UFT Rule ProposalS Adopting statewide Horizontal rules in texas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

Statewide Rule 10 : Downhole Commingling
How to Submit Oil Online Completions – (Form W-2)
RULES DONE RIGHT HOW ARKANSAS BROUGHT ITS OIL AND GAS LAW INTO A HORIZONTAL WORLD.
Drilling Permits Statewide Rule 37 & 38 Exceptions Lorenzo Garza
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Top Problems That Can Delay A Completion Packets Final Approval 1.
Land Development Regulations : Section 2 – Waivers (and related sections) Regulation Update Board of County Commissioners Hearing November 25, 2014.
Industry Growth and Change 2014 Martz Summer Conference University of Colorado Law School Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the.
To Begin The Discussion Remember The Rule Of Capture.
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
EVOLUTION OF SPACING AND POOLING IN COLORADO Denver Association of Division Order Analysts July 21, 2014 Denver, Colorado Steve Sullivan Welborn Sullivan.
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP DGSLAW.COM Dave Neslin Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Former Director of the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission Environmental.
FORM 1000 – APPLICATION TO DRILL, RECOMPLETE OR REENTER.
PSA Wells, Allocation Wells and Stacked Laterals Permitting and Completion Lorenzo Garza & Joe Stasulli.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS BACK TO THE BASICS : WELL COMPLIANCE FORMS AND PROCEDURES 1.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Platting Update Orange County BCC January 27, 2015.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Williston Basin Petroleum Conference Advances in Technology Panel Efficient Fracture Stimulation Rick Ross – Whiting Petroleum Corporation 1.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Horizontal Drilling Permit Applications Lorenzo Garza.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Regulatory Conference San Antonio 2014 Drilling Permits and Online Filings Advanced Valerie Atkins-Team Leader.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Regulatory Conference San Antonio 2014 Introduction to Drilling Permits and Online Filing Valerie Atkins-Team Leader.
Process and Lessons Learned. All content presented here, as well as supporting documentation may be found in a publicly accessible repository at the following:
PETROLEUM LAND ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW PRESENTATION BY CAPLA Regulatory Committee.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS WELL COMPLIANCE FORMS AND PROCEDURES Austin Regulatory Conference September
Railroad Commission of Texas Surface Commingling P-17 Applications Darlene Williams 1.
Class Description In the class today we will be discussing how to properly file the P-17 report. The P-17 form is used by an operator when they are surface.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING REGULATIONS FOR NEVADA PRESENTATION TO MINING OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ( MOAC) September 24, 2014.
Oil and Gas Well Completions Advanced Regulatory Seminar – Midland 2013 Pamela Thompson Katie McNally.
1 © The Delos Partnership 2004 Project Management Organisation and Structure.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Regulatory Conference San Antonio 2014 Drilling Permits and Online Filings Advanced Valerie Atkins-Team Leader.
1 BLM’s Hydraulic Fracturing Revised Proposed Rule 2013 Virginia Governor’s Conference on Energy Richmond, VA October 16, 2013 Presented by: Luke D. Johnson,
Dealing with Missing Persons and Holdouts: Using Rule 37 and MIPA for Urban Gas Development Presented By: Eric C. Camp W HITAKER, C HALK, S WINDLE & S.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Lorenzo Garza Drilling Permits and Online Filing – Advanced Topics to be discussed: Stacked Laterals, Allocation and PSA wells,
Special Railways Phase III Proposed approach to regulatory changes Jakarta 16 May 2011.
Location Exception Increased Density Eric R. King Week Five September 30, 2010.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Early Action Program A Proposal to Stimulate Voluntary Reductions of Greenhouse Gases J. Bennett Johnston Alvin L. Alm.
Class Description In the class today we will be discussing how to properly file the P-17 report. The P-17 form is used by an operator when they are surface.
Drilling Permits Statewide Rule 37 & 38 Exceptions Lorenzo Garza
Corporate Strategy Team 3 – 001. Business Strategy  Competitive Advantage  How should we compete? Corporate Strategy  Industry Attractiveness  Scope.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Regulatory Conference San Antonio 2014 Introduction to Drilling Permits and Online Filing Valerie Atkins-Team Leader.
An Overview of: Generation Connections: Transmission Connection Cost Responsibility Review July
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Page No. 1 FDOC/MOD Observation Groundrules & Communication information.
SPACING Vertical Horizontal Eric R. King Week Three September 8, 2011.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS How to Submit Oil Online Completions – Online (Form W-2) Austin Regulatory Conference September 2013 Katie McNally 1.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
The Sage-Grouse Plan Tripp Parks Policy Analyst. GREATER SAGE-GROUSE The Greater Sage-Grouse (GrSG) is a large ground-dwelling bird that inhabits 186.
John James Tintera, PG #325 Texas Alliance of Energy Producers Injection Well Regulatory Update April, 2016.
HB 2031 and HB 4097: Marine Seawater Desalination Rulemaking Trade Fair / May 2016 Office of Water Water Availability Division Water Quality Division.
Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 123: Final-form Rulemaking: Commercial Fuel Oil Sulfur Limits for Combustion Units Environmental Quality Board.
Lowell Randel Global Cold Chain Alliance/ International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.
Woodford Horizontal Wells June 30, 2005
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Directional Surveys and Associated Issues
Developments in Utica Shale Economic Potential
PSA WELLS, ALLOCATION WELLS,
Hydraulic Fracturing in Virginia
2017 Zoning Update New Sewickley Township.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
Drilling Permits Statewide Rule
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM LANDMEN
Dr. Jim Thomas Desert Research Institute
Presentation transcript:

09.16.2015 UFT Rule ProposalS Adopting statewide Horizontal rules in texas R. Mark Henkhaus, pe, regulatory manager, apache corp

Horizontal drilling Horizontal (HZ) drilling is an old method with new technology and much potential It has enabled complex geometry of well paths Allows precise placement of entire lateral length Has dramatically increased drilling in unconventional reservoirs- makes uneconomic plays economic Has dramatically increased production Has brought the US and Texas to the forefront of energy technology and production!

UFT? What’s a UFT? UFT means Unconventional Fracture Treated Generally, an unconventional reservoir requiring horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing for commercial production There is no formal designation by the RRC at this time This effort is a unique, grass-roots driven effort by industry to implement state-wide horizontal rules Led by multi-trade group including the Alliance, TIPRO, PBPA, and TXOGA

Current HZ status iN texas Horizontal drilling is governed by Statewide Rule 86 SWR 86 was implemented 1990, amended 2000, 2001 and 2004 Rule was developed prior to current technological developments in HZ drilling and multi-stage frac’ing In 1990 a long lateral was 500 ft… now it is not uncommon to see 10,000+ ft laterals Clearly, SWR 86 needs modernization

current SWR 86 requirements HZ well must be on lease at all points from formation penetration to terminus No off-lease formation penetration point permitted No alternative lease line spacing (“heel” and “toe”) No “no perf zones” No “box rule” No “stacked laterals” In general, SWR 86 restricts efficient HZ development rather than encouraging it

Proposed uft rules-field designation A formal procedure for the RRC designate certain fields as “UFT” fields within the rule Permeability < 0.1 md 5 producing wells 80% of wells must have been HZ and frac’ed Notice to operators If objections, set for hearing Approximately 60 fields are under consideration at this time

Proposed uft rules-field designation A formal procedure for operators to nominate fields as “UFT” fields Formal request Notice to operators Applicant must submit technical data, including Core analysis Well test Logs, other data as needed If no protest, approval is administrative If protest, hearing is required

Proposed uft rules-Acreage Allows duplicate assignment of acreage between vertical and horizontal wells Identical to recent Spraberry (Trend Area) field rules Requires new P-16 to manage acreage accounting Allows full HZ development on vertically developed tracts without use of Rule 38 (density) exceptions Example: 640 acre lease with 80 acre density. Proposal would allow 8 vertical wells and 8 horizontal wells in this tract

Proposed uft rules-density reduction Proposal will allow field-wide density reduction to one-half existing density upon good evidence increased density needed for full development Notice to operators Administrative approval if no objections

Proposed uft rules-SWR 38 Streamlined procedure for Rule 38 density exceptions Reduced notice requirements- 600 ft radius No technical information required 21 day waiting period If no objections, administrative approval Similar to current Spraberry (Trend Area) procedure

Proposed uft rules- double asgmt of Acreage Allows double assignment of acreage between vertical and horizontal wells No requirements for Rule 38s in this case Does not affect field spacing Encourages HZ development without forcing vertical operators into obligation drilling Essentially as Spraberry (Trend Area) rules allow now

