Adequate Yearly Progress Report (AYP) BARBARA SIMS – AUGUST 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.

Advertisements

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

AYP Status Determination in Smart Accountability Six Steps to Status.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.

Red Oak CSD August, District / School ReadingMath Other Academic Indicator Red Oak Community School System ParticipationMet AYP Goal AssessmentMet.

Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.

By Bobby Schueller, Brianna Trower ED 446, 11/11/2011.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.

Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

Boyd Independent School District 2012 District Performance/AEIS Report.

AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,

Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.

Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)

Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Annual Student Performance Report September

August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.

Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

AERA March 25, 2008 Delaware’s Growth Model and Results from Year One.

School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.

Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

2nd QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter NOVEMBER 2012.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

Adequate Yearly Progress DE/AEA Mini Summit.

Accountability Scorecards Top to Bottom Ranking February 2016.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.

- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.

African American.

Texas State Accountability

How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12

Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School

Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress Report (AYP) BARBARA SIMS – AUGUST 2013

Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status #Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + Growth Assessment Status ALL Students82 / 83 = 98.80Met AYP Goal(53+0) / 75 = 70.67Missed AYP Low SES48 / 49 = 97.96Met AYP Goal(26+0) / 45 = 57.78Met AYP - Safe Harbor Spec Ed.(IEP)3 / 4 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (0+0) / 3 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 ELL4 / 4 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (2+0) / 4 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic9 / 9 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (5+0) / 9 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 White71 / 72 = 98.61Met AYP Goal(47+0) / 64 = 73.44Missed AYP Multi-Racial2 / 2 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (1+0) / 2 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 Inman Primary - Reading

Inman Primary - Math Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status #Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + Growth Assessment Status ALL Students82 / 83 = 98.80Met AYP Goal(59+0) / 75 = Met AYP - Safe Harbor Low SES48 / 49 = 97.96Met AYP Goal(36+0) / 45 = Met AYP - Safe Harbor Spec Ed.(IEP)3 / 4 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (0+0) / 3 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 ELL4 / 4 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (4+0) / 4 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic9 / 9 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (7+0) / 9 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30 White71 / 72 = 98.61Met AYP Goal(52+0) / 64 = Met AYP - Safe Harbor Multi-Racial2 / 2 = NA Enrolled on Test Date < 40 (0+0) / 2 = NA Calculated Total Tested < 30

Washington Intermediate - Reading Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status #Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + Growth Assessment Status ALL Students169 / 170 = 99.41Met AYP Goal(116+5) / 154 = 78.57Met AYP - Safe Harbor Low SES102 / 103 = 99.03Met AYP Goal(59+4) / 90 = 70.00Met AYP - Safe Harbor Spec Ed.(IEP)15 / 15 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(8+2) / 13 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 ELL9 / 9 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(4+1) / 8 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 African American3 / 3 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 2 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Asian1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic17 / 17 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(7+2) / 14 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White144 / 145 = 99.31Met AYP Goal(105+3) / 133 = 81.20Met AYP - Safe Harbor Multi-Racial4 / 4 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 4 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30

Washington Intermediate - Math Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status#Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + GrowthAssessment Status ALL Students169 / 170 = 99.41Met AYP Goal(131+6) / 154 = 88.96Met AYP - Safe Harbor Low SES102 / 103 = 99.03Met AYP Goal(71+6) / 90 = 85.56Met AYP - Safe Harbor Spec Ed.(IEP)15 / 15 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(8+2) / 13 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 ELL9 / 9 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(7+1) / 8 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 African American3 / 3 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 2 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Asian1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic17 / 17 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(11+1) / 14 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White144 / 145 = 99.31Met AYP Goal(115+5) / 133 = 90.23Met AYP - Safe Harbor Multi-Racial4 / 4 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 4 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30

Red Oak Middle School - Reading Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status#Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + GrowthAssessment Status ALL Students264 / 267 = 98.88Met AYP Goal(134+1) / 242 = 55.79Missed AYP Low SES158 / 161 = 98.14Met AYP Goal(68+0) / 144 = 47.22Missed AYP Spec Ed.(IEP)43 / 45 = 95.56Met AYP Goal(6+1) / 38 = 18.42Missed AYP ELL7 / 7 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(0+0) / 7 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Asian3 / 3 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 3 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic23 / 23 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(6+0) / 22 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Native American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White233 / 236 = 98.73Met AYP Goal(123+1) / 212 = 58.49Missed AYP Multi-Racial4 / 4 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 4 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30

Red Oak Middle School - Math Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status #Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + Growth Assessment Status ALL Students267 / 270 = 98.89Met AYP Goal(171+0) / 242 = 70.66Met AYP - Safe Harbor Low SES161 / 164 = 98.17Met AYP Goal(84+0) / 144 = 58.33Missed AYP Spec Ed.(IEP)43 / 45 = 95.56Met AYP Goal(11+0) / 38 = 28.95Missed AYP ELL10 / 10 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(4+0) / 7 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Asian3 / 3 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(2+0) / 3 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic26 / 26 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(12+0) / 22 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Native American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White233 / 236 = 98.73Met AYP Goal(152+0) / 212 = 71.70Met AYP - Safe Harbor Multi-Racial4 / 4 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(4+0) / 4 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30

Red Oak High School - Reading Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status #Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + Growth Assessment Status ALL Students87 / 88 = 98.86Met AYP Goal(73+0) / 83 = 87.95Met AYP - Biennium Low SES33 / 34 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(27+0) / 30 = 90.00Met AYP Goal Spec Ed.(IEP)9 / 9 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(4+0) / 8 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 African American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic6 / 6 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(6+0) / 6 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Native American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White79 / 80 = 98.75Met AYP Goal(65+0) / 75 = 86.67Met AYP - Biennium

Red Oak High School - Math Participation Display Assessment Display SubGroupNumber Tested / Enrolled = % TestedParticipation Status#Prof + Additional Meeting Growth / FAY = %Prof + GrowthAssessment Status ALL Students88 / 89 = 98.88Met AYP Goal(69+0) / 83 = 83.13Met AYP - Safe Harbor Low SES34 / 35 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(24+0) / 30 = 80.00Met AYP - Safe Harbor Spec Ed.(IEP)9 / 9 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(4+0) / 8 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 ELL1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(0+0) / 0 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 African American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Hispanic7 / 7 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(6+0) / 6 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 Native American1 / 1 = NAEnrolled on Test Date < 40(1+0) / 1 = NACalculated Total Tested < 30 White79 / 80 = 98.75Met AYP Goal(61+0) / 75 = 81.33Missed AYP

ReadingMath SchoolParticipation AssessmentParticipation AssessmentOther Academic Indicators Red Oak Comm School District (0000) Met AYP GoalView Met AYP - Safe Harbor Met AYP GoalView Met AYP - Safe Harbor Met AYP Goal Red Oak High School (0109) Met AYP GoalView Met AYP - Biennium Met AYP GoalViewMissed AYPMet AYP Goal Red Oak Middle School (0209) Met AYP GoalViewMissed AYPMet AYP GoalViewMissed AYPMet AYP Goal Inman Primary School (0418) Met AYP GoalViewMissed AYPMet AYP GoalView Met AYP - Safe Harbor Met AYP Goal Washington Intermediate School (0445) Met AYP GoalView Met AYP - Safe Harbor Met AYP GoalView Met AYP - Safe Harbor Met AYP Goal Decisions:

Adequate Yearly Progress School Year Red Oak School DistrictParticipation RateAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ReadingMET MathematicsMET Other Academic Indicator: MET Red Oak High SchoolParticipation RateAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ReadingMET MathematicsMET (Biennium)Missed - Watch Other Academic Indicator: MET RO Middle SchoolParticipation RateAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ReadingMETMissed -SINA -3 MathematicsMETMissed – SINA 3 Other Academic Indicator: MET Washington IntermediateParticipation RateAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ReadingMETMissed – SINA 2 MathematicsMETMET Safe Harbor Other Academic Indicator: MET Inman PrimaryParticipation RateAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ReadingMETMissed - Watch MathematicsMETMissed - Watch Other Academic Indicator: MET