POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
Advertisements

Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
ENEA, 12. September 2005 WWF Handbook and Score-card Presentation by Stefanie Lang,
POLISH PRESIDENCY IN THE EU: COHESION POLICY AND EVALUATION-RELATED ACTIVITIES Presentation of Objectives and Programme Stanisław Bienias, Ministry of.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
The complexity of migration in the Baltic Sea Region Immigration, a threat or a solution? Warsaw, April 24, 2008 Migration Policy Department Ministry of.
HR 08 IB SPP 02 TWINNING PROJECT “ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF EU COHESION POLICY FUNDS” 1 The most significant results of Component.
Progress in PRS Implementation: The Republic of Serbia Presented by Ivana Aleksić, Team Manager Poverty Reduction Strategy Implementation Focal Point Deputy.
Bucharest, 18 February 2009 Evaluation of Structural Instruments in POLAND Stanislaw Bienias National Evaluation Unit Department of Structural Policy Coordination.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU The Strategic Planning System at Central Public Administration.
Enhancing Institutional and Administrative Capacity case: POLAND
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL
1 Performance budget for Poland – the budget of the future Polish economists’ congress Warsaw, November 2007.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Project Implementation Plan and Principal Activities
9 th NSRF Monitoring Committee meeting, 11 December 2014 EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Investing in Your Future Operational Programme.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
The Eastern Partnership Panel on Agriculture and Rural Development Dominik Olewinski European Commission Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum: Working.
POLAND Modernisation of development policy Sofia, June 5, 2012.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
MINISTRY OF FINANCE /1 Maija Jussilainen Project Manager Ministry of Finance Government Information Management Unit Knowledge.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
1 Polish SAI (NIK) experience in the field of EU funds Piotr Szpakowski Najwyższa Izba Kontroli Prague, 6-8 November 2006.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Belgrade, Donor Coordination Meeting Belgrade, 30 th of November 2011.
1 Anna Wypych-Namiotko Undersecretary of State Ministry of Infrastructure, Poland European Maritime Day 2010 Innovation for growth and jobs Ministerial.
Regional policy European Commission EN Update on IPA Component III - environment Brussels, 28 November 2008 Erich Unterwurzacher REGIO.I4 – IPA/ISPA.
1 KNI as a part of the legal framework for mid-term and long-term programming in Poland POLAND  KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Belgrade, 14 th December Aid Coordination Meeting Gender Equality Synergy Group Belgrade, 14 th of March 2012.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE CURRENT CHALLENGES IN BUDGET REFORM SOFIAMR. LYUBOMIR DATZOV 03 DECEMBER 2004DEPUTY MINISTER
1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGET PRIORITISATION IN CROATIA Francois-Roger Cazala, Rimantas Veckys SIGMA - Lithuanian Ministry of Finance.
MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION How to ensure thatdifferent governance levels combine to achieve goals of.
Mihai Iacob – junior researcher INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, Bucharest , Tallinn, Estonia Overview of the implementation of NQF in Romania.
PFM reform – change management Module 3.2 Preparing and managing a PFM reform programme 1.
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
ASSESSING LONG-TERM STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS WITH THE EU PERSPECTIVE Supreme Audit Office Poland Slawomir Grzelak Director, Department of Economy,
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Anna Borowska Civil Service Director
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
Belgian Presidency Regional Policy COCOF - 29 & 30 June 2010.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
MARITIME POLICY OF POLAND UP TO 2020 (WITH A PERSPECTIVE UP TO 2030)
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Zsuzsa Sötét Monitoring and Evaluation Departement
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
Presentation transcript:

POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010

Challenges large number of unrelated strategies with mixed development (sectoral) objectives strong sectoral approach unclear relation between development policy and regional policy different spatial and socio-economic planning systems weak links between programming and operational levels lack of transparent financing system for development policy large number of unrelated strategies with mixed development (sectoral) objectives strong sectoral approach unclear relation between development policy and regional policy different spatial and socio-economic planning systems weak links between programming and operational levels lack of transparent financing system for development policy

Processes assessment of strategic documents legislation new systemic solutions administrative capacity enhancement instruments

Subsystems of development management model Programming subsystemProgramming subsystem – determination of development directions and preparation of strategic documents Institutional subsystemInstitutional subsystem – collaboration of entities involved in development policy Implementation subsystem (incl. monitoring, evaluation, financial issues and instruments) -Implementation subsystem (incl. monitoring, evaluation, financial issues and instruments) - efficient implementation of the development policy together with providing sufficient funds Time horizon for model implementation– autumn 2010 Time horizon for model implementation – autumn 2010

Programming Aims: to integrate three dimensions: social, economic and territorial and assure coherence between policies: sectoral, regional, field (long-term national development strategy, guidelines) to define the role of regional policy (national strategy for regional development) to reduce number of strategic documents and fill in the gaps (missing strategies) to assure coherence between strategies and programmes (compliance assessment, thematic links) Aims: to integrate three dimensions: social, economic and territorial and assure coherence between policies: sectoral, regional, field (long-term national development strategy, guidelines) to define the role of regional policy (national strategy for regional development) to reduce number of strategic documents and fill in the gaps (missing strategies) to assure coherence between strategies and programmes (compliance assessment, thematic links)

