FACET Machine Performance and Expectations M. Sullivan for the FACET Accelerator group SAREC Review July 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Advertisements

Summary of the discussion for the commissioning session 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 6/ 1/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Commissioning August & September. 2 Agenda 11:20 Coffee 11:30 Introduction Sue S 11:35 Controls (an overview) Brian M 10:55 Controls & Data Acquisition.
FACET Status ESTB 2011 Workshop Christine Clarke March 17 th 2011.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
CLIC programme at FACET Update on CERN-BBA A. Latina, J. Pfingstner, G. De Michele, D. Schulte (CERN) E. Adli (Univ. of Oslo), J. Resta Lopez (IFIC) In.
Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection Nov 9-10, 2011 Closeout by P. Cruikshank, M. Giovannozzi, D. Johnson, B. Jones, B. Pine, M. Plum, D. Tommasini.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Overview Run-6 - RHIC Vadim Ptitsyn C-AD, BNL. V.Ptitsyn RHIC Spin Workshop 2006 RHIC Run-6 Timeline  1 Feb – Start of the Run-6. Start of the cooldown.
Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting, dec. 2007, KEK, Japan Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault,
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
FACET Update ARD Status Meeting Christine Clarke April 14 th 2011.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Results of the argon beam test at Linac3 D. Küchler BE/ABP/HSL Including feedback from R. Scrivens and M. Bodendorfer.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer May 31, Initial Design Overview For design purposes, the following is assumed –H - beam comes from PIP II and follow-on.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Study of alternative ILC final focus optical configurations Dou Wang (IHEP), Yiwei Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) International Workshop.
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
ATF2 Tuning Summary Nov & Dec 2010 Glen White, SLAC 11 th ATF2 Project Meeting, SLAC Jan
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
1 Run7 startup M. Sullivan MAC Review Nov , 2007 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team Machine Advisory Committee Review November 15-17, 2007 Run 7 Startup.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault, Brossard, P. Bambade (LAL) Main goal : - Try to improve.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Hardwares for commissioning 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 5/ 31/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
The Interaction Region
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

FACET Machine Performance and Expectations M. Sullivan for the FACET Accelerator group SAREC Review July 25, 2013

2 Improvements from last year New optics for the sector 20 chicane were found that feature reduced beta functions in the chicane and larger beta functions at the IP compared to last year’s lattice. This discovery was made near the end of the last FACET run. This greatly reduced the non-linear lattice terms in the chicane which lowered the beam sensitivity to small variations in position, energy and charge. The beam energy spread is very large due to the high compression needed to get a short beam bunch Resulted in a significant improvement in beam stability and reproducibility

3 Improvements from last year (2) Sector 20 chicane hardware improvements Added two skew quadrupoles (X-Y coupling) Added two more sextupole movers Now have a total of four movers Installed a transverse RF cavity for dedicated bunch length measurements Upgraded selected bpms for shot-to-shot readout Two bunches time X 60 μm

4 Improvements from last year (3) Linac Increased the damping ring RF voltage shorter bunch Improved orbit control in the Linac Interaction Region Added more wire scanners (now have four) Improved the OTR screens Developed and improved operational procedures New and better beam measurement software packages Greatly enhanced beam reproducibility and decreased recovery times from accesses or other off times

5 Interaction Region WS1 WS2 WS3WS4

6 “Typical” wire scans X Y I believe these were taken with no gas present We measured smaller numbers many times but this method has limitations

7 Bunch length measurement We achieved smaller bunch lengths when fully compressed but stopped measuring the bunch length in order to prevent vacuum damage (more soon)

8 Ability to easily change the Interaction Region waist location Center of the plasma chamber Wire scanner #2 Main IP Excellent software program that let the operator select the Z location of the IR waist, then calculates the necessary changes to the final focus optics and implements the new settings. This was asked for by the experimenters and quickly became a valuable tool for general machine setup

9 Beam performance Eleven primary IP parameters X position, angle, size, dispersion, dispersion slope Y position, angle, size, dispersion, dispersion slope Z length Consistently able to get measured transverse spot sizes down to um (beam size is smaller than this) and a bunch length well below 50 um (not measured under full compression). Also able to measure and control (minimize) the beam dispersion and slope of the dispersion Improved software package to measure dispersion was of great benefit here together with the ability to move the sextupoles Sextupole moves to correct dispersion were um

10 Beam performance (cont.) We were able to shoot the high compression beam through very small dielectric tubes (400 um inner dia.) that were 10 cm long without hitting the tube wall For reference, the wire used in an ordinary paper clip has an 800 um diameter This was done consistently over a period of hours (with intermediate checks) Correcting dispersion is critical here because with dispersion, a klystron that drops out of the Linac will significantly change the beam energy thereby shifting the beam position at the IP

11 Linac emittances Four general Linac configurations were developed Pencil beam low charge (minimal compression – 500 um) Low charge maximum compression High charge maximum compression High charge two bunch operation (using notch collimator) longer bunch ( um) Linac beams were measured to be about 50% larger than the theoretical limit Jun 27, :36 units are cm-mrad Linac emittance measurements near the end of the run

12 Damage to vacuum components Beam power density was high enough to damage Optical Transition Radiators – punched holes through Be foils used for vacuum isolation – drilled holes Care had to be taken to ensure the beam waist was far enough away from the OPRs and Be windows Be window Succeeded in ionizing He which would require a bunch size closer to 10x10x20 um

13 Plans going ahead Work on improving wire scanner information The measured values are overestimates The beam size is getting too small to measure very well with the wire size we are using (next few slides) Smaller wires do not make enough of a signal especially when a gas is being ionized -The scanning signal is scattered beam particles as the beam goes through the wire Make the scanning step size smaller (will be done) Try using wire strips -Instead of this try this Try to reduce backgrounds Under study…

14 Realistic beam size estimation Really quite difficult to resolve any difference below about 20 μm. In 10 x 100 cm optics, σ ≈ 10 μm. Simulation Courtesy of Nate Lipkowitz Blue is what the wire scan GUI gives us Red has D/4 subtracted in quadrature (exact solution in large-beam limit) Noise level of 25% Better ionization  more noise

15 Things to change Same data, now with 500 nm steps (10x finer) Easy change: add more points. Still 60 um wire. Currently there is a software limit of 5 um for step size. We have requested it to be removed. Simulation Courtesy of Nate Lipkowitz

16 More things to change 20 micron “wire” with 500 nm steps 20 μm wire with small step size gives much more believable results. However in practice we don’t see the small wire (signal < noise) Propose to use instead a small aspect ratio wire: 20 μm Multiple wire windings or Flat ribbon wire 20 μm 100 μm Courtesy of Nate Lipkowitz

17 Positron System Start commissioning the positron system Initial work to see what parts still work and what parts are broken or need replacement Last used in spring 2008 Steps to getting positrons to the IR dump Make e+ on target (have been doing this) Capture Accelerate to about 200 MeV Make 180 deg turn up to the ceiling of the vault Transport back to the front of the Linac Make a 180 deg turn and inject down into the Linac Accelerate up to 1 GeV Extract and transport to the entrance of the SDR

18 Positrons Still more to do Compress the positron bunch prior to injection into the ring Inject into the SDR Store Extract the bunch from the ring Compress the bunch after extraction Inject back into the Linac Go through the sector 10 chicane Accelerate up to 20 GeV Go through the S20 chicane with all magnet polarities reversed Considerable amount of work and effort

19 Summary The last run delivered a steady and reproducible beam to users with good specifications A lot of the current success rests on the work done during the previous FACET run where much of the difficulties in both hardware and in lattice design were uncovered Positron commissioning will start this coming fall with delivery of positrons planned for calendar 2015 We will be working on our diagnostics to improve spot size measurements We plan to deliver at least as good a (and hopefully better) beam as we had this last run to upcoming users