Magnetic dynamo over different astrophysical scales Axel Brandenburg & Fabio Del Sordo (Nordita) with contributions from many others seed field primordial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Advertisements

Outline Dynamo: theoretical General considerations and plans Progress report Dynamo action associated with astrophysical jets Progress report Dynamo: experiment.
Magnetic dynamos in accretion disks Magnetic helicity and the theory of astrophysical dynamos Dmitry Shapovalov JHU, 2006.
INI 2004 Astrophysical dynamos Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization Computations Institute Department of Mathematics.
New Insights into the Acceleration and Transport of Cosmic Rays in the Galaxy or Some Simple Considerations J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented.
September 2005 Magnetic field excitation in galaxies.
Observations of turbulence in the magneto-ionized ISM on subparsec scales Marijke Haverkorn.
Cosmological Seed Fields versus Seed Fields Generated in Protogalaxies Dmitry Sokoloff Moscow State University Moscow, Russia in collaboration with D.Moss.
1. 2 Apologies from Ed and Karl-Heinz
Coronal Mass Ejections - the exhaust of modern dynamos Examples: systematic swirl (helicity) Measuring it quantitatively Connection with the dynamo Axel.
Magnetization of Galactic Disks and Beyond Collaborators: Dmitry Shapovalov (Johns Hopkins) Alex Lazarian (U. Wisconsin) Jungyeon Cho (Chungnam) Kracow.
New Mechanism of Generation of Large-Scale Magnetic Field in Turbulence with Large-Scale Velocity Shear I. ROGACHEVSKII, N. KLEEORIN, E. LIVERTS Ben-Gurion.
SHINE The Role of Sub-Surface Processes in the Formation of Coronal Magnetic Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
1 Forced – decaying Helical – nonhelical. 2 Points of the talk Resistive effects during inverse transfer B-field does not care about irrotational part.
Krakow 2010 Galactic magnetic fields: MRI or SN-driven dynamo? Detlef Elstner Oliver Gressel Natali Dziourkevich Alfio Bonanno Günther Rüdiger.
Plasma Dynamos UCLA January 5th 2009 Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin.
Magneto-hydrodynamic turbulence: from the ISM to discs
Structured outflow from a dynamo-active accretion disc B. von Rekowski, A. Brandenburg, W. Dobler, A. Shukurov A&A 398,
Sunspots: the interface between dynamos and the theory of stellar atmospheres Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) 70 yr Guenther.
Magnetic field generation on long time scales Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Cosmic magnetism ( KSP of the SKA) understand the origin and evolution of magnetism in the Galaxy, extragalactic objects, clusters and inter-galactic/-cluster.
Critical issues to get right about stellar dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Shukurov et al. (2006, A&A 448, L33) Schekochihin et al. (2005,
Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.
Magneto-rotational instability Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen)
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.
Accretion disc dynamos B. von Rekowski, A. Brandenburg, 2004, A&A 420, B. von Rekowski, A. Brandenburg, W. Dobler, A. Shukurov, 2003 A&A 398,
1 This is how it looks like… Magnetic helicity at the solar surface and in the solar wind Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Properties of magn helicity.
Magnetic Fields from Phase Transitions Magnetic Fields from Phase Transitions Tina Kahniashvili McWilliams Center for Cosmology Carnegie Mellon University.
Solar activity as a surface phenomenon Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Dynamo theory and magneto-rotational instability Axel Brandenburg (Nordita) seed field primordial (decay) diagnostic interest (CMB) AGN outflows MRI driven.
Large Scale Dynamo Action in MRI Disks Role of stratification Dynamo cycles Mean-field interpretation Incoherent alpha-shear dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita,
Turbulent Dynamo Stanislav Boldyrev (Wisconsin-Madison) Fausto Cattaneo (Chicago) Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.
Catastrophic  -quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Christer Sandin (Uppsala) Collaborators: Eric G.
Astrophysical Magnetism Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)
Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of stellar differential rotation and meridional circulation (submitted to A&A, arXiv: ) Bidya Binay Karak (Nordita.
Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.
Numerical simulations of astrophysical dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Dynamos: numerical issues Alpha dynamos do exist: linear and nonlinear.
Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.
ITP 2008 MRI Driven turbulence and dynamo action Fausto Cattaneo University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory.
Dongsu Ryu (CNU), Magnetism Team in Korea
Numerical simulations of the SN driven ISM Axel Brandenburg (NORDITA, Copenhagen, Denmark) Boris Gudiksen (Stockholm Observatory, Sweden) Graeme Sarson.
High-order codes for astrophysical turbulence
Turbulence in Magnetised Plasma of Galaxies and Clusters
Self-assembly of shallow magnetic spots through strongly stratified turbulence Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Brandenburg+13 Warnecke+11.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
1 This is how it looks like… The solar dynamo and its spots Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Solar & stellar dynamos: differences? Magnetic helicity:
Self-organized magnetic structures in computational astrophysics Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+13Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.
Turbulent transport coefficients from numerical experiments Axel Brandenburg & Matthias Rheinhardt (Nordita, Stockholm) Extracting concepts from grand.
ANGULAR MOMENTUM TRANSPORT BY MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC TURBULENCE Gordon Ogilvie University of Cambridge TACHOCLINE DYNAMICS
Turbulence research at Nordita 1.Bottleneck effect 2.Magnetic fields (active vector) 3.Passive scalar diffusion Haugen & Brandenburg (2006, Phys. Fl. 18,
Is the Inner Radio Jet of BL Lac Precessing? R. L. Mutel University of Iowa Astrophysics Seminar 17 September 2003.
Seeding the ICM: Primordial or Astrophysical? Jungyeon Cho Chungnam National University, Korea Cho & Yoo (2012; ApJ) Cho (2013; PRD) Cho (2014, ApJ) Origin.
Radiation Recoil Velocity of a Neutron Star Y. Kojima Hiroshima Univ. JGRG20 at Kyoto Sept in 2010 The 20 th Anniversary of JGRG & The 60 th Birthday.
Prandtl number dependence of magnetic-to-kinetic dissipation 1.What gets in, will get out 2.Even for vanishing viscosity 3.What if magnetic fields 4. contribute?
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
What happens in a star when convection stops? G th October 2007 Jonathan Braithwaite CITA, Toronto.
Physical conditions in astrophysics Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Overview of dynamos in stars and galaxies
Is solar activity a surface phenomenon?
Paradigm shifts in solar dynamo modelling
Probing Magnetized Turbulence in the Fermi Bubbles
Dynamo action & MHD turbulence (in the ISM, hopefully…)
Scale-dependence of magnetic helicity in the solar wind
宇宙磁场的起源 郭宗宽 中山大学宇宙学研讨班
Energy spectra of small scale dynamos with large Reynolds numbers
Magnetic acceleration of relativistic jets
Catastrophic a-quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic dynamo over different astrophysical scales Axel Brandenburg & Fabio Del Sordo (Nordita) with contributions from many others seed field primordial (decay) diagnostic interest (CMB) AGN outflows MRI driven SS dynamo galactic LS dynamo helicity losses

