MSP PROJECT EVALUATION Lessons Learned Margaret Phelps & Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr. January 8, 2008 Millard Oakley STEM Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Strategic Plan Inquiry Based Learning Grades 9-12 Minnetonka Public Schools 2011/12.
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
MSP Program Evaluation
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
The Northwest Georgia Science Education Partnership Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Program.
What do you know about Effective Teaching Behaviors?
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Lesson Study Races to the Top in Florida A Report on Lesson Study Initiatives In The Sunshine State Collaborate Plan Align Learn Motivate Share.
Student Learning Objectives Part 2: A Deeper Dive Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Susan Poole Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
(MSP) 2 : Minority Student Pipeline, Math Science Partnership Strengthening the Early-College Minority Student Pipeline in Science with a Multi-Faceted.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1 Studying Teacher Professional Development: Challenges and Possible Solutions Nicole Kersting Research Scientist LessonLab Research Institute, Santa Monica,
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
Oregon Pathways for Adult Basic Skills Transition to Education and Work (OPABS) Initiative.
Evaluating Outcomes Across the Partnerships Tom Loveless Director, Brown Center on Education Policy The Brookings Institution Saturday,
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Quasi-Experimental Designs For Evaluating MSP Projects: Processes & Some Results Dr. George N. Bratton Project Evaluator in Arkansas.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
Building a Successful Professional Development Model Presented by: Howard Landman Project Director “Eastern Connecticut Elementary Science Coaching Consortium”
Implementing Educational Gaming in the Mathematics Classroom: Phase I, Professional Development.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
Making Consistent Decisions About Accommodations for English Language Learners – Research Summit – Texas Comprehensive SEDL Austin, Texas March.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
RET conference An External Evaluation of the RET Program in the Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Arizona: Our Model &
SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Assisting GPRA Report for MSP Xiaodong Zhang, Westat MSP Regional Conference Miami, January 7-9, 2008.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
Mid-State Mathematics Partnership Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Middle Schools Dovie Kimmins, Ed.D. E. Ray Phillips, Ph.D. Tennessee Mathematics,
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument MSP Regional Conferences November, 2006 – February, 2007.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Arkansas Capacity Building Science Partnership Grant: Beyond Traditional Professional Development Models 2008 Math Science Partnership Regional Conference.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
1 Science KICKS Keep Improving Content Knowledge and Skills Sheree Person-Pandil, Project Director Jim Woodland, Technical Advisor John Sutton, Project.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.
The Evaluation of Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program A Quasi Experimental Design Study Abdallah Bendada, Title II Director
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
AIM: K–8 Science Iris Weiss Eric Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Center for Teacher Leadership Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Mrs. Stacey Branch Coordinator,
Outcomes Evaluation A good evaluation is …. –Useful to its audience –practical to implement –conducted ethically –technically accurate.
Saturday, April 12, TEACH Project Students “Broaden Horizons” Through STEM Investigations 2 Service Learning Project Presentation presented at University.
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
Creating Effective Cooperative Groups in 3 rd Grade Math Classes Rebecca R. Kish Dr. Sharon O’Connor-Petruso Brooklyn College CBSE 7202T.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
STEM Connect A STEM Initiative funded by Golden Leaf.
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
Presented by: Dr. Ford, Ms. Nsele, and Dr. Harris-Thompson
Presentation transcript:

MSP PROJECT EVALUATION Lessons Learned Margaret Phelps & Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr. January 8, 2008 Millard Oakley STEM Center

Our MSP History Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Math Partnership ( ) TTU Engineering (7-12) Math Science Partnership ( ) Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Math Partnership ( ) Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Science Research Partnership ( ) Tennessee Pre-Engineering (7-12) Math Science Research Partnership ( )

Formative Assessment Participant Surveys (Institutes & Workshops) –Content –Format –Faculty –Scheduling –Facilities & food Basis for change/ improvement

Formative Assessment Daily faculty meetings during summer institutes –Observations of master teachers That was great! The teachers loved it! Don’t ever do that again! –Open discussion of issues Extremely helpful for “non-education” faculty Basis for “quick fix” improvements

Evaluation Designs Experimental Design with Random Assignment –LEAs provide list of eligible teachers (or teams) –Local evaluator does random selection Non-matched Comparison Groups –LEAs select teachers for intervention and control groups –Groups are compared statistically on base line measures to determine equivalence Descriptive--No comparison group

Evaluation Components Teachers –STEM Content Knowledge –STEM Pedagogy & Beliefs –Classroom Performance Students –STEM Content Knowledge –STEM Authentic Assessment

Teacher Content--Praxis II Advantages –External measure –Valid & Reliable –Tracks change over time Disadvantages –Cost –Obtaining score reports –Inflexibility of schedule

Instructor-made Test Advantages –Matches institute content –Aligns with standards –Control of testing Disadvantages –Not necessarily valid or reliable –Not normed –Forms might not be equivalent

Purchased Test Advantages –Control of testing –Access to scores Disadvantages –Cost –Single form –Alignment

Teacher Pedagogy & Beliefs Teacher-developed lesson modules Reports on lesson implementation Periodic self-assessment Surveys –Beliefs and Attitudes (Math) –Misconceptions (Science)

Classroom Performance Project-specific Observations –Conducted by LEA liaison or principal –Informs local leadership –Creates buy-in –Not valid for research purposes Research-based Observations –Requires training of observers –Cost (perhaps) –Useful for research purposes

Student Content Knowledge Middle school math & science –State testing program –Password-protected data available (can be disaggregated for analysis) –Compare NCE and proficiency level of students for pervious year (pre-) to year with project teacher (post-)

Student Content Knowledge High school math & science –8th grade scores are only common pre-test –HS scores not reported in NCE –Proficiency levels do not provide basis for strong evaluation –Many courses not tested –ACT only available for graduates

Student Content Knowledge Engineering Principles –JETS Assess (Junior Engineer Technical Society) –Will be administered in classrooms –Fall/Spring for comparison –Control of data collection –Will also be administered to teachers

Student Authentic Assessment Electronic Portfolio Based on Engineering Principles Multi-year – leads to pre-engineering certificate Curricular components –Project Lead the Way –Math, Science & Career Technical courses & projects

Student Authentic Assessment Electronic Portfolio Co-curricular components –FIRST LEGO League, FIRST Robotics –4-H and Scouting projects –Work experience –Service learning –Utilize local opportunities

Contact Information Dr. Margaret Phelps – –All TTU-related MSP programs & Millard Oakley STEM Center Mr. Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr. – –Tennessee Pre-Engineering Math Science Research Partnership ( ) Dr. Susan Gore – –Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Science Research Partnership ( ) Dr. Sandra Koczwara – –Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Math Partnership ( ) –Upper Cumberland Middle Grades Math Partnership ( ) Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser – –TTU Engineering Math Science Partnership ( )

The instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in these presentations are not intended as an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education.