Work Package 7 Argumentation for teacher education in science Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain (María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Juan Ramón.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
Advertisements

Consistent teaching – K-6 Science and Technology
PORTFOLIO.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
Workshop Report. Introduction e-Educational Leadership in ICT workshop, Cebu. A component of ACEC’s ‘Bridging The Digital Divide’ initiative. Centre for.
1 9-10/01/2007 Kick-off meeting UPDATE
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 Requirements for awarding a doctorate. Dublin descriptors.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © S-TEAM : Science-Teacher Education Advanced Methods This project is funded by the EU’s Seventh Framework.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
An Integrated Approach to TGfU
Central Asian Forum April 23-27, 2012 INTRODUCTION Brian O’Neill.
Research, evidence and engaging learning Profiling the influence of school librarianship Penny Moore
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Science Teacher Education Advanced Methods Project Work Package 6 Work Package 6 Meeting Nottingham, January 2010.
How could Teacher Education contribute to the development of European Citizenship Literacy ?
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
ESERA 2009, Istanbul 01/09/09 From informing to (reforming) learning: new strategies for European research and dissemination of good methods in Science.
University of South Bohemia (USB, Czech Republic) WP6 of the S-TEAM project.
Improving Practical Work in Science Session 1 Secondary.
European Life Sciences Infrastructure for Biological Information ELIXIR
Doris Jorde Doctoral Education in Europe – A closer look at the Bologna process Math and Science Education Tokyo University of Science November, 2010.
TEMPUS UM_JEP Development of Quality Assurance System in Higher Education - QUASYS Promotion of Quality Assurance System at the University of.
Education for Democracy and Human Rights Education: good practices, lessons learned and challenges from ODIHR’s perspective International Seminar on Education.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Anden information Andersen,Krogh & Nielsen Glasgow, UK, Oct ”Motivating to Learn – Learning to Motivate” Designing, trialling and documenting an.
FLIBS June 2015 Biology Category 1 Session 2: Learning Biology within the IB Philosophy.
Skills Online: Building Practitioner Competence in an Inter-professional, Virtual Classroom Canadian Public Health Association 2008 Annual Conference.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Latin: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Ensuring Ownership of PARSEL by Partners.
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
Brussels MST cluster meeting 26/03/09S-TEAM The S-TEAM Project Science-Teacher Education Advanced Methods Geir Karlsen & Peter Gray Presentation for: DG.
Get Newswise Science-related news reports play an important role in informing and influencing public understanding. Young people should be equipped to.
Enriching primary student teachers’ conceptions about science teaching: Towards dialogic inquiry-based learning Ilkka Ratinen, Sami Lehesvuori, Otto Kulhomäki,
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
The Science-Teacher Education Advanced Methods project A coordination and support action under FP7, SiS 2008, action Innovative Methods in Science.
M athematics in A ction Communalities across differences Mieke van Groenestijn Florence, 6 September 2007.
S-TEAM PROJECT: Dialogic Inquiry University of Leeds January 2010 Jaume Ametller and Phil Scott School of Education University of Leeds.
‘Learning to teach inclusively’ Developing the inclusive practitioner: How OERs can support the development of 'Professional Values' in HE. Professor Chris.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Implementing Inquiry Based Science Teaching Through Teacher Networks The SINUS model for educational development in Germany Matthias Stadler, Kiel (Germany)
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network Work Package 1 – Career Management Skills Field visit 1: Integration of career management skills in curricula.
Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 4 Literacy and Quality Teaching Workshop 4 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle.
June’s remodeling 2013 Summer Institutes | Changing Teacher Practice  Changing Student Outcomes Remodeling Session Rolling Out the Reasons for Engaging.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Biology: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
Inquiry Based Science Teaching. Mind the Gap Secondary science is characterized by: – Duality of teaching science for future scientists and also for scientific.
Tempus PROSET Promoting Sustainable Excellence in Testing and Assessment of English Lucie Betáková, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
CASIE MYP Workshop June 21-23, 2011 International Mindedness: From Outside to Inside the Classroom.
Uncovering Critical Thinking in Social Studies Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation with Wally.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Formation and Competence Building of Academic Developers.
Principles of High-Quality Professional Development Dean Richards January 15, 2009.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Project Coordinator: Odilla Finlayson DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY Strategies for Assessment of Inquiry Learning in Science.
PRIMAS: Promoting Brussels, 16/03/2011. Structure The content of the project –Aims –What do we mean by inquiry-based learning (IBL)? –Why IBL & why Primas?
Jena workshop 24/06/09S-TEAM The S-TEAM Project Science-Teacher Education Advanced Methods Peter Gray Workshop for: Friedrich Schiller University of Jena.
C2ME Main findings Jeanine Suurmond, AMC, dept of Public Health, Project leader C2ME 18 September 2015 ‘Culturally Competent In Medical Education’ Amsterdam.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
ECML – a Council of Europe centre promoting excellence in language education Waldemar Martyniuk, ECML Executive Director.
Prof Mpine Makoe Institute for Open Distance Learning 8 July 2015 Nadeosa conference.
Questions, Claims and Evidence: Teaching Argumentation in Science
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Presentation transcript:

