Gemini Observatory Marianne Takamiya October 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ranking and priorities | | Michael Hilker Ranking of service mode observations and relative priorities Michael Hilker.
Advertisements

1 AAO AusGO : 29 June 2009 Demystifying the Queue at Gemini Observatory AAO Epping - 29 June 2009 Henry Lee Gemini South, Chile.
Integral Field Spectroscopy on Gemini Andrew Bunker (IoA, Cambridge) Euro3D Meeting July 2002 GMOS Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph, optical IFU (Durham)
Multi-band Infrared Mapping of the Galactic Nuclear Region Q. D. Wang (PI), H. Dong, D. Calzetti (Umass), Cotera (SETI), S. Stolovy, M. Muno, J. Mauerhan,
Extragalactic science with the Herschel Space Observatory Marc Sauvage CEA/DSM/DAPNIA Service d'Astrophysique UMR AIM.
Kinematics/Dynamics  Chemistry/dust  Stellar populations  Searches for z ~ 6-7 « Hot » scientific researches at VLT in cosmology Mass Galaxy formation/gas.
NOAO/Gemini Data workshop – Tucson,  Hosted by CADC in Victoria, Canada.  Released September 2004  Gemini North data from May 2000  Gemini.
Imaging Science FundamentalsChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science The LASP* at RIT’s Center for Imaging Science *Laboratory for Astronomy in Strange.
Facilities & Infrastructure Working Groups Meeting UNSW, 17 December 2004 Gemini Warrick Couch, UNSW.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
Wide-Field Science Capabilities at the AAO Stuart Ryder Australian Gemini Office Australian Astronomical Observatory.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Emma Hogan, Gemini Data Workshop, July 19-22, 2010 What to do when things go wrong: Tips and tricks, and the Gemini HelpDesk Emma Hogan, Gemini Observatory.
1 HST Status Cycle 14 TAC/Panels 14 March Telescope and Instrument Status Telescope and support systems are all working well – no unexpected limitations.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
ALMA Proposal Preparation and Submission Eelco van Kampen European ALMA Regional Centre (ESO, Garching) Thanks to Liz Humphrys, Andy Biggs and Paola Andreani.
Commissioning the NOAO Data Management System Howard H. Lanning, Rob Seaman, Chris Smith (National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Data Products Program)
ALMA Proposal Preparation and Submission Liz Humphreys European ALMA Regional Centre ESO, Garching Thanks to Andy Biggs, Paola Andreani, Eelco van Kampen.
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT August 04, 2010.
Gemini Overview of the telescopes Gemini’s core science goals Gemini instrumentation Applying for Gemini time 2001 Observational Techniques Workshop Warrick.
1 R. D. Gehrz 66th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, Columbus, OH, June 23, 2011 The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
Gemini Observatory Results & Lessons Leaned SPIE August 2002 Matt Mountain Jean-Rene Roy Phil Puxley Eric Hansen.
SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.
Observing modes at the AT ATUC Presentations October 2000 Ray Norris CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility.
3D meeting Tenerife July 2002 Ian Parry, Andrew Dean, Dave King, Andy Bunker, Steve Medlen, Jim Pritchard, Rachel Johnson, Anamparabu Ramaprakash, Rob.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
MAXAT-II Woods Hole September Overview Science Drivers Lessons of the past Focusing on Science and Innovation.
Cycle 1 Planning Process B-G Andersson (SOFIA Science Operations Manager) & Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC, May 11, 2011 Mountain View.
Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
ASTRO-F Survey as an Input Catalogue for FIRST Takao Nakagawa (ISAS, Japan) & ASTRO-F Team.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership Gemini Observatory soon to be Five.
Objectives 1. How should Gemini respond in terms of scientific effectiveness to the the current competition from Subaru, ESO and perhaps even Keck? 2.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
1 R. D. Gehrz 67th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, Columbus, OH, June 21, 2012 The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
Monitor of all-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) was designed to be capable of monitoring variability of a medium-sized sample of active galactic nuclei. As of November.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Keck Observatory in the TMT Era Keck Strategic Planning meeting September 18, 2009.
Data Reduction with NIRI Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop Tucson, AZ July 21, 2010 Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop.
WFMOS as a Bridge to the Future for Gemini & Subaru Doug Simons Director, Gemini Observatory.
GSC Report Simon Morris (Durham University, GSC Chair)
Lessons Learned Workshop 24 th August 2002 Success Success Challenges Challenges The Context for Aspen 2003 The Context for Aspen 2003  Looking ahead.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
RUP Deployment RUP Deployment Workflow
GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band Jagadheep D. Pandian Cornell University.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
Photometric Calibration Jorge F. García Yus GEMINI Observatory Barolo 2001.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
HSC Queue Mode Implementation Plan ~ Stage I, II, III ~ Tae-Soo Pyo Subaru Telescope /01/15.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
26th October 2005 HST Calibration Workshop 1 The New GSC-II and it’s Use for HST Brian McLean Archive Sciences Branch.
Black Holes in Globular Clusters Karl Gebhardt (UT)
GSPC -II Program GOAL: extend GSPC-I photometry to B = V ˜ 20 add R band to calibrate red second-epoch surveys HOW: take B,V,R CCD exposures centered at.
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting AI#28. SAE Release Schedule David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC) Julie McEnery (GSFC)
Team Discussion: CLASH DATA RELEASE PLAN September 2013 London.
Wide-Field Science Capabilities at the AAO
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
NIR Spectroscopy at Gemini South
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Detecting Solar System Objects with Euclid
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Gemini Observatory Marianne Takamiya October 2000

