The Value of Old Data: Trends in GSA Data Repository Usage Matt Hudson, Geological Society of America, 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder CO 80301 INTRODUCTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background Measuring the effectiveness of community outreach: The Community Medical School project Laura L. Haines, MLS, Outreach Librarian Dana Medical.
Advertisements

28 April 2004Second Nordic Conference on Scholarly Communication 1 Citation Analysis for the Free, Online Literature Tim Brody Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia.
For Details Visit : or For any Help Contact the Librarian EBSCOhost 2.0.
Journal Citation Reports on the Web Don Sechler Customer Education – Science and Scholarly Research
Mine Action Information Center
1 “China’s Remarkable Progress in Science and Technology” Akito Arima P resident of Japan Science Foundation, Former Minister of Science and Technology.
N EW WAYS TO TRACK SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY : T HE H - AND G - INDICES.
OPEN ACCESS Your Publisher of Choice DE GRUYTER OPEN Society-Pays Publishing Program.
Data citation from the perspective of a scholarly publisher Lyubomir Penev TDWG Data Citation Workshop, New Orleans, Oct 2011 ViBRANT.
T.Sharon-A.Frank 1 Internet Resources Discovery (IRD) Internet/WWW Technical Background Thanks to Miki Even-Haim and Yoram Dahan.
Shou Ray Information Service Co., Ltd.
INCITES PLATFORM NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)
1 How to Evaluate Research Impact of Journals. 2 Why Journal Impact?  Librarians - can support selection or removal of journals from their collections,
Journal Citation Reports on the Web. Copyright 2006 Thomson Corporation 2 Introduction JCR distills citation trend data for 7,600+ journals from more.
Using Journal Citation Reports The MyRI Project Team.
Journal Citation Reports – The Impact Factor
Not all Journals are Created Equal! Using Impact Factors to Assess the Impact of a Journal.
ⓒ UNIST LIBRARY UNIST Institutional Repository ⓒ UNIST LIBRARY
Research you can use Emerald Group Publishing Research & Publishing 1 April 2014 RADKA MACHKOVA Business Manager – South Easter.
Journal Impact Factors and H index
PubMed/How to Search, Display, Download & (module 4.1)
THOMSON SCIENTIFIC Web of Science 7.0 via the Web of Knowledge 3.0 Platform Access to the World’s Most Important Published Research.
Using the H-index to Measure Czech Economic Research and Czech Researchers’ Habits Related to Research Papers T. Cahlík, H. Pessrová.
Urban Growth and Structure Kreg Walvoord And Hillary Campbell.
Several social media platforms are used to alert readers to recently published papers as well as to providing fora for authors to discuss their work or.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Solar Physics Board Meeting Rio de Janeiro July, 2009.
Open Access Ayesha Abed Library BRAC University October 30, 2011.
Introduction to Online Journal System (OJS) using Latin America Journals Online (LAMJOL) Sioux Cumming INASP.
November 8, Global Competitive Internet Usage Forecasting Across Countries and Languages June Wei Department of Management/MIS College of Business.
Personalization features to accelerate research Presented by: Armond DiRado Account Development Manager
Understanding Virtual Users: Connecting Research to Practice Lynn Silipigni Connaway Consulting Research Scientist Clifton Snyder Software Engineer October.
Usage log analysis of the contents of institutional repositories: user domains, types of referrals and content attributes Usage log analysis of the contents.
Searching Scholarly Literature: A Google Scholar Perspective Anurag Acharya.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 21/06/2011 COASTAL Google Analytics Report March 2011 – June /03/2011 – 08/06/11.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 09/12/2010 COASTAL Google Analytics Report September 2010 – December /09/2010 – 08/12/2010.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 10/01/2012 COASTAL Google Analytics Report September 2011– December /09/2011 – 08/12/11.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 18/10/2011 COASTAL Google Analytics Report June 2011 – September /06/2011 – 08/09/11.
35 th Consultative INIS Liaison Officers Meeting Vienna, Austria October 2010 Usage Metrics Subgroup Status Report Debbie Cutler (augmented by Taghrid.