Work Package 7 Argumentation for teacher education in science Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain (María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Juan Ramón Gallástegui, Blanca Puig) STEAM Start-up meeting Trondheim, 7-8 May 2009

Participants in WP7: six institutions 4 USC Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain 4 (Prof. María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Juan Ramón Gallástegui, Blanca Puig) 4 UnivBris University of Bristol, UK 4 (Dr. Sibel Erduran, Katie Hall, Xiomei Yan) 4 C.N.R.S., Lyon, France (Prof. Andrée Tiberghien) 4 UHB Université de Haute Bretagne, France  (Ghislaine Gueudet, Gérard Sensevy, Sylvain Laubé) 4 USB University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic  (Prof. Iva Stuchlikova, Miroslav Papacek, Jan Petr) 4 KUT Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania 4 Nijole Ciuciulkiene, Arvydas Palevicius, Regita Bendikiene, Nijole Bankauskiene

Objectives of WP7 4 – To disseminate specialised training resources and related materials to support the teaching and learning of argumentation in science classrooms, as a component of IBST/E.

Background: the relevance of argumentation 4 Argumentation can be characterized as the evaluation of knowledge in the light of evidence 4 Argumentation & use of evidence make part of the scientific competences (UE ‘basic competences’) 4 One of the three dimensions in scientific competence (PISA, policy documents), e.g. 4 “the capacity to draw appropriate conclusions from evidence, to criticize arguments made by other on the basis of evidence and to distinguish among an opinion and a claim supported by evidence” (PISA report)

Contribution of WP7 4 Our contribution is aimed at the development of resources and strategies to support teachers in the design and implementation of learning environments to promote argumentation and the appropriation of the discursive practices of science. 4 It will extend the research from projects as Mind the Gap, RODA (USC), IDEAS (UK), PEGASE (CNRS) 4 WP7 will disseminate training resources and classroom materials to support teaching and learning argumentation in science classrooms, and the development of teachers’ reasoning 4 Professional development programmes will be designed and implemented.

Tasks and principles WP7 4 We will use guidelines and design principles for the design of learning environments to support students’ argumentation, coherent with the design principles for inquiry-based classrooms. 4 Key features: the evaluation of evidence, inquiry perspectives, centred on authentic problems, and the dialogic communicative approach. 4 Outcomes in terms of students’ argumentation skills will provide proof of effectiveness

DeliverablesWP7 DeliverablesWP7 & connections to WPs Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe (18) --- connection to WP2 (UIO) Set of teaching sequences for argumentation for use in teacher education (24) --- connection to WP9 (FSU) Set of teaching sequences for argumentation, for use in schools (30) --- connection to WP9 (FSU) Chapter about argumentation in Science teacher education (30)-- book in WP6 (CYCO) Guidelines for professional development (24)- WP7a Training program in P4CM (18) - WP7b Professional development programme on argumentative competence for new teachers (12) - WP7c

Sub-packages WP7 4 WP7a (CNRS-UHB, France) Guidelines for professional development in argumentation, based on the project PEGASE 46 4 WP7b (USB, Czech Republic)Training program in P4CM (Philosophy for children-Mathematics), focused on creating communities of inquiry 4 WP7c (KTU, Lithuania) Professional development programme on argumentative competence for new teachers

Links among WP7 and other WPs 4 With WP2 Production of report on the state of the art 4 With WP3 Dissemination of SINUS through national workshop 4 With WP6 Book chapter on argumentation in science teacher ed. & links to inquiry 4 With WP9 evaluation of teaching sequences & training programmes 4 With WP10 Dissemination of outcomes

Implementation WP7 4 Collaborative work with teachers to produce and test teaching sequences 4 Teacher workshops through national schemes for teacher education 4 Webpage 4 Dissemination events: University summer courses summerschool 4 Presentation in conferences: ESERA, ERIDOB, NARST 4 Sharing and adapting video data

WP7 4 Thank you!