VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra - February 6-7, 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FactorInformation Needed Enterprise: Natural Resources Unit: Soil Judging I. Intro- duction A. Protecting resources, like soil, is an important career.

Advertisements

1 SOMIS: Schruns 11/10/2004 A Part of the European Soil portal - A step towards harmonization of Soil Information in Europe Panos.

Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps Technical and Operational Procedures Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps Technical and Operational.

EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.

1 SOMIS: ISPRA 25/11/2004 A step towards harmonization of Soil Information in Europe Marc Van Liedekerke, Panos Panagos Eusoils.jrc.it:

VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.

MASCAREF – Overview (short) Study under EEC 2152/2003 Forest Focus regulation on developing harmonized methods for assessing carbon sequestration in European.

Attribute values are classified, e.g. DR = Depth to rock. S = Shallow ( < 40 cm) M = Moderate ( cm) D = Deep ( cm) V = Very deep ( > 120.

Soil Information System of the Danube River Basin - source of the data for flooding prediction models. Beata Houšková Soil & Waste Unit, Institute for.

WP5 – Chapter 7. Harmonisation Harmonisation of geometry, data definitions, data models, naming ISSUES: MS deliveries are described in WP 4.1 in an enhanced.

1 EnviroInfo 2005 Alpine Area (5 Countries): 11 x 7 = 77 cells Area: 770,000 Km 2 European Soil Erosion Risk Local Italian Alpine Area EU Member Regional.

Key sources of uncertainty in forest carbon inventories Raisa Mäkipää with Mikko Peltoniemi, Suvi Monni, Taru Palosuo, Aleksi Lehtonen & Ilkka Savolainen.

Ecological soil map of the Alps A cross-border pilot area between Italy and Slovenia Sara Zanolla Stefano Barbieri Giuseppe Michelutti Borut Vrščaj.

Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps The ECALP Project: Results and Prospects Lombardia Pilot Area Stefano Brenna, Alberto Rocca ERSAF – Agency.

SDMX in the Vietnam Ministry of Planning and Investment - A Data Model to Manage Metadata and Data ETV2 Component 5 – Facilitating better decision-making.

CoopIS2001 Trento, Italy The Use of Machine-Generated Ontologies in Dynamic Information Seeking Giovanni Modica Avigdor Gal Hasan M. Jamil.

EGTC-Meeting of the Approval Authorities 21 st – 22 nd February 2013, Budapest Ministry of Public Administration and Justice Experiences of Approval Authorities.

Event/ date: WISE GIS – IT workshop, EEA, Author: Miroslav Fanta, ETC/ICM 1 Selected critical issues in current GIS datasets incl. general.

Eco-Pedological Map of the Alpine Territory: a Crossborder Example.

Site Grading Site Grading Civil Engineering and Architecture

GHG Inventory hands-on training Workshop of the CGE Ricardo Leonardo Vianna Rodrigues Difficulties in calculating net CO 2 emissions from Brazilian agricultural.

Regression Analysis Module 3. Regression Regression is the attempt to explain the variation in a dependent variable using the variation in independent.

SOILS INVENTORIES We can consider two basic approaches: A. Samples points extracted from a population of points. B. Mapping. For the first an example (at.

Surface Temperature Described scientifically, surface temperature is the radiating temperature of the ground surface including grass, bare soil, roads,

JRC Ispra - IES 1 Overview of soil data at European scales F. Carré & T. Mayr.

Experiences with WRB in the 1:250,000 mapping in Italy Institutional Framework and Soil Classification Systems Numerous authorities are active in many.

On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.

Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.

C M Clarke-Hill1 Collecting Quantitative Data Samples Surveys Pitfalls etc... Research Methods.

HARMONISINGEUROPEAN SNOW LOADS MAPPING B.Eiselt, R.Peckham, G.Solomos ISIS, JRC - Ispra (Italy)

Soil Emissions and Removals Reporting in Portugal 2014 JRC LULUCCF Workshop 06/05/2014 Paulo Canaveira.

Field Estimates for Measuring Rock Fragment Content Marc Crouch, SSDQS, MO14 Professional Development Workshop Ocean City, MD October 23-26, 2000.

Results of forest soil inventory implemented in within the scope of the demonstration project BioSoil Soil stability in ecologically and socially.

Is a combination of: rock and mineral fragments organisms (such as plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, etc.) organic matter water and air Soils are a complex.

Soil Profile and Soil Horizons Presented by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, PASEO Wilkes University GeoEnvironmental Sciences and Environmental Engineering Department.

Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.

Modeling Soil Organic Matter Distribution in a Northern Hardwood Forest and Tropical Watershed. Kris Johnson* Fred Scatena* and Yude Pan** *University.

11 july 2008 European Conference on Quality COMPARISON OF VALIDATION PROCEDURES TO DETECT MEASUREMENT ERRORS IN AN AREA FRAME SAMPLE SURVEY Laura Martino,

Geodetic Institute of Slovenia Map presentations of data collection for the indicators 4th National Stakeholder involvement workshop Anita Ipša, Vesna.

Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing

LIFE08 ENV/IT/ THE SURVEY ACTIVITY WILL CONSIST OF THE SPADE DIGGING OF AT LEAST 75 MINIPITS, WHