Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
Roma inclusion and HRE OP in the Czech Republic Prague, May 12, 2011.
Structural Funds Management Mr. Kjell PETERSON Director, West Sweden Office 20 June 2000.
Petr Cerveny Unit Administration and Finance 31/5/2010 Major FP7 Negotiation Issues.
Paying Authorities Structural Funds Financial Management Responsibilities of Paying Authorities See Doc.REGIO/0051/2000 Certify the claim sent to the Commission.
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
CLEARANCE OF ACCOUNTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES RICHARD CROFT.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes. IT systems SFC 2007 and RDIS Brussels, 3 October 2007.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION The new European Regional Development Fund Brussels, 12 October 2006 Committee of the Regions N. De Michelis,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Planning and use of funding instruments
OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Click to edit Master title style 1 How to produce a good final report ? How to treat unfinished, non- operational or suspended projects? Commissions views.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Felix LOZANO, DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
Article 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006: Revenue-generating projects Impact of the revision 2010 Presented by Anton Schrag DG.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
European Union Cohesion Policy
Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners , Centre Borschette (CCAB), Brussels, 9-10 April From ISPA to Cohesion and Structural Funds DG Regio - Ispa.
1 Technical Meeting Closure : Winding-up declaration and Commission procedures Elina Hakonen-Meddings DG REGIO J4 Technical Meeting on.
Closure of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund interventions European Commission Bernard LANGE, DG Regional Policy Laurent SENS, DG Employment,
Meeting of 9 and 10 April Financial rules of the Structural and Cohesion Funds DG Regio - Ispa nkb Financial Management : the n+2 rule Organised.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Annual meeting with the MA of the ETC programmes April 2013 Financial management Juan Lopez Lledo, Budget and Financial mangement, Unit REGIO.A.3.
Financial Management and Control Annual Meeting of ISPA PARTNERS 2003 Preparation for post-accession Management of Community Funds : Nicholas Martyn Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Click to edit Master title style © Dr. Norbert Heller – Verwaltungsbehörde - Preparation of the certified statement of final expenditure: Member States'
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
PRESAGE CTE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING PROCESURES
10/04/20081 TWG of ESF Committee 10 April 2008 Franck Sébert Head of unit DG EMPL/I/1 Relations with Control Authorities Action plan to strengthen the.
Subsidy Contract Lead Partner seminar October 2008, Riga Arina Andreičika Managing Authority
Maurizio Angeli Felicioni ANCI Lazio - National Association of the Italian Municipalities Lazio Main rules for the project implementation: A brief overview.
Characteristics of projects in EU research programmes
Winding-up Declaration and Audit Requirements at the Closure of INTERREG III programmes ( ) Directorate General Regional Policy Audit and.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
“MED P ROGRAMME ” Z ERO C O (2) Z ERO EMISSION CO MMUNITIES F INANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM K ICK O FF M EETING J UNE 17° 18° 2010.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
Eligibility of expenditure Relevant rules and regulations Workshop on Financial Management and auditing Rostock, 3 February 2005 Rostislav Zatloukal.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Workshop on irregularities EEA and Norway Grants Financial aspects related to the irregularities Herdis Bjornevik Svendsen Financial Controller.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Legal framework:
Audit Authority and Auditors Group of “European Territorial Cooperation” Programmes for Lessons to be learnt from the INTERREG IIIB NWE Auditors.
1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Beethovnova 11, 1000 Ljubljana Tel.: (01) Fax: (01) Ljubljana, EU funds absorption and forecast process.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
CLOSURE OF THE EQUAL PROGRAMME - FINLAND Tommi Nordberg Warsaw EQUAL Baltic Sea Seminar.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Michael HILL, DG Regional Policy.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
Budget absorption and automatic decommitment
Presentation transcript:

Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission Thomas BENDER, DG Employment, Social Policy & Equal Opportunities

2 Experience of previous closures shows the importance of anticipation and planning. Presentation concentrates on the main lines of closure : the next important steps – including the deadlines - and the changes compared to day to day implementation. => Lay out: next steps and their deadlines, consequences of delays, n , recommendations. Closure Purpose of the presentation

3 Closure Back to the future Implementation of last operations Final date eligibility of expenditure Administrative process of closure: Final report Winding Up Declaration Statement of final expenditure Conservation of supporting documents 15 months Transmission closure documents Closure bv Comm. 3 years End of conservation period