Instruments Underway Mauna KeaCerro Pachon

Instruments Underway  NIRI  GMOS  MICHELLE  NIFS  T-ReCS  GMOS  GNIRS  FLAMINGOS-2  NICI  HROS Mauna KeaCerro Pachon

Instrument Availability Summary (Dates indicate first Community access) 1999 UH AOS Gemini-South Gemini-North 2000 OSCIR Op’s Hand-over FLAMINGOS CIRPASS NIRI 2001 GMOS T-ReCS GMOS Op’s Hand-over Hokupa’a-85? PHOENIX 2003 GNIRS HROS LGS ALTAIR NICI FLAMINGOS2 MICHELLE 2002 ALTAIR NIFS

Next Generation Instruments  A near-infrared imager and spectrometer, optimized for MCAO, are likely the next set of instruments to be built within the Gemini program  FLAMINGOS-2 will provide some µm slit spectroscopic capability as well  Imager  Sample MCAO PSF across ~2 arcmin FOV  Nominally 2x2 mosaic of arrays  µm Rockwell devices, either HAWAII-2 or CdZnTe (requires detector development)

MCAO Optimized Spectrometer  Baseline design stems from current GIRMOS d-IFU tech study occurring at ATC and AAO  ~2 arcmin deployment field  µm coverage using 6 detectors  IFUs 12 deployable IFUs total ~0.03” spatial sampling ~1x1” field for each IFU R ~ 6000

Demonstration Science Programs

Hokupa’a Demonstration Science - Plan  K’, H, CO and K-cont imaging of in and around the Galactic Centre to study the distribution of stellar populations vs. distance from Sgr A*  6-8 fields in the GC  2 control fields 3 arcmin along plane  2 fields in “Arches” 10 arcmin North

Hokupa’a Demonstration Science Results  Overview of data:  FWHM (H,K’) = 0.1” ”  9 fields of 20”x20” mapped in H and K’  6 min (K’) / 12min (H) to 40min per field  CO and K-cont on most fields

CTIO K-band 1.5 arcsec 6’ bow shock? 20 stars/arcsec 2 at K~21 IRS7 40”

Astronomy Picture of the Day astropic.htm

OSCIR Demonstration Science: Planning  Four options considered for 10um deep field  ‘Blank’ field survey - rejected FOV too small given mid-IR source counts; sensitivity shallow compared with ultra-deep ISO surveys  X-ray selected fields - rejected No suitable sample of reliable hard X-ray sources  SCUBA-selected cluster fields  SCUBA-selected HzRG fields Strategy is to observe the brightest from both cluster and HzRG lists, four targets in total Some are unknown quantities in the mid-IR; one is a bright-ish ISOCAM detection; one has a good redshift, and there is the potential for serendipity with some less identified (and perhaps higher redshift) counterparts

OSCIR Demonstration Science: Results  OSCIR DS observations not yet taken place… ….but encouraging results (sensitivity, image quality & PSF) from first engineering run

