KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Logical Framework approach Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata.
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS PARA ÁMERICA LATINA Y ÁFRICA LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH HUMANA.
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Results-Based Management
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
The role of assumptions
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Cross-cutting Issues And other things your project document must include.
Impact evaluation: External and internal stakes Impact evaluation seminar - 2 to 6 December, Phnom Penh.
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Pilot Project IEC Materials for Child Friendly City Endah Sri Rejeki INDONESIA.
Evaluation of sector programmes and budget support operations in the context of EU development cooperation 1 st M&E Network Forum 07 to 08 November 2011.
Mothers unwilling to go to clinics Low staff skills Inadequate number of clinics Shortage of drugs High infant mortality rates Commercial pressure for.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
PREPARING FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 27 – 31 May 2013 Bangkok Bangkok Office Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education United Nations Educational,
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Evaluation What is evaluation?
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Building an ENI CBC project
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Project Cycle Management
The Logical Framework Approach
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Day 2 The LogFrame.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Assessing Trust Fund Performance
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Session 2 First steps in the LFA.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT

Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis of Objectives: identification and verification of future desired benefits to which the beneficiaries and target groups attach priority. The product of an analysis of objectives is the objective tree/hierarchy of objectives Analysis of Strategies: critical assessment of the alternative ways of achieving objectives, and selection of a set of ‘feasible’ objective clusters for inclusion in the proposed project. Assumptions: external factors which could affect the progress or success of the project, but over which the project manager has no direct control. They form the 4th column of the Logframe, and are formulated in a positive way, e.g.: “Reform of penal procedures successfully implemented”. If formulated as negative statements, assumptions become ‘risks’.

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT Beneficiaries: are those who benefit in whatever way from the implementation of the project. Distinction may be made between: (a) Target group(s): the group/entity who will be immediately positively affected by the project at the Project Purpose level; (b) Final beneficiaries: those who benefit from the project in the long term at the level of the society or sector at large, e.g. “children” due to increased spending on health and education, or “consumers” due to improved agricultural production and marketing. Effectiveness: the contribution made by the project’s results to the achievement of the project purpose Efficiency: the fact that the results were obtained at reasonable cost and within scheduled time Evaluation: a periodic assessment of the efficiency, effectiveness, impact, sustainability and relevance of a project in the context of stated objectives. It is usually undertaken as an independent examination with a view to drawing lessons that may guide future decision-making.

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT Feasibility: addresses the issue whether the project objectives can really be achieved Impact: the effect of the project on its environment, and its contribution to the wider sector objectives summarised in the project’s Overall Objective, and on the achievement of the overarching policy objectives of the EC Means: means are physical and non-physical resources (often referred to as “Inputs”) that are necessary to carry out the planned Activities and manage the project. A distinction can be drawn between human resources and material resources Monitoring: the systematic and continuous collecting, analysis and using of information for the purpose of management and decision-making. Partner organization or institution: any organisation or institution working with your organisation on a project. They have shared planning and design of the project and are valuable for their role in the project. They share responsibility in carrying out some of the project’s activities. They can include local or international NGOs, CBOs, local authorities or other public institutions, foundations, cooperatives, chambers of commerce, unions, universities, research centres, training centres.

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT Relevance: the appropriateness of project objectives to the real problems, needs and priorities of the intended target groups and beneficiaries that the project is supposed to address, and to the physical and policy environment within which it operates. Results. in the EC’s Logframe Matrix hierarchy of objectives, Results are the tangible products/services delivered as a consequence of implementing a set of Activities. The hierarchy of objectives used by some other donors (and indeed within the context of some EC programmes) refer to these results as ‘Outputs’. Stakeholder Analysis: stakeholder analysis involves the identification of all stakeholder groups likely to be affected (either positively or negatively) by the proposed intervention, the identification and analysis of their interests, problems, potentials, etc.

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: Input indicators: measure the financial, administrative and regulatory resources provided by the Government and donors. It is necessary to establish a link between the resources used and the results achieved in order to assess the efficiency of the actions carried out Output indicators: measure the immediate and concrete consequences of the measures taken and resources used: E.g.: Number of schools built, number of teachers trained. In the EC’s Logframe structure these ‘outputs’ are referred to as ‘results’. Outcome indicators: measure the results in terms of target group benefits. E.g.: school enrolment, percentage of girls among the children entering in first year of primary school Impact indicators: measure the long-term consequences of the outcomes. They measure the general objectives in terms of national development and poverty reduction. E.g.: Literacy rates