City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of New Pension Accounting Requirements Under GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68 September 2013.
Advertisements

Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) Overview: Sweeping Changes for Defined Benefit Pension Plans Presented by David S. Boomershine, Senior Actuary Boomershine.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 An electronic presentation by Norman Sunderman Angelo State University An electronic presentation by.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to House Appropriations Committee _____________________________________.
League of Minnesota Cities Fiscal Futures Policy Committee August 28, 2013 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 17 Pensions.
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide 17-1 Chapter Seventeen Pensions Pensions.
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Pension Accounting Chapter 17
Communicating the Facts on GASB 68
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
GASB 68 Employer Training Presenters: Shelley Johnson Foster & Foster System Actuary for LASERS and TRSL Artie Fillastre LASERS Chief Financial Officer.
Pension Funding Risks & Possible Method Changes Alan Milligan Chief Actuary.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Employee Benefits Gavin Aspden Head of Innovation and Technical Development 8 September 2009.
Chapter 21: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota An Overview of GASB 68 for Cost-Sharing Plans Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
GASB 45 at SMCCCD District Committee on Budget and Finance October 3, 2006.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
Inside the New GASB Pensions Standards Municipal Analysts Group of New York February 15, 2013 Thad Calabrese, Assistant Professor, NYU Dean Michael Mead,
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
IAS 26 – Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans Wiecek and Young IFRS Primer Chapter 36.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
THE FINANCIAL REPORTING WORKSHOP 25 TH AND 29 TH AUGUST 2014 HILLTON HOTEL, NAIROBI IAS 26 ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING BY RETIRMENT BENEFIT PLANS 1.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
Unfunded Actuarial Liabilities For a Defined Benefit Plan: UAL t = AL t – F t ”Funding Ratio” = F t / AL t We can calculate this Unfunded Actuarial Liability.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 FCERA Benefits and Reserves January 11, 2006 P.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Governmental Accounting Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits Local Government Corporation.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
PricewaterhouseCoopers IAS 19 Employee benefits. PricewaterhouseCoopers Objectives and scope Accounting and disclosure of Short term employee benefits.
Governmental Accounting and Standards Board Pension Accounting Changes September 10, 2013.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Regional Transportation District Salaried Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Plan Presented by: Terry Bright January 13, 2015  Foster City, CA  Denver,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
20-1 An arrangement whereby an employer provides benefits (payments) to retired employees for services they provided in their working years. Pension Plan.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Other Post Employment Benefits
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
GASB 75 Employer Reporting Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
10/28/2014 The Municipal Analysts Group of New York What’s New With the GASB and What Does It Mean for Municipal Credit? Mr. Bean.
Beth Wright Managing Director
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
GASB 67 and 68: Pension Fund Reporting
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
Presentation transcript:

City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014

2 October 1, 2013 Valuation Review

3 Basic Funding Equation

4 The Annual Required Contribution (ARC) for the 2013 and 2014 fiscal year is $912,745 and 748,978. The 2013 ARC is equal to 87.38% of estimated participant compensation. The 2014 ARC is equal to 101.6% of estimated participant compensation Expected employee contributions for the 2013 plan year are $80,622. Expected employee contributions for the 2014 plan year are $59,103.

5 Analysis of Actuarial Experience Total Normal Cost decreased from $480,722 for the 2013 fiscal year to $305,201 for the 2014 fiscal year. As a percentage of estimated payroll, the decrease was from 46.02% to 41.40%. Participant salaries were slightly higher than expected. The actuarial value of plan assets increased approximately 10% due to investment earnings assuming mid-year cash flow. We anticipated an increase of 7.5%. The market value of assets increased approximately 11%.

6 Smooth unexpected investment return over 4 years Reduces volatility of ARC Development of Actuarial Value of Assets

7 Development of Actuarial Value of Assets continued…. a)Market Value of Assets as of 10/01/2012$12,571,796 b)Contributions/Transfers1,092,332 c)Benefit payments(499,162) d)Expenses(32,593) e)Expected Interest on (a, b, c, and d)967,538 f)Expected Value of Assets as of 10/01/2013 (a+b+c+d+e) 14,099,911 g)Market Value of Assets as of 10/01/201314,565,895 h)Current year excess appreciation/(shortfall) (g-f)465,984 i)Adjustments to market value (sum of deferred amounts)750,622 j)Actuarial value of assets (g-i)13,815,273

8 Deferred Asset Gains/(Losses) Plan Year Allocation Year $59, $59,097$(197,913) 2012 $59,097 $(197,912)$299, $59,096 $(197,912) $299,524 $116, $(197,912) $299,523 $116, $299,523 $116, $116,496 Total $236,387 $(791,649) $1,198,094 $465,984 Deferred$0 $(197,912) $599,046 $349,488 Adjustment to market value (sum of deferred amounts) $750,622

