A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Carsten Güttler & Jürgen Blum Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik, TU Braunschweig,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can Photo-Evaporation Trigger Planetesimal Formation? Henry Throop John Bally SWRI Univ.Colorado / CASA DPS 12-Oct-2004.
Advertisements

Disk Structure and Evolution (the so-called model of disk viscosity) Ge/Ay 133.
Proto-Planetary Disk and Planetary Formation
Formation of Terrestrial Planets
Dust Growth in Transitional Disks Paola Pinilla PhD student Heidelberg University ZAH/ITA 1st ITA-MPIA/Heidelberg-IPAG Colloquium "Signs of planetary formation.
Star & Planet Formation Minicourse, U of T Astronomy Dept. Lecture 5 - Ed Thommes Accretion of Planets Bill Hartmann.
Amaya Moro-Martín Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC) & Princeton Univ. Chaotic exchange of solid material between planetary systems: implications for.
Things that matter during the first stages of formation of giant planets Andrea Fortier Physikalisches Institut – UniBe 02/03/2011.
Neal Turner Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Protostellar Disks: Birth, Life and Death National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Planet Formation Topic: Dust motion and coagulation Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond.
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks Phil Armitage Colorado.
Planetesimal Formation gas drag settling of dust turbulent diffusion damping and excitation mechanisms for planetesimals embedded in disks minimum mass.
Physics and Astronomy University of Utah Extreme Solar Systems II Fall 2011 The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks and the Diversity of Giant Planets Diversity.
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
The formation of stars and planets
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
Observations and models of size distribution of KBOs (summarize several articles) Yeh, Lun-Wen
Ge/Ay133 How do small dust grains grow in protoplanetary disks?
Comets as test cases for planetesimal- formation scenarios Jürgen Blum Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik Technische Universität Braunschweig.
Lecture 2—Planetary Formation Abiol 574. Let’s start with topics that we won’t talk about at any great length in this course First, one has to form the.
How did the Solar System form? 3. What are the broad general characteristics or physical features of our Solar System and how do they illuminate Solar.
Star and Planet Formation Sommer term 2007 Henrik Beuther & Sebastian Wolf 16.4 Introduction (H.B. & S.W.) 23.4 Physical processes, heating and cooling.
Mass Distribution and Planet Formation in the Solar Nebula Steve Desch School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary.
The Formation of Uranus and Neptune (and intermediate-mass planets) R. Helled Tel-Aviv University 1 Dec
The formation of stars and planets
Any theory about the origin of the solar system must explain why all of the planets’ orbits lie more or less in a plane and all of the planets orbit the.
Buffering Capacity of Granular Matter to Impact Force State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment Dalian University of Technology.
IMPACT Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to: 1.Understand and analyze the mechanics of impact. 2.Analyze the motion of bodies undergoing a collision,
MODELING FORMATION OF SELF- GRAVITATING DUST CONDENSATIONS AND ORIGINAL PLANETESIMALS IN A PROTOPLANETARY DISK A. B. Makalkin, I. N. Ziglina, Schmidt Institute.
Origin of solar systems 30 June - 2 July 2009 by Klaus Jockers Max-Planck-Institut of Solar System Science Katlenburg-Lindau.
Planet Building Part 3 Growth of Protoplanets. Starter Hubble images WKn7k&list=PLiuUQ9asub3Ta8mqP5LNiOhOygRzue8k.
Current problems in dust collision physics  No approved model for single-grain collision  lab data (e.g. Poppe et al for µm particles): sticking.
Automotive Soiling Simulation Based On Massive Particle Tracing Stefan Röttger Martin Schulz Wolf Bartelheimer Thomas Ertl Visualization and Interactive.
Summary  We have implemented numerically stable, continuous method of treating condensation on to grains in Titan’s atmosphere.  Our model can establish.
Aggregate Analysis In A CubeSat Centrifuge: A Study Of Primary Accretion Sarah Smallwood Faculty Mentor: Erik Asphaug, School of Earth and Space Exploration.
HBT 28-Jun-2005 Henry Throop Department of Space Studies Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Boulder, Colorado John Bally University of Colorado DPS Pasadena,
Mário Santos1 EoR / 21cm simulations 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Epoch of Reionization / 21cm simulations Mário Santos CENTRA - IST.
Modelling Transport Phenomena during Spreading and Solidification
The PSI Planet-building Code: Multi-zone, Multi-use S. J. Weidenschilling PSI Retreat August 20, 2007.
HBT 28-Jun-2005 Henry Throop Department of Space Studies Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Boulder, Colorado John Bally University of Colorado Portugal,
DAVID KIRSH RALPH PUDRITZ IAU 276 TORINO 2010 Planetesimal Formation in Turbulent Circumstellar Disks.
Dokumentname > Dokumentname > B Recent Results of Comet Activity Modeling as input for RPC Plasma Simulations Recent Results of Comet.
Planetesimal dynamics in self-gravitating discs Giuseppe Lodato IoA - Cambridge.
From Planetesimals to Planets Pre-Galactic Black Holes and ALMA.
The Origin of the Solar System. I. The Great Chain of Origins A. Early Hypotheses B. A Review of the Origin of Matter C. The Solar Nebula Hypothesis D.
Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison HAPL Review Meeting March 3-4, 2005.
Planet Building Part 2 Planetesimals and Protoplanets.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Are transition discs much commoner in M stars? Recent claim that 50% of discs around M stars are in transition (Sicilia-Aguilar et al 2008) CAREFUL! For.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
Forces. I. Section 1 A. Newton- (N) the SI unit for the magnitude of a force. Also called weight. B. Force- a push or a pull. Described by its magnitude.
THERMAL PHYSICS.  Matter is most commonly found in solid, liquid or gas form. We will discuss the properties of these different states of matter. STATES.
Collision Enhancement due to Planetesimal Binary Formation Planetesimal Binary Formation Junko Kominami Jun Makino (Earth-Life-Science Institute, Tokyo.
Grain Growth and Substructure in Protoplanetary Disks David J. Wilner Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics S. Corder (NRAO) A. Deller.
Complex Organic Molecules formation on Interstellar Grains Qiang Chang Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences April 22, 2014.
25.5. Any theory about the origin of the solar system must explain why all of the planets’ orbits lie more or less in a plane Why all of the planets orbit.
Dynamics of planetesimal formation
Star and Planet Formation
5. Formation of Solar System
Three-dimensional collision analysis of millimeter-sized dust aggregates R.Weidling and J. Blum, IGEP, TU Braunschweig
IMPACT Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
Bell Ringer What is the order of the planets?
Any theory about the origin of the solar system must explain why all of the planets’ orbits lie more or less in a plane and all of the planets orbit the.
Planetesimal formation in self-gravitating accretion discs
Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM
Origin of the Earth.
Formation of the solar system
The Formation of Planetesimals – the Laboratory Perspective
Stochastic Late Accretion on the Earth, Moon and Mars
How does rime accretion rate (RAR) influence charge transfer?
Presentation transcript:

