Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Implementation and policy overview Directors of General Insurance,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solvency ii: an overview Lloyds May © LloydsSolvency II May Contents Solvency II: key features Legislative process Solvency II implementation.
Advertisements

The Benefits and Challenges of Implementation of Basel II in Europe José María Roldán | 27 Sept 2005.
Quantitative Challenges of Solvency 2. Bruce Porteous, Standard Life. Challenges in Quantitative Risk Management for Insurance, ICMS, 14 India Street,
Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Other approvals Sid Malik Head of Department, Life and Pensions.
Solvency II regulatory reporting
Experience of the UK market in Social Security, Pensions and Insurance Regulation Dermot Grenham 25 November 2014.
Presentation of the ECB Framework Regulation Organisational aspects
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
1 The insurance industry and the financial crisis London Insurance Institute London, 17 March 2010 Prof. Karel VAN HULLE Head of Insurance and Pensions.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
Solvency II Alberto Corinti
INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF PENSION REGULATORS AND SUPERVISORS CENRTAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN REGIONAL NETWORK Investment of Pension Funds: Challenges for the.
Overview of the Legislative Process
1 Solvency II Part 1: Background Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Standard formula appropriateness for life and general insurers.
Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Internal models Gareth Truran Head of Department, London Markets.
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
Andreas Weller, Head of IT Roadmap for the implementation of the new COREP and FINREP in XBRL, 31 th May 2012.
XBRL as a tool for supervision Arnoud Vossen Chairman CEBS Expert Group on Financial Information.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
The Basel Committee’s Approach
BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION 1 Cross-Border Supervisory Cooperation under the Revised Basel Core Principles and Basel II 6th Annual International.
After the crisis: Changes in Regulation in Europe... - the most important trends and influences upon the insurance market Michaela Koller, director general,
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Regulatory expectations and current good practice Charles Cattell The Cattellyst Consultancy.
Our Changing Future Unit Linked Fund Governance George McCutcheon FIA MSc– Director, Financial Risk Solutions 18 Sep 2013.
!+# Scott Robertson Michael Eakins December 2003 Principles and Practices of Financial Management (PPFM) Younger Members Convention.
CEBS in Brief. The Lamfalussy approach The Lamfalussy approach was first implemented in the securities field following the recommendations of the Committee.
1 INTRODUCTION OF MULTIFUNDS IN THE BULGARIAN PENSION SYSTEM. READINESS FOR THE START! БАДДПО Nikola Abadjiev Chairman of BASPSC International Conference.
© 2002 KPMG NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS 11 October 2002 FINANCIAL SERVICES.
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
Implications of the introduction of ICAS+ before SII Stuart Robinson 1 May 2013.
SUERF Annual Lecture Risk Management – A supervisor’s approach Gabriel Bernardino EIOPA Chairman Helsinki, 22 September 2011.
European insurers' preparedness for Solvency II Janine Hawes, Director 6 November 2013.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) Worldbank Global Development Learning Network The Advanced Program in Accounting.
4. Solvency II update Catherine Beech 9 October
, 2014 Introduction to Captives and the Bermuda Domicile.
Lisbon comitology in practice – a Commission perspective on the financial services sector Jan Ceyssens European Commission – DG Internal Market and Services.
Institute Seminar on the Impact of Basel II A European Perspective on Basel II implementation Institute of International Bankers New-York Danièle Nouy.
Future of Credit Risk Management: Supervisory Approach to Basel II CIA Annual Meeting Session 4405 Ben Gully Director, Basel Implementation Division Office.
The insurance in EU on the threshold of the third millennium Supervision of the Insurance Industry from the Czech National Bank Perspective Zuzana Silberová.
Solvency II: almost there IIS 43RD Annual Seminar Berlin 9 July 2007
Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 of Solvency II Kathryn Morgan The Association of Financial Mutuals 4 April 2011.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
Implementing the new Directives 12 March 2002 Policy Focus Group.
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
© Copyright Allianz IIS Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk & Global Strategy July 9, 2007 Berlin Helmut Perlet, Allianz SE The Emergence of Solvency.
2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec 2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Implementation of Insurance Core Principles and FSAP Evaluations The Portuguese FSAP experience Gabriel Bernardino Instituto de Seguros de Portugal.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Introduction Press Briefing Frankfurt, 10 January 2011.
Session 6 – Pillar 2: Governance and Supervision Models Conferencia Anual ASSAL-IAIS 2016 Rio de Janeiro, 19 April 2016.
Session 7 – Pillar 3: Transparency versus Confidentiality Conferencia Anual ASSAL-IAIS 2016 Rio de Janeiro, 19 April 2016.
Page 1 Own Solvency and Risk Assessment Jarl Kure Malta 9 April 2010.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
Abcd FSA’s approach to Prudential Regulation - general insurance proposals Peter Hinton Insurance Technical Risk Financial Services Authority May.
SOLVENCY II - PILLAR I Grey areas
Solvency II The first year of implementation José Almaça
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Introduction
CEBS – The Challenges of Supervisory Convergence
ITS and GL Set 2 Main comments on reporting and disclosure
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission
4. Solvency II – Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
CEBS’ role in the CRD implementation
Solvency 2 The final countdown
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
European Commission proposals for data protection
Presentation transcript:

Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Implementation and policy overview Directors of General Insurance, Life Insurance and Financial Policy Chris Moulder, Andrew Bulley and Victoria Saporta

Implementation overview Development of new regime is difficult and demanding Successful Solvency II implementation is a priority for the PRA Finding balance between policy stability and providing information to firms –PRA consultation papers and supervisory statements –Technical actuarial events, website updates and Directors’ letters 2 As implementation approaches and policy is published, more information will be available for all firms via the website and supervisors

Implementation overview Similarities and differences between current and future regimes Currently operating in advanced risk sensitive regime with many firms using complex modelling techniques. ICAS+ has supported this –But internal models are far more complex, expert judgment is subjective and PRA has to make significant decisions in a short space of time ICAS regime has withstood shocks of last decade and PRA understands capital requirements under old regime –But Solvency II is different to ICAS in a number of respects and the PRA is using data collection to calibrate expectations of capital The existing regime expects regular reporting returns from the industry –But Solvency II will give the PRA a far greater quantity of data than ever before to supervise firms 3 Solvency II is changing the operations and procedures of insurers and the PRA

Implementation overview Implementation of the EIOPA preparatory guidelines PRA supervisory statement 4/13 provided a consistent and convergent framework for firms’ Solvency II preparations 4 System of Governance Similar to current Pillar II regime Need more evidence of prudent person principle and outsourcing arrangements Crucial role of Board and support from actuarial function Submission of Information Previously insufficient emphasis on asset composition Increase in frequency and detail, significant effort to be ready for reporting in summer 2015 Forward Looking Assessment of Own Risks Concise, focused on key issues Considers business model and strategy Includes stress and scenario testing Used by the Board Internal Models Long running internal model approval process with ICAS+ to help transition Compressed review timetable Documentation and validation, more focus on assumptions and justifications Preparatory guidelines are an important step towards Solvency II implementation

5 Level 1 – Solvency II Directive Maximum harmonising Rules are being transposed into national law and the PRA Rulebook Level 2 – Delegated Act and Implementing Technical Standards Directly applicable to firms as law, PRA will be enforcing and supervising against those standards Level 3 – Guidelines Generally addressed to National Competent Authorities and/or Member States Addressees are obliged to “Comply or Explain” Addressees to interpret how they comply with these Guidelines Both the PRA and firms will need to adjust to the new EU framework Policy overview - European framework

6 Asset eligibility in the matching adjustment The PRA will not produce a prescriptive list of assets that can/cannot be used for MA Eligibility is determined on a principles basis ‘Non-hedgeable’ risks in risk margin Risk margin has a clear definition in the legislation Longevity risk calibrations should not be influenced by the presence of the risk margin Capital resources under Solvency II – availability of group own funds Groups need to consider both legal and regulatory restrictions when considering limitations on availability Policy overview - resolving uncertainty

7 Short term Models - balancing the use of internal models, partial internal models and standard formula Quantifying other risks: Pensions risk Diversification benefit Quality of capital Third country branches Looking ahead Utilising the Bank’s analytical capacity Policy overview - current policy questions

8 Q4 2014Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q Transposition 31 March 2015 Implementation 1 January 2016 Delegated Act published on 10 October Up to six month scrutiny period for EP and Council on DA Set 1 Guidelines published Public consultation on set 2 ITS and Guidelines Set 2 Guidelines published Post- transposition issues CP23/14 published – Other approvals Further CPs due in Q4 – including reporting and pensions Further information – including more on reporting and branches European timeline Domestic timeline Timeline to Solvency II implementation