Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of Governments Caribbean Telecommunications Union Ministerial Seminar May 29, 2012 Heather Dryden Chair - Governmental Advisory Committee, ICANN.
Advertisements

Patient Participation Group Representative Elections Gail Hawksworth, Head of Communications and Engagement.
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
DR MACIEJ JUNKIERT PRACOWNIA BADAŃ NAD TRADYCJĄ EUROPEJSKĄ Guide for Applicants.
Introduction and Election of Co-Chair H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan NASA/GSFC Metrics Planning and Reporting (MPAR) WG 8 th Earth Science Data Systems Working.
School Council Roles and Responsibilities Michele Giroux and Susan Klimchuk 05 October 2013.
PARIS21 CONSORTIUM MEETING Paris, October 2002 Progress Report of the Task Team on Food, Agriculture and Rural Statistics  Objectives  Past activities.
Query Health Business Working Group Kick-Off September 8, 2011.
OSIAM4HE Proposed org structure Authored by the strategy and organization team.
NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.
The 16 th Session of WIPO Standing Committee of the Law of Patents Catherine Eunkyeong Lee APAA Patent Committee Meeting November 13, 2011, Manila.
Student Advisor Training. Senator Advisor Trainging This meeting is intended as a brief overview to help you understand your role as a Student Senate.
© GEO Secretariat 5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation John Adamec Co-Chair, M&E Working Group GEO-XI Plenary November 2014 Geneva, Switzerland.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
Research Data Alliance Future Directions Consultation August, September 2015 Updated: 18 th August 2015.
Collaborative Charges USAPI HEALTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL.
NDIIPP The Next Phase Meg Williams Associate General Counsel The Library of Congress.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
Discussion on HTASC Future Tobias Haas XV HTASC 3 October, 2003 CERN.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
Building Strong Library Associations | Regional Convenings DAY 2 Session 3 How Goals can be achieved through Objectives: Slides.
Towards Data Management Principles (report of progress of the Task Force on Data Management Principles) Alessandro Annoni European Commission Joint Research.
20th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference Lessons Learned in AIAA Working Group Development E. Allen Arrington Dynacs/NASA.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
MPARWG Business & Disposition of Action Items from MPARWG October 2009 H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan NASA/GSFC Metrics Planning and Reporting (MPAR) WG 9 th.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
Capacity Building Committee Architecture and Data Committee Meeting Seattle – July 2006.
Text #ICANN51 GAC / GNSO Joint Meeting 12 October 2014.
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Guidance document 2 nd Capacity Building Committee Meeting, Brussels September 2006.
Report on the review of ACG structure The Exchange of Information Task Force October 7-9, 2009 The 13th ACG General Meeting in Hanoi.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Making sense of Interest Group/Working Group Activity by RDA Technical Advisory Board Beth Plale Professor of Data Science Indiana University USA With.
Hydro DWG at the RDA Plenary: BoF and Aligning HDWG work with WMO expectations and timeline Sylvain, Tony, Silvano, Ilya.
Committees. Executive Committee Terms of Reference Committee Type – standing Purpose -. Manage the business and technical affairs of Open Health Tools.
Building Strong Library Associations | Regional Convenings DAY 2 Session 3 How Goals can be achieved through Objectives.
Task ID_01 “Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” The Group on Earth Observations Data Sharing Activities for 2013 Reported by Lerato Senoko 29 th EXCOM:
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
1 The Sakai Community Practice Work Group: Progress Statement Mark J. Norton, Chairman.
TSG-S OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) Ad-Hoc Report Richard Robinson Chair - 3GPP2 TSG-S SC B_Eshwar Pittampalli’s (Lucent) comments/concerns embedded.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
An adoption phase for RDA WGs?. Background WGs end after 18 months WGs (and some IGs) produce outputs, but adoption of these outputs often only takes.
Policy Development Processes in the APNIC Region 4 th ASO General Assembly Santiago, Chile 24 April 2003.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
THE INTRODUCTION AND SUPPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS AS PART OF THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE RCARO Dr Waqar Ahmad Dr John Easey.
Women’s Health Grampians Local Update Grampians Community of Practice for the Prevention of Violence against Women Darlene Henning-Marshall Program Manager.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Working Group II Terms of Reference Presented to CGMS Plenary and Working Group II CGMS-44 CGMS-WP-30.
Global Water Information Interest Group meeting RDA 7 th Plenary, 1 st March 2016, Tokyo Global Water Information Interest Group Welcome to the inaugural.
THE INTRODUCTION AND SUPPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS AS PART OF THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE RCARO Dr Waqar Ahmad Dr John Easey.
Organisational March 1, 2016 Open Meeting, 14:30-16:00 Members-Only meeting, 16:30-18:00.
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Project Charter I want to design a project
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
IEEE Participation in NFPA (SCC-18) UL Participation Opportunities
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Organisations & The Research Data Alliance (RDA) - the Organisational Advisory Board CC BY-SA 4.0.
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Strategy
Policies, Procedures, and Best Practices IEEE AESS PANELS 2019 Prepared by the Technical Operations Committee Contents: Applying for Panel Approval Forming.
The RDA Europe project CC BY-SA 4.0.
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Organisational September 15, Open Meeting, 14:00-15:30
The Research Data Alliance: Business session
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers

2  Individuals  Agree with the RDA’s Guiding Principles listed at  Sign up to the Research Data Alliance at  Organisations  See organisation-affiliate-members/rda-organisational- membership.html for information on membership benefits, costs, and expectations. organisation-affiliate-members/rda-organisational- membership.html Becoming a Member of the RDA

3  Organisational Members provide expertise and funding to RDA.  Each Organisational Member is expected to nominate one representative who will become part of the Organisational Assembly (OA).  Now that RDA has more than 36 member organisations, an Organisational Assembly Board (OAB) will be established.  The OAB advises Council on the directions, processes, and mechanisms of RDA.  So far, the OA has performed the role of the OAB. Contributing as Organisational Member

4 As representative of an organisational member, you can contribute in many ways, including by:  Joining / Initiating BoFs, Working or Interest Groups  Participating in the Organisational Assembly  Participating in the election of the OAB  Providing advice to Council via the OAB  Providing input on documents currently under community review (see the “Request for Comments” box on  Adopting RDA Outputs  Displaying a poster at an RDA Plenary Contributing as Organisational Member (cont’d)

5 You can contribute in many ways, including by:  Joining BoFs, Working or Interest Groups  For WGs, please take a look at the group’s colour coding before joining  Initiating BoFs, Working or Interest Groups  Attending RDA Plenaries  Displaying a poster at a Plenary meeting  Providing input on documents currently under community review (see the “Request for Comments” box on  Adopting RDA Outputs  Standing for election as a TAB member Contributing as Individual Member

6 Starting a New Group  Any member of the RDA can initiate a new BoF, Interest or Working Group  Before starting a new group, please have a look at existing Working and Interest Groups at alliance.org/groupshttps:// alliance.org/groups  If there is a group covering your topic of interest, or closely related to it, please join the group rather than start a new one  BoFs are meant to gauge interest in the proposed topic and are closely associated with a Plenary

7 To Start a New Interest or Working Group  Be an RDA member  Find a group of interested participants:  From 3 or more continents  From multiple sectors/disciplines  Willing to commit to the group’s goals over the lifespan of the group  Develop the Charter (IG) or Case Statement (WG)  All IGs and WGs undergo a review process by the RDA Community, the Technical Advisory Board, and Council before being recognized and endorsed. (See groups/group-process-procedures.html for more detail) groups/group-process-procedures.html

