Session 5: Aligning accounting systems and performance information 28.10.2008 Juha Majanen, Ministry of Finance, Finland Matti Väisänen, Ministry of Education,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Ireland Stat Fiachra Kennedy Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit Department of Public Expenditure & Reform.
Challenging the Budget Creating Incentives for Results Rwandas Experience Elias Baingana - Budget Director.
Linkages Between NPoA and MTEF
South Africas MTEF Effective expenditure for development Malawi Poverty Monitoring System Workshop July 2002.
Debt Management Strategy: Governance and Transparency
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Queensland Treasury Department Role and Function of Treasury Financial Framework Charter of Fiscal and Social Responsibility and Priorities in Progress.
TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING COLLEGES AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMPEMENTATION OF A COMPLIANT RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS July 2014.
The Medium Term Expenditure Framework
1 Bulgaria Delegation. 2 Societary evaluation context Globalization Increasing complexity of governance Better governance Global competition Budget deficits.
Program Performance Reporting and Evaluation in Australia Mark Nizette Department of Finance and Administration October 2001.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
PAD190 PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Perspectives on Maximising Accountability Andy Wynne.
The National Audit Office of Finland
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Gender Responsive Budgeting An introduction Catharina Schmitz.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Medium term expenditure frameworks and performance budgeting – Swedish experience OECD Paris, October 27-28, 2008 Thomas Küchen Ministry of Finance Sweden.
Productivity programme Visa Paajanen National Audit Office of Finland
International experiences, Sweden Visa Paajanen,
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Selecting and Designing Concession / PPP Projects Martin Darcy.
Fiscal Policy Audit – National Audit Office of Finland Hannu Rajamäki Director for Performance Audit NAO of Finland.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Reforming civil service in the Baltic States: the Case of Lithuania Jurgita Siugzdiniene, PhD Department of Public Administration, Kaunas University of.
INDONESIA BUDGET REFORM (Priorities and Challenges) International Conference Budgeting for Performance-Modernizing PFM in Indonesia May , Hotel.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
1 The Auditor-General’s Role in Auditing Performance Reporting: Image here 2014 Presentation for the Indonesian Ministry of Finance Shilinka Smith: Director,
The state of performance management Visa Paajanen/NAOF
Governance Reform in Cambodia: Decentralization and Deconcentration and Local Governance Lecture 8 1 Public Administration Reform and Decentralized Governance.
1 Performance elements in budget and reporting process - Norway 5TH ANNUAL MEETING OF OECD SENIOR BUDGET OFFICIALS NETWORK ON PERFORMANCE&RESULTS – 28.
1 Joint Donor Staff Training Activity Tanzania, June 2002 Partnership for Poverty Reduction Module 4 - Links between PRSP, Sector Programmes and.
Economic Policy Committee The President Medium term expenditure frameworks and performance budgeting: Elements of the Quality of Public Finances Dr. Christian.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
GRB in Austria TOT on gender Responsive Budgeting, Sponsored by UN Women Russian Presidential Academy on the Economy and Public Administration Moscow,
Outline of the Presentation I.Context II.Key Questions III. How do Countries Rate? IV. Conclusion.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
MTEF and links to annual budgets Osten Chulu Economist – UNDP Lesotho.
Estimates of National Expenditure 2003 NATIONAL TREASURY.
MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN ( ) Date : 8/10/2010 Decision No : 2010/28.
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
Welcome to the Presentation on Guidelines for ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (APA) Zahir Uddin Ahmed ndc Addl. Secy. MoC.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
GOOD PRACTICES AND REFORM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET transparency in the Kyrgyz Republic
Program budgeting in the Kyrgyz Republic
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
Kari Kiesiläinen Heikki Liljeroos
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
2018/19 draft APP & Budget June /20/2018.
Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Performance Management in Finland
Performance Assessment in Finland
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
Making Budget Reform Matter for the Poverty Reduction
Gauteng Provincial Legislature Money Bills Act Discussion
11 July 2019 APP Presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament June 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Session 5: Aligning accounting systems and performance information Juha Majanen, Ministry of Finance, Finland Matti Väisänen, Ministry of Education, Finland

2 Aligning accounting systems and performance information  Key elements  Accountability  Agency --> Ministry/Government --> Parliament  Performace targets  True and fair information  Performance management  Agency Ministry  Agreement on resources and performance targets  Information for managerial purposes

3 What is performance management ?  Performance management is an agreement-based interactive control model.  Its operational core is in the ability of the agreement parties (ministry and agency) to find the appropriate balance between the available resources and the results to be attained with them.  The basic idea of performance management is to balance resources and targets on the one hand and efficiency and quality on the other as well as possible and to ensure that the desired effects are cost-efficiently achieved.

