April 15, 2014. A.Discussion of the Vision Statement for the 2040 LRTP B.Discussion of Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures C.Presentation and Discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Advertisements

Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
The National Context for Smart Mobility John V. Thomas, PhD US EPA Smart Growth Program.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO February 2015.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
September 6, 2011 Summerville Chamber Public Policy Committee.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA NATIONAL FORUM ON PERFORMANCE- BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Regional Visions: 50-Year Transportation Demand Modeling Florida Model Task Force Meeting December 13, 2006.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
2016 Active Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives & Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee March 2, 2016 meeting.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Updated Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives October 20, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
MPO Board Presentation
Public Workshop September 26, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

April 15, 2014

A.Discussion of the Vision Statement for the 2040 LRTP B.Discussion of Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures C.Presentation and Discussion of Draft Constrained Trend Socioeconomic Data Forecast Methodology and Alternative Land Use Scenario.

Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas while providing mobility in a fiscally responsible, energy efficient, and environmentally compatible manner. This integrated system will support economic development, allowing for the effective movement of all people, goods, and services necessary to maintain and enhance our quality of life.

Goals represent the desired end result Objectives are the criteria to achieve each Goal Performance Measures are the specific measurements by which the Plan is evaluated

Federal MAP-21 Implementation Schedule Rulemaking for Performance Measures to be completed Spring 2015 SAFETEA-LU Planning Factors State Florida Transportation Plan – “Horizon 2060” Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan Regional Strategic Regional Policy Plans (SRPP) East Central Florida Regional Planning Council - “East Central Florida 2060 Plan” Expanded TPO Planning Area Northeast Florida Regional Council - “Strategic Directions”

Clear & Succinct Goal Statements New Goal Emphasizing Safety and Security Federal and State Emphasis on Highway Safety and Transit Safety

Goal 1 Provide a Balanced and Efficient Multimodal Transportation System Goal 2 Support Economic Development Goal 3 Enhance Connectivity and Transportation Choices Goal 4 Improve Safety and Security Goal 5 Continue to Provide and Create New Quality Places Goal 6 Provide Transportation Equity and Encourage Public Participation

Objective Balanced Multimodal System Develop a multimodal transportation system that improves the accessibility and mobility to economic centers for all users (vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian) as well as the movement of goods. Objective Roadway Efficiency Minimize congestion and delay on roadways and intersections through projects that improve capacity, provide more efficient use and operation of existing transportation facilities, and reduce transportation demand. Objective Transit Efficiency Provide public transit systems that deliver efficient and convenient transit service.

Objective Financial Efficiency Develop a Plan that maximizes use of all available existing and alternative revenue sources and is financially feasible. Objective Cost Effectiveness Incorporate measures that give priority to projects that provide high benefit- to-cost considerations.

Objective Economic Benefit Develop a transportation system that supports regional and local economic growth and diversity and improves the economic competitiveness of the region. Objective Freight Movement Identify and support safe and efficient truck routes and other facilities that improve freight and goods movement. Objective Access to Intermodal Facilities Improve connectivity and access to rail, port and airport facilities. Objective Transit Access to Employment Support funding of transit service that improves access to employment centers.

Objective Multimodal Transportation Options Provide a range of transportation alternatives to improve mobility for all citizens with special consideration for the elderly, people with disabilities, and those unable to drive. Objective Interconnectivity Between Modes Maximize the interconnectivity of roadways, sidewalks, bicycle facilities, trails, transit and other transportation system components to provide safe and convenient pedestrian, bicycle, transit and motor vehicle mobility. Objective Connectivity Between Activity Centers Enhance regional connectivity to employment, education, health, entertainment and other major activity centers. Objective Connectivity Between Jurisdictions Enhance connectivity between local government jurisdictions within the region.

Objective Roadway System Safety Identify and prioritize improvements to reduce the frequency and severity of crashes, and minimize injuries and fatalities. Objective Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Identify and implement safety programs and enhancements to improve the safety of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Objective Transit System Security and Safety Enhance security of transit systems through appropriate design, monitoring and enforcement programs. Objective Emergency Evacuation Develop a transportation plan that supports emergency evacuation, response and post-disaster recovery; and improves national, state and local security and emergency management functions.