8  Should this be an Interest Group (IG), or a Working Group (WG)? (See and-interest-groups/group-process-procedures.html) and-interest-groups/group-process-procedures.html  IGs do not have a specific lifespan and produce important deliverables such as surveys, recommendations, reports  WGs have a month lifespan and develop and implement specific tools, code, best practices, standards, etc. at multiple institutions (see alliance.org/groups/goals-and-outcomes.html) alliance.org/groups/goals-and-outcomes.html  Who will be the 2-4 Co-Chairs? For Group Chair responsibilities, see and-interest-group-chairs-roles-and-responsibilities.htmlhttps://rd-alliance.org/rda-working- and-interest-group-chairs-roles-and-responsibilities.html Group Decisions

9 Overview of Interest and Working Group Initiation

10 To Start an Interest Group 1.Contact to request the Interest Group Charter template. A Secretariat Liaison will be assigned to your 2.The group puts together a short Charter using the template 3.A group co-chair or member then  Creates a new Charter and posts this via “New Case Statement”, if there is already an RDA Organic Group for the group, or  Creates a new Interest Group via the “Initiate new group” button in the “Working and Interest Groups” menu, then adds the charter to this group as described above, or  s to request help with this 4.Review Process

11 Interest Group Review Criteria  2-4 co-chairs leading the initiative  Members are international experts  Ideally, the group spans at least 3 continents  Group will serve as a platform for communication and coordination around the topic of interest  Not promoting one specific product or technology  No overlap with existing IGs / WGs

12 To Start a Working Group 1.Contact A Secretariat liaison will be assigned to your 2.The group develops its Case Statement (see groups/case-statements.html) groups/case-statements.html 3.A group co-chair or member then  Creates a new Case Statement, if there is already an RDA Organic Group for the group, or  Creates a new Working Group via the “Initiate new group” button in the “Working and Interest Groups” menu, then adds the Case Statement to this group as described above, or  Contacts their Secretariat liaison to request help with this step 4.Review Process

13 Working Group Review Criteria  Are there measurable outcomes?  Will the outcome(s) of the Working Group be taken up by the intended community?  Will the outcome(s) of the Working Group foster data sharing and/or exchange?  Can the proposed work, outcomes /deliverables, and Action Plan described in the Case Statement be accomplished in months?  Is the scope too large for effective progress, too small for an RDA effort, or not appropriate for the RDA?  Overall, is this a worthwhile effort for the RDA to take on? Is this an effort that adds value over and above what is currently being done within the community? For more detail, see groups/case-statements.htmlhttps:// groups/case-statements.html

14 Review Process 1.Community Review (4 weeks)  Please follow the discussion and respond to community comments  Revisions may be required 2.TAB Review (2 weeks)  Revisions may be required 3.Council Review (2-4 weeks)  Revisions may be required

15 After the Review  Once the group is recognised, the Secretariat Liaison will help the group establish working, communication, and recording processes.  Joint activities with RDA affiliates are encouraged.  Groups are encouraged to meet at RDA Plenaries.  The outcomes of recognized Working Groups are strongly promoted by Council, the TAB, the Secretariat, and the RDA Membership at large.

16 Further Information  Organisational Membership: organisation-affiliate-members/rda-organisational-membership.htmlhttps://rd-alliance.org/organisation/rda- organisation-affiliate-members/rda-organisational-membership.html  Overview of Group Processes: and-interest-groups/group-process-procedures.htmlhttps:// and-interest-groups/group-process-procedures.html  WG Goals and Outcomes: interest-groups/goals-and-outcomes.htmlhttps:// interest-groups/goals-and-outcomes.html  WG Case Statements and Review Criteria: alliance.org/working-and-interest-groups/case-statements.htmlhttps:// alliance.org/working-and-interest-groups/case-statements.html  List of all RDA WGs and IGs:  Group Chair Primer: interest-group-chairs-roles-and-responsibilities.htmlhttps://rd-alliance.org/rda-working-and- interest-group-chairs-roles-and-responsibilities.html Questions or comments? Contact

17 Thank You!