Use of a mark in a form differing in elements which do not alter its distinctive character - practice and examples - Мр Мирела Бошковић

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Precaution WTO Symposium, 6-7 July 2001 Current issues facing the World Trading System Session:Food Safety and SPS D. TAEYMANS, Director Scientific & Regulatory.
Advertisements

Use of the mark in forms different from the registered DOMINIKA WALICKA 24 APRIL 2013.
Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings: Proof of Use – Subcategories of Goods and Services.
5th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks
TRADEMARKS CONTAINING A NATIONAL FLAG
Descriptive Word Mark - Examination Procedure - Industrial Property Registrations - Malta - Gina Borg Trademark Examiner.
Convergence Programme CP 4. Scope of Protection B&W Marks Alicante October 2012.
1 Marks Registration In Jordan Presented by: Samer AL-Tarawneh Director Industrial Property Directorate Ministry of Industry & Trade Amman-Jordan.
WIPO: South-South Cooperation Cairo, May 7, 2013 Trademarks and the Public Domain Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The.
DATA PROTECTION and Research University Research Ethics Committee – David Cauchi David Cauchi Office of the Commissioner for Data Protection.
Comparison and overlap between trademark and design rights and the protection by unfair competition rules Presentation for IBA Conference, European Forum.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
Reputation. Reputation Reputation means that an association has been established between the mark and the source Reputation means that an association.
Generic marks – proofs demonstrating that the activity of the holder is preventing the trade mark from becoming a generic term M.Radulova R.Trenkova Patent.
Genuine Use in inter partes cases 4th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks June 2009.
Chapter 11 Product Strategies: Branding & Packaging Decisions.
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
Content General rules, Related parties, Price paid or payable, Introduction to the transfer pricing.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection :
8th WIPO Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights, WIPO- Geneva, May 26-28, 2014 The need for a fair referential trademark use from the.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
CP3: Absolute grounds – Distinctiveness of figurative marks containing descriptive/non-distinctive words CP5: Relative Grounds – Likelihood of Confusion.
Trademark Law and Cultural Heritage Marketing Strategies for SME’s based on Cultural Symbols WIPO Seminar, Geneva, May 18-20, 2009 Hendrik Jan Bulte, VU.
Trademarks A Product of Creativity in Bloom Elexis Jones 2011.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
January 29, 2013 KOJI MURAI JPAA International Activity Center JTA International Activity Commitee Upcoming Revision of Trademark Law and Design Law in.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
AIPPI IP IN GERMANY AND FRANCE Paris, 7-8 November 2013 THREEE-DIMENSIONAL MARKS Contribution José MONTEIRO (L’Oréal) 9/8/20151AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
BRANDING AND PACKAGING. BRAND Name, term, design or symbol that identifies a business and its products Connotates quality and reliability IMPORTANCE OF.
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
Protection of New Type of Trademark in Japan-“Present Basis and Future” JPAA International Activities Center Fujiko Shibata October 22, 2013 IP Practice.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
1 Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice.
1 Patent Claim Interpretation under Art. 69 EPC – Should prosecution history be used to interpret the patent? presented at Fordham 19th Annual Conference.
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION Domenico Di Pietro STUDYING LAW AT ROME TRE SECOND SEMESTER 2009/ October 2009.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
특허청 국제상표심사과 과장 Trademark Protection by using EC Design System.
특허청 국제상표심사과 과장 문삼섭 Trademark Protection by using EC Design System.
EU-China Workshop on the Chinese Patent Law 24/25 September 2008 Topic IV: Legal Consequences of Invalidity of a Patent Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
“Bad Faith” Trademark Filings/Registrations: TIPO’s Solution Jeffrey CHEN TIPO, Chinese Taipei 37 th IPEG Meeting in Medan 1.
CP4: Scope of Protection B&W Marks “Harmonise the different interpretations of the scope of protection of trade marks exclusively in black, white and/or.
Recognizing the Client
Connectivity to bank and sample account structure
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
Project Implementation - Contract modification -
Analogizing and Distinguishing Cases
SPCs and the unitary patent package
GST Valuation - Related or Distinct persons
Community protection of geographical indications :
Recent CJEU case law Fordham IP Conference, 25 April 2014 Prof. Dr
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Apple v. Samsung: Product Design
The EU trademark reform package – Back to status quo?
Workshop on « Economic Analysis of Trade Marks and Brands »
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Presentation for the Equinet Seminar on Tackling discrimination and protection for carers in Europe The Greek Labor Inspectorate and its cooperation with.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
Presentation transcript:

