Presented to: By: Date: February 1, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft in the National Airspace System The Certification Path EASA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

NATO FINAS Cdr Max Snow, Royal Navy Chairman, NATO FINAS
Global Safety Management: Revolution or Evolution? Update on Sport and Recreational Aviation.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Ce document est la propriété intellectuelle de Dasssault Aviation.Il ne peut être utilisé, reproduit, modifié ou communiqué
Presented to: COSCAP SA By: Aaron E. Wilkins III / Ajay Kumar Date: April 2011 FAAs Presence in South Asia An Overview of Technical Assistance Provided.
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
Timothy E. Gowen NATO Ad Hoc Airworthiness Group
JARUS A harmonized approach to UAS rulemaking. What is JARUS? JARUS is the Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on Unmanned Systems The group aims at drafting.
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
Unmanned Aircraft Systems EUROCONTROL ATM Integration
UAV: EASA and ICAO activities
1 Aircraft Accident Investigation The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.
Federal Aviation Administration SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR AIRPORT OPERATORS.
Date: October 16, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Research and Technology Park of New Jersey (ARTP) Presented to: American Society for Quality.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System (SMS) at Airports : Principles APEC TPT-WG AEG-SAF Jim White, Deputy Director.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration By: Ken Jacobs FAA Airport Planning and Environmental Division APP-400 Date: March 2, 2011.
Casa RPAS regulatory Development
Karen T. Carey & Dan Wakelee. Background  Potential as tools for research and teaching  Design, selection, operation & analyses of sensor data  Cover.
Ken Jacobs Airport Planning & Environmental Division March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration 33.
Installation Requirements Paperwork Trail Difficulties
Benedetto Marasa ENAC Deputy Director General 1. – Cooperation in the development of: Safety regulations Standards Licensing measures Projects of mutual.
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
Drones in the Legal Environment Gene Betler, CLVS CTTS AMA, AUVSI, & Small UAV Coalition member.
Operational Considerations in the Certification of TAA Slide 1 Operational Considerations in the Certification of Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA) Robert.
GROUP PRESENTATION AVIATION DOCUMENTATION DAV 2113 BADRULMUBSYIR BIN BABOO PB DEVAKUMAR A/L SANGGARALINGAM PB MUHAMMAD HANIF BIN ABD MUJAMIL.
Integrated Pest Management Symposium Progress and Challenges With Integrating UAS Into the National Airspace System Robin Koch Program Director, Aviation.
© ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. ASTM International Committee F38 Vision: Routine, safe UAS operations in civil airspace through standardization.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: In-flight Icing Users TIM By: Tom Bond Date: February 25, 2015 FAA Icing Steering Committee.
International Civil Aviation Organization Unmanned Aircraft Systems International Standards Progress Leslie Cary Secretary UAS Study Group Technical Officer,
Unmanned Aircraft Systems - UAS
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
TPC Meeting | April 30 – May 1, 2014GAMA | Washington, DC E. Restructuring of Airworthiness Standards - Status of Part 23 & ASTM Standards - Strategy for.
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
FAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Update
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
Greg Werner, ATP, CFII - SynergyWerks Derrick Lue, P.E., PTOE – Parsons Brinckerhoff Transpo2012 October 28 – 31, 2012 Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Unmanned.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
SUA Process Overview FAA JO
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
UAS and NAS A glance at FAA guidelines and challenges PEAK 3 1.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Presented by: Deborah Germak To:FLC National Meeting Date:April 29, 2010.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems. What is a UAS? What is a DRONE?
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems “The Basics” ASPRS Conference San Diego, CA Cherlynn Jones, Air Traffic.
Air Line Pilots Association, International Shared Skies: Safe Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Captain Sean Cassidy 1 st Vice President National.
UAS in the NAS Technology Working Group Out-Brief Suborbital Science Technical Roadmap.
“ Global Safety Management: Revolution or Evolution?” Aircraft Certification.
MAPPS members do big things in the profession…and for the profession. FAA’s UAS Aviation Rulemaking Committee UAS ARC Beyond Visual Line-of-Sight Operations.
1 DFRC SUAS Program Operations and Risk Management Approach for Small UAS Presented to the Certification Working Group 6/26/2008 Brad Flick/DFRC Chief.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #2 – FAA Oversight September 18th, 2012.
UAS Operations in the Golden Triangle Mike Hainsey Executive Director Golden Triangle Regional Airport.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
~ RPAS use and regulation of civil Air Traffic Control point of view Acceptable and reasonable rules are needed Mr. Kornél Szepessy CEO 3-4th of November.
Brief Introduction to ASSURE & ARDC Mississippi Airports Association
DACSC TG3 (UAS Funding) Recommendations for the Near Term
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
Emerging Technology Converging Regulations
Certificate of Waiver or Authority
FAA Building Blocks Leading to UAS Integration Emerging Trends
IAOPA Participation Work Efforts IAOPA (and IAOPA Affiliates) are currently participating on the following workgroups that are focused on Integration.
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
The Future of Delegation
San Francisco Fire Department
Regulatory Impact Analysis for Enabling Regulations: The Federal Aviation Administration's Small UAS Rule Deborah Vaughn Aiken, Phd Director of Regulatory.
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: February 1, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft in the National Airspace System The Certification Path EASA UAS Workshop Doug Davis, Manager, UAPO