A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Carsten Güttler & Jürgen Blum Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik, TU Braunschweig, Germany Dust in Planetary Systems Friedrich Schiller Universität, Jena September 27 th to October 1 st 2010 PRESENTATION WITHOUT MOVIE FILES. PLEASE REQUEST FROM OR

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates From Dust to Planets dust ~1 µm planetesimals e.g. 1 km agglomeration Interaction with gas dominant gravitation negligible Blum et al., 1998 Dominik & Tielens, 1997 see also: Blum & Wurm, 2000 ? Comet Temple 1 © NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMD Poppe et al., 2000a

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Outline 1.The Collision Model laboratory experiments 2.Results: Application of the Model consequences for the evolution of dust 3.Discussion of Results critical inspection of the model 4.New Experiments future improvements of the model

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 1. Overview on Collisional Outcomes Güttler et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 1. Overview on Collisional Outcomes Güttler et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates S1: Hit & Stick  Sticking without any restructuring if E impact < 5 · E roll  Physical description and simulation: Dominik & Tielens (1997)  Experiments: Blum & Wurm (2000) Blum & Wurm, 2000 Blum & Wurm, 1998 Blum et al., 1998

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates S2: Sticking by Surface Effects  Collisions can lead to sticking although the hit- and-stick threshold velocity is exceeded  Explanation: aggregate is compacted, contact area increases → more contacts support sticking size: 0.2 mm; velocity: 0.24 m/s Kothe, Güttler & Blum, unpublished data

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates B1: Bouncing with Compaction I  Collisions between mm-sized aggregates hardly lead to sticking  Bouncing for low velocities (<1m/s) Heißelmann, Fraser & Blum, mm v rel = 0.4 m/s

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates B1: Bouncing with Compaction II Weidling et al., mm

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 1. Possible Collisional Outcomes

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates The Collision Model x axes: velocity cm/s y axes: mass g

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 1. The Collision Model

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Outline 1.The Collision Model laboratory experiments 2.Results: Application of the Model consequences for the evolution of dust 3.Discussion of Results critical inspection of the model 4.New Experiments future improvements of the model