Proposed uft rules-allowables Establishes a per-acre allocation formula for UFT fields. Per-acre factors proposed: 100 bbl/acre oil, 600 mcf/acre gas Overproduction can be cancelled upon request Allows for typical HZ production curves, with very high rates early, steep decline, and long life

Proposed uft rules-spacing Does not change field rule spacing Allows off-lease penetration point, with notice Allows Stacked Laterals Allows drilling box Allows NPZs- Non-Perf Zones in a well

HZ lease line spacing without special field rules Illustrated with statewide spacing

HZ well-to-well spacing without special field rules Illustrated with statewide spacing

Proposed uft rules-spacing Does not change field rule spacing Allows off-lease penetration point, with notice Allows Stacked Laterals Allows drilling box Allows NPZs- Non-Perf Zones in a well

Off Lease Penetration Point Off Lease Surface Location Allows full lateral length on lease First Take Pt Surface Loc Terminus Penetration Point

Proposed uft rules-spacing Does not change field rule spacing Allows off-lease penetration point, with notice Allows Stacked Laterals Allows drilling box Allows NPZs- Non-Perf Zones in a well

Stacked lateral wells Vertical Section View Plat View

The “red” wells are stacked laterals They share acreage and allowable

Proposed uft rules-Stacked laterals Stacked laterals allow the conservation of acreage by allowing “multiple assignment” of acreage in multiple landing zones Wells must be within a defined distance in distinct landing zones, 660 ft Allow efficient drilling and development in thick, tight unconventional reservoirs Enables additional HZ wells to “share” acres and allowable with the parent well Common in modern HZ fields now

Proposed uft rules-spacing Does not change field rule spacing Allows off-lease penetration point, with notice Allows Stacked Laterals Allows drilling box Allows NPZs- Non-Perf Zones in a well

Box Rule for Drilling Allows a “legal well” to be within a box 50 ft either side of permitted well path Provides for drilling efficiency Common in recent HZ field rules

Proposed uft rules-spacing Does not change field rule spacing Allows off-lease penetration point, with notice Allows Stacked Laterals Allows drilling box Allows NPZs- Non-Perf Zones in a well

NPZ Illustration Allows penetration closer to lease line than field rules allow All take points must be within field rules Notice required to NPZ offsets, opportunity for protest

Proposed uft rules-Plats To address concern about wellbore placement and legal well spacing and take points, survey required Requires as-drilled, as-completed plats for all HZ wells showing actual well path and first/last take pts Plats must be certified by RPLS or PE as to the wellbore path and take points. Continues requirements for directional companies to independently upload and certify directional surveys

Proposed uft rules-new fields An orderly process for requesting new fields to be added to approved UFT list Requires technical data Allows other operators to object Hearing process if objections, otherwise administrative approval

Proposed uft rules-Current Status Alliance, PBPA, TIPRO, TXOGA have been working with RRC staff since early 2014 on this proposal Those participating have the backing of their companies and their Trades RRC staff has been very open to suggestions and have been very helpful in cleaning up proposals Proposal exists in draft form only, has not been released by Trades or RRC

Proposed uft rules-Going Forward UFT group has requested RRC initiate formal rulemaking for SWR 5, 31, 38, 40, 45, 52, and 86 RRC must decide, at conference, to formally publish for rulemaking Initially was to be at September conference, but we believe that is postponed until October Upon publishing, public comments will be received

Proposed uft rules-going forward When this proposal is open for rulemaking, please support the Alliance and the other Trades by expressing your support to the Commissioners, and commenting in writing to the RRC Rules Coordinator

Benefit of UFT rules HZ development represents a sea-change in how we do business and how we develop resources These proposed rules eliminate inconsistencies in existing rules These proposed rules will eliminate red tape, increase efficiency, while still protecting correlative rights These proposed rules will enable the technology shift to be utilized fully to the benefit of the operators, owners, and the State of Texas

These proposed rules will work These proposed rules are essentially in place now, in the Spraberry They work now in the Spraberry (Trend Area) Field

Full Development in Action!

Proposed uft Rules- in closing Texas has always been the most important contributor to American energy, but there has never been a time where the work of Texas operators has been so closely tied to international geopolitics, economics and the security of our nation. For the past 50 years we have been in a near-constant price war with OPEC.  This paradigm has shifted... it is now a production war.  As Texans we only know a few ways to deal with our problems:  work harder, get better…. and Win!

Thank you! UFT Rule Proposal 09.16.2015 UFT Rule Proposal Adopting statewide Horizontal rules in texas