QuickStart Service Observing

QuickStart Overview  QuickStart enables scientific use of Hokupa'a/QUIRC and OSCIR prior to the start of normal operations  The aims are to exercise proposal, planning and operational procedures, refine telescope and instrument performance, train support staff and get data out into the community  Proposals were submitted via the National TACs and ITAC in (what will become) the normal process  Successful applications are being executed by Gemini staff in a service mode Phase II detailed definition performed by Gemini Contact Scientists (in consultation with PI if necessary) Planning and execution of later QuickStart blocks will have direct involvement of National Office support staff from US, UK and Canada (Manual) data processing follows pipeline procedures

QuickStart Proposal Statistics  Oversubscription assumes 420 hr available and nominal partner shares  Likely to be underestimate as some proposals neglected to include significant overheads

0.065 arcsec at 1.65um

Hokupa’a QuickStart Performance  Performance is consistent with expectations  Including AO correction as a function of observing conditions and WFS target brightness, overheads  Will refine web information before CfP  Observing efficiency is consistent with the goal for QuickStart  30% ‘shutter-open’ (cf 15% during dedication imaging)

Semester 2001A Schedule (1 Feb - 31 July 2001)  Announcement and Call for Proposals - 1 Sept  NIRI final (on-telescope) Acceptance Test (AT) continues NIRI passed pre-ship lab AT in May Initial HBF lab characterisation occurred in June-July  NTAC deadline for 2001A normal cycle: end Sept  Specific date varies slightly from partner to partner  Ranked proposals due at Gemini: 22 Nov  ITAC: 13 Dec  Semester 2001A runs 1 Feb - 31 July

Top-Level Operational Constraints for 2001A  All capabilites are made available in shared-risks mode  Baseline instrument availability  Facility: NIRI  Visitor: Hokupa’a+QUIRC, OSCIR  Not CIRPASS, GMOS, other visitor instruments  Operational modes  Queue  Classical  May also be partner-run service mode  Queue & classical modes schedules as blocks  Permit observations of non-sidereal objects  30-50% engineering time

Planned 2001A Phase II Preparation  Require Observing Tool (OT) for NIRI queue observations  Must contain high level of functionality to minimise support staff effort Define NIRI, GCAL and telescope configurations Define telescope sequences Field, position sequence and time visualisation Develop OT library content of commonly-executed configurations, sequences and calibrations to ease user learning curve  Beta-2 version was tested extensively; required development is well-understood  Require database to hold Phase II programs with simple query and reporting capabilities

Observing Tool Beta-2 Features  Target, offset and WFS positions, including graphical representations.  Detailed representation of NIRI OIWFS and vignetting.

Gemini Requirements Update  Available instruments semester 2001A:  NIRI - near infrared OIWFS most likely only at f/14  UH AO - no OIWFS, NGS limiting magnitude R~16  OSCIR - no OIWFS  GMOS  CIRPASS - no OIFWS  Semester 2001A  Proposals deadline was 30 September Use of GSC1  Phase-II we expect to use GSC2

Gemini Requirements Update  Until final delivery of GSC 2.2 (January 2001), we will continue to use a combination of GSC 1, GSC2.1.X, USNO and Hipparcos/Tycho to support guide star selections in future semesters.  Once GSC 2.2 is delivered, it will be made available via our server to successful queue/classical observers, i.e. those who have been awarded time and are in Phase II.  AO programs require good astrometrics, proper motions, and classification to select adequate AOGS: R<16-17 with known proper motions and not too extended.

DSS II  CADC delivered two copies in one band (red) to Gemini ~August 1999  Gemini does not have a large enough jukebox to house all DSS II disks. Working a deal with NOAJ.  ~1/3 of DSSII is installed in Subaru jukebox and accessible via our secure network to Gemini since May  MOU has been signed two weeks ago by Directors of Subaru and Gemini. Green light (lawyers) to load rest of CDROMs in Subaru jukebox in early November.  For political reasons, good to have % of sky covered.  From users perspective: quick way of knowing if area is included in delivered survey.

GSC II  Delivery to Gemini started September 1999  Still not widely used within Gemini because of decrease sky coverage compared with existing catalogs (GSC1, USNO, 2MASS). “Customers” (read: proposal writers and observers) prefer to use catalogs that will provide them with all sky coverage.  Fluxes in standard photometric system.  For political reasons: good to know % of sky covered.  From an users perspective: Useful to know if star/area is contained in delivered catalog (maybe a mute point now but…)