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 2. The Monte-Carlo Growth Model  Dust growth in a box in the protoplanetars disk  Fast Monte Carlo code (Zsom & Dullemond, 2008)  Aggregates possess physical properties (i.e. mass, porosity), which determine the collisional outcome  Monte Carlo character: collision probabilities determine the next collision to compute  Model parameters: r=1AU; α =10 -4 ; T=200K; Σ 0 =1700 g/cm 2 (MMSN)

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 2. Which Collisions Do Really Occur?  Dust growth in a box in the protoplanetary disk (Zsom & Dullemond, 2008)  Model parameters: r=1AU; α =10 -4 ; T=200K; Σ 0 =1700 g/cm 2 (MMSN) Zsom et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 2. How do the Aggregates Grow?  Mass Evolution  max ~1g  Bouncing inhibits further growth  Porosity Evolution  very fluffy aggregates after ~1000 years  Bouncing compacts aggregates Zsom et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 2.Overview of Collisions  Many collisions do not occur within the experiment-boxes  Extrapolations by orders of magnitude  New experiments are being designed to check the 'hot-spots' Zsom et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Outline 1.The Collision Model laboratory experiments 2.Results: Application of the Model consequences for the evolution of dust 3.Discussion of Results critical inspection of the model 4.New Experiments future improvements of the model

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates  Sizes of protoplanetary dust aggregates:  Mass ratios of projectile and target:  Collision velocities of protoplanetary dust aggregates:  Porosities of protoplanetary dust aggregates:  Protoplanetary dust materials and temperatures: 1 µm1 mm1 kmx1 m m/s10 -2 m/s100 m/sx1 m/s oxides/metals >1000 K silicates ~300 K ices ~100 K organics ~200 K no expt’sexpt’s compactvery porousxporous 0 1x1x 3. How Complete is the Model?

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 3. How Solid are the Threshold Lines? experiments and MD simulations model based on Hertzian theory based on experiments bouncing dominates porosity model exclusively based on Weidling et al.

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 3. Improvement of Monte Carlo Method  Previous simulations in a local, static box (no global particle motion)  0D  Recent simulations with many boxes, including differential settling and turbulent mixing  1D

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Zsom, Ormel, Dullemond & Henning, in prep. midplane 1 pressure scale height 2 pressure scale heights

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Outline 1.The Collision Model laboratory experiments 2.Results: Application of the Model consequences for the evolution of dust 3.Discussion of Results critical inspection of the model 4.New Experiments future improvements of the model

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Sticking and Bouncing Güttler et al., 2010

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Collisional Outcomes Weidling et al., unpublished  Microgravity experiment (drop tower, suborbital flight)  Particle diameter: mm  Initial velocity ~0.1m/s  Collisional cooling down to mm/s

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Two bouncing collision v = 17 cm/s (first) v = 14 cm/s (second) particle size: mm 4. Bouncing I particle diameter: 1 mm filling factor: 40% 47 analyzed collisions: 6xsticking 40xbouncing 1xfragmentation Weidling et al., unpublished

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Bouncing collision v = 12 mm/s particle size: mm 4. Bouncing II particle diameter: 1 mm filling factor: 40% 47 analyzed collisions: 6xsticking 40xbouncing 1xfragmentation Weidling et al., unpublished

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Sticking collision v = 9 mm/s particle size: mm 4. Sticking particle diameter: 1 mm filling factor: 40% 47 analyzed collisions: 6xsticking 40xbouncing 1xfragmentation Weidling et al., unpublished

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Relation to Collision Model scheduled for 11/2010 to be analyzed Weidling et al., unpublished

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Bouncing and Fragmentation

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Laboratory Drop Tower  Laboratory drop tower  Two aggregates collide in free fall  Two falling cameras, 1.5 m drop height  Velocities from 1 cm/s to 3 m/s Beitz et al., in prep.

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Low-Velocity Collisions 2cm diameter, 50% filling factor, velocity: 10 mm/s 2cm diameter, 50% filling factor, velocity: 1.8 m/s

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Fragmenting Collisions  bouncing for v < 20 cm/s  fragmentation with mass transfer for v > 20 cm/s Beitz et al., in prep. also see poster by Jens Teiser et al.

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Revised Fragmentation Threshold? Beitz et al., in prep.

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates 4. Fragmentation with Mass Transfer Kothe, Güttler & Blum, accepted by ApJ

Güttler & Blum: A New Growth Model for Protoplanetary Dust Aggregates Kothe, Güttler & Blum, accepted by ApJ 4. Fragmentation with Mass Transfer II

Thank you for your attention! This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft (DFG) under grant Bl 298/14-1 and by DLR under grant 50WM0936. We thank René Weidling, Eike Beitz, and Stefan Kothe for providing their unpublished data. Additional information on the presented model can be found in Güttler et al. (2010, A&A) and Zsom et al. (2010, A&A).