Www.pimedu.org. When Professor Michael Geist from the University of Ottawa spoke with Directors of Education on the topic of Privacy and Information Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roma, 10 maggio 2011 THE ITALIAN EVALUATION POLICY ISFOL, Silvia Ciampi.
Advertisements

ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Parents as Partners in Education
CG APPLICATION FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY FOR RESEARCHERS INCORPORATING THE CHARTER AND THE CODE (HRS4R) EXCELLENCE.
1 LNS Mathematics Updates OMCA Meeting June 11, 2010.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Milwaukee Public Schools: Another Way to Differentiate: Parallel Tasks March Academic Coach-Math Training March 15, 2013 Presented by: Bernard Rahming.
Characteristics of on-line formation courses. Criteria for their pedagogical evaluation Catalina Martínez Mediano, Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis.
System Office Performance Management
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 7 -1 Chapter 7 Implementing Strategies: Management & Operations Issues Strategic.
MTIP: Michigan Technology Implementation Project: Western Michigan Technology Conference April 19, 2002.
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
SMART Goals.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Clinical Audit How to make it work Clinical Audit Department Last revised July 2009.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
Session Materials  Wiki
Information Security Governance 25 th June 2007 Gordon Micallef Vice President – ISACA MALTA CHAPTER.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.
SNA seminar in the Caribbean Marie Brodeur Director General, Industry Statistics Branch, Statistics Canada St. Lucia February, 2014 Governance of an Integrated.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Achieving Balance in Innovation Stephen Uban, PE, NPDP, ISCP PDMA Research Foundation 8/14/2015Performance Excellence Network - Duluth1.
Welcome to Applying Data!. Applying Data I want to be in your classroom!
Inquiry Based Learning in HPE
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Assessment on the implementation of the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development Dr Nicola Cantore Overseas Development Institute,
Equality Impact Assessments: Measuring Impact and Driving Change Lucy Ambrozejczyk Service Improvement Officer Hafod Housing Association.
National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
2014 NAEP Technology and Engineering Literacy Assessment Junichi Hara July 7, 2010.
1 Customized Employment Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Assessment Workshop Title of the Project (date). Project Title Assessment Workshop October 25, 2015© Company Name All rights reserved2 Agenda Purpose.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
E.M.P.O.W.E.R.R. Project (Elementary Mathematics Partnership Opening Windows to Excellence, Rigor & Relevance) BOR/IDE MSP Grant from Title II BOR/IDE.
Change with a Purpose Kruger National Park Operations Division 21 st July 2006.
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative U.S. General Services Administration FSSI Office Products II “ OS2 in a Box” Implementation Kit.
Technical Assistance to Support the ADRC Grantees June 2004 The Lewin Group.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 South-Western. All rights reserved.
Response to Intervention Activity: Selecting the ‘Best of the Best’ Tier I Intervention Ideas.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
How to Build Collaborative Partnerships Between Developmental Service Agencies and Long Term Care Homes Three Models from Three Regions Karen Belyea, Executive.
Presented by David Shumaker Clinical Associate Professor Catholic University of America December 9, 2015.
WELCOME Next Generation Councils. Jan Stone, Director of Data, Assessment and Research Bullitt County Schools Amy Ramage, District Assessment Coordinator.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS North Carolina Teachers of Mathematics Conference 2013 Teruni Lamberg Ph.D. University of Nevada, Reno Whole Class Mathematics Discussions:
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
World Bank Group Impact Evaluations: Relevance and Effectiveness Jeff Tanner Task Team Leader for Impact Evaluations Independent Evaluation Group Based.
NSW Public Sector Capability Framework An Introduction These slides are designed to provide an introduction to the NSW Public Sector Capability Framework.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Classroom Response System
Leading Student Achievement: Our Principal Purpose Expanding the Professional Dialogue Diriger la réussite des élèves, notre ligne directrice : Élargir.
School Board Audit Committee Training Introduction Overview of Provincial Initiatives - Audit Committees & Internal Audit.
Leading E Competent Schools – Implementing Digital Learning Materials
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Technical Cooperation Section SEDI- Executive Office
Drafting a Climate Change Response Plan
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Essential Components.
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Our Leadership Journey
Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)
Presentation transcript:

When Professor Michael Geist from the University of Ottawa spoke with Directors of Education on the topic of Privacy and Information Management he said, “it is important to view privacy as a number of stages and the act of matching the stages of privacy (implementation) within your own districts is also a very important task using a maturity model.” Click here to link to Professor Geist’s video presentation. Click here to link to the PIM Maturity Model The PIM Capacity Building Framework is a construct developed to facilitate the challenging task of implementing specific components of the PIM toolkit. In school boards, it is clear that the elements of the Privacy Standard and the RIM principles do not operate in isolation nor are they implemented one at a time. However, developing “how to” documents can be beneficial to schools boards in that they provide an approach to incorporating some of the foundational elements of the toolkit into school board practice. As well, they can provide content elements related to each foundational area and a methodology that can be replicated or adapted by school board teams should they choose to work in other PIM content areas. Click here to link to the Foundation section of the PIM toolkit: Privacy Standard Click here to link to the Foundation section of the PIM toolkit: RIM Principles Click here to link to the PIM Capacity Building Framework Click here Some Background Information