Objective Land Use Efficiency Promote compact, walkable, mixed use development and redevelopment opportunities that encourage a range of transportation options and maximize the effectiveness of the transportation system. Objective Preserve and Enhance Existing Communities Develop a transportation plan with components planned and designed to preserve and enhance existing urban areas and communities. Objective Comprehensive Planning Support local visioning and planning principles by developing a Plan that is consistent with local government comprehensive plans to the maximize extent feasible.

Objective Natural Resource Protection Locate and design transportation facilities to avoid or minimize the impact to natural resources including environmentally sensitive areas, and critical lands, waters and habitats. Objective Air & Water Quality Protection Develop and support a multimodal transportation system that maintains or reduces vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and pollutants that degrade water quality.

Objective Public Involvement Provide opportunities for public participation that is open, inclusive and accessible for all citizens; and develop outreach programs to engage citizens of all jurisdictions and the traditionally under-served and under-represented. Objective Transportation Equity Include provisions to identify the needs of low income and minority populations and ensure that projects in the Plan do not disproportionally burden low income and minority populations, and include measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts. Objective Transit Access to Low Income and Transit Dependent Populations Support transportation investments that improve public transit services for low income and transit development populations to gain access to jobs, schools, health services, and other needed services.

ObjectivePerformance Measure Balanced Multimodal System The Plan incorporates multimodal projects that increase the mobility to economic centers for all users, including pedestrian, bicycle, transit and automobile Roadway Efficiency Percent of lane miles with V/C ratio greater than 1.0 Total daily vehicle hours of delay Average Trip Length The Plan includes Transportation Systems Management (TSM), Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects and programs Transit Efficiency Total transit trips per capita Total passengers per hour Financial Efficiency The Plan includes existing and alternative federal, state and local revenue sources, user fees and private contributions The Plan is financially feasible Cost Effectiveness The Plan includes a prioritization process that incorporates cost/benefit considerations

ObjectivePerformance Measure Economic BenefitJobs created resulting from transportation investments Freight MovementAverage V/C on designated truck routes Access to Intermodal FacilitiesNumber of lane miles on roads connecting rail, port and airport facilities Transit Access to EmploymentPercent of total employment within ¼ mile of transit service

ObjectivePerformance Measure Multimodal Transportation Options Percent of roadway lane miles with sidewalks Percent of roadway lane miles with bicycle facilities Percent of roadway lane miles with transit routes Total miles of multi-use paths and trails Interconnectivity Between Modes The Plan includes projects that provide interconnectivity between modes Connectivity Between Activity Centers The Plan includes transportation corridors connecting designated Activity Centers Connectivity Between Jurisdictions Roadway corridors crossing political jurisdictions have same functional classification and number of lanes Number of transit routes connecting different jurisdictions

ObjectivePerformance Measure Roadway System Safety Crash rates per million VMT Total number of fatalities/severe injuries Bicycle and Pedestrian SafetyTotal number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes Transit System Security & SafetyCertification of Responsible Agencies Emergency EvacuationAverage V/C of evacuation routes

ObjectivePerformance Measure Land Use Efficiency The Plan prioritizes projects that promote TOD or Smart Growth principles, including Complete Streets The Plan promotes compact, walkable, mixed use development and redevelopment Protect and Enhance Existing Communities The Plan incorporates provisions to ensure projects preserve and enhance existing communities Comprehensive PlanningThe Plan is consistent with local government comprehensive plans Natural Resource Protection The Plan minimizes impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and protects natural resources Transportation projects recommended for inclusion in the 5-Year Work Plan should be screened through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process Air & Water Quality Protection The Plan maintains or reduces per capita greenhouse gas emissions Transportation projects in the Plan include provisions for stormwater management

ObjectivePerformance Measure Public Involvement The Plan includes public notice and access to public workshops and meetings to all jurisdictions of the TPO A Public Involvement Plan has been adopted that includes outreach to the traditionally under-served and under- represented Transportation Equity The Plan avoids, minimizes, or mitigates adverse impacts to low income and minority populations Transit Access to Low Income and Transit Dependent Populations Percent of households below poverty level or no auto ownership within ¼ mile of transit service

Necessary input to the transportation model Increase awareness of neighboring jurisdictions’ plans Highlight the connection between land use planning and transportation outcomes Investigate how changes to the land use approach might affect the transportation system

Constrained Trend Socioeconomic Data Similar to the approach of previous LRTP updates Up to date and consistent with Comp Plans Committees supply a check for local accuracy Land Use Alternative Builds on the Trend Forecast Optimizes land use efficiency Collaborative process to test opportunities

Start with data from the 2035 LRTP Update Use the new 2010 base year to correct and update Gather input from LRTP and TCC committees on: Major changes to future land use (e.g. DRIs added or withdrawn) Review of 2035 Employment Projections (ZDATA2 was distributed to LRTP and TTC for review)

New 2010 Base Year What didn’t get built that was expected? What got built that wasn’t expected? New Control Totals for Volusia County 2035 LRTP UpdatePopulation 2000 Actual:443, Actual: 494, Forecast: 692, LRTP Update 2010 Actual: 494, Actual: 498, BEBR Med forecast:592,700

New 2010 Base Year What didn’t get built that was expected? What got built that wasn’t expected? New Control Totals for Volusia County 2035 LRTP UpdatePopulationAnnual10 YR Rate 2000 Actual:443, Actual: 494,6312.2%24% 2035 Forecast: 692,7631.3%13% 2040 LRTP UpdatePopulationAnnual10 YR Rate 2010 Actual: 494, %-0.1% 2013 Actual: 498,9780.3%2.8% 2040 BEBR Med forecast:592,7000.6%6.2%

Comparing 2010 actuals to previous 2015 projections Despite overall growth being lower than expected; some growth did occur in unexpected places ZDATA2 (Employment) was sent to LRTP and TTC committee for comments by April 10th. No comments have been received Request for updated large projects by April 10th. Received input from Volusia County re: Farmton DRI Transferring 2035 growth data to 2040 model TAZ structure (TAZ splits)

New 2040 BEBR Projections for Volusia County BEBRChange2035 PlanChange (a) ,631 (a) , (a) ,9784, ,7008,722529,49230, ,50022,800579,44549, ,50020,000630,68551, ,20016,700662,70532, ,90013, ,763 30, ,70011,800

New 2040 BEBR Projections for Volusia County New BEBRGrowth2035 PlanGrowthFarmton Farmton Growth % of BEBR (a) ,631 (a) , (a) ,978(4,385) ,70013,107529,49230,5142,491 19% ,50022,800579,44549,9537,0914,60020% ,50020,000630,68551,24011,6914,60023% ,20016,700662,70532,02016,2914,60028% ,90013, ,763 30,05820,891*4,60034% ,70011,80025,4914,60039% ,0914, ,6914, ,2914, ,890*4,600 * Based on 10,995 units by 2035 and 23,100 units by 2060 Farmton projection for 2040 is equal to 26% of the overall BEBR growth projected from

Draft of Constrained Trend Socioeconomic Dataset anticipated on April 25 th for review Review TAZ splits by jurisdictions as requested

Highlight areas where compact, walkable development has the most impact Increase jobs/housing balance Support multiple modes (transit, walking) Reduce reliance on regional highway system for everyday trips

An Atlanta study measured: Land Use Mix Density Connectivity Correlated to: Lower VMT More walk/bike trips Lower emissions “This pattern holds true regardless of many other factors … age, whether they had a driver’s license, their household income, vehicles per household, household size, transit accessibility and regional location”

Potential measures of success: Reduce VMT (trip length) Reduce per capita VHT (time spent traveling) Increased transit/walk share of mode split Increased reverse commuting