THOMSON REUTERS RESEARCH IN VIEW Philip Purnell September 2011 euroCRIS symposium Brussels.
EOSDIS FY2010 Annual Metrics Report Prepared By: Hyo Duck Chang Adnet, Inc. Brian Krupp Adnet, Inc. Lalit Wanchoo Adnet, Inc. February 2011.
April 9, 2003Santiago, Chile The ISI Database: Reflecting the Best of International and Regional Research Keith R. MacGregor Sr. Vice President The Americas,
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
SWE.org. Not what we wanted to hear … but we needed to listen Some choice findings from our initial member survey “Make the material more user friendly.
RSC Publishing Karlheinz Lamprecht Regional Sales Manager, Europe RSC Publishing.
Communication and response management reporting dashboard February 2010.
The ISI Web of Knowledge nce/training/wok/#tab3.
Bibliometrics toolkit Website: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Further info: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scopus Scopus was launched by Elsevier in.
EOSDIS FY2009 Annual Metrics Report Prepared By: Hyo Duck Chang Adnet, Inc. Brian Krupp Adnet, Inc. Lalit Wanchoo Adnet, Inc. March 2010.
JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS James Cook University Celebrating Research 9 OCTOBER 2009 Steven Werkheiser Manager, Customer Education & Training ANZ Thomson.
A case study in the rewards of long term data sharing : 26 years of the MRC Psycholinguistic Database Michael Wilson STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
An International Open Access and Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal Sponsored by the “Brazilian Diabetes Society” ✤ Poor language as a barrier for authors.
EOSDIS FY2008 Annual Metrics Report Prepared By: Ed Sofinowski SGT, Inc. Donna Rahmani SGT, Inc. March 2009 ESDIS Project GSFC Code 423.
DE GRUYTER OPEN PUBLISHING PROPOSAL 2January 2016Publishing Proposal.
17th International Conference on Grey Literature A New Wave of Textual and Non-Textual Grey Literature 1-2 December 2015, Amsterdam Dr Dobrica Savić
Assessing Hyperthermia and Cancer Research Productivity Shu-Wan Yeh 1 *, Shih-Ting Hung 1, Yuan-Hsin Chang 1, Yee-Shuan Lee 2 and Yuh-Shan Ho 1# 1 School.
The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Policy – Building Great Journals - Adding Value to Web of Science Maintaining and Growing Web of Science Regional.
THOMSON REUTERS INCITES Marta Plebani – Country Account Manager – Italy, Slovenia, Croatia 12 May 2011.
Publication Pattern of CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinician Hsin Chen 1 *, Yee-Shuan Lee 2 and Yuh-Shan Ho 1# 1 School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University.
THE BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS. BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS COMPARING ‘LIKE TO LIKE’ Productivity And Impact Productivity And Impact Normalization Top Performance.
Using Google Scholar Ronald Wirtz, Ph.D.Calvin T. Ryan LibraryDec Finding Scholarly Information With A Popular Search Engine Tool.
Tools for Effective Evaluation of Science InCites David Horky Country Manager – Central and Eastern Europe
Introduction to SHERPA RoMEO and its Significance for Publishers
Peter Ingwersen Royal School of Library & Information Science, DK
Holiday season e-commerce in the U.S. - Statista Dossier
PIWIK JUNIOR TIDAL ASSOCIATE PROF., WEB SERVICES & MULTIMEDIA LIBRARIAN NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, CUNY.
