1 Noise differentiated track access charging Joint position of railway representative bodies Workshop on Noise differentiated track access charges And.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
Slide: 1 Website: DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
How to apply for a Grant EIDHR / NSA CBSS How do you apply for an EU Grant? You apply by sending: A Concept Note in response to one of the two Calls.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 ECCP Aviation Working Group Mandate and draft work programme Directorate C – Air and Chemicals.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
COMPENSATION SCHEME IN CANADA Dr. Namatie TRAORE Compensation Experience in Western Hemisphere – Closing Workshop, July 2008, Panama.
INTERREG and Tacis budgets Main differences: No breakdown of the Tacis budget between the partners is required; No strict limits for the project management.
Shaping the railway of the 21st century Implementation of Retrofitting freight fleet Analysis of the EU funding possibilities Rail Freight Noise Abatement.
Subsidy Contract Lead Partner seminar October 2008, Riga Arina Andreičika Managing Authority
Characteristics of projects in EU research programmes
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Radmila Trkulja, Head of the CHU of Republika Srpska.
TEN-T R EVIEW AND “C ONNECTING E UROPE F ACILITY ” CPMR PROPOSALS LISBON 6 March 2012.
UIC/CER - MB/RT - 11/2002 ___________________________ Noise Policy - European perspective Mads Bergendorff Environmental advisor UIC ___________________________.
ERGEG Advice Comitology Guidelines on Fundamental Electricity Data Transparency Florence Forum 13 December 2010 Bente Danielsen.
Local Support for Council Tax The Consultation Document.
Shaping the railway of the 21st century 25 October 2005, Paris Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe UIC/UIP/CER Action Programme Noise Reduction.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Director, Northwest Universities European Unit
Stakeholder meeting on the SHIFT²RAIL Strategic Master Plan Manuel Pereira, IST Lisbon ERRAC Vice Chairman 20 th June 2014, Brussels 1.
Railway Days, , Bucharest, Romania Railways in CEE countries – infrastructure investments Miroslaw Kanclerz Manager CEE.
EP Transport Committee Fourth Railway Package - public hearing Brussels, 7 May 2013 Better governance of the railways – a freight perspective Tony Berkeley.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
116 November 2009CER The Voice of European Railways European Commission Communication: «Sustainable future for transport» - a CER perspective UNECE, Geneva,
1 Silencing freight trains A small country’s perspective Martine Serbruyns BeWag 27 april Brussels.
The variable cost approach to pricing John Thomas Deputy Director, Economic Regulation Office of Rail Regulation, UK 9 July 2004.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
RAILWAY UNDERTAKINGS & INFORMATION EXCHANGE ICT Interoperability Issues in Rail Freight - European Railway Conference.
European Commission - Directorate General for Energy and Transport 1 European transport infrastructure charging policy Christophe Deblanc DG TREN.
BEWAG (UIP) General assembly European Railway Agency Jean-Marie DECHAMPS, Head of Sector (Safety) Brussels, 27 April 2015.
1 Noise and rail What about Belgium ? Martine Serbruyns Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport Brussels - 28 april 2014.
Energy Forum Compensation arrangements for indirect EU ETS cost effects Presented by Vianney Schyns Brussels 9 June
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
1 The Voice of European Railways Libor Lochman Deputy Executive Director, CER Prague, 12 March 2009 Interoperability of the Railway Infrastructure Architecture.
OVERVIEW OF NAS PROBLEMS AND THE WAY FORWARD Dr. Katalin TÁNCZOS BUTE.
Working Party on Rail Transport – 63rd session Geneva, 18 November 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
108 October 2013CER The Voice of European Railways Building the WBSA railway land bridge. Providing frameworks for a seamless transport from Far East to.
EU Infrastructure charging and investment policy Christophe Deblanc DG TREN.
Die Ingenieurwerkstatt Pilot project and innovation programme “Silent Rail Freight Traffic “ (Silent Rhine) Status of the pilot project: noise reduction.
Communication Temporary framework for State aid measures European Commission DG Competition 21 January 2009.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Workshop B Preparation of an application: FOCUS ON BUDGET Project development seminar Prague, 2 nd February 2010 Luca.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Cooperative compliance at the crossroad of different legal frameworks – Cooperative.
1 ERFA Annual Event Brussels, Welcome. Irmtraut Tonndorf ERFA Chair.
BEWAG General Assembly 10 May, 2015 Brussels UIP News Maria Price, DPhil. Manager, European Affairs.
in Croatian Track access charging system
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes, April 2016
Jaroslav Straka, F4 Czech Republic and Slovakia, G.1 – Transport
European Rail Freight Association (ERFA), represents the independent rail freight sector across the whole value chain : Railway Undertakings (RUs) Wagon.
Meeting of the WG on Rail Transport Statistics 2-3 April 2009
The new regulatory framework for suburban railways
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
EC-­activities and strategy to reduce rail freight noise
Noise – an operational and economical challenge for wagon keepers BeWag & UIP Workshop, April 28, 2014, Brussels Markus Vaerst Chairman UIP Topical.
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Presentation transcript:

