 3 11/09/2015 Mario Sisinni.
Role of Smart Grids in the Italian Energy Policy Strategy Marcello Capra General Directorate for Electricity Market, Renewables, Energy Efficiency and.
Increasing integration of variable RES-E: Policy and regulatory measures for T&D networks Luis Olmos Pontificia Comillas University Madrid / Spain
The Smart Grid: Re-powering America George W. Arnold National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability NIST Gaithersburg, MD April 28, 2010.
Andrea Ricci - ISIS Brussels, 12 April 2012 Policy conclusions and way forward.
Demand Response
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
Smart grid project - interim report - Interim report for the 6th Steering Group Meeting of the Priority Area 2 Budapest,13 June 2013 The project is supported.
Smart Grid PRESENTED BY: ZUBAIR AHMAD
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Évora demonstrator site
ETIP SNET WG4 : Digital Energy
Eric Peirano BRIDGE Support Team, Technofi
Chairman of the Board and CEO,
Ben Voorhorst, President, ENTSO-E
WG1: RELIABLE, ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT SMART GRID SYSTEM
Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy
Sahar Rahim MS-Electrical Engineering Supervisor: Dr. Nadeem Javaid
Smart Grid Wyatt Kroemer.
The Future of Demand Response in New England

HOLISDER Integrating Real-Intelligence in Energy Management Systems enabling Holistic Demand Response Optimization in Buildings and Districts Project presentation.
GIE Annual Conference Bratislava, September 2006
Regulation for Smart Grids
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
The Future Grid and Energy Storage
Electricity Distribution and Energy Decarbonisation
Consumers at the heat of energy system?
Presentation transcript:

Smart grid energy business Melanie Degel – IZT presented by Stefano Faberi – ISIS Brussels, 12 April 2012

Content Change of the electricity value chain Development of business models Existing and new business models Pilot business cases Future challenges Conclusion

New value chain Core innovation is the Integration of DR, that entails: Power system changes from: “one way street” to “two-way communicating smart system” New business opportunities New market participants To remain competitive existing companies renew traditional business models Utility challenge: identify necessary changes in existing business cases

business model development Sustainable business models Actors and roles Products and services Contract relations Trans-actions Enabling technology Values and benefits Drivers and barriers Benefits smart grid technologies / applications to whom? How is the benefit produced and at which costs? Who is paying? Incentives of benefit generation? Is the business model compatible with current market model? Smart grid business models

Business model development The future development of the smart grid should be primarily market-driven, with system operators as the main investors and beneficiaries Business models that do not allow for the sharing of short-term investment costs and of long-term benefits are bound to fail Incentives from the regulatory framework should encourage the actors to seek benefits from efficiency increases rather than additional sales Only in this way the transition from the “volume-based” to the “efficiency-based” business model can take place (IEA 2011)

Customer-provisioned Business models Existing business models Traditional Utilities identify DR and develop DR plans non restructured markets Aggregator via aggregation intermediary Aggregator benefits from DR programs restructured markets Customer-provisioned Large customers purchase demand response technology enabling to decrease operation costs benefits from national DR programs ESCO Savings by installation of efficient equipment Cost sharing between customers and installers market restructuring involved the divestiture of generation from utilities, the formation of organized wholesale spot energy markets with non-discriminatory economic mechanisms for the rationing of scarce transmission resources, the introduction of retail choice programs, and the establishment of new forms of market oversight and coordination.

Dynamic efficient building operation Business models New business models Smart Home Minimize costs: technologies with many functions Maximize benefits: functions with a high willingness to pay Benefits: house owners, EU-Member States and third party companies CSP or aggregator model Dynamic efficient building operation From reduction of overall consumption to optimized time of energy usage Solutions that maximize available granularity of real-time communication and control

Business cases EU-DEEP and FENIX Aggregation models Overall key elements Examples System integration of single technologies Equally shared costs among all stakeholders Complete consumer engagement by tangible tariffs Education and trust building EU-DEEP and FENIX Aggregation models DER integration through aggregation operation by an independent market participant (aggregator or retailer)

