Kenji Petrucci Cody Jones Sam Murphy. Introduction  Passenger cabin intrusion, PCI  Severe Injury/fatalities  No requirement to prevent side under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Element Analysis of the Steel Horse Rear Suspension Presented by: Erika Ramirez April 29, 2003.
Advertisements

Makes FED up to 10% lighter than a comparably sized steel vehicle
Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003.
Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
Faculty Advisor: Dr. Han P. Bao Group Leader: Parker Harding Group Members: Christina Toroc Hunter Hughes Deborah C. McHugh.
FEA of Wind Turbine Tower Martin Knecht. The Problem FEA modeling of a wind turbine tower. Analysis: –Stress –Deflection Want to prevent –Yielding –Excessive.
Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi.
Team: Clyde Baker Ken Brown Alex Cherukara Kevin Eady Sponsor: Dr. Patrick Hollis SAE 1: Mini-Baja Four Wheel Steering.
Blue Sky Solar Roll Cage Design. Back Roll Cage Final Design.
Designing an Air-Propulsion System Presentation by – Jacob Griffin Advisor -Dr. Junkun Ma Senior Design Teacher -Dr. Cris Koutsougeras.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Erdem Acar Sunil Kumar Richard J. Pippy Nam Ho Kim Raphael T. Haftka
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
Team Flying Sheep Engineering Analysis Mark Berkobin John Nevin John Nott Christian Yaeger Michelle Rivero.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Introduction – Concept of Stress
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 20: Connections
Background - To date there are no other products designed to connect two wheelchairs together for steering Initial Thoughts External features are easier.
Structure Analysis of 6061-T651 Aluminum Bridge Team Blackboard Mechanical Engineering University of Rochester Team Blackboard Department of Mechanical.
ME 501 Corey Roberts Leo Montgomery Motor Plate Analysis.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Introduction – Concept of Stress
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
Types of Welds and Welded Joints.
F13-60-BAJA PROPOSAL SAE SALUKI FRAME DESIGN Team Members Austin Lewandowski (ME) (PM) Thang Tran (ME) Preston Mathis (ME) Keegan Lohman (ME) Kyle Koester.
TEAM MEMBERS: Chad Chandler Joe Cofer Nathan Eramian Francis Hauris Jeff Wong.
Mechanical Engineering Analysis. Material Selection Process WoodStainless Steel HDPEAluminumPTFE Cost Machinability Strength Durability
NASA moon buggy project
 Pedibus Development Sponsored by Capital City Pedicab Company In affiliation with the FSU and FAMU College of Engineering Team 18: John Hassler Andrew.
Rolling Process of reducing the thickness or changing the cross-section area of a long work piece by compressive forces. accounts for about 90% of all.
PROJECT BIG DUMP.
Engineering 309: Machine Design I Instructor: Dr. Min Lu Presented by: Mike Kraft Thanh Nguyen.
RITMechanical Engineering Laboratory and Classroom Study of Low Cycle Fatigue Rochester Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Department Rochester,
Load Resistance – The Structural Properties of Materials Chapter 4.
ME Session #5 Selection of term projects Assignment#4 : Review of manufacturing processes Presentations of PDS work Material selection Questions.
T HE CRUSHED E XPERIMENT By: Carlos Sanabria Justin Roose Phillip Munday.
1 Fuel Cell Safety & Failure Modes in Light Duty Vehicles Principal Investigators: Dr. Keith Williams Dr. Beth Todd Dr. Steve Shepard Department of Mechanical.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Welding Design 1998/MJ1/MatJoin2/1 Design. Lesson Objectives When you finish this lesson you will understand: Mechanical and Physical Properties (structure.
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Abdelmageed Elmustafa
Unit 91 Week 7 Jon Gutierrez, Chris Sauer, Simon Radomski, Chat Huynh, Jeff Burton, & Robert Platt October 1, 2008 Final Presentation.
Steer-by-Wire Project Presentation Group 7 ME 462 Sponsor: Dr. Sohel Anwar Spring 2007 Donny Franzen Jimmy Huser Ugo Anyaorah Stephen Chittenden.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Chapter 3 Design for Direct Stress.
MAST STORAGE RACK Philip Crist Max Carpenter Sean Ellis Gershom Obeng.
PILE CHECK A NEW DYNAMIC PILE TESTING SYSTEM GEORGE GOBLE GOBLE PILE TEST.
Engineering/Failure Analysis
Chapter 1 Introduction Concept of Stress. Road Map: Statics  Mechanics of Materials  Elasticity  Plasticity Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Creep Mechanics.
F UTURE I MPROVEMENTS : 1) Upgrade the plastic liner to a more durable material. 2) Upgrade tow cable and/or drive pulley. 3) Place windows in the tank.
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
EMD223 Machine Component Design Dr. Mohamad Yusof Idroas Room: 3.10 (SoME) EMD223 Machine Component Design.
March 2 nd, 2009 Anthony FerrignoMechanical Engineering James LukerMechanical Engineering Quang TranMechanical Engineering Philip MarinoMechanical Engineering.
Suspension Cody Dykman Jesse Ramer Jesson Salyards Frame Warren Starbuck Brett Schuler Doug Romoth Drive Train Josh Voorhees Corey Saner Spencer Garland.
Introduction A wildland firefighter is a valuable resource to protecting public lands and managing fuels. The many hand tools used by firefighters aid.
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
End of Line “Pass Through” Conveyor
Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science
SAE Mini Baja: Powertrain
CTMA Investment - $250K; Industry Cost Share - $500K
Chapter 1 Introduction  Concept of Stress.
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
Cymbal Stand Surface Mount Hinge Light Rail Structure Bracket
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
Manufacturing Systems
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
RIA Case Study from the United States FMVSS No
SAE Mini Baja: Powertrain
Moonbuggy ME Capstone Design Project SP 2006
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Kenji Petrucci Cody Jones Sam Murphy