2 Federal Aviation Administration Topics Do No Harm Access Today Access Tomorrow

3 Federal Aviation Administration Do No Harm UAS Must not degrade the current level of safety UAS must be treated like aircraft, thats what they are Collision between Manned/Unmanned must be avoided

4 Federal Aviation Administration Access Today – Non-Segregated Airspace Certificates of Authorization/Waiver –State or Public Aircraft only –Over 100 issued annually Experimental Airworthiness Certificates –Over 17 Issued –8 in the queue Draft Experimental Policy being finalized FAA/DoD Memorandum of Agreement –Allows access 20 lbs and under in Class G –Over DoD owned/leased property

5 Federal Aviation Administration New Mexico State Univ Cooperative Research and Development Agreement Creates the first UAS Flight Test Center Why NMSU? –Experience with UAS Foundational SOPs in place and exercised Ability to collect and process significant data Solid and credible safety record Over 8 years operational experience Experienced UAS personnel –Location – Its not the end of the world, but you can see it from there….. Very sparsely populated Low density Air Traffic Climate is favorable In coordination, expect to be finalized any day FAA gets data, data, data

6 Federal Aviation Administration Southwest New Mexico Airspace McGregor Range Holloman AFB WSMR NMSU/PSL COA Call Up Areas Las Cruces Airport Stallion AAF Condron AAF * * * * NMSU/PSL COA >12,000 sq mi Significant airspace access Adjacent to WSMR * Biggs AAF

7 Federal Aviation Administration FAA/DoD Joint UAS Lab FAA Technical Center engaged Establishing a Joint UAS lab at the FAA Tech Center –Funding initially from DoD & ATO –Proposed modeling and simulation –Involving ATO/JPDO/NGATS FAA soliciting industry for potential partnerships –Opportunity to share technical development information

8 Federal Aviation Administration Access Tomorrow Small UAS Rulemaking –Pursuing a small UAS Rule (SFAR) –Creating an Advisory Rulemaking Committee –Completing a safety analysis on potential: Size Speed Location –Will probably start out very conservative –Potentially Nontraditional Certification Approach Web-based, self-certification –Frequency Spectrum Issues in densely populated areas at low altitudes are a BIG concern –Applicants required to submit operational data routinely

9 Federal Aviation Administration Access Tomorrow Restricted Category Guidance –Clearly recognize unique applications –No Type Certifications applicants seen for some time –Proposals Include: Pipeline survey Crop survey Aerial photography Geographical survey –Working with an applicant

10 Federal Aviation Administration The Future for Rules Part 23, 25 or what? Too soon to tell Leaning toward new part Build it by SFARs and the restricted applications –Data, data, data

11 Federal Aviation Administration Safety Target Lack of defined and experiential data cannot support a Safety Objective of The FAA Small Airplane Directorate developed AC after reviewing years of manned airplane accidents, operational data and based on a need to improve safety in aircraft certified before the requirements of Another assumption used in developing AC C was that for small airplanes the number and complexity of the systems where minimal. Reliance on the systems for safe flight was also minimal. This allowed for a reduction in the quantitative safety objective numbers required by 1309 that resulted in an overall safety improvement. These assumptions are not valid for used by UAS since the unmanned aircraft is highly reliant on systems for safe flight and operational aspects of UAS differ significantly from manned aircraft. Complex systems demand