National Strategy of Regional Development Strategy for Sustainable Development of Rural areas and Agriculture National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland Efficient State Energy Safety and Environment Transport Development Strategy Human Resources Development Strategy Strategy of Innovation and Economic Efficiency Social Capital Development Strategy Medium-term national development strategy Long-term national development strategy

Hierarchy of strategic documents Long-term financial plan Horizontal, long-term documents Horizontal, mid-term documents Other documents Long-term national development strategy ( social-economic and spatial development ) National Cohesion Strategy ( NCS ) Development strategies ( sector, field ) National strategy of regional development Development programmes Operational programmes Voivodships spatial arrangement policies Supra-regional strategies Voivodships development strategies Regional operational programmes Local development strategies (of villages and towns) Regional/local development programmes of the sector Study of conditions and directions of spatial arrangement at municipal level Local spatial arrangement strategy Development programmes Local sector strategies Mid-term national development strategy (economic, social and spatial dimension) National spatial arrangement study National Reforms Programme Convergence Programme Contract as an instrument of development policy coordination

Institutions Aims: to establish a strong intersectoral coordination body (Prime Ministers Chancellery) to change public administration approach from sectoral to horizontal (clusters of ministries) to involve all levels of public administration in attaining development goals Aims: to establish a strong intersectoral coordination body (Prime Ministers Chancellery) to change public administration approach from sectoral to horizontal (clusters of ministries) to involve all levels of public administration in attaining development goals

Institutions The Chancellery of the Prime MinisterThe Chancellery of the Prime Minister – initiating actions in accordance with the programme, verification and supervision function; Ministry of Regional Development (MRD)Ministry of Regional Development (MRD) – coordination function to the extent defined in appropriate act; Ministers, heads of central authorities officeslocal administrationMinisters, heads of central authorities offices and local administration i.e. institutions which are subject to coordination and which implement development policy; Other participantsOther participants (social and economic partners)

Institutions The Chancellery of the Prime Minister – preparing long-term national development strategy in cooperation with MRD Coordination Committee for Development Policy The Chancellery of the Prime Minister – defining strategic challenges in long term perspective, including preparing long-term national development strategy in cooperation with MRD, participation in the process of formulating mid-term strategic development goals, ensuring a proper functioning of Coordination Committee for Development Policy; MRD MRD – preparation of mid-term superior documents coordinating national development actions, defining and enforcing methodological standards and organisational procedures of the programming process. Competent ministers Competent ministers – preparation of lower rank documents i. e. sector development strategies, development programmes; Local authorities Local authorities – provincial development strategies, provincial programmes, regional operational programmes.

Implementation Aims to provide clear links between programming and implementation levels (compliance assessment) to review development policy instruments (effectiveness evaluation) to elaborate and disseminate best practices to assure financing Aims to provide clear links between programming and implementation levels (compliance assessment) to review development policy instruments (effectiveness evaluation) to elaborate and disseminate best practices to assure financing

Implementation Evaluation of effectiveness of particular development policy instruments –annual report on mid-term NDS realisation; –requirement of ex ante evaluation of development programmes; –report concerning socio-economic, regional and spatial development prepared every three years. Development of best practices and their popularisation –methodology of preparing strategic documents; –unified terminology related to strategic programming –course of training for public administration officers. Ensuring effective financing of development policy –long-term estimated financial programme; –performance budget; –new role of voivodship contracts

Key determinants and valuable solutions strong intersectoral coordination body – charisma, determination and authority of chairperson clusters of ministries – shift towards horizontal approach common framework strategic document (time frame and degree of details not so important) result –oriented management system and strong links between programming and implementation levels (compliance assessment, cross-analysis, core indicators) clear relation between development policy and regional policy (territorial dimension) legal base strong intersectoral coordination body – charisma, determination and authority of chairperson clusters of ministries – shift towards horizontal approach common framework strategic document (time frame and degree of details not so important) result –oriented management system and strong links between programming and implementation levels (compliance assessment, cross-analysis, core indicators) clear relation between development policy and regional policy (territorial dimension) legal base

Slow-downs slow pace of approach changes (from sectoral to horizontal) time-consuming process of documents review difficult timing of documents Mare understanding between budget and development experts lack of omnibus at different levels slow pace of approach changes (from sectoral to horizontal) time-consuming process of documents review difficult timing of documents Mare understanding between budget and development experts lack of omnibus at different levels

PL Presidency objectives conclusions of ministers (formal, if possible) Cohesion Policy regulations policy recommendations guidelines

PL Presidency core events Ministerial meetings Ministerial meetings Directors General (regional policy, territorial cohesion, urban development) – September Ministers (regional policy, territorial cohesion, urban development) – November Ministers (formal meeting within Council) – December Conferences Conferences Cohesion Policy - value added and evidence-based policy ESF and other funds and policies Transnational programmes Regional Policy – integrated approach to development Urbact

Thank you for your attention Ministry of Regional Development Wspólna St. 2/4, Warsaw