Introduction  Passenger cabin intrusion, PCI  Severe Injury/fatalities  No requirement to prevent side under ride

Background  Rear guard  initially required in 1953 but were highly ineffective; safer guards required in 1998 by NHTSA

Background Over 4 million trailers travel on US roads, none with side under ride guards Approx 226 people die annually due to side under ride 98% of collisions with a trailer result in at least 1 fatality *all pictures from

Customer needs  Absorb force of a light duty vehicle (6000lbs) traveling at 35mph and prevent under ride  Cost efficient and easily installed by end user; bolt- on “kit” configuration  Provide aerodynamic qualities  Offset cost of purchase/installation  Increase fuel efficiency  Reduction in total hauling capacity

Product Specifications  Impulse time of 200ms  Impulse force vs. static force  Safety factor N = 2 EnglishSI Mass6000lb2722kg Velocity35mph15.65m/s ΔtΔt0.2s ΔvΔv35mph15.65m/s Table 1

Product Specifications Units of N*s  Factor of safety = 2 means double the impulse force  Nearly 500,000N of force for static load

Product Specifications  Modular vs. single unit  Impact always on at least 2 sections  Force per bar approximately 213,000N  47,884lbs

Final Design  Aluminum  1.5in (0.25in wall thickness) square tubing  0.25in thick brackets for welding  Steel  2in (0.25in wall thickness) square tubing  Weld directly to trailer I-beam  6in x 24in x 0.5in aluminum impact bar

Final Design Aluminum w/brackets

Final Design Steel

Stress/Deflection Analysis 6061-Al  Max stress  100ksi for steel  85ksi for aluminum  Max stress at joint corners  Impact bar failure acceptable

Summary  Aluminum questionable (6061-T6)  UTS = 45ksi  Tensile yield strength = 40ksi  UBS = 88ksi  Bearing yield strength = 56ksi  Max deflection at ends acceptable, even if failure occurs  Safety factor of 2 realistic and achievable

Fabrication/Assembly/Testing

Risks  Time constraints  Parts/Shipping  Fabrication  Welding, machining  Testing  Correct material choice

Acknowledgements  Dr. Hollis  Faculty advisor  Perry Ponder  Sponsor  Andrew Magaletti

References  C ̧ engel, Yunus A., Robert H. Turner, and John M. Cimbala. Fundamentals of Thermal-fluid Sciences. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Print.  Wolfson, Richard. Essential University Physics. 1. San Francisco: Pearson Addison Wesley, Print 