4 Final date of eligibility of expenditure = date by which: –the expenditure has to be incurred –by the final beneficiary => importance to define the final beneficiary. Laid down in the Programme Decision: Generally, 31 Dec. 2008, but 30 Apr for expenditure incurred by bodies which grant the aid under Article 9(l) of Regulation 1260/99 Possible to have several final dates of eligibility within the same programme according to the type of final beneficiary. Closure Final date of eligibility of expenditure 31/12/0830/04/09 Final date of eligibility or

5 The final beneficiary: Defined in Article 9 (l) General rule: « bodies and public or private firms responsible for commissioning operations » Specificities in the case of state aid schemes and aid granted by bodies designated by the Member States: bodies which grant the aid NOT the final recipient of the aid! Due to the impact on the final date of eligibility important to clearly define the final beneficiary in the Programming Complement (before the final date of eligibility). Closure Next steps: Final date of eligibility of expenditure

6 Practical consequences of the definition of the final beneficiary: Closure Final date of eligibility of expenditure « Usual » case such as grants directly implemented by the final beneficiary and public tenders 1. Expenditure to be incurred (paid) by 31 December 2008 by the final beneficiary who is also the final recipient. Specific cases state aid / aid granted by bodies designated by the Member State 1. Expenditure to be incurred (paid) by 30 April 2009 by the final beneficiary who is different from the final recipient. 2. The expenditure has also to be incurred by the final recipient by 30 April 2009.

7 Case of technical assistance: In what concerns the final eligibility date the same rules apply. BUT for ESF/ERDF, after final date of eligibility it is possible to finance closure administrative steps with technical assistance of OPs IF: 1.Expenditure eligible to the OP (including national rules) 2.The OP is a continuation of the OP (automatic for mainstreamed Community Initiatives) Closure Final date of eligibility of expenditure

8 Extension of the deadline possible in three cases: 1.Significant changes in the socio economic situation and the labour market 2.Cases of force majeure 3.Manifest error attributed solely to the Commission Specific and properly grounded request by the MS before deadline for eligibility of expenditure. Examined by the Commission on a case by case basis depending on the causal link between the justification and the proposed extension. In order to prevent legal uncertainties requests should be submitted as soon as possible. Closure Final date of eligibility of expenditure 31/12/0830/04/09 Final date of eligibility or

9 Modification of programmes : before the final date of eligibility no modification of the financing plan of the programme decision since 31/12/2006 Modification of programme complements: to be approved by Monitoring Committee before the final date of eligibility and submitted to the Commission within one month of their approval by the Monitoring Committee. => Still possibilities to « optimise » the closure by anticipation of potential problems that could be faced with modifications of the Programming Complement or the programme. Closure Next steps: Modification of programmes and PCs Final date of eligibility (FDE) 31/12/08 or 30/04/09 Modifications

10 -Automatic decommitment rule for 2006 will NOT be applied by 31 December more time for national authorities to make checks & send the claim -BUT no additional time for final beneficiaries to spend money Closure SF: Automatic decommitment 2006

11 What is possible after final date of eligibility? Still possible to certify expenditure -But if the 95% threshold of payments by the Commission is reached, the Commission will not issue any payments until final payment. Certification of expenditure by the national authorities and related payments by the authorities. Closure Next steps: After final date of eligibility FDE Closure docs (FDE + 15m) <31/03/10 or <31/07/10

12 Deadline for submission Deadline for submission: – 15 months after final date of eligibility of expenditure – if different final dates of eligibility for a Fund, the last of these dates will be used to calculate the 15 months deadline Closure documents SF: – Certified statement of final expenditure – Final report (approved by Monitoring Committee ) – Winding-up declaration Consistency between documents Closure of multi-fund programmes possible by Fund: send the documents as soon they are ready Closure Next steps: Submission of closure documents FDE Closure docs (FDE + 15m) <31/03/10 or <31/07/10

13 Warning letters will be sent to MS before the 15 months deadline is reached. Closure on the basis of available documents Automatic decommitment Financial corrections Closure Consequences of non- submission of closure documents

14 Start planning as early as possible Tight monitoring of important operations Cofinancing rate by measure to be verified and anticipated Timely identification of interpretative and qualitative problems Preparation of high quality closure documents Timely submission of closure documents Coordination in the MS between the bodies in charge of preparing closure Communication with the Commission to prevent delays Make sure that audit and controls are being done properly and well in advance of closure Follow up and update of irregularities communicated to OLAF Closure Recommen- dations

15 Guidance documents: Structural Funds Closure Guidelines adopted in August 2006 (Decision C(2006) 3424) amended by Decision of April 2008 Closure Guidance documents

16 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!