Response to Intervention: A Standards- aligned System for Student Success High Quality Standards-aligned Curriculum and Research-based Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
SIOP Co-Teaching Goal:
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
D62 Response to Intervention
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Ingham ISD RtI District Leadership Team March 8, 2010.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PaTTAN-Harrisburg Update Angela Kirby-Wehr Director, PaTTAN-Harrisburg Response to Instruction and.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
1 Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21st Century Teaching and Learning December 8, 2009 HOMEROOM 3 Fair Assessment & Materials and Resources.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Response to Intervention: A Standards-aligned System for Student Success High Quality Standards-aligned Curriculum and Research-based Instruction.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Physical Education
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Response to Intervention: A Standards- aligned System for Student Success High Quality Standards-aligned Curriculum and Research-based Instruction

Training Outcomes Participants will: Assess the alignment of their core programs to the PA Standards Define the term scientifically-based Identify effective principles of design and delivery of core instruction Develop an awareness of criteria used to evaluate core reading and math programs Analyze strengths and weaknesses of core reading and math programs Develop an action plan to strengthen the district’s existing core reading program

Goal A standards-aligned curriculum delivered with fidelity using differentiated, effective instructional practices should meet the needs of 80% of students!! Core programming and instruction is the foundation of all that follows in the RtI process. Without this solid base, all later instructional decisions are suspect.

Core Programs: Serve as the base of reading/math/behavior instruction Provide complete instruction in the key components of reading/math/behavior Are designed for all settings and all students Are preventive and proactive Incorporate a high probability of student proficiency (80%)

Core Programs also: Align student materials and assessments Provide small and large group instructional activities Scaffold to support initial learning and transference of skills Provide ongoing cumulative review

Questions Is my core curriculum standards-aligned? Is my core program research based? Is my core instruction differentiated to meet the needs of all learners? Is my core instruction delivered using effective instructional practices? Is my core instruction delivered with fidelity? How can I know this??

Implementation of a School-wide Approach to Address the Reading, Mathematics and Behavioral Needs of All Students Conduct Benchmark/Outcome Assessment for All Students ( PSSA, PVAAS, 4 Sight, Formative Assessments), Universal Screening of Academics and Behavior is Conducted for All Students; Continuous Progress Monitoring; Progress Monitoring Data used to drive instruction and intervention.; All students receive the Standards aligned Core Curriculum. ALL Staff (Gen, Sp Ed, Title, ESL) Assume an Active role in Instruction in the Curriculum ALL Students Receive High Quality, Research-Based Instruction in the General Education Setting; High- Quality Instruction and Intervention Using Data to Inform Instruction, Ensure that Researched- Based Instruction and Intervention Strategies are Implemented with Fidelity Support Resources and Materials along with Supplementary Interventions are Necessary to Help Students Not Making Sufficient Progress Research-Validated Interventions are Implemented Based on the Type, Level and Intensity of the Individual Student’s Need SAS and RtI: The Connection

Pennsylvania ’ s Standards-Aligned System

Is our core curriculum standards aligned?

Standard-alignment ‘Look fors’ 1.Evidence of an annual planning process that reviews PSSA Proficiency, PVAAS and local data analyzing proficiency on standards and eligible content within and across grade levels. Are there curricular holes for all or any subgroup? PSSA (PSSA Data Interaction, GROW Network) PVAAS Other Assessments (DIBELS, 4Sight, Discipline Referrals, Drop out Rate, etc.