1 Noise differentiated track access charging Joint position of railway representative bodies Workshop on Noise differentiated track access charges And other rail noise developments at the EU level Brussels, 27 th April 2010

2 Introductory Remarks Reduction of rail noise is a common goal for all actors of the sector in order to ensure the environmental friendly character of the rail transport mode and to maintain the high levels of acceptance of this transport mode in society However the efforts must stay proportionate among all transport modes. Sector urges to consider Rail freight's market conditions Budgetary situation of Wagon Owner No revenue losses for IMs or other actors in the sector; Therefore, an impact assessment is vital to estimate the effect on the freight traffic and a possible modal shift from rail to road if track access charges are increased

3 Sector position – central proposals of the KCW study supported The sector agrees with the central proposals of the KCW study: Retrofitting of freight wagons is the most effective method to reduce rail freight noise Due to fierce competition wagon owners do not have sufficient resources to finance the retrofitting of their fleet The level of complexity and administrative costs must be kept to a minimum Any incentive system should neither weaken the overall market share of the freight sector nor disadvantage any freight market player

4 Evaluation of the study on NDTAC (KCW) - 1 Direct funding It will be more difficult to manage funding under NDTAC than under Direct Funding that appear to be easier, cheaper and quicker to introduce The sector recognises that any kind of discrimination must be avoided, but is convinced that direct funding was rejected prematurely. Financing Unacceptable risk of funding NDTAC bonuses through the overall increase of track access charges; consequence: risk of modal shift from rail to road NDTAC is unacceptable as long as various systems apply for TAC calculation in individual MSs (disproportion EU 15 x EU 10) The internal/external financing and problems of rail freight companies & wagon owners are not taken into account sufficiently

5 Evaluation of the study on NDTAC (KCW) - 2 CEE/SEE too little consideration of Central & Eastern-Eastern Europe (only two from CEE), so the specific issues of CEE/SEE have not been considered adequately Wagons with tyred wheels would cost far more to convert into quiet wagons because composite brake blocks cannot be installed in these wagons the replacement of the wheelsets to be considered; consequence: necessity of special funding Timing Timing is not discussed Considering the high retrofitting cost of K-blocks for the time being the serial retrofitting cannot be considered until LL blocks are available (by more than one manufacturer) – not before end Every effort must be made to speed up homologation of LL-blocks – in this regard manufacturers play a key role The legislation should therefore not set timetables which require retrofitting before LL blocks are available

6 Evaluation of the study on NDTAC (KCW) - 3 Complexity & costs Full impact assessment missing for charging NDTAC routing of wagons train composition varying technical characteristics of wagons Important cost elements were not considered: Design /homologation costs for each wagon type; The opportunity cost of taking wagons out of service Those that would be incurred by the infrastructure manager The marginal costs of using TAF-TSI based on wagons; The cost of the billing system; The cost for administering the proposed clearing entity The costs of the proposed control and enforcement body

7 Evaluation of the study on NDTAC (KCW) - 4 Wrong assumptions / missing considerations The NDTAC will have to be far higher than the 3-9 cts/wagon km (equal to 0,9-2.7/train km) proposed to cover all related expenses and to set the desired incentives. Note that in eight member states, the track access charge for freight trains in 2006 was less than 2 /train km so NDTAC would have major impact! Reasons: The lower value of LL-block retrofitting costs is much lower than the sector estimates (~1250 instead of 500 for 4-axled wagons) The additional operating costs of LL and K blocks, due to greater wheel wear have been underestimated (by more than 50%). Wrong assumption of an average yearly mileage of km, the real one of the mainly used fleet is around km The report limits its proposals on the relations between IM and RU. It fails to analyze whether and how wagon owners would be provided with incentives to retrofit wagons more actors means more transaction costs !