The following presentation highlights a process that school board teams might use to develop strategies to support their implementation of specific privacy standards and record and information management principles. Creating “How To” Documents

Working through this activity as a board team can contribute to: The development of local PIM PD strategies Toolkit implementation strategies Knowledge mobilization in the area of PIM The use of the PIM self - assessment activities PIM policy & procedure models A culture change in the area of PIM

The process involves board teams working through the following three steps: Step 1. Selecting a specific privacy standard or record & information management principle as listed on the PIM capacity building framework. Step 2. Developing a specific goal for the selected component based on the PIM maturity model by completing the goal setting activity. Step 3. Identifying an implementation strategy to achieve the goal.

Step 1. Each team selects one of the elements of the privacy standard or one of the record and information management principles listed in the PIM Capacity Building Framework.

Step 2. Each team develops a specific goal for the standard / principle they have selected by working through the goal development activity.

Step 3. Each team identifies an implementation strategy by working through the activity sheet “Moving toward level 4”.

Working Through the Three Steps The following slides include links to resources, templates and examples of completed sections of the activity sheets. Teams can access these as they work through the next three slides to complete their own “level 4 goal and “how to” document.

Step 1. Each team selects one of the elements of the privacy standard or one of the record and information management principles listed in the PIM Capacity Building Framework (CBF). Click hereClick here for a printable version of the CBF Click hereClick here to link to the PIM Privacy Standard and click here to link to the RIM principles located on pages 18 to 40 of the PIM toolkit. click here Note: The PIM Privacy Standard and the Record and Information Management (RIM) Framework can be found in the Foundation section of the PIM toolkit and are an essential resource for completing this activity.

Step 2. Teams should answer each of the questions on the goal development sheet with your standard / principle in mind and then use this information to create a smart goal(s). Note: Writing a specific level 4 goal will create an explicit focus for actions to be taken to move through the levels of the PIM maturity model. Try This: Make the goal(s) more compelling by putting time limits on progress and allow for monitoring progress and measuring effectiveness of the implementation. Click hereClick here for a printable version of the goal development sheet Click hereClick here to access a completed sample of the goal development sheet. A completed goal development sheet is available and can be used as an example for teams to look at as they work through this activity

Step 3. Each team develops the details to support the implementation of their standard / principle using the “Moving toward level 4” sheet. Click hereClick here for a printable version of the “Moving toward level 4” sheet. Note: Developing a specific implementation strategy involves: identifying actions that need to be put in place and how they will be put in place. Click here to access a completed sample of specific strategy use.Click here detailing what supports and/or resources are necessary and available. Click here to access a completed sample of specific resource supports.Click here identifying who should be involved in the implementation. Click here to access a completed sample of who could be involved in the process.Click here putting monitoring systems in place in order to achieve the goal. Click here to access a completed sample of a monitoring description.Click here

Some Resources to Support this Activity. Collins, Jim, Why Business Thinking is Not the Answer, Good to Great and the Social Sectors, All rights reserved, Gardner, Howard, Changing Minds, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Heath, Chip and Heath, Dan, Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die, Made to Stick, Random House, New York, Hume, Karen, The Evidence-Based School, Pearson Publishing, Toronto, Canada, Patton,Michael Quinn, Utilization-Focused Evaluation, 3 rd edition, Sage Publications, 1997.

With thanks to the following contributors whose input and effort provided much of the content for this presentation. Laurie Baines, Records Information Management Officer, Thames Valley DSB Kellie Barron, ICT Director Corporate Systems, Kawartha Pine Ridge DSB Leslie Chouinor, Information Officer, Near North DSB Marie Clarke, Coordinator of K-12 Programs/ MISA Exec Lead, Lakehead DSB/ NOEL Gina Coish, Co-chair, PIM taskforce, Simcoe County DSB Russ Coles, Senior Manager - Computer Applications, York Region DSB Roy Hart, Chief Information Officer, Durham CDSB Marianne Hendren, Senior Employee & Labour Relations Consultant, Kawartha Pine Ridge DSB Cheryl Kennedy, ER officer / HR, York Catholic DSB François Lee-Daigle, Direction des ressources humaines, CSDECSO David Midwood, PIM taskforce, MCI Stephen Mitchell, Ph.D., Chief Information Officer, St-Clair Catholic DSB Kathleen O’Flaherty, Finance Manager, Keewatin-Patricia DSB Jeff Roynon, Data Analyst, Near North DSB Nancy Sharpe, Manager of Communications and Freedom of Information/Protection of Privacy, PVNCCDSB Sandy Smith, Community outreach coordinator and privacy, HPEDSB Carol Stock, Executive Assistant, Board Services, Toronto DSB Norma Townsend, Records Administrator/Privacy Officer, London DCSB Erica vanRoosmalen, Co-chair, PIM taskforce, Halton Catholic DSB Sandra Vieira, Privacy and Records Management Officer, Waterloo Catholic DSB Janice Wright, Superintendent of Finance, Upper Grand DSB