Bibliometric Analysis of Water Research
Google Analytics Data for “Going Out There” website
Isid.research.ac.ir
Presentation transcript:

The Value of Old Data: Trends in GSA Data Repository Usage Matt Hudson, Geological Society of America, 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder CO INTRODUCTION The Geological Society of America (GSA) Data Repository (DR) was established in 1974 as an open file in which authors of articles in GSA journals and books could place information that supplements and expands on their original papers. While not intended as a true data repository, meaning the data in the DR cannot be searched or manipulated on the online site, its usage provides a glimpse of the value of older data. The online version began in 1996, but only included data back to In 2004 the online version expanded to include the complete archive, but analysis of DR usage did not become possible until April 2011 when GSA installed Google Analytics. As of October 2014, the DR contains data from more than 4,600 papers. The number of items deposited per year has grown considerably. Prior to the mid-1990s, the Repository received data from 350 papers per year. This increase in DR items parallels a larger trend. Many government funding agencies, such as the National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Research Councils UK now have data handling policies. The Registry of Research Data Repositories, an inventory of all data repositories, has now identified more than 900 repositories, and in 2012 Thomson Reuters launched the Data Citation Index, which tracks this growing pool of data. This growing emphasis on data accessibility has raised questions. Who is using data and how is the data being used? How long should data be stored and made available? INTRODUCTION The Geological Society of America (GSA) Data Repository (DR) was established in 1974 as an open file in which authors of articles in GSA journals and books could place information that supplements and expands on their original papers. While not intended as a true data repository, meaning the data in the DR cannot be searched or manipulated on the online site, its usage provides a glimpse of the value of older data. The online version began in 1996, but only included data back to In 2004 the online version expanded to include the complete archive, but analysis of DR usage did not become possible until April 2011 when GSA installed Google Analytics. As of October 2014, the DR contains data from more than 4,600 papers. The number of items deposited per year has grown considerably. Prior to the mid-1990s, the Repository received data from 350 papers per year. This increase in DR items parallels a larger trend. Many government funding agencies, such as the National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Research Councils UK now have data handling policies. The Registry of Research Data Repositories, an inventory of all data repositories, has now identified more than 900 repositories, and in 2012 Thomson Reuters launched the Data Citation Index, which tracks this growing pool of data. This growing emphasis on data accessibility has raised questions. Who is using data and how is the data being used? How long should data be stored and made available? METHODS GSA began using Google Analytics to track online visits to its DR in This software provides information about the numbers of visitors, page views, and the technology, location, and behavior of visitors. This usage can then be sorted according to the various pages of a Web site, and since the DR includes the year of the data in all url subdirectories, it is possible to sort this usage by age of the data. The article-usage data was drawn from GeoScienceWorld usage statistics. GSA is one of the founders of GeoScienceWorld, and currently GSA’s journals are hosted at GeoScienceWorld and on the Society’s own site at GeoScienceWorld is uniquely capable of providing usage statistics for GSA’s journals that reveal the number of full-text article views for each issue of a journal. In this way, the usage per volume can be determined. METHODS GSA began using Google Analytics to track online visits to its DR in This software provides information about the numbers of visitors, page views, and the technology, location, and behavior of visitors. This usage can then be sorted according to the various pages of a Web site, and since the DR includes the year of the data in all url subdirectories, it is possible to sort this usage by age of the data. The article-usage data was drawn from GeoScienceWorld usage statistics. GSA is one of the founders of GeoScienceWorld, and currently GSA’s journals are hosted at GeoScienceWorld and on the Society’s own site at GeoScienceWorld is uniquely capable of providing usage statistics for GSA’s journals that reveal the number of full-text article views for each issue of a journal. In this way, the usage per volume can be determined. RESULTS Who is Using GSA Data? The DR receives visitors from more than 120 countries and territories per year. These visitors account for >20,000 sessions per year that produce >38,000 page views. Google Analytics can determine the location of 99% of these users. From 2011 to 2014, the top eight visitor-producing countries remained consistent: United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia, Japan, and France. Approximately 40% of all visitors came from the United States. The percent of visitors from most countries remained stable; however, visitors from China increased from 8% in 2011 to 11% in 2014, making it the second highest contributor. RESULTS Who is Using GSA Data? The DR receives visitors from more than 120 countries and territories per year. These visitors account for >20,000 sessions per year