t J OAQUIM B ERNARDO Coordenador Adjunto do Observatório do QREN Deputy Coordinator of the NSRF Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Evaluation Arrangements for : A Decentralized Approach Laura Tagle Evaluation Unit – Department for Development Policies – Ministry for Development.
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Implementation of Transnational cooperation in the Czech Republic in Markéta Pěchoučková
OPEN DAYS 2006 Workshop 12E28 – 12. October The new European Social Fund DENMARK Head of division Preben Gregersen Ministry of Economic and Business.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Evaluation structure and mechanisms for the operational programs of the period : On–going evaluation arrangements for the Hellenic National Strategic.
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Integrated Territorial Investments
María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry of Economy and Finance SPAIN María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The urban dimension : State of play and perspectives Władysław Piskorz DIRECTORATE-GENERAL.
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 15 July 2004.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.
URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Networks and projects on Social economy promoted by Italian Regions Milan, 5 November 2011 Rita Porru Networks and projects on Social economy promoted.
Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the Department for Coordination of Operational Programmes Gdańsk,
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Guy Flament European Commission, DG REGIO Cardiff, 19 April 2013.
Mid-term Evaluation Implementation of the EU Structural Funds in R&DI and Higher Education, Stage 1: Strategic view
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Cyprus Project Management Society
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Hungarian Delegation Lisbon, 28 October 2008 Financial Institute for Regional Development.
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
The Territorial Dimension in the legislative proposals for cohesion policy Zsolt SZOKOLAI Policy Analyst, Urban development and territorial cohesion.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Workshop on the Legal Framework of EU Structural Funds’ Management for the Period Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006 Head of Division, Preben.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
The Portuguese NSRF Strategic Report th Meeting of the Coordination Committee of the Funds (COCOF) Brussels, 27 February 2013 Joaquim Bernardo Deputy.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
The dti Striving for a growing economy that benefits all Presentation to the Joint Budget Committee 2 November 2005.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Improve 1st level control for greater efficiency of Structural Funds José Santos Soeiro President Financial Institute for Regional Development.
The European Social Fund
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development
Purpose of the presentation
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Presentation transcript:

t J OAQUIM B ERNARDO Coordenador Adjunto do Observatório do QREN Deputy Coordinator of the NSRF Observatory

PORTUGUESE NSRF OVERVIEW PORTUGUESE NSRF OVERVIEW 2 THE INVESTMENT 21.5 M of EU Funds, 29.2 M of public expenditure and 44 M with private investment (current prices) MAIN STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Develop the skills of Portuguese - men and women; Promote sustained growth; Guarantee social cohesion; Ensure the qualification of the territory and the cities; Improve the efficiency of governance. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES 3 Thematic OP (Human Capital; Competitiveness Factors; Territorial Enhancement) 9 Regional OP (5 OP of the Mainland and 4 OP of the Autonomous Regions) 2 Technical Assistance OP (ESF and ERDF) 8 European Territorial Cooperation NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION 3 The Portuguese NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan (GEP) is based on an approach to evaluation that assumes the major importance of bridging None of these issues is independent from one another, so the main goal of the GEP is to INTEGRATE AND ARTICULATE THE EVALUATION NEEDS OF ALL NSRF AND OP STAKEHOLDERS, IN A SINGLE PLAN, SO ITS POSSIBLE TO HAVE A GENERAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE MAIN AREAS OF INTEREST OF THE NSRF ORGANIZATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND AVOID REPEATED EXERCISES. Evaluation Monitoring Strategy Operationalization Global Thematic/Sectorial NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION 4 NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan Evaluation Network NSRF Ministerial Coordination Committee OP Ministerial Coordination Committees Managing Authorities of the OP NSRF Observatory National Coordination Authorities of the ERDF, Coehesion Fund (IFDR ) and ESF (IGFSE) Monitoring Committees Other Stakeholders Ministries Coordination

OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OVERALL APPROACH TO EVALUATION 5 UtilityPartnershipFlexibility Accountability Independence The Global Evaluation Plan join together a very significant number of evaluation exercises, all of them with the same values approach: These exercises are organized in two types of evaluation: Strategic Evaluation Operational Evaluation But strategic evaluations should produce operational consequences and vice-versa NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

EVALUATION SCOPE EVALUATION SCOPE 6 The Global Evaluation Plan has a very large scope, including the following topics: Main issues covered: Qualification of the portuguese population, Sustained growth, Social cohesion, Qualification of the cities and the territory and Governance efficiency – connected with the main priorities Funds actually spent: Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund, National Public Expenditure, Private Investment Time period: , with at least annual revision (dynamic/flexible planning) Geographical coverage: National, with a regional and/or transnational focus when necessary Target groups: Governmental institutions, Public Administration, Enterprises and their associations, Municipalities and their associations, Civil Society organizations, citizens in general NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING 7 NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING 8 NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING MAIN EVALUATIONS PLANNED AND TIMING 9 NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan Major stages and objectives/aims of the on-going evaluations planned in the GEP: Operational evaluation stage (mainly 2009) - improve the strategic and operational management of the OP (information diffusion, selection criteria, monitoring, regulations, etc.) and/or of specific thematic areas of the NSRF. Focalized strategic evaluations stage ( ) – global view of the NSRF implementation and macro-economic impacts, namely in order to contribute to the portuguese report containing information on the contribution of the OP to the cohesion policy. Mid term evaluations stage (2010 and mainly 2011) – global view of the performance of the OP and NSRF (intermediate results and impacts), in order to examine and, if necessary, review them (article 33.º of the regulation (CE) n.º 1083/2006). Global strategic evaluation stage ( ) – general evaluations of the performance of the NSRF, manly to support the preparation of the next cycle of structural policies in Portugal.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION MONITORING AND EVALUATION 10 NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan OperationalStrategic Selection Process Financial Execution Outputs Context/Environment Impact Analysis Operation Applyment Outcomes (results) Effects Global Evaluation Plan NSRF ( ) Programmation P ROJECT LIFE CYCLE

USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS 11 Based on a learning and improvement approach, the evaluation results will be used mainly to: 1.Analyse the impacts of the structural funds and the cohesion fund; 2.Determine whether any adjustments are necessary to improve programme effectiveness in: Programme strategy; Results and resources framework; Regulamentary framework; Activities… 3.Increase awareness and accountability on achievements; 4.Contribute to ex-post evaluations with valid information. NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

IMPLEMENTATION AND METAEVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION AND METAEVALUATION 12 Main concerns: Launch and follow-up the evaluation exercises (one monitoring team for each exercise, including a representative of the NSRF Observatory) ; Contribute to the development of the evaluation market and methodologies Plan a metaevaluation. We believe that the evaluation itself should be formatively and summatively evaluated against its own goals, objectives, principals and standards of utility, feasibility, property and accuracy, so that its conduct is appropriately guided and stakeholders can closely examine its strengths and weaknesses. NSRF and OP Global Evaluation Plan

Thank you for your kind attention (For more information of the Portuguese NSRF