8 How to reduce railway noise quickly and efficiently? Funding and Financing – results of the sector (UIC) study Possible funding source?

9 Recent statements of the DG MOVE Director General to be supported A bonus system should be put in place for less noisy wagons the implementation of such a bonus system shall not be preceded and undermined by an overall increase in track access charging The concept of self-declaration of wagon-kilometres run with less noisy wagons supported In fact no need for sophisticated technical applications / adaptations of TAF TSI after completion of retrofitting exercise!

10 Planning of further steps – must be realistic! Actions must be carefully planned! Retrofitting of wagons needs to be realistically scheduled Bonus system must ensure that administrative and transaction costs are as low as possible Bonus system shall be introduced in all member states operating standard gauge continental railway, otherwise it will accentuate distortions and thus result in negative effects on rail freight corridor developments Public funding should preferably go directly to wagon owners to ensure high level of incentives The sector knowledge should be welcomed!

11 Model proposed by the sector- 1 (presented in the frame of the Leiser Rhein programme) Noise & mileage-based wagon bonus system: National authorities should fund the retrofitting of freight wagons by means of a noise reduction bonus Starting at the date when LL brake blocks are ready for serial production and economically viable Terminating when vast majority of the eligible freight wagons is retrofitted (approx 8 years) The noise reduction bonus to be granted on the mileage basis travelled on lines of the respective national networks The noise reduction bonus compensates investment costs as well as the additional operating costs and transaction and administrative effort

12 Noise & mileage-based wagon bonus system: The maximum amount of aid per wagon results from the total expenditures caused by the retrofitting (investment and additional operating as well as transaction costs) The brake equipment will be registered at the NSA - based on NVR The railway undertakings communicate the mileage of the wagons carried by them on trains on the network concerned on an annual basis - based on GCU Both, NVR and GCU existing systems enabling an European harmonized rollout of the model The Bonus should be paid directly to the wagon owners The annual application for bonuses will be based on the wagon mileage recorded by the keepers/owners After the retrofitting is finished: no need for a NDTAC scheme as an incentive for retrofitting! Model proposed by the sector- 2 (presented in the frame of the Leiser Rhein programme)

13 Bonus allocation process No contractual or financial relationship Administrative costs for getting information from Infrastructure Manager Train performance Calculationof bonus Railway undertaking Mileage of wagon Wagon keeper/ or Wagon owner? Pays bonus Claims bonus Pays bonus/ factored in renting price The State Compensation (MACsor dedicated fund) Risk of leakage effect, since various RU-WO constellations are possible 1. KCW studys option Infrastructure Manager Train performance Calculationof bonus Railway undertaking Mileage of wagon Wagon keeper/ or Wagon owner? Pays bonus Claims bonus Pays bonus/ factored in renting price Member States / EU? Compensation (MACsor dedicated fund) Pays bonus 1. KCW studys option 2. Rail sectors option

14 Summary – actions needed both on the sector and legislators' side Focus efforts on rapid homologation of economically viable LL-blocks The Commission is invited to support the Europe-train project Bonus addressed directly to wagon owners Self declaration principle No impact for IMs Wagons with no other changes but that in the material of the brake blocks (especially LL-blocks) should be exempted from any mandatory repeated authorization procedure by authorities The Commission should support that retrofitted wagons accepted by one MS get cross acceptance The Commission should support coordinated engineering

15 Further sector involvement Legislative proposal of the Commission Addressing noise related track access charging in the frame of the Directive 2001/14 The sector shall be consulted before presenting proposals for modifications of the aforementioned directive The Commission Working group? To spell out various issues related to the design of a noise related track access charge and co-draft new regulations (e.g. new annexes to Directive) To achieve a harmonized approach to the structure of noise related track access charged The sector expects to be invited to participate very soon

16 Thank you for listening!