Use of a mark in a form differing in elements which do not alter its distinctive character - practice and examples - Мр Мирела Бошковић

Basic principles (obligation to use a trademark) Basic principles (obligation to use a trademark) Admissiblity of variations – standards Admissiblity of variations – standards Types of trademarks (word, figurative, composed trademarks) Types of trademarks (word, figurative, composed trademarks) Examples Examples

GENERAL PRINCIPLE A trademark holder must use a trademark (Art. 46 TML). A trademark must be used as registered. A trademark holder has the exclusive right to use a sign protected by a trademark for goods and/or services for which it is registered (Art TML). Sanctions for the non-use of a registered trademark: - invalidation of trademark for the reasons of similarity or identity with an earlier trademark; - revocation of registered trademark due to its non-use

INVALIDATION AND REVOCATION OF TRADEMARK INVALIDATION - The registered trademark may not be declared invalid if the earlier trademark had not been used in Serbia for the purposes of marking goods or services comprised, for a period of five years preceding the submission of the request for invalidation, unless the applicant for the registration of the later trademark had not acted in good faith. (Art TML) REVOCATION - At the request of an interested party, the competent authority may issue a decision on revocation of a trademark if the holder of the trademark or a person authorized by him fail, without a justified reason, to seriously use trademark on the domestic market for marking of goods and/or services comprised, for an uninterrupted period of five years as of the day on which the trademark was entered in the Trademark Register or from the day of its last use. During the proceedings for termination of a trademark due to its non-use, the trademark holder or a person authorized by him must prove that the trademark has been used. (Art TML)

ADMISSIBILITY OF VARIATIONS Differences between the form in which the mark is used on the market and the registered form are acceptable as long as the DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF THE MARK IS NOT ALTERED. In each individual case it should be examined does the differences alter the distinctive character of the trademark as registered. Use of the trademark, within the meaning of Art and Art shall also mean the use of the sign protected by the trademark in a form which differ in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the trademark, as well as the use of the protected trademark on goods or packaging of goods intended exclusively for export. (Art TML)

ADMISSIBILITY OF VARIATIONS – what should be examined? What elements of the sign are to be considered as distinctive characterstics of the trademark as registered; Does the sign as used in the market alters this distincitve character.

WORD TRADEMARKS As a general rule they are considered used as registered if the typeface is different. EXCALIBUR excalibur – Excalibur – EXCALIBUR (acceptable variations) unless the typeface is a particular one so that overall appearance of the word mark is changed to that of a figurative mark EXCALIBUR - EXcaliBUR (not acceptable variations)

FIGURATIVE TRADEMARKS As a general rule alterations shall be acceptable as long as the distincive character of the trademark as registered is not altered.

FIGURATIVE TRADEMARKS Alterations shall not be acceptable when the distincive character of the trademark as registered is altered.

FIGURATIVE TRADEMARKS When a registered trademark is used together with a generic indication of the product or descriptive term that is not integrated into the trademark as registered (kind, quality, quantity etc.) this will be considered as use of of the registered trademark. acceptable

FIGURATIVE TRADEMARKS In the case of composed trademark, where only one or some elements makes a trademark distinctive at whole (generic term in combination of distinctive combination of colors), an alteration of any of these elements will alter the distinctive character of the trademark. Not acceptable FRESH - LIME

FIGURATIVE TRADEMARKS When the composed trademark consists of both word and figurative elements as distinctive, and when figurative element is dominant in the overall impression of the trademark, alteration in a dominant figurative element or its omission will alter its overall distinctive character even if the word element remains unchanged. Not acceptable

CONCLUSION Admissibility of variations in some situations, is a result of the need to adapt the use of a registered trademark with respect of the specific circumstances of the market such a form o packaging of the product etc.

Thank you for your attention Mirela Bošković, LL.M. assistant director