that produce >38,000 page views. Google Analytics can determine the location of 99% of these users. From 2011 to 2014, the top eight visitor-producing countries remained consistent: United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia, Japan, and France. Approximately 40% of all visitors came from the United States. The percent of visitors from most countries remained stable; however, visitors from China increased from 8% in 2011 to 11% in 2014, making it the second highest contributor. CONCLUSIONS The GSA Data Repository receives worldwide usage. Forty percent of visitors come from the United States, and a growing portion of visitors are coming from China, the second highest user. Although 83% of the Data Repository usage is for data produced in the previous 10 years, the archival data continues to receive views long after it has been published. Articles and data less than one year old both account for a quarter of all views, but archival articles receive more interest than archival data, suggesting that over time the original articles are more valuable to readers than the data behind them. CONCLUSIONS The GSA Data Repository receives worldwide usage. Forty percent of visitors come from the United States, and a growing portion of visitors are coming from China, the second highest user. Although 83% of the Data Repository usage is for data produced in the previous 10 years, the archival data continues to receive views long after it has been published. Articles and data less than one year old both account for a quarter of all views, but archival articles receive more interest than archival data, suggesting that over time the original articles are more valuable to readers than the data behind them. For more information: Matt Hudson Geological Society of America 3300 Penrose Place Boulder, CO How Data Usage Compares to Article Usage One might expect that the usage of GSA’s data would follow similar patterns to the usage of GSA’s journal articles, particularly for a journal like Geology that is of a similar age to the DR. In some respects this is true. The most recent year’s worth of content accounts for 24% of the annual DR usage and 25% of Geology’s article views. Taken as a whole, however, this trend does not continue. Only 65% of Geology’s usage is for papers published in the past 10 years, compared to 83% of the DR usage. This is particularly surprising given that there are a number of vehicles in place to drive readers to the most recent articles, such as alerts and RSS feeds for each new issue. This indicates that there is greater interest in archival articles than there is in archival data. Not surprisingly, the most recent content for GSA Bulletin, which has an archive dating back to 1890, accounts for an even smaller portion of views. When GSA Bulletin’s archive is divided up into 8 equal segments similar to the structure of the Geology and DR analysis, the most recent two time slices account for only 59% of overall usage, well below Geology and the DR. How Data Usage Compares to Article Usage One might expect that the usage of GSA’s data would follow similar patterns to the usage of GSA’s journal articles, particularly for a journal like Geology that is of a similar age to the DR. In some respects this is true. The most recent year’s worth of content accounts for 24% of the annual DR usage and 25% of Geology’s article views. Taken as a whole, however, this trend does not continue. Only 65% of Geology’s usage is for papers published in the past 10 years, compared to 83% of the DR usage. This is particularly surprising given that there are a number of vehicles in place to drive readers to the most recent articles, such as alerts and RSS feeds for each new issue. This indicates that there is greater interest in archival articles than there is in archival data. Not surprisingly, the most recent content for GSA Bulletin, which has an archive dating back to 1890, accounts for an even smaller portion of views. When GSA Bulletin’s archive is divided up into 8 equal segments similar to the structure of the Geology and DR analysis, the most recent two time slices account for only 59% of overall usage, well below Geology and the DR. What Data is Being Viewed? Google Analytics tracks usage only in the form of views. How much of this data is being used in new studies cannot be determined, but analytics can show what data users are interested in viewing. Not surprisingly, the most recent data receives the largest percentage of viewers. Between 2011 and 2014, 83% of the DR usage was for data produced in the past 10 years. In order to take into account that more data has been added to the DR in recent years, and thus is likely to produce more views, the average number of views per item was also examined, which shows that the most recent data receives ~26 views per year whereas older data receives ~5 views per year. The oldest data was eliminated because the low number of items made the usage calculations unreliable. What Data is Being Viewed? Google Analytics tracks usage only in the form of views. How much of this data is being used in new studies cannot be determined, but analytics can show what data users are interested in viewing. Not surprisingly, the most recent data receives the largest percentage of viewers. Between 2011 and 2014, 83% of the DR usage was for data produced in the past 10 years. In order to take into account that more data has been added to the DR in recent years, and thus is likely to produce more views, the average number of views per item was also examined, which shows that the most recent data receives ~26 views per year whereas older data receives ~5 views per year. The oldest data was eliminated because the low number of items made the usage calculations unreliable.