Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
Advertisements

Transportation Planning Association Meeting MAP 21 PERFORMANCE MEASURES February 19, 2013.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Overview and Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in MTC’s 2035 RTP Joan Sollenberger, Chief Lisa Klein Division of.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
An Overview of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings And TAM Plans MAP-21 National Performance Management Measures.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
MAP Washington State Public Transportation Symposium August 26, 2013.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZATION (Mid-course policy and strategy) Performance Management Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance.
RIDOT’s Performance MEASUREMENTS, Management & MESSAGING APPROACH.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Reauthorization Update at the AASHTO-FHWA Asset Management Peer Exchange July 26,2010 Tony Kane Director of Engineering and Technical Services Matthew.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Financing and Funding Will Kempton Chair ASC Financing and Funding Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee on Finance and Administration Director California.
1 TransCOMM: Performance Management Overview Lloyd Brown and Matt Hardy June 19, 2013.
Transportation leadership you can trust. Performance Measurement State of the Practice presented to AASHTO Annual Meeting presented by Lance A. Neumann.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
A M O T I A A N N U A L M E E T I N G 2 3 S E P T E M B E R N A S H V I L L E, T N 1 A View from the State DOTs Joung H. Lee Associate Director.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
© 2010 AMPO 1029 Vermont Ave., NW, Suite 710 Washington, DC tel: fax: Washington Update AMPO Management & Operations Work.
Surface Transportation Authorization AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley SCOH Subcommittee on Construction Chicago, Illinois August 4, 2009.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Comparative Performance Measurement Highlights And Standing Committee on Performance Management Task Force Update October 2009 Mara Campbell Organizational.
Performance Reporting and Target Setting Tuesday, July 27 th Francis G. Ziegler, P.E. NDDOT Director.
‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’’ or ‘‘MAP–21’’ Signed into Law July 6, 2012 Implications for Infrastructure Asset Management, Pavement.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Presented by Standing Committee on Performance Management: Update and Status July 26, 2010 Kirk T. Steudle, Director Michigan Department of Transportation.
SCOPM Overview Performance Management: The Game Changer SCOPT Business Meeting December 7, 2010 Savannah, GA.
MAP-21 Performance-Based Planning: A Focus on Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Presentation to the Transportation.
Numbers? Rates? Trends? Thomas M. Welch, P.E. State Transportation Safety Engineer Office of Traffic and Safety Iowa Department of Transportation
Freight Project Financing Challenges, Questions and Options presented by Michael P. Huerta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 30, 2001.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Strategic Plan Adoption May PRESENTERS John Horsley Reason for update Al Biehler Summary of Plan Changes Pete Rahn Performance and Accountability.
AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING BILOXI, MS OCTOBER 30, 2010 Potential Changes to STAA Planning Process and Performance Measurement.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security TRANSIT BUS SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM Mike Flanigon Federal Transit Administration U.S./
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
Freight Partnerships = Economic Development and Freight Performance Pete Rahn Missouri Department of Transportation AASHTO 2009 Annual Meeting Palm Desert,
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
SCOPM National Performance Measurement Workshop Performance Management: The Game Changer AASHTO Annual Meeting October 29, 2010 Biloxi, Mississippi 3 –
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Performance Management FHWA’s Strategic Direction and Outcome Performance Measures Using Performance Management to Deliver Accountability AASHTO Annual.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Perspectives on a Performance-Based Federal-aid Highway Program Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration January 12, 2010.
Intercity Passenger Rail and its Return on Investment
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Presentation transcript:

Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO Legislative Briefing

Overview Recommendations We believe major reform is needed in order to be successful in securing increased federal funds There needs to be a continued strong federal role, restoring historic federal share of 45% of highway and transit capital funding, apportioning 90% of the overall highway program to states, and limiting earmarks to no more than 5% of the program

Establish National Transportation Performance Goals through which National Objectives Can be Achieved  National goals should be established in six areas including safety, preservation, congestion, system operations, freight and environment. For safety, the congress should enact the national goal of halving fatalities in two decades.  Authorization legislation should direct AASHTO in consultation with APTA, the MPOs, and the U.S. DOT to establish national performance goals for each of the other five areas by two years after enactment.  No rulemaking process would be required or desired, with the exception of a conforming rulemaking to accommodate the changes in statute.

Develop a State Driven Performance Management Approach Each state will adopt state developed performance targets for each of the six key national goals once they are established. These will be coordinated with their MPO’s and transit properties Changes to the eight planning factors to be goal oriented objectives are recommended.

State Measurements and Reports Each state will be called on to develop a process to track and report on performance results in each of the six key national goal areas of safety, preservation, congestion, system operations, freight/economic development, and environment. AASHTO must recommend a process by which states self-define targets that would work in their unique context rather than have measures and targets imposed through some other process including federal statute, regulation or funding distribution.

State Measurements and Reports (Continued) Establish a Performance-Oriented Pilot Program, similar to what USDOT has recently proposed for those states and metropolitan areas that have established and met performance measures and targets in the six national goal areas that are acceptable to the USDOT. Regulatory relief and funding flexibility would be provided in terms of planning requirements, conformity requirements, 4(f) requirements, and engineering oversight. All states are eligible

Candidate Performance Measures SAFETY: fatalities and serious injuries-numbers and rates PRESERVATION: pavement roughness, bridge condition and age of transit fleet CONGESTION: hours of delay, travel time and transit load factors SYSTEM OPERATION: travel time index, incident clearance time, and lane closures FREIGHT/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: average Interstate and NHS speed, border crossing time, bridge clearance for containers, TEU throughput at ports ENVIRONMENT: green house gas emissions, agency use of energy recycled products and carbon footprint

Draft Candidate National Goals for Discussion Safety: Reduce the number of highway fatalities by 50% over 20 years Preservation:  Pavement goal: Reduce the percent of pavement in poor condition on the Interstate by X percent in ten years and reduce the percent of poor pavement on the NHS by Y percent in ten years  Bridge goal: Reduce the number of structurally deficient bridges on the interstate by X percent in ten years and reduce the number of structurally deficient bridges on the NHS by Y percent in ten years  Transit goal: Keep the transit fleet in a state of good repair by maintaining average age of bus fleet at X years and average age of rail fleet at Y years.

Draft Candidate National Goals for Discussion Congestion: Immediate goals would be establishing a consistent method for measuring and tracking congestion levels (total delay) for all urban areas above X population. Once in place a national goal to reduce total delay by X percent over ten years could be established. System Operation: Initial goal would need to be focused on establishing a consistent approach to measuring incident clearance times on Interstate (and potentially other systems) a national goal to reduce incident clearance time by X or Y percent within ten years Freight /Economic Development: Increase the average speed on freight significant Interstate and NHS corridors by X percent Environment: Reduce the growth in greenhouse gas emissions from transport by X percent by year Y.

Challenges in the Concept Agreement in principle among all the owners/operators. National goals—what are they? Measures—for translating national goals thru measures and targets at the state and metro area levels Target setting -----State driven a must! Federal vs. State vs. Metro roles and expectations