Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. APAI 2010 ANNUAL MEETING HOT TOPICS MEPDG DARWin-ME ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN SAFETY EDGE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institute for Road Construction and Maintenance - Vienna University of Technology ISTU O PTIMIZED P AVEMENT D ESIGN W ITH R ESPECT TO Q UALITY AND E CONOMY.
Advertisements

Licensing Because DARWin-ME will not be available for licensing until April 2011, the annual license fees will be prorated for the period April through.
Implementation of Darwin – ME Chris Wagner, PE July 26-29, 2010 Kansas City, MO.
Design and Construction Guidelines for Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements Lev Khazanovich, UM John Harvey, UCD Joe Mahoney, UW September 12, 2007.
1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014.
Alternate Bidding: The West Virginia Experience 2011Virginia Concrete Conference March 3, 2011 Richmond, VA Bob Long Executive Director ACPA Mid-Atlantic.
Presented at: Rutgers Asphalt Paving Conference March 8, 2011 Presented by: Eileen Sheehy, P.E. Manager, Bureau of Materials NJDOT.
Development and Application of the Asphalt Mix Performance Tester Ramon Bonaquist, Ph.D., P.E Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC.
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Why the United States needs NACLA Recognition of Accreditation Bodies Federal Highway Administration’s Perspective Mike Rafalowski Materials Engineer Office.
Pavement Type Selection (Designs, Costs & Bidding) 9 th Annual Concrete Conference for the Maryland Transportation Industry March 24, 2009 Timonium, MD.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director.  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support.
Alternate Bidding in Missouri Transportation Estimators Association Annual Conference November 2-4, 2005 – Daytona Beach, FL Interstate 44 … South-Central.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding Virginia Concrete Conference Richmond, VA March 6, 2014.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
APAM Annual Paving Conference April 21-22, 2015 Mt. Pleasant, MI Michael Eacker, MDOT Justin Schenkel, MDOT.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
System Analysis and Design
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Methods and Preliminary Results January 10, 2011 John Harvey Nick Santero Lev Khazanovich.
Jerry G. Rose, PE University of Kentucky Department of Civil Engineering REES 3: Module 3-D REES 2014.
Administrator’s Guide
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) October 6, 2007.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) November 6, 2005.
Lesson 4 Computer Software
Rigid Pavement Design Deficiencies
Juva Barber Executive Director. What is KBT? Kentuckians for Better Transportation educates and advocates for all modes of transportation to promote a.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
Implementation of Darwin – ME Chris Wagner, PE July 26-29, 2010 Kansas City, MO.
LTPP Program Presented to the ACPA Professors Workshop Skokie, IL June 19, 2008 Long-Term Pavement Performance Program.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 1 NCDOT Pavement Management Unit.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Toll Road Asset Management and the Linkage to Finance Transportation Innovations, Inc. 10/22/
Software Research, Inc. Setting the Standard for Software Testing Windows Solution.
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.
AASHTO Technical Committee on Cost Estimating AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Annual Meeting July 20, 2009 Lesly Tribelhorn, Chair, TCCE.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Alternate Technical Concepts AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 28, 2010 Columbia, S.C. KATHY HARVEY State Design Engineer Missouri Department of Transportation.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)
PBCAT Software Upgrade Progress and Plans Carol Tan Esse Federal Highway Administration David Harkey University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research.
WELCOME TO THE WEBINAR This Webinar is being presented from a computer with a resolution of 1280 X Using a similar setting on your machine may improve.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
MODULE 1-2 Introduction to HMA Pavements. Learning Objectives Describe the types of (HMA) pavements Identify the role of each pavement layer Discuss key.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
HMA Warranties The Wisconsin Experience Presentation to the California Department of Transportation.
Integrates and automates the transportation safety planning and management Software analysis tools to assist highway agencies to implement their SHSP and.
John Donahue, P.E. Missouri DOT 5 th Annual Building Green with Concrete Workshop June 21, 2012.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth 2011 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL PAVEMENT DESIGN PROCESS David Andrewski, PE.
Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
SAFETYANALYST Integrates and automates the transportation safety planning and management Software analysis tools to assist highway agencies to implement.
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
WELCOME TO THE WEBINAR This Webinar is being presented from a computer with a resolution of 1280 X Using a similar setting on your machine may improve.
Long-Term Pavement Performance Program
AASHTOWare Pavement-ME Design Software: Materials Library
Ranking of Pavement Preservation Methods and Practices
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding
Intersection Conflict Warning Systems
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth Bidding Alternate Pavement Designs
Presentation transcript:

Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth

APAI 2010 ANNUAL MEETING HOT TOPICS MEPDG DARWin-ME ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN SAFETY EDGE

PAVEMENTDESIGN MECHANISTIC EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDE (MEPDG) Mechanistic Models Traffic Climate Materials

MEPDG (Analysis Tool) Predicts Stresses and Strains Predicts Pavement Distresses Compares Distresses to Allowable Calculates Reliability Pass / Fail

PAVEMENT DESIGN RESULTS Thinner HMA Thinner PCCP RISK ! Pay Attention to the Subgrade

MEPDG (Trial & Error) DARWin-ME 1.0 Research Software Run Time (one trial) HMA 20 to 90 minutes PCCP 15 to 30 minutes Reliability Final Design Typically 2 to 5 runs Thinnest not Exceeding Distresses

Background DARWin-ME supports AASHTO’s Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide published in 2008 Work product of NCHRP projects 1-37A and 1-40D Nearly a decade of development Base software: Freeware, available through the Transportation Research Board DARWin-ME covers 17 pavement design situations New concrete and asphalt pavements and various types of asphalt and concrete overlays

DARWin-ME Inputs/Outputs System Inputs Project information Design information Materials & structure data Traffic data Climate data Rehabilitation information Initialization data System Outputs Input summary Climate summary Design pass/fail checks Material properties summary Pavement distress summary/charts

DARWin-ME 2.0 Pooled Fund Provide the transportation community with a production level, state-of-the-art software tool for the design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures consistent with AASHTO’s MEPDG

DARWin-ME Planned Improvements Redesign GUI using.NET 3.5 framework User configurable screens Agency defined data libraries Input control at the central office Expansion capabilities for new analysis engines Improved display on large or multiple monitors Improved error handling stability and error display Multiple project editing Handicap accessibility options Improved reporting (stability, speed and quality) Utilities for importing previous version files, third party data Multiple language extensibility

DARWin-ME Planned Improvements Efficiency Increase software speed Automated thickness optimization Batch mode Sensitivity Functionality SI version Traffic caps Stability Correct reported bugs (Task Force directed) Improve error handling

DARWin-ME Task Force Judy Corley-Lay (Chair), North Carolina Marta Juhasz, Alberta, Canada Jay Goldbaum, Colorado Dave Andrewski, Indiana Williams F. Barstis, Mississippi J.F. Bledsoe, Missouri Julian Bendana, New York Madgy Mikhail, Texas Trenton Clark, Virginia Interested Agency Liaisons: Federal Highway Administration Transportation Association of Canada

Current Project Status Project solicitation issued in July 2008 Received commitments from 20 member agencies and the FHWA. Sole Source Contract to ARA Correct known bugs and those discovered during development Incorporate enhancements outlined in solicitation Alpha testing completed November 2010 Beta testing by three agencies in November and December Software Release April 11, 2011

GENERAL INFO RUN PROGRESS PAVEMENT STRUCTURE LAYER PROPERTIES ANALYSIS PARAMETERS EXPLORER WINDOW ERROR LIST Opening Screen

DARWin-ME Toolbar

Project Creation

Pavement Structure Layers can be added/removed using visual aid Layer labels editable Layer represented graphically Layering check to disallow illegal entries

Material Properties – AC

Material Properties – PCC

Material Properties – Non-Stabilized Materials & Subgrade

Material Properties – Stabilized Layer

Traffic TRAFFIC INPUTS MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT AXLES PER TRUCK VEHICLE CLASS HOURLY ADJUSTMENT HIGHWAY CAPACITY

Traffic Traffic Growth Rate for Each Truck Class

Highway Capacity Limits  Freeway  Multilane highway  2-lane highway  Level  Rolling  Urban  Rural

Highway Capacity Limits

Climate

Climate

Runtime Improvements Proj Name DescriptionMEPDG-v1.1 Runtime DarwinME Runtime Overall * Overal l Following runtime is measured on a laptop of 32bit XP, 3 GHz, 3.5 GB RAM 121 New HMA: 8” AC, Binder 10%, Air voids 8.5%, Granular base. 13’45”12’21”5’11” Following runtime is measured on a laptop of 32bit XP, 3 GHz, 1.0 GB RAM 121 New HMA: 8” AC, Binder 10%, Air voids 8.5%, Granular base. 32’28”30’00”11’37” Overall* - time measure does not include Summary process for Excel report generation PC comparisons – PRELIMINARY RESULTS UR01 – Asphalt pavement type analysis shall be improved to be completed within 15 minutes

License Fees for FY2011 Individual License 1 - The single user license allows for only one user. For two, three or four users, multiple single user licenses will have to be purchased. Single user - $5,000 Site License 1 - Site licenses based on the number of users and single user licenses will be available for DARWin-ME. The unlimited site license allows use of DARWin-ME on an unlimited number of workstations within an agency, and permits cities/counties, and contractors/consultants employed by the agency, access to the product on the Member Department’s network. Site License – up to 9 users $20,000 Site License – up to 14 users $30,000 Site License – unlimited users $40,000 Educational License - will not be offered until FY Because the software won’t be available until after the fiscal year has begun, license fees will be prorated for first time licensees. License fees are annual 29

ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN A CONTRACT LET WITH DIFFERENT PAVEMENT TYPE OPTIONS (usually HMA & PCCP) THAT A CONTRACTOR CAN BID EITHER OR BOTH OPTIONS. DIFFERING DESIGN LIVES ARE ACCOUNTED FOR BY CALCULATING A 50 YEAR LIFE CYCLE COST FACTOR FOR EACH TYPE. THE WINNING BID IS THE LOWEST SUM OF THE BID PLUS THE FACTOR.

HMA STRATEGY 20 Year Initial Design Life Joint Seal at Year 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, & 18 Mill and Functional Overlay at 20 Years Joint Seal at Year 23, 26, 29, & 32 Mill and Resurface Joint Seal at Year 38, 41, 44, & 47

PCCP STRATEGY 30 Year Initial Design Life Reseal Joints at Year 8, 16, & 24 Mill and Functional Overlay at Year 30 Reseal Joints at Year 33, 36, & 39 Mill and Resurface at Year 42 Reseal Joints at Year 45 & 48

50 Year Life Cycle Cost factor > 10 PERCENT USE LESS COSTLY < 10 PERCENT ALTERNATE BID SPECIAL CASE Settlement Areas Presence of Distillates

Contract Bid plus Factor Initial Costs – Contractor’s Bid LCCA (50 years) Present Value HMA Strategy PCCP Strategy

RECENT CONTRACT FACTORS HMA - $2,353, PCCP - $1,480,742.91

WINNING BID HMA ($)PCCP ($) BID22,154, ,290, FACTOR2,353, ,480, LOWEST BID + FACTOR 24,508, ,771,050.94

SUGGESTIONS / CONSTRUCTIVE COMPLAINTS Call me at