1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Wait Time Information in Priority Areas: Definitions Updated May 2012 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physician Assistants Optimizing Patient Care. Presentation Objectives What is a PA? Scope of Practice PAs in Canada The Impact on the Health Care System.
Advertisements

WEST GTA LHIN STROKE REPORT CARDS. Stroke Report Card Indicators 20 indicators Integral to access, efficiency, effectiveness and integration that span.
Alternate Level of Care Beyond Beds. ALC – A Definition Complex issue extending beyond hospital ALC represents multitude of patient populations all requiring.
The Delivery of Radical Prostatectomy to Treat Men With Prostate Cancer ChartbookAugust 2014.
A Healthier Tomorrow High Cost Users South West LHIN Hospital CCAC Leadership Forum September 13, 2013.
Waiting for Health Care in Canada: What We Know and What We Don’t Know.
2014 CT State Health Care Facilities and Services Plan Advisory Group Meeting Thursday, July 31, :00am – 11:00am.
1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Care in Canada, 2011: A Focus on Seniors and Aging An Overview 2.
Stroke Mark Sudlow Consultant and Senior Lecturer
1 Access Targets: Beyond 2007 Colin Lauder Health Delivery Directorate Access Support Team May 2008.
BEYOND THE WEEKLY CENSUS: A CLOSER LOOK AT PATIENT FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO EMERGENCY ROOM USE IN WINNIPEG Romy McMaster, BSc (MSc Candidate), Anita Kozyrskyj,
2009 CEO Forum Kananaskis, Alberta Alan R. Hudson, OC, FRCSC February 16, 2009.
Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2014 Chloe Anderson The Commonwealth Fund November 2014.
Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker How do the use and price of healthcare in the U.S. compare to other countries?
A Perspective on Canadian Initiatives in Health Care Quality HL7 Clinical Quality Work Group June 26,
INTRODUCTION TO ICD-9-CM PART TWO ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines (Sections II and III): Selection of Principal Diagnosis/Additional Diagnoses for Inpatient.
0 Prepared by (15pt Arial) [Insert name of presenter 15pt Arial Bold] [Insert title] [Insert Hospital name] Month 200X (12pt Arial Bold) Understanding.
1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospital Care for Heart Attacks Among First Nations, Inuit and Métis Released January 31,
Copyright © 2008 Delmar Learning. All rights reserved. Unit 1 Community Health Care.
Research Evidence in the Federal Policy Process: A Wait Times Case Study Presentation to Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University.
1 Chapter 5 Unit 4 Presentation ICD-9-CM Hospital Inpatient, Outpatient, and Physician Office Coding Shatondra Surulere, MBA, RHIA, CCS.
1 Terri Conner,PhD Nybeck Analytics Partnership for Patients 14 th May 2012 USE OF MEDICARE DIAGNOSIS AND PROCEDURE CODES TO IMPROVE DETECTION OF SURGICAL.
Copyright 2011 Right Care Why act? If population healthcare is the solution – what is the problem? Sir Muir Gray Joint National Director, Right Care August.
Knee Replacement Surgery Evaluating Rehabilitation Management Strategies Dr Marlene Fransen.
Inputs, Outputs and Outcomes: What Measures, What Matters Glenda Yeates, President & CEO Canadian Institute for Health Information October 30, 2007.
Ontario Wait Time Strategy Visit to Champlain June 25, 2008 Alan R. Hudson, OC, FRCSC.
Respiratory Service Framework Asthma and COPD Care (Nursing) Project Learning and Development Strategy.
1 Quality of Care – Quarterly Report Key Quality Indicators March 2008.
Are hip fracture rates falling or rising over time? Using routine data to understand the Epidemiology. Scottish Faculty of Public Health Annual Conference,
Health Statistics Information on STC website Calgary–DLI training–Dec 2003 Michel B. Séguin, Statistics Canada,
Access to care Timely access to care Cost as a barrier to health care 1.
Socio-economic gradients in the occurrence of stroke and 30 days in- hospital mortality after a stroke in Canada 2014 Canadian Population Health Association.
1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Exploring Occupancy Through Administrative Data: A Test Case Using Operating Rooms Emerging Issues
February 2012 Wait-Time Presentation Health Sciences North Board.
Exploratory Analysis of Observation Stay Pamela Owens, Ph.D. Ryan Mutter, Ph.D. September, 2009 AHRQ Annual Meeting.
1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Surgical Trends Within and Beyond Wait Time Priority Areas Updated May 2012.
Seminar 4. Unit 4 Inpatient coding guidelines Principal diagnosis: “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the.
Cancer Mortality Target Measuring and Monitoring at a National Level Jennifer Benjamin, Department of Health Kathy Elliott, National Cancer Action Team.
RCP bone health and NHFD database Neil Pendleton Senior lecturer Geriatric Medicine University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust.
Hospital Departments, Staff and Equipments
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2012 David Squires The Commonwealth Fund November 2012.
Inpatient Quality Reporting In Colorado Sept HCUP User Group Meeting.
Health Care Systems Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, BDS, MPH, DrPH Community Health / First Semester 2014/2015 Department of Family and Community Medicine Faculty.
Performance assessment A performance assessment framework is a collation of statistics across a district or within a hospital and is far removed from.
Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Use of Aspirin or Another Antithrombotic Updates (CMS164) Change Review Process Meeting November 19, 2015 Jenna Williams-Bader.
TUTORIAL How to Count Patients Admitted from the Emergency Department (ED) in the Casemix Hospital Discharge Data (HDD)
Cost Drivers of Cancer Care: Medicare and Commercially Insured Populations Pamela Pelizzari April 1, 2016.
1 Wait Time Information in Priority Areas: Definitions.
New and Revised Definitions A Quick Summary Wait Times Measurement Toolkit.
Cancer System Quality Index (CSQI) 2012 Treatment.
Creating incentives for better quality: Lessons from the English NHS Jennifer Field, Associate Director National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
ICD-10 Lessons Learned from Canada. Background of ICD-10 in Canada 1995 – Agreement reached between World Health Organization (WHO) and Canada to adopt.
South East Public Health Observatory Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) Steve Morgan - Senior Public Health Intelligence Analyst - SEPHO Day 2 – Session.
A ssociation of Public Health Observatories Hospital Activity data Roy Maxwell SWPHO & Bristol University Dr Richard Wilson Sandwell PCT.
RECTAL CARCINOMA AND PREOPERATIVE MRI: USING A NATIONAL DATASET FOR REGIONAL AUDIT South West Cancer Intelligence Service J Weeks
PARALLELSESSION III. Follert, P. & Doebler, K. Use of administrative data from health insurances for mandatory nationwide performance measurement in Germany.
Scrutiny Commission 3 Scrutiny of Health 30 September 2002 Jane Lewington Chief Executive North East Lincolnshire PCT.
2 November John Childs and Deborah Woodley
1000 Lives Plus: National Learning Event
Attachment #1: Examples of Encounter Data
Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2011
Facility & Hospital Patient Types
Canadian Institute for Health Information
Wait Time Information in Priority Areas
CNISP & CIHI MRSA infection rate comparison Preliminary results
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2018
How do the use and price of healthcare in the U. S
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
Retrospective Post Payment Claim Review 2019 Q2
Presentation transcript:

1 Canadian Institute for Health Information

Wait Time Information in Priority Areas: Definitions Updated May

Background In 2004, Canada's first ministers agreed to work towards reducing wait times for five priority areas: cancer treatment, cardiac care, diagnostic imaging, joint replacement and sight restoration. CIHI was mandated to collect wait times information and monitor provincial progress in meeting benchmarks. Since 2004, CIHI and the provinces have collaboratively worked towards the development of indicators and public wait times reporting for five priority procedures and two diagnostic imaging procedures. 3

Background In 2005, the Comparable Indicators of Access Sub Committee (CIASC) developed a pan-Canadian definition for wait time measurement which was adopted by the federal/provincial/territorial ministries. The definition of start date for wait time measurement was defined as follows: “Waiting for a health service begins with the booking of a service, which is when the patient and the appropriate physician agree to a service, and the patient is ready to receive it.” The definition of finish date for wait time measurement was defined as follows: “Waiting for a service ends when the patient receives the service, or the initial service in a series of treatments or services.” 4

Procedures for Which Wait Times Information Is Currently Being Reported Hip replacement Knee replacement Hip fracture repair Cataract Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) Radiation therapy MRI CT 5

Reporting for Hip Replacement As of 2010, the following definition and population have been applied to CIHI’s reporting for hip replacement surgery wait times: Definition The number of days a patient waited, between the booking date and the date the patient received a planned total hip replacement. Benchmark Within 26 weeks (182 days) Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population  Includes those age 18 and older  Includes all total hip replacements (primary and revision); bilaterals count as a single wait  For all priority levels  Excludes emergency cases  Excludes elective partial hip replacements and hip-resurfacing techniques  Excludes days when the patient was unavailable Decisions/Rationale  The inclusion of bilateral hip replacements, patients younger than age 18, and/or out-of-province patients are not material to the reported wait times for hip replacements. These are not reported as exceptions for provinces that are unable to remove these cases from their data.  Provinces continue to work towards removing “patient unavailable” days from reported wait times. This will continue to be an area of variation which CIHI will note.

Reporting for Knee Replacement As of 2010, the following definition and population have been applied to reporting for knee replacement surgery wait times: Definition The number of days a patient waited, between the booking date and the date the patient received a planned total knee replacement. Benchmark Within 26 weeks (182 days) Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Includes those age 18 and older Includes all total knee joint replacements (primary and revision); bilateral joints count as a single wait For all priority levels Excludes emergency cases Excludes knee-resurfacing techniques Excludes days when the patient was unavailable Decisions/Rationale The inclusion of bilateral knee replacements, patients younger than age 18 and out-of-province patients are not material to the reported wait times for knee replacements. These will not be reported as exceptions for provinces that are unable to remove these cases from their data. Provinces continue to work towards removing “patient unavailable” days from reported wait times. This will continue to be an area of variation which CIHI will note.

Reporting for Hip Fracture Repair As of 2010, the following definition and population have been applied to reporting for hip fracture repair wait times: Definition 1. Measured from the time of first registration at an emergency department with hip fracture (index admission) to the time when hip surgery was received. AND/OR 2. Measured from the time of first inpatient admission with hip fracture (index admission) to the time when hip surgery was received. Benchmark Within 48 hours Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Ages 18 and older Discharge from an acute care institution Admission category recorded as emergent/urgent (if wait from first inpatient admission) Excludes in-hospital hip fractures Decisions/Rationale In-hospital hip fractures are excluded as the time of the fracture or start of wait is not known.

Reporting for Cataract Surgery As of 2010, the following definition and population have been applied to reporting for cataract surgery wait times: Definition The number of days that patients waited, between the booking date and the date the patient received cataract surgery. Benchmark Within 16 weeks (112 days) Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Ages 18 and older For first eye only; bilateral cataract removal counts as a single wait For all priority levels Excludes emergency cases Excludes days when the patient was unavailable Reviewed April 19, 2011 Decisions/Rationale CIHI will note the cases that have been included in which a procedure has been performed on the second eye. There is no universal definition for high-risk cataract surgery procedures across provinces, hence, they are not consistent across jurisdictions. CIHI will note where high-risk patients are included. Inclusion of out-of-province patients is not material to the reported wait times for cataract surgery. These are not reported as exceptions for provinces that are unable to remove these cases from their data. Provinces continue to work towards removing “patient unavailable” days from reported wait times. This will continue to be an area of variation which CIHI notes. Rationale for Inclusion of First Eye Only: Provincial start times for the wait for cataract surgery for the second eye vary (booking date, DTT, time of first surgery). About 40% of all cataract surgery procedures involve the second eye. Taken together, including this wait will likely materially affect reported waits.

Reporting for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG) As of 2011, the following definition and population have been applied to reporting for bypass surgery wait times: Definition The number of days that patients waited, between the booking date and the date the patient received a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Benchmark Within 2 to 26 weeks (14 to 182 days), depending on how urgently care is needed. Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Includes those age 18 and older Includes Isolated CABG only For all priority levels Excludes emergency cases Excludes days when the patient was unavailable Decisions/Rationale The inclusion of out-of-province patients and those younger than age 18 is not material to the reported wait times for bypass surgery. Inclusion of these patients will not be reported as an exception. Provinces continue to work towards removing “patient unavailable” days from reported wait times. This will continue to be an area of variation which CIHI notes.

Reporting for Radiation Therapy As of 2011, the following definition and population will apply to reporting for radiation therapy wait times: Definition The number of days that patients waited, between the date the patient is “ready to treat” and the date of the first radiation therapy treatment. Benchmark Within 4 weeks (28 days) of patient being ready to treat Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Includes adults (those age 18 and older) All referrals to start or initiate radiation treatment All priority levels and all cancer types rolled up Excludes days when the patient was unavailable Includes oncology planning time Reviewed April 19, 2011 Provinces that include radiation treatments other than external beam are noted in the exceptions. Decisions/Rationale Pediatrics and emergency patients are included as their inclusion is not material to the reported wait times for radiation therapy. The inclusion of these patients will not be reported as an exception for those provinces that do report in this manner. All referrals to start or initiate treatment may include patients who have had previous radiation treatment for the same or other cancers, patients who have metastases from a previous cancer and/or palliative patients. Provinces that include radiation treatments other than external beam will be noted in the exceptions.

Reporting for CT and MRI Scans As of 2010, the following definition and population have been applied to reporting for CT and MRI wait times: Definition The number of days that patients waited, between the date the order/requisition is received and the date of the date the patient received the scan. Time Frame April 1 to September 30, annually Population Includes adults (those age 18 and older) Includes diagnostic scans (may be inpatient and/or outpatient) For all priority levels Excludes routine follow-up scans Excludes mammography screening and prenatal screening Decisions/Rationale The inclusion of emergency patients is not material to the reported wait times for diagnostic imaging. These will not be reported as an exception. Routine follow-up scans are material to reported wait times as they comprise between10% and 15% of all cases and typically might occur at a six-month or annual cycle and would contribute to long “waits” if left in. Several provinces are able to identify routine follow-up scans via a flag in their databases. For those unable to identify follow-ups, CIHI will note this as an exception. Mammography screening and prenatal screening will not be included in the population and will be noted in the population.