Phase 1 ORGANIZE and REVIEW DATA RtI –Data driven process Phase 1 ORGANIZE and REVIEW DATA RtI –Data driven process Phase 2 ANALYZE DATA and DISCOVER “Root Cause” RtI –Data teaming process Phase 2 ANALYZE DATA and DISCOVER “Root Cause” RtI –Data teaming process Phase 3 PLAN SOLUTION *RtI Strategy Phase 3 PLAN SOLUTION *RtI Strategy *RtI connection: The RtI strategy may be used as one of the “vital few” research validated strategies to assist schools with improving student performance. Figure 1: The Three Phases of a Continuous Improvement Planning Framework  Summative Assessments  Formative Assessments  Perceptual/Demographic Data Phase 1 ORGANIZE and REVIEW DATA Phase 2 ANALYZE DATA and DISCOVER “Root Cause” Phase 3 PLAN SOLUTION Main Idea  Multiple data sources  Balance of local and state assessments  Current state of student achievement, based ONLY on student data  Highest-priority Areas of Strength and Areas of Concern  Underlying causes of current state of student achievement  Potential improvement strategies  Student achievement improvement targets  Action Sequence…in Steps! Key Components  PSSA Data  PVAAS Data  4Sight Assessments (or equivalent)  Locally relevant assessments  Guiding Questions for “root cause” analysis  “Vital few” research-based or promising strategies  NCLB/AYP target  Action Sequence:  Step 1: DATA  Step 2: DESIGN  Step 3: DELIVERY  Step 4: DEVELOPMENT OF PEOPLE  5:DOCUMENTA-TION

Standard-alignment ‘Look fors’ 2.Evidence of periodic curriculum mapping in reading and math. 3.Evidence anchors and eligible content are addressed in teacher lesson planning. 4.Evidence teachers understand the flow of the curriculum and standards within and across grade levels.

Standard-alignment ‘Look fors’ 5. Evidence of effective use of 4Sight, DIBELS, AIMSweb or other benchmark systems 6. Grade level planning sessions that set grade- wide goals to achieve benchmark targets in reading, math and/or behavior.

Complete the Standards- aligned Core Program Component of the Core Program Review Tool

Is our core program research-based?

What is Scientifically-Based Research? Definition Activity NCLB 2001 IDEA 2004 Reading First

Scientifically-Based Research True scientific model Long–term duration Sampling procedures Researcher bias Contrast with other educational research

Reading MUST Explicitly Address: Key elements of scientifically-based core programs includes explicit and systematic instruction in the following: – Phonological Awareness – Phonics – Fluency – Vocabulary – Comprehension

Math MUST Address Concept Standards; – Numbers and Operations – Measurement – Geometry – Algebraic Concepts – Data Analysis and probability

As well as: Process Standards: – Problem Solving – Reasoning and Proof – Communication – Connections – Representations

As Well as: The Five Strands of Mathmatical Proficiency – Conceptial Understanding – Procedural Fluency – Strategic Competence – Adaptive Reasoning – Procedural Disposition

Behavior Characteristics Expected behaviors are defined and explicitly taught across all settings and supported by all staff. A system of school-wide positive behavior support is in place. Effective instructional practices are the base of effective positive behavior support. Data gathering process for skills addressed in the behavior core (School-wide Information System, etc)

Behavior Characteristics Expectations and consequences are consistent, known and understood by staff and students. A system is in place to positively reinforce appropriate student behavior. Staff utilizes de-escalation techniques with inappropriate student behavior.

Program Evaluation Resources  PSSA Blueprint Florida Center for Reading Research. [Website.] Oregon Reading First. [Website]  What Works Clearinghouse 

Program Evaluation Resources  Best Evidence Encyclopedia   K-12 Mathematics Curriculum Center  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics  National Science Foundation   National Math Panel  dex.html dex.html

Research-based ‘Look fors’ 1.Evidence of consideration of research-based issues in the material selection process. 2.Evidence supplemental programs were selected/implemented to fill gaps in the core programs selected. 3.Evidence of professional development around the critical research features of reading and math content.

Complete the Research-based Core Program Component of the Core Program Review Tool

Is our core instruction differentiated to meet the needs of all learners?

Differentiated Instruction Seeks to “... provide varied learning options in a classroom to make curriculum and instruction the best possible fit for learners who, though they have many things in common, differ in some important ways from one another.” (Tomlinson, 1998)

Differentiation means: Meeting the needs of all students through: Whole Group Instruction Small Group Instruction – Same Ability Small Group Instruction- Mixed Ability Student Pairs One on One

What Happens? In a differentiated classroom, the teacher plans and carries out with assistance varied approaches to content, process, and product in anticipation of and response to student differences in readiness and/or interest.

Differentiated Instruction ‘Look fors’ 1.Evidence the staff has received training in differentiated instruction and co-teaching. 2.Evidence the teachers have received the student data they need to plan for differentiated instruction.

Differentiated Instruction ‘Look fors’ 3. Evidence the schedule provides for planning time to facilitate differentiated instruction? 4. Evidence the schedule provides for ‘all hands on deck’ resources during reading and math instruction.( All staff is available to support core instruction)

Complete the Differentiated Instruction Component of the Core Program Review Tool

Is our core instruction delivered using effective instructional practices?

Remember: Effective Instruction

10 Effective Teaching Principles 1.Engaged Time 2.High Success rates 3.Opportunity to learn content 4.Direct and supervised teaching 5.Scaffolded instruction 6.Critical forms of Knowledge 7.Organizing, storing and retrieving knowledge 8.Sameness taught 9.Strategic Instruction 10.Explicit Instruction Ellis, E. S., et. al. (2000)

9 Essential Instructional Strategies 39 1.Identifying similarities and differences 2.Summarizing and note taking 3.Reinforcing effort and providing recognition 4.Homework and practice 5.Nonlinguistic representations 6.Cooperative learning 7.Setting objectives and providing feedback 8.Generating and testing hypotheses 9.Cues, questions, and advance organizers Classroom Instruction That WorksClassroom Instruction That Works by Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock.

Effective Instruction ‘Look fors’ 1.Evidence of professional development in research-based effective instructional practices. 2. Evidence that implementation of effective instructional practices are monitored and supported by administration and/or peer processes.

Complete the Effective Instruction Component of Core Program Review Tool

Are all aspects of our core instruction delivered with fidelity?

Fidelity of Implementation Core programming and effective instruction are the foundations of all that follows in the RtI process. Without this solid base, all later instructional decisions are suspect. Without fidelity, all bets are off!! How do we know if it is true?

Fidelity of Implementation Of the Core Program Of Programs Supplemental to the Core Of research-based Instructional Practices

Fidelity ‘Look-fors’ 1. Adequate uninterrupted instruction time Reading-90 minutes Math-60 minute 2. Publisher developed fidelity of implementation checklists. 3. Generic effective instruction checklists (

Fidelity ‘Look-fors’ 4. The principal’s observation of teacher performance through classroom visits and observations conducted during the instructional period for the targeted content/ subject area on a regular basis. 5. Checklists of integrity of instruction completed by teachers as self‐check measure. 6. Checklists of integrity of instruction completed among teachers as peer‐check measures. 7. Implementation of checklists by content specialists or curriculum supervisors working with classroom teachers.

Complete the Fidelity Component of the Core Program Review Tool. Complete Scoring Summary and set Priorities. Action Plan

That Is: Data indicates that the school’s standards-aligned curriculum delivered with fidelity using differentiated, effective instructional practices meets the needs of 80% of students!!

Supplemental Activity 1 Carousel Activity on Instructional Design

Tier 3: Interventions for A Few Students Tier I: Foundation Standards Aligned Instruction for All Students Tier 2: Interventions for Some Students Culminating Activity

Instructional Design Allocation of time Connection to supplemental materials Grouping strategies – Implemented – Flexible Active student engagement Effective classroom management High levels of academic learning time

Supplemental Activity 2 Core Reading Program Evaluations Analysis Activity

Resources Armbruster, B. & Osborn, J. (2001). Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy. Batsche, G., et al. (2005). Response to Intervention: Policy Considerations and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc. Brown-Chidsey, R. & Steege, M. (2005). Response to Intervention: Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice. New York: Guilford Press.