1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation 2014-2020: Concepts and recommendations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Financial Instruments in ETC programmes
Planning and use of funding instruments
Theory-Based Evaluation:
1 Report on the Implementation of the EUSBSR Anders Lindholm European Commission Directorate General for Regional Policy.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Categorisation of EU interventions Cohesion policy
1 Workshop I - Introduction: Monitoring and evaluation (M+E) financial engineering instruments for SMEs 5 th Plenary Meeting JEREMIE Networking Platform.
A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
1 State of play Evaluations undertaken for DG REGIO.
The political framework
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 6 March
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 20 September
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commissions proposal for incentives and conditionality in Open Days.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Addressing challenges in a changing world: -The future Cohesion Policy- Wolfgang.
Regional Policy Revised version Marielle Riché Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Brussels.
Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
Veronica Gaffey DG REGIO Evaluation Unit
Key features of the draft cohesion policy and ETC regulations
The future cohesion policy: clusters as critical instruments to implement smart specialisation Claus Schultze, Policy Analyst, European Commission, DG.
The EU context for future funding in Wales Rona Michie Funding the EU and EU Funding in Wales European Parliament Seminar Novotel, Atlantic Wharf, Cardiff,
Cyprus Project Management Society
1 W ORKSHOP ON S TRATEGIC P ROGRAMMING, M ONITORING AND EVALUATION F OCUSING ON P ERFORMANCE AND RE SULTS Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Regional Policy Meta-Evaluation Some Reflections Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 12/13 November 2012 Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation DG for Regional.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
1 Monitoring and evaluation after 2013 – some first ideas, mainly for ERDF / CF Evaluation network DG REGIO 14 th October 2010.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
Regional Policy Concepts and Recommendations Update Kai Stryczynski DG Regional and Urban Policy Brussels, 10 March Cohesion Policy.
1 Monitoring & evaluation 2013+: concepts and ideas (ERDF & CF) CMEF meeting, 17 th June 2011, Kai Stryczynski, DG REGIO Evaluation Unit.
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
Peer Learning Event on national Lifelong Guidance Policy Forums 4th-5th of June 2008, Thessaloniki With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Regional Policy How are evaluations used in the EU? How to make them more usable? Stockholm, 8 October 2015 Kai Stryczynski, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Regional Policy Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit, DG for Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Operational Programmes.
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities
Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks
How to improve their contribution to programme quality?
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Competition for Evaluations & 2016 Conference
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey
TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Evaluation Network Meeting
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
Expert Evaluation Network
Support Tools for ESF Evaluation
Evaluation network MS - DG REGIO 14th April 2011, Kai Stryczynski
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play
Presentation transcript:

1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations REGIO network meeting with Member States, 20 Oct Kai Stryczynski

2 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Findings of April meeting General support from Member States Use and usability missing Definitions of common indicators needed Annex 2 on result indicators not helpful

3 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Section 1: Concepts New section on use and usability –Further development planned in EVALSED No other major changes Text improvements –E.g. relation between counterfactual and theory-based evaluation Section on standards suppressed – little interest, no reactions

4 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Section 2 More changes than in section 1…

5 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Section 2: Quality criteria for result indicators New: Quality criteria for result indicators New: ex ante conditionality on statistical systems and result indicators Network could discuss how to deal with ex ante conditionality in due time (together with ex ante evaluation?)

6 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Result indicators: A baseline for what or whom? Baseline for the priority axis can be different from baseline data needed for evaluation. For example: –Baseline data for all SME in a region when deciding the programme content –Only a small part will be supported – the effect on these enterprises only will be evaluated. See box page 11, example in annex 2.

7 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Targets for result indicators I Setting targets for result indicators is difficult! Reflects effect of programme and other factors. Can be of quantitative or qualitative nature. What is a qualitative target? –Range of expected values, –the expected direction of change and the expected pace of change

8 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Targets for result indicators II Attention – two different issues the estimate of a future value of the result indicator - influenced by programme and other factors. It is this stated aim that is meant by the legal text. an estimate of the contribution of the programme to the change of the result indicator (the effect or impact of the programme).

9 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Targets for output indicators Based on past experience (past unit costs) Recommendation: Make information available for a discussion of targets

10 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Ex ante evaluation Some new elements, reflecting changes in OP, possible support for meeting conditionalities Do MS wish a special meeting of network? Should the Commission write up guidance?

11 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Evaluation plan A flexible planning tool for MS Less details likely for later years Attention: some baseline data cannot be created ex post Commission encourages coordination across programmes

12 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Electronic data transmission No legal provisions so far in proposed regulation Planned for implementing regulation Key idea the same as for –Common indicators: electronic structured transmission –Programme-specific indicators: only in annual report

13 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Examples on result indicators (annex 2) Mix of intervention areas (enterprise support, infrastructure, innovation, cross- border cooperation) Mix of evaluation appproaches (counterfactual, theory-based) Mix of data sources (statistics, surveys, tax authority data) Is this more helpful?