Open Days European Week of Regions and Cities Blue Book - Guide to cost benefit analysis in transport sector JASPERS: Bringing Major Projects to Maturity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

1 Simplification & Harmonization: CPAP & AWP S and H Roll Out Countries Nairobi 25 – 27 June 2003.
1 Simplification & Harmonization: CPAP AWP S&H Roll Out Countries Pakistan 28 – 29 July 2003.
By Susan Toben Ministry for Labour, Building and Regional Development M-V Germany Lead Partner ICZM Strategy Development Process The PlanCoast Input from.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Twenty years of EU co-financed programmes in Greece:
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _______________________ Workshop 11E18: Structural Funds 2007 – 13:
Planning and use of funding instruments
EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
Transparency as a Key to Sustainable Regional Development Experiences from CEE Countries with EU Funds Programmes and Projects Keti Medarova-Bergstrom,
1 Open Days 2008 Communicating Cohesion Policy Together Bruxelles, 10/07/2008 The experience of the Italian ED network in Cohesion Policy Communication.
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,
INFSO/F3 1 The TEN-Telecom Programme Jose Soler INFSO/F3, EC TEN-TELECOM Information Day.
JASPERS Brendan Smyth DG REGIO co-ordination. A new context after 2006 –EU Enlargement has greatly added to the requirement to prepare projects for EU.
Evaluation Plan in Hungary Dr. Tamás Tétényi Head of Department for Strategy and Evaluation National Development Agency.
1 Managing Authority Conducting a self assessment 10 June 2008 A. Badrichani – DG Regional Policy – Audit Unit J3.
1 Ex post evaluation of the Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) Work Package B: cost - benefit analysis of selected transport projects Jurate Vaznelyte,
European Union Cohesion Policy
AUDIT AND CONTROL UNIT EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (ERDF) AND COHESION FUND (CF) QUIRINO MEALHA DIRECTOR.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
1 Lessons learned – success factors for biodiversity projects Peter Tramberend Environment Agency Austria.
Shaping the railway of the 21st century Implementation of Retrofitting freight fleet Analysis of the EU funding possibilities Rail Freight Noise Abatement.
1 Seminar on the economic evaluation of transport projects The rationale for economic evaluation in Europe The case of EU regional policy A.Mairate, European.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
Tools to help the development of Innovative firms Thessaloniki Technology Park 1 Dissemination of Innovation: Clusters, Regional Institutions and Telematics.
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Budapest October 2, 2014 Irina Kotliar Energy efficiency in buildings. European support schemes.
CIRAS PROJECT OVERVIEW
1 Regional policy The Resource BOOK of PPP case studies Second International workshop on PPP Brussels 5th July Roberto Ridolfi.
André Piérard, ERGEG Project Leader on Complaints Citizens’ Energy Forum, London, September 2009 Draft advice on Customer Complaint Handling, Reporting.
Support for programme and project development: JASPERS and ELENA Ralf Goldmann EMA network Meeting
The European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 25 th September 2014 Casablanca, Morocco Christof Marx Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized.
JASPERS – Supporting Urban Transport Projects Ministry of Regional Development, Czech Republic JASPERS Seminar, Prague - 28th November 2007 Dr. Joachim.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Introduction to JASPERS and reflections on Sustainable Roads Kristian DUUS, JASPERS Roads Division, Vienna Regional Office.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Roma Education Fund Presentation by Rumyan Russinov Deputy Director.
SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLANS Bucharest 15 th June 2015 Preparing a Plan, and Lessons from Experience.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
Regional Development OP in Hungary , June 2008, Zagrab.
June 3, 2016Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Interaction of national and European Commission guidelines on Cost-Benefit Analysis : - common misunderstandings.
Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.
PHARE TWINNING CONTRACT BG/2004/IB/TR/02/UE Strengthening the capacity of the Ministry of Transport to manage the Sectoral Operational Programme on Transport.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Eugenia Kazamaki Ottersten
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Targeted Analysis A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
Sustainable public transport – electric transport development project for the capital.
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
THE ROLE OF THE MANAGING AUTHORITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRUCTURAL AND COHESION FUNDS AND ITS OPERATION ANDREJ ENGELMAN.
Assisting African countries to improve compilation of basic economic statistics: an outline of the UNSD strategy Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics.
Open Days 2008 Presentation on JASPERS Dr. Norbert Hahn, Head of JASPERS Operations Management Division 8 th October 2008.
Information by the Managing Authority on evaluations of EU funds in 2009 Monitoring Committee meeting 25 March 2009.
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
JASPERS activities to promote intermodal projects March 2010 Bratislava György BESSENYEI Transport Sector Specialist.
Introduction to JASPERS and reflections on Sustainable Roads Kristian DUUS, JASPERS Roads Division, Vienna Regional Office.
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Developments in the Community transport policy and their statistical implications The White Paper 2011 sets the Commission strategy on transport for the.
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
The evaluation process
Information on projects
Guidelines for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Rail transport statistics version 6.0.
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
OP Integrated infrastructure 2014 – 2020
Presentation transcript:

Open Days European Week of Regions and Cities Blue Book - Guide to cost benefit analysis in transport sector JASPERS: Bringing Major Projects to Maturity 8 October 2008 Artur Rudnicki - JASPERS

2 Introduction Why another CBA Guide Real demand in Poland for a more detail Manual Origin of the Blue Book (CBA Manual) Jaspers assignment (Horizontal task) Different and new approach – development process Tool to bringing transport projects to maturity Final benefits for the beneficiary country (Poland) Jaspers Value added

3 Background Why another CBA Guide Demand for sstandardised tool for more than 100 EU funded projects Existing guides – not bad, but too general No information on several topics (like:…) traffic forecast methodology forecasted speed assumptions for particular scenarios some economic unit values and factors (country specific)

4 Origin of the Blue Book Expectation from the Managing Authority (MA) and Intermediate Body (to have a CBA Manual for implementing more than 100 EU founded projects) Expectation form experts and consulting community to update first addition of the Blue Book (prepared for a financial perspective) A sort of an assembly line process of preparing EU application is expected by MA and more detail tool was in great demand Single tool for comparison purposes and ranking creation - strongly required

5 Different performance indicators (I) Structure of economic benefits in road projects (39) Source: Report and Presentation on evaluation of transport projects under SPOT - Sectoral Operational Programme Transport ( ), Consortium Scott Wilson Arup PM Group, Preparation of the project Pipeline for European Regional Found (ERDF) in Poland Blue: VOC / Red: VOT / Yellow: environment / Light blue: accidents

6 Rehabilitation without additional lanes Rehabilitation with additional lanes New road Different performance indicators (II) ERR ratio for different type of road projects (39) Source: Report and Presentation on evaluation of transport projects under SPOT - Sectoral Operational Programme Transport ( ), Consortium Scott Wilson Arup PM Group, Preparation of the project Pipeline for European Regional Development Found (ERDF) in Poland

7 Jaspers final input 4 Blue Books covering main transport sectors: 1. Road infrastructure projects 2. Airport infrastructure projects 3. Public transport projects (infra + rolling stock) 4. Rail projects (infra + rolling stock) 5 Annexes to major project application (document summarising all info from FS & CBA)

8 Jaspers input What is Annex? Detail, structured document showing, step by step how to present all necessary information about particular transport project (road, rail, public transport, airports) – available in two languages What is Blue Book? CBA Manual showing how to fulfil the Annex (contains entire methodology)

9 Main issues addressed in the Blue Book Standardised macroeconomic assumptions Detail regulations regarding traffic forecast (including sequence) Fiscal correction factor for each transport sector Risk analysis simplified Developed economic unit rates for each category and transport sector Blue Book - Simplicity when possible, but more detail approach when necessary

10 Jaspers approach Full process of public consultation for all parties Ministries and other intermediate bodies Experts and consulting community Beneficiaries Workshop at the beginning of the assignment (collecting expectations and input from all parties) Workshop at the end – final thesis preparation Process very transparent with consensual approach No similar process in neighbour countries

11 JASPERS Value Added (I) Development of a document consistent with the EC regulations Creating a pipeline for project preparation – one tool for more than 100 projects Single CBA methodology for comparison purposes – contest of public transport, road infra and other projects, Objective assessment tool

12 JASPERS Value Added (II) Consensual approach means better perception of solutions provided Beneficiaries can have a feeling that the Blue Book is for them really, not for EU bureaucrats only Practical experience in regions (experts and consultants) could be collected on national level and utilised for a better solutions in the Blue Book Very universal document (only 15% country specific) - slipping potential for a transfer and dissemination in other countries

13 Lessons learned & recommendations Process quite long, but worth doing Difficulties to convince some beneficiaries for better solutions Document creation process - a kind of learning exercise for experts and beneficiaries involved in process Allowing beneficiaries and experts to participate in such activities we accelerate processes of building more responsible society

14 Thank you for your attention