Aggregation business Aggregators are intermediaries between consumers and markets They group customer demand or generation into diversified portfolios of DER Aggregation business drivers Lower market entry barriers Rollout of smart meters as enabler for aggregation Optimization of generation and consumption Lower overall operating costs Aggregators finally require a stable legal and contractual framework The aggregator needs to transform complex electricity market mechanisms into simple transaction mechanisms for customers

EU DEEP business models I: Aggregating commercial and industrial demand response to balance intermittent generation II: Integrating residential scale flexible Micro-CHP into electricity markets Result: low level of risk , application short-term perspective Result: higher risks, application medium- and long term III: Leveraging on the flexibility of aggregated CHP units and demand response to extend the conventional ESCO business Result: extension of the existing ESCO model for new emerging services 

A possible remuneration system A conceivable remuneration system between aggregators and customers based on payments for the offered flexibility and provision on request in electricity markets (EU-DEEP Project)

Future challenges Change of customers role from passive to active Customers expect real-time price signals Relation between price signals and personal consumption, price of resources, system security and environmental concerns Radical utility change in data collection, storage and processing Smart metering Utilities expect their customers to respond to price signals by modifying their electricity usage full benefits requires advanced technology in the homes of customers Policy makers, entrepreneurs, manufacturers must support economic convenient solutions to transmit price signals to the customer beyond the meter effective technologies and models for customer engagement the profitability of new models for small residential customers Further Development beyond the meter DR more than a capacity resource in peak times Integration of residential customers Direct and non direct customer feedback technologies Declining costs and the lack of granular energy data, Improvement of dynamic pricing and interconnection standards

Implementation of residential demand response business 1. Advanced distribution infrastructure Further ability to integrate increasing DER Operation and management rules Supply – Demand matching concepts 2. Dynamic pricing models Reduced grid expansion investment Efficient capacity utilization Lower grid usage fees 3. Smart technologies Customer feedback technologies Direct: In Home Display, web-based services Non-direct: Smart thermostats, Smart household appliances 4. Advanced metering infrastructure Communication gateway Development of interconnection standards Energy data services 5. Smart meter Efficient implementation and usage Investment support 6. Profitable customer-utility partnership New active customer as main utiltiy concern High levels on communication, privacy and transparency Education programs

From traditional to real-time energy business Conclusions Today Daily energy efficiency Demand response plans Demand response programs for companies Aggregation models to integrate DER Intermediate Time-of-use energy and daily peak load managed Market platforms with clear interaction rules Peak management Future Day ahead demand response and real-time-business Smart Meter with AMI Integration of residential customers beyond the meter Smart appliances, Active customer relation, Dynamic pricing, High granular energy data Equally shared costs and benefits between all stakeholders High levels of transparency, privacy and user friendliness Systemic benefits from the entire smart architecture Less regulation more market competition From traditional to real-time energy business

Thank you for your attention!

FENIX business model Framework Results Virtual power plant concepts Two models : Access to the market, in absence / presence of strong pressure to integrate DER Participants: DER-owner, CVPP operator CVPP responding to market price signals Results Market-entry for small participants Improves their integration Minimize investment costs and market fees, Maximize benefits Optimize real-time market operation, Strong pressure model II Provide fast start-up power capacity Higher grid reliability due to ancillary services Postponed grid investments are reduced Costs: network expenditures Needs: stable commercial, regulatory framework and ICT standards market-entry for small participants: improves their integration

Market platforms Market platforms for: Status Quo: Benefits communication in smart grids Interconnection of market actors Data provision for system operation Status Quo: DER integration on supply side is well advanced much more demonstration is required on the demand side Benefits Access provision to applications and supply / demand data Increase with the number of participants Fundamental transaction rules Clear coordination mechanisms between market actors and platform operator Surrounding platform architecture influences long-term benefits Further development needs Tight linkage of IT-infrastructure between DSO and TSO Ensuring compatibility of energy services and physical constraints with geographical area mapping Success depends on high levels of transparency, privacy issues and user friendliness Open question: who is the platform operator