TaK - Reason Reason as a Way of Knowing. TaK - Reason 1. Reason (noun) a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc 2. Reason (verb)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Knowledge?. you must believe the knowledge statement your belief in the knowledge statement has to be true your true belief has to be justified.
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 5 Ways of knowing – Reason.
Welcome to Dave Penner’s Presentation on Inductive Reasoning!
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
A summary of common fallacies
4/9/13 CAS plan is due 4/23/13 or earlier; talk to Ms. Gant if you have questions. Quarter 4 TOK Reminders: – Work is due in class on due date – You need.
The Burnet News Club THE SEVEN ‘C’S TRUTH CHECKER The Seven ‘C’s Truth Checker.
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
Some Methods and Interests. Argument Argument is at the heart of philosophy Argument is at the heart of philosophy It is the only method for getting results.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?
“It sort of makes you stop and think, doesn’t it”
“It sort of makes you stop and think, doesn’t it”
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
What is Knowledge?. “organised common sense” Imagine a mental map of reality: your ideas of true and false, right and wrong, reasonable and unreasonable,
Chapter 4: Lecture Notes
What is Knowledge?.
Logic is the study of the principles of correct reasoning associated with the formation and analysis of arguments.
TOK - Emotion And reason.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
The Method Argumentative or Persuasive writings act as an exchange between two or more parties (the Writer and Reader) where one side tries to convince.
“It sort of makes you stop and think, doesn’t it”.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
The Science of Good Reasons
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Informal Reasoning 1/9. Agenda  Introduce Informal Reasoning  Reflect on Informal Reasoning  END GOAL: Is informal reasoning reliable?
SOCIAL STUDIES Unit 1: Thinking Critically. Unit Overview Critical Thinking Perception Thought Patterns Problem Solving Facts Vs. Opinions Propaganda.
 Reason A Way of Knowing.  Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. - Spock.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 12 Evaluating.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
LOGICAL FALLACIES Informal Reasoning.  A fallacy is a failure in reasoning that leads to an argument being invalid.  They are like cracks in the foundation.
Reasoning To understand and analyse how basic philosophical arguments work. Understand basic philosophical terms. Use the terms to identify key features.
John Wisdom’s Parable of the Gardener AS Philosophy God and the World – Seeing as hns adapted from richmond.
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
ToK - Reason 1. Reason (noun) a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc 2. Reason (verb) - to think or argue in a logical manner;
Sight Words.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning AP Language and Composition.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Deductive reasoning. The curious incident An expensive racehorse has been stolen. A policeman asks Holmes if any aspect of the crime strikes him as significent.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
Deductive logic What is it? What is it? How does it work? How does it work? Why does it matter? Why does it matter? All generalizations are false, including.
Reason: Wrap Up 1/16. Agenda Review main points Bad Reasoning Is reasoning certain? END GOAL: For you, is reason a reliable WOK?
ToK Reason 2 Why did we get the smelly creatures part last time? ‘cos we smell?
Unit Four Seminar. Fallacies A.What is a fallacy? 1. A fallacy is a defect in an argument that consists in something other than false premises alone.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE Or OBSTACLE TO IT?
What is it? How does it work? Why does it matter?
Inductive Reasoning.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
If A happens, then B happens then A must cause B
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Informal Logical Fallacies
Rules of Evidence and Objections
Presentation transcript:

TaK - Reason Reason as a Way of Knowing

TaK - Reason 1. Reason (noun) a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc 2. Reason (verb) to think or argue in a logical manner; to form conclusions or judgments from facts, propositions or premises (initial assumptions) What is meant by ‘Reason’?

“He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; and he that dares not reason is a slave” William Drummond TaK - Reason

Rationalism: We can discover important truths about reality through the use of reason alone Empiricism: All knowledge is ultimately based on perceptual experience TaK - Reason

from ‘The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time’ by Mark Haddon There are three men on a train: one of them is an economist, one is a logician and one is a mathematician. They have just crossed the border into Scotland and they see a brown cow standing in a field from the window of the train. The cow is standing parallel to the train. The economist says, “Look! The cows in Scotland are brown”. The logician says, “No. There are cows in Scotland of which one, at least, is brown.” The mathematician says, “No. There is at least one cow in Scotland of which one side appears to be brown.” TaK - Reason

You are presented with the following rule - Every card with a vowel on one side has an even number on the reverse side These are the cards: U U G G Which 2 cards should be turned over in order to find out if this statement is true or false? TaK - Reason

You are a bar-person in a nightclub. The club has the following rule - Every person drinking alcohol must be over 20 years of age There are four situations: Person Drinking Beer Person Drinking Beer Person Drinking Lemonade Person Drinking Lemonade Person Aged 19 years Person Aged 19 years Person Aged 21 years Person Aged 21 years Which two situations should be investigated? TaK - Reason

The two examples are formally identical. Why is it easier to spot the correct answers in the second example? Do your answers reflect something about human thinking in general? TaK - Reason

A Story A businessman had just turned off the lights in the store when a man appeared and demanded money. The owner opened a cash register. The contents of the cash register were scooped up, and the man sped away. A member of the police force was notified promptly. Statements about the story (True/False/Uncertain) 1. A man appeared after the owner had turned off his store lights. 2. The robber was a man. 3. The man who appeared did not demand money. 4. The man who opened the cash register was the owner. 5. The store owner scooped up the contents of the cash register and ran away. 6. Someone opened a cash register. 7. After the man who demanded the money scooped up the contents of the cash register, he ran away. 8. While the cash register contained money the story does not state how much. 9. The robber demanded money of the owner. 10. The story concerns a series of events in which only three persons are referred to: the owner of the store, a man who demanded money, and a member of the police force. 11. The following events are true: Someone demanded money, a cash register was opened, its contents were scooped up, and a man dashed out of the store.

Key points: It is important to be aware of assumptions, and recognize one is making them, though sometimes it will be necessary to make assumptions (due to urgency of decisions, lacking complete information etc) Sometimes it is not practical to have all the facts before making decisions; assumptions are necessary, but can be misleading Assumptions made by individuals (even for the same questions) may be different Increased awareness and sharing of assumptions can improve decision making TaK - Reason

Three kinds of Reasoning  Deductive reasoning  Inductive reasoning  Informal reasoning TaK - Reason

Reason enables us to go beyond the immediate evidence of our senses to acquire new knowledge The path is wet in the morning.... You left your mobile phone either on your desk or in your coat pocket... TaK - Reason

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time.... Sherlock Holmes TaK - Reason

Watchdogs bark at strangers The watchdog did not bark at the thief Therefore the thief was not a stranger The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time.... TaK - Reason Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): "Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?“ Holmes: "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.“ Gregory: "The dog did nothing in the night-time.“ Holmes: "That was the curious incident.”

Deductive reasoning From general to particular All humans are mortal Edmund is human Therefore Edmund is mortal If the ‘assumptions’ are correct (which in Logic are called, ‘premises’) the conclusion has to follow. No if’s and but’s - it’s not a matter of personal opinion, nor is it affected by culture. TaK - Reason

Deductive reasoning From general to particular: Two premises and a conclusion Three terms – each occurring twice Quantifiers (‘all’, ‘some’, ‘most’ etc) This is formally called a Syllogism TaK - Reason All humans are mortal Edmund is human Therefore Edmund is mortal Premise 1 Premise 2 Conclusion Term 1 Term 2 Term 3 Quantifier

There is a scene in a Broadway play where a guest at a party meets a Catholic priest. The guest asks, “Don’t you hear some terrible things in confession?” The priest replies, “Oh yes. In fact when i was just starting out as a priest, the first person who came to confession told me they had committed a murder.” Later on, a newcomer joins the party, and on being introduced to the priest says, “I met you a long time ago, Father. In fact I was the first person to come to you for confession.” TaK - Reason

Deductive reasoning From general to particular: TaK - Reason The first person who came to confession told the priest that he had committed a murder The guest at the party was the first person to come to the priest for confession Therefore the guest had committed a murder

Truth and Validity Truth : concerned with what is the case Validity : only concerned with whether conclusions follow from premises: (All polar bears are footballers David is a polar bear Therefore David is a footballer) Valid – but not true You should not say that an argument is true or false, but that it is valid or invalid. TaK - Reason

1. Argument (noun) an oral disagreement; verbal opposition; contention; altercation: ‘a violent argument’ 2. Argument (noun) a process of reasoning; series of reasons: ‘I couldn't follow his argument’ TaK - Reason

Being careful in arguments: Definitions - Bachelor Anthony is 17 years old. He attends school and lives with his parents. Joe is 17 years old. He left home at 14 to start his own company and is now a millionaire. When not travelling around the world to attend business meetings he lives in his own house and has a playboy lifestyle. Charlie and Chris are homosexual lovers who have been happily living together for 20 years. David has been living with Sue for the last 10 years. They have 3 children. He has never been married and has no intention of ever getting married. Jim is a married to a woman who paid him $50,000 so that she could become a citizen of his country. He has met her once, and they have never lived together. Father Francis is a Catholic priest TaK - Reason

Factual disputes If I think Singapore is south of the equator, and you say that it is north of the equator, our disagreement is easily resolved by reference to an atlas. Verbal disputes This is where the presence of an ambiguous term conceals the fact that there is no real disagreement. As shown in the ‘bachelor’ example, the ambiguity can arise even with words in common use. TaK - Reason

1)A: Dave is the best tennis player at the club. His serve is faster than anyone elses. B: No, Nick is much better! His volleying is amazing. 2) A: National Inc. are doing well. Their sales so far this year are 15% up on last year. B: No, they aren’t doing very well. Profits so far this year are 30% lower than they were this time last year. 3) A: Jenny is a great student. Although her assignments are always late, she always asks perceptive and intelligent questions in class. B: Jenny is one of the worst students I’ve ever met. Her smart answers in class don’t make up for never getting assignments in on time. 4) A: That man just broke the law by driving like that. B: No he didn’t – that was perfectly legal. 5) A: Jim finally got rid of that old computer and bought himself a new one. B: No he didn’t. It’s his roommate’s computer that he’s using. TaK - Reason

Inductive reasoning From the particular to the general (the observed to the unobserved) I have never heard of a human being who didn’t die... then we generalise to... All human beings are mortal Inductive Reasoning allows us to make generalisations about the world. TaK - Reason

Inductive reasoning From the particular to the general (the observed to the unobserved) This first bird can fly... This second bird can fly... This third bird can fly... This fourth bird can fly... This n th bird can fly... Therefore all birds can fly. TaK - Reason ?

Science uses inductive reasoning: Formulates general laws on the basis of limited observations – Metal A expands when heated Metal B expands when heated Metal C expands when heated..... a conclusion? TaK - Reason

Will the sun rise tomorrow? How do you know? How certain are you? TaK - Reason

Deduction general particular Induction TaK - Reason

DEDUCTIONINDUCTION Definition Reasoning from general to particularReasoning from particular to general Example All metals expand when heated A is a metal Therefore A expands when heated Metal A expands when heated; metal B expands when heated; metal C expands when heated Therefore all metals expand when heated Value More certain, but less informative than induction More informative, but less certain than deduction TaK - Reason

What distinguishes good generalisations? Number – you see one dog swimming... Variety – different circumstances; old dogs, young dogs, different breeds... Exceptions – find counter-examples... Coherence – you should demand more evidence to support surprising claims than unsurprising ones Subject area – eg. generalisations tend to be more reliable in the natural sciences than in the social sciences What is a generalisation? TaK - Reason

Give examples of some hasty generalisations Why do you think that people are so quick to jump to conclusions? What is the difference between a prejudice, a generalisation and a scientific law? TaK - Reason

Since strict gun controls were introduced in Dodge City, the crime rate has risen. This shows that gun control does nothing to reduce crime. Jane said she trusted me, and she must be telling the truth because she wouldn’t lie to someone that she trusted. The ends justify the means. After all, if you want to make omelettes, you have to break eggs. Since the English always talk about the weather, if you meet someone who talks about the weather you can be sure they are from England. Since many great scientists have believed in God, there must be some truth in religion. We got on very well on both of our dates together. We are clearly well suited. Let’s get married! Do you want to be part of the solution or part of the problem? The average UK family has 2.4 children. The Smiths are very average people. Therefore they must have 2.4 children. Since no-one has been able to prove that we are alone in the universe, we must conclude that other life forms exist. Are all your family stupid, or is it just you? No breath of scandal has ever touched the Senator. So he must be an honest man. Just as you are more likely to take care of a car that you own than one that you rent, so a slave owner is more likely to take care of his slave than an employer is of his worker. TaK - Reason

Informal reasoning Fallacies (invalid patterns of reasoning) Handout TaK - Reason

Informal reasoning – Fallacies (Invalid patterns of reasoning) Post hoc ergo propter hoc – assume that because B follows A that A must be the cause of B Ad hominem fallacy – attack or support the person rather than the argument Circular reasoning – assume the truth of something you are supposed to be proving Special pleading – making an exception in your own case that you would not find acceptable if it came from someone else Equivocation – using language ambiguously Argument ad ignorantium – claim that something is true on the grounds that there is no evidence to disprove it False analogy – assume that because two things are similar in some ways that they must be similar in some further way False dilemma – assume that only two alternatives exist when there are in fact a wide range of options Loaded questions – a question that is biased because it contains a built-in assumption TaK - Reason

Bad reasoning Ignorance Laziness Pride Prejudice TaK - Reason

Some key points: Through reason we can acquire knowledge about the world that goes beyond the immediate evidence of our senses Deductive Reasoning - from the general to the particular Inductive Reasoning - from the particular to general Inductive Reasoning sometimes leads to our making hasty generalisations which are then reinforced by our tendency to only notice things which confirm them Dangers of Informal Reasoning The main causes of bad reasoning are a combination of ignorance, laziness, pride and prejudice Logic – the art of reasoning, can all too easily give way to Rhetoric – the art of persuasion TaK - Reason

Questions… What constitutes a 'good reason' for belief? Does the nature of reason vary across cultures? Does knowledge always require some kind of rational basis? If knowledge claims cannot be rationally defended, or can be shown to be irrational, should they be renounced? How do beliefs affect the capacity to reason logically and the capacity to recognize valid arguments? TaK - Reason

ToK Essay Prescribed Title 2008: “Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as a way of knowing” TaK - Reason

Reason Perception Should we trust reason rather than perception? Perception Should we trust reason rather than perception? Religion Is religious belief rational or irrational? Religion Is religious belief rational or irrational? Ethics How important is consistency in moral reasoning? Ethics How important is consistency in moral reasoning? Arts What is the relationship between creativity and rationality? Arts What is the relationship between creativity and rationality? History What kinds of bad reasoning can be found in history? History What kinds of bad reasoning can be found in history? Human Sciences Are human beings rational animals? Human Sciences Are human beings rational animals? Maths Can mathematics be reduced to logic? Maths Can mathematics be reduced to logic? Natural Sciences Is there a logic of scientific discovery? Natural Sciences Is there a logic of scientific discovery? TaK - Reason