Collab 4/15/04 #1 EDMEDM Funding the Project Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to The EDM Collaboration Los Alamos, NM April 15, 2004 Funding the Project

Collab 4/15/04 #2 EDMEDM Outline I)The March 1 visit to DOE II)A new R&D proposal for FY’05 III)Pushing for a FY’06 construction start IV)Getting CD0 and CD1 V)Project management

Collab 4/15/04 #3 EDMEDM I) The March 1 Visit to DOE Presentation to Jehanne Simon-Gillo, Gene Henry, Steve Steadman (DOE) and Brad Keister (NSF) I)R&D for the EDM Search - Steve Lamoreaux - 30 min. II)Studies of 3 He - Haiyan Gao - 15 min. III)Planning - Martin Cooper - 15 min.

Collab 4/15/04 #4 EDMEDM R&D Request for FY'04 and FY'05 FY'04$300k Pre-conceptual engineering on challenging issues Removing the "and a miracle happens here" FY'05$750k Continuing R&D at universities Conceptual engineering in preparation for the technical, cost and schedule review Project management for review

Collab 4/15/04 #5 EDMEDM Budget for the Experiment Estimated costs in FY04$k Project: Neutron EDM FY03 FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11 Total Pre-R&D R&D375 CDR375 PED/ EDIA1, ,366 Cons4,4692, ,956 Preops TEC5,7043,9771,64111,322 TPC ,7043,9771, ,948 Planned redirect Needed New Funds ,7043,9771, ,948

Collab 4/15/04 #6 EDMEDM Schedule for the Experiment March 1, 2004R&D Report to DOE June 1, 2004Proposal Submission to DOE September 1, 2004CD0 on favorable review February 1, 2005CDR Submission to DOE March 1, 2005Technical, cost and schedule review April, 2005CD1 on favorable review November, 2005First construction funds available Spring 2008Commissioning begins

Collab 4/15/04 #7 EDMEDM SNS Risk Analysis QuantitySymbolDesignDegradedEDM LossEDM Limit [95% CL] Wall Loss Time ww >2,000 s +500 s1.8 Particle ID30:1 +2:14 Background / Signal2:15: He Relaxation Time 33 30,000 s *3,000 s He Initial PolarizationP3P3 99% *90% SQUID Noise 1  0 * * 10  Trapped Fields  B/B ** 5 x Electric FieldE50 kV/cm ***25 kV/cm2 1.0 Quadrature+ Under study * Positive evidence ** Likely OK *** Proven OK x e*cm Murphey's Law (4 worst) x e*cm

Collab 4/15/04 #8 EDMEDM Collaboration Proposal The team has entered a very active period of R&D to evaluate the challenges of building a successful experiment. It is our judgment that all technical problems can be overcome in the period between now and the beginning of construction. Progress report sent at the end of the first week of February. More results were presented today. The EDM Collaboration strongly urges the DOE Office of Nuclear Physics to submit the EDM project to Congress for construction in fiscal 2006.

Collab 4/15/04 #9 EDMEDM II) A New R&D Proposal for FY’05 InstitutionSubjectFunds Berkeley$ Caltech Duke HMI a Harvard Illinois b Leiden c Los Alamos c Engineering, project management, CDR 375 NIST a NC State a Oak Ridge Simon Fraser b Total$750k

Collab 4/15/04 #10 EDMEDM III) Pushing for a FY’06 Const. Start Doug thinks we should... I asked, "When is the date you would like to have an R&D proposal for FY'05? Is there a deadline? During our presentation in Germantown, I discussed submitting a real proposal for the construction of the EDM experiment fairly soon. Would your office now welcome a formal proposal from our collaboration? I suggested a June time frame." Jehanne responded, "I'm afraid that it is too early in the FY2006 budget process for us to give you definite guidance. We had to deal with an unprecedented number of budget scenarios this year, and various projects are in or out, depending on the scenario. At this point, we are very interested in your FY05 needs, which are not identified in the FY05 President's budget. I think we are now beyond the pre-conceptual R&D phase, so we will be approaching additional funding cautiously in the absence of a commitment to do the project at this moment. None-the-less, a prioritized plan that discusses the needs for 05 and the risks the R&D tasks are addressing, accompanied by task description, schedule, deliverable, who, cost etc, would be very interesting. In a cover letter, it would also be interesting to assess the impact to the project and collaboration if this R&D funding were not supported in 05, given that there are no funds earmarked for this activity, in as quantitative and concise of a manner as possible. "We will keep you in the loop and provide you with as much information as we can over the next many months."

Collab 4/15/04 #11 EDMEDM IV) Getting CD0 and CD1 The Proposal - Should be the path to CD0 1.Pre-proposal 2.R&D update 3."This is Jehanne Simon-Gillo and Gene Henry is also in the room..." Source of operating funds Commitments of researchers - Fraction of time for research, fraction of research time for EDM Time scale for MOUs Facility modifications Cost breakdown with an "honest-to-God" contingency analysis A more clear description of milestones

Collab 4/15/04 #12 EDMEDM IV) Getting CD0 and CD1 The R&D project in preparation for the CDR Complete the polarized 3 He relaxation studies Measure the UCN storage time Demonstrate particle ID Tidy up preliminary measurements Improve light collection from the measuring cell Demonstrate 3 He injection into superfluid He Observe 3 He magnetization with SQUIDs Depolarized 3He removal Design the beam splitter/state-selector and address other neutron transport issues The CDR - Should be the path to CD1 Results from the nearly completed R&D project Latest technical design A carefully scrubbed cost and schedule

Collab 4/15/04 #13 EDMEDM V) Project management Employ a professional project planner at LANL 2 days/week Planner will work closely with LANL physicists and engineers to establish initial cost and schedule Work package leaders must be selected soon!! Work package leaders will work with the planner to do the next iteration on the budget. The work packages will be iterated a number of times between the proposal and the CDR Work package leaders should expect paperwork