9 Valuation History Deposit calculations are based on the plan’s actuarial funding method and the City’s funding policy. The City’s funding policy has been to calculate the Annual Required Contribution equal to the City’s Normal Cost plus an amount to find the unfunded Frozen Initial Liability over 30 years. Plan Year Beginning10/1/201310/1/201210/1/201110/1/2010 Total Normal Cost (% of Estimated Payroll) $305,201 (41.40%) $480,722 (46.02%) $452,071 (34.13%) $673,627 (39.58%) Employee Normal Cost$59,103$80,622$100,221$129,320 Employer Normal Cost$246,098$400,100$351,850$544,307 Annual Required Contribution (% of Estimated Payroll) $748,978 (101.6%) $912,745 (87.3%) $762,010 (57.5) $953,218 (56.0%)

10 Funded Status Present Value of Accrued Benefits: The comparison uses the asset values divided by the present value of all benefits accrued to date. The liability measure does not include a provision for future service accruals or salary increases. Present Value of Future Benefits: Ultimately, the plan will need to fund the Present Value of Future Benefits. This present value assumes future salary increases and service credits. It is the present value of the projected benefit payable at retirement for each current plan participant. The funded status is a measurement of the plan’s assets compared to the benefit liabilities. The value of these benefit liabilities on either an “accrued” or “projected” basis. Another measure that we have not shown includes the plan termination liabilities. The actual cost to terminate the plan would be based on annuity purchase rates at the time of termination.

11 Plan Year Beginning10/1/201310/1/201210/1/201110/1/2010 Plan Assets Market Value Actuarial Value * $14,565,895 $13,815,273 $12,810,101 $12,248,259 $10,102,657 $10,788,956 $9,370,501 $10,186,540 Present Value of Accrued Bens Funded % (Market Value) Funded % (Actuarial Value) $16,618,695 88% 83% $15,251,081 84% 80% $12,443,511 81% 87% $11,519,812 81% 88% Present Value of Proj. Bens Funded % (Market Value) Funded % (Actuarial Value) * Limited to 120% of MVA $19,817,057 74% 70% $19,144,638 67% 64% $16,608,976 61% 65% $17,853,094 52% 57% Funded Status

12 Actuarial History Plan Year Beginning10/1/201310/1/2012 Liability (Accumulated Plan Benefits) Active Vested Terminated/DROP Retired Total $6,134,429 2,332,937 8,151,329 $16,618,695 $5,881,963 3,263,910 6,105,208 $15,251,081 Liability (PV Projected Plan Benefits) Active Vested Terminated/DROP Retired Total $9,332,791 2,332,937 8,151,329 $19,817,057 $9,775,520 3,263,910 6,105,208 $19,144,638 Asset Information Market City Contributions Pension Payment $14,565,895$12,810,101 $746,022 $499,162

13 Actuarial History Plan Year Beginning10/1/201310/1/201210/1/201110/1/2010 Lives Covered Active Vested Terminated/DROP Retired Total Salary Increases Actual Expected 7.2% 6.6% 4.4% 7.4% 3.2% 7.4% 3.0% 7.5% Investment Return Market Actuarial Expected 11.11% 10.09% 7.50% 19.34% 6.81% 7.50% (0.44)% (1.65)% 7.75% 10.53% 0.98% 7.75%

Entry Age Cost Method (possible new Method) Active Present Value of Projected Benefits Total Normal Cost Sum Equals Spread evenly over each Participant Working Career Times Interest Equals Annual Required Contribution Note: Results will vary depending on assumptions used. Administrative expenses paid from Trust are added to Normal Cost each year. Initial unfunded plus future Gains/Losses spread over 15 years Amortization Amounts

Defined Benefit Plan Sponsors are in a Challenging Environment Plan Sponsor Law changes Accounting Changes Market Conditions Administrative Complexity Forecasting & Projections Plan Design Review Asset Liability Modeling Frozen Plan Solutions Bundled Services Principal Financial Group

GASB Statements 67 & 68 Statement No. 67 (Financial Reporting for Pension Plans) replaces Statement No. 25. Statement No. 68 (Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pension) replaces Statement No. 27. Key matter from GASB Board is that these statements are completely separate from funding calculations and policies 16

17 GASB 67 Will divorce accounting and funding  funding policy is established separately Approved 6/25/2012. Statements available from GASB in Aug 2012 Effective Date: – Fiscal year beginning after June 15, – Statement No. 67 does not significantly change present framework under Statement No. 25. Enhances Note to Financials Disclosures –Some of the key information to be included in the Note disclosures Plan description Information on investments and policies Deferred retirement option program information (DROP) Components of net pension liability (NPL) Significant assumptions (especially those related to the determination of the discount rate)

GASB Statement No. 68 Effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, Implementation Guide released January 30, Significant in that this will likely require a second report each year (similar to private sector) The Net Pension Liability will move from notes to entity’s balance sheet. NPL is a measure of plan assets vs. plan liabilities. Pension Expense (PE) will now be calculated (similar to FASB expense for private sector). Immediate (or shorter) recognition of some components is expected to lead to volatility. Pension Liabilities include future salaries and service along with COLAs if written in the plan or effectively automatic EAN (% of pay) is the required cost method for attribution 18