4 Performance management development  Performance management problems and development needs have mainly been identified, and they have been taken into consideration in the performance management and accountability reform and in changes to the budget legislation in  The main aim has been to enhance performance management by emphasising the contolling task and accountability of ministries.  The content of control has been diversified, and a clear distinction has been made between strategic outcome targets and operational performance targets.

5 Use of performance information in budgeting  Different level of targets are set and reported:  social policy targets: changes in the state of society and the conditions of its members and the extent to which the set targets have been achieved (social effectiveness);  costs of achieving the social policy targets (cost effectiveness);  operating performance  outputs, service capacity and the quality of outputs and processes (outputs and quality management)  economy, productivity and the cost effectiveness and profitability of charged and jointly financed operations (operational efficiency)  personnel and job satisfaction, and information, expertise and renewal. Mainly at the level of Government and ministries Mainly at the level of agencies

6 Outcome targets and social impact targets at the level of ministries  The ministries are responsible for the functionality of performance management and for control development within their respective operational branches.  The basic tasks of ministries are emphasized: preparation for political decision-making, strategic control of their operational branches and international influence.  Proper performance management includes the ministries ensuring that proper performance targets are set (also regarding their own operations) and the agencies presenting true and fair information on their operations in their annual accounts.  Social impacts and outcome targets are amphasized in the performanace targets of ministries (policy effectiveness).

7 Operational performace targets at level of Agencies and Institutions  Operational performance targets are emphasized in the perfromance targets of agencies and institutions.  The targets should be connected with operations and resources as closely as possible, whereby their attainment depends direcly on what the agency does and how it is managed.  Alongside positive performance targets and outcome targets, targets conserning unintended effects or side effects should also be set.  Performance targets are set primarily as indicators and only secondarily as verbal targets.

8 Good performance targets Targets are:  connected with and derived from the basic tasks of a government agency  strategic, essential from the point of view of operations  clear, understandable to everybody  concrete and operational  evaluable, measurable and tíme-dependent  preferably comparable  such that the government agency itself can influence them  ambitious and challenging, but attainable and realistic  acceptable, jointly outlined and agreed  such that they cover as large a part of the operations as possible while on the other hand determining priorities

9 Basic performance criteria (true and fair information) Policy effectiveness Outputs and quality management -goods and services - service capacity and quality Operational efficiency -economy - productivity - profitability - cost-equivalence Human resource management Outcome targets Operational performance targets Policy effectiveness: outcomes How operations and finances have affected policy effectiveness Operational results: outputs (which can be influenced through management) PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTABILITY

10 Performance information in budgeting  Preliminary performance targets are agreed (between Agencies and corresponding ministries) and set during the preparation of spending limits (medium term fiscal framework)  Preliminary performance targets (operational targets and outcome targets) are represented to the Parliament in the budget proposal together with the appropriations.  At the same time the Financial Statements and the achievement (or non-achievement) of the Performance targets of previuos year is reported to the Parliament  An important budget development point is the presentation of outcome targets in the justifications for classes within the main title for each ministry --> reflects the accountability of ministry concerned.  Budget classes need to be collated into larger entities constituting an administrative sector or policy sector for which an outcome target can be set.

11 Public statement of the ministry (Central Government Budget Decree section 66i§) 1) an estimate of performance and the trend therein and of the outturn of the performance targets set; 2) a statement as to whether the grounds for reporting performance are appropriate with respect to steering and accountability and the ministry´s position on development needs; 3) the measures that should be taken by the agency due to the final accounts and to improve performance; 4) the measures to be taken by the ministry because of the final accounts and to improve performance. The Ministry has to formulate an opinion on performance, (achievements and non-achievements) and take its position Opinion is published

12 Accounting and Performance information I  Netra Reporting System  Operational since 2004  Internet-based tool which includes  Accounting data  Performance data  Tool for performance management --> providing information for decision making and reporting in all levels  Ready-defined reports and user-defined reports  Public --> enhances transparency  Available at

13 Accounting and Performance information II  On-going reform of budget preparation system and some other systems  Started 2007, operational at 2010  Common tool for preparation process of Budget proposals, Spending Limits (medium term fiscal framework) and Financial Statemens  Will be in use in Agencies, line Ministries and MoF  Enables more coherent approach  Reduces manual work