2 Early-Universe B-field may have been helical: 3-D decay simulations Initial slope E~k 4 Christensson et al. (2001, PRE 64, ) helical vs nonhelical cosmological scale: ~3 cm

3 Proposed helical decay law H not exactly constant Assume power law, not const H follows power law iff r=1/2; then M. Christensson, M. Hindmarsh, A. Brandenburg: 2005, AN 326, 393

4 Many astrophysical sources of turbulence are potential No dynamo action in nearly potential flows (at least not so far)  and  t are also small Examples: EW phase transition bubbles, SN explosions

5 Nearly potential flows neither  nor B is produced, unless … Mee & Brandenburg (2006, MNRAS 370, 415)

6 Baroclinic and battery terms Analogy between  and B eqns  even with baroclinicity Kulsrud et al. (1996)  relevance to oblique cosmological shocks degree of ionisation

7 Alternative: Magnetisation from quasars? 10,000 galaxies for 1 Gyr, erg/s each Similar figure also for outflows from protostellar disc B. von Rekowski, A. Brandenburg, W. Dobler, A. Shukurov, 2003 A&A 398, Poynting flux

8 To maintain equipartition-strength fields  need dynamos: small-scale vs large-scale B-scale larger than U-scale B-scale smaller than U-scale Wavenumber =1/scale energy injection scale

9 Small-scale vs large-scale dynamo

10 Growth rate, applied to galaxy l =2 x yr -1 u rms =10 km/s k f =2 p /70 pc=0.1 pc -1 u rms k f =10 -6 s -1 Re=10 9 l =3 x yr -1 (very fast) Amplication factors: exp( l t)=10 4 for 5 Gr

11 Kick-start the GBF with strong B Forced turbulence with shear and strong initial field at k=6

12 Weaker initial field Kazantsev slope, exponential growth

13 Reach full saturation: need helicity fluxes  evidence from different simulations Convective dynamo in a box with shear and rotation Käpylä, Korpi, Brandenburg (2008, A&A 491, 353) Only weak field if box is closed Forced turbulence in domain with solar-like shear Brandenburg (2005, ApJ 625, 539) 3-D simulations, no mean-field modeling

14 Saturation phase: here for convection Käpylä et al (2008, A&A 491, 353) with rotationwithout rotation

15 It can take some time… Rm=121, B y, LS dynamo not always excited

16 Conclusion 70 pc 10 pc factor 500 slope 3/2 factor 10,000