F.E.T.S. RFQ Support Structure by Peter Savage 21 ST October 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AND ELEMENTS OF MACHINES
Advertisements

How to center the top roller Current Situation The slider is not centered because the bottom slider was not placed at 6 o’clock ?!
TIGERBOT MECHANICAL DESIGN Kyle Backer (EE), Jeremy Jensen (ME), Matthew DeCapua (EE), Eric Walkama (ME), Mike Thomas (EE), Jonathan Cormier (CE), John.
BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 1 The Design of the Booster Collimators Larry Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 3/10/03.
Purpose Body Making module is designed for bending the laminated foil film in the shape of a tube, for welding the side seam and for cutting bodies with.
FEA of Wind Turbine Tower Martin Knecht. The Problem FEA modeling of a wind turbine tower. Analysis: –Stress –Deflection Want to prevent –Yielding –Excessive.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Longitudinal Expansion of RFQ Vane Ends at Section-to-Section Interface.
FIG. 1.4 Deformations produced by the components of internal forces and couples.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
ILC Cryomodule Earthquake response simulation H. Hayano, H. Nakai, Y. Yamamoto LCWS13 AWG7-SCRF.
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
27/9/2007, T Water =19°C No Box screwed onto cooling block: T min =37°C, T max =48 °C.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
-1- ICST/HIT The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets Vacuum Vessel Design Guo, Xinglong.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Luca Dassa – 23/02/ / 8 CRAB cavities meeting Preload Bolt size (1) Shear load: 602 N (p=0.26 MPa) -> Min preload: 2006 with Static friction coefficient:
Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008 RFCC Module and Subcomponents Mechanical Design.
F.E.T.S. Mechanical Engineering Update by P. Savage 13 th August 2008.
Give the expression for the velocity of an object rolling down an incline without slipping in terms of h (height), M(mass), g, I (Moment of inertia) and.
RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.
MERLIN BEAMLINE RIXS refocusing mirror system D. Yegian
Structural option for the Jinping neutrino central detector Contributor : Yuanqing Wang, Zongyi Wang Speaker : Zongyi Wang Department of civil engineering,
F.E.T.S. RFQ Mechanical Design by Peter Savage 7 th January 2010.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
FETS meeting Beam Profile Measurement Tank By P. Savage 13th June 2007.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Workshop 4.2.
IMP Visit July 10, 2013 Matt Hoff LBNL July 18, 2013.
Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007.
Design Review RSXS - EndStation Review on Vacuum Chamber Stand and Supports Location Beamline Roll-up Endstation.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
Frame Overview A36 Steel square tubing and plate Frame will rest on four wheels or two air skids 90” Long, 30” wide- outside CG envelope Two carts for.
Lav meeting F. Raffaelli INFN – Sezione di Pisa C. Capoccia LNF, A. Cecchetti INFN – Sezione di Frascati CERN, Dec13 th, Feet friction studies. -Installation.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
UK Neutrino Factory Meeting Front End Test Stand (F.E.T.S.) Engineering Status by P. Savage 22nd April 2009.
Kapton module ass. Spacers for pins 3.6 m m 1.25 mm.
Engineering Division 1 HHMI 8.2.X Endstation Modification Review Allan DeMello 12/13/2006.
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Tracker Mechanical Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Light Guide Map Connectors Patch.
LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL, UK November 6, 2009.
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Winter Semester
Introduction to mechanical design of the SPES RFQ Ferrari Luigi, Technical Review, 09/21/15 Design review, 09/21/20151.
B [OT - Mechanics & Cooling] Stefan Gruenendahl February 2, 2016 S.Grünendahl, 2016 February 2 Director's Review -- OT: Mechanics &
PRELIMINARY VERSION Mechanical integration in the ESS Accelerator tunnel HENRY PRZYBILSKI.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Pre-stressed Modal Analysis Winter Semester
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
Ferrara MECHANICAL SUPPORT for forward tracking detectors Federico Evangelisti INFN - Ferrara GSI – 2-6 march 2009.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
SX1 manipulation VERSION 1 Version
Solenoid Yoke Door-Barrel Connection
GANIL-SPIRAL2 DESIGN OFFICE MECHANiCAL SIMULATION WITH
F.E.T.S. Mechanical Engineering Update
Platform for Target Spectrometer using linear montion drive Rexroth
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
One quarter of RFQ vessel + vacuum pumps and supports
Assembly, survey, alignment of the CBM Dipole Magnet
Part II Design of Fasteners and Joints
Mechanical Engineering progress for the Front End Test Stand
The Bunker Steel Structure – Structural Analysis
Single Detector Design
BGC Collaboration Meeting –
Presentation transcript:

F.E.T.S. RFQ Support Structure by Peter Savage 21 ST October 2009

The welded RFQ section support frame Tops of strips and bottoms of feet to be machined flat and parallel. Total weight = 60kg EN24 flat blocks x 2 EN24 vee blocks x2 Made from box section mild steel

What is the load on each support structure? Component#Weight (kg)Total weight (kg) Major vane Minor vane23065 Static tuner15230 Dynamic tuner155 Vacuum pump130 Cooling manifolds4416 Cooling water155 Hanging pipes etc10 Kinematics112 Cradle kg

FEA for the RFQ support frame – using quarter model ComponentYield strength (MPa) Ultimate strength (MPa) Density (g/cm 3 ) ASTM A36 steel

Nodes:22500 Elements:9857 Quarter load:75kg (300/4) Load applied:Top faces of pads Support 1:Frictionless at 2 symmetry planes. Support 2:Fixed under foot Material:Structural steel Mass:60kg Results: Total deformation: mm Max equ. stress:12MPa Safety factor:20 Stress and deformation due to weight of RFQ

The kinematics assembly Total weight = 12kg

The kinematic mount for the RFQ section Complete kinematic assembly can be positioned by adjusting these screws Screw jacks allow for RFQ height adjustment and tilt by resting in: 1.cone – allows rotation only 2.flat – allows movement in horizontal plane 3.vee – allows movement in one axis Springs reduce judder when re-positioning RFQ sections

RFQ welded steel support cradle Cradle must: 1.Support the RFQ section 2.Allow RFQ section to be mounted to the kinematics 3.Allow the RFQ section to be lifted by crane. Total weight = 22kg

Cradle + kinematics + main support Here the cradle is shown placed onto the kinematic system which in turn sits on the main frame. To adjust for height or tilt the screw jacks must first be unlocked by undoing the 3 nuts shown. To move the entire kinematic assembly in the horizontal plane these four nuts must first be undone

+/- 10mm

Case1: Under weight of RFQ Nodes:31838 Elements:12022 Half load:150kg Load applied:Top of dummy RFQ. Support 1:Frictionless at symmetry plane. Support 2:Fixed at screw jack domes. Material:Structural steel Mass:22kg (cradle + jacks) Results: Total deformation:0.007 mm Max equ. stress:11MPa Safety factor:22

Case 2: Lifting RFQ Nodes:31838 Elements:12022 Half load:150kg Load applied:Under hooks Support 1:Frictionless at symmetry plane. Support 2:Fixed at dummy RFQ top (not shown). Material:Structural steel Mass:22kg (cradle + jacks) Results: Total deformation:0.007 mm Max equ. stress:10MPa Safety factor:25

WORK IN PROGRESS

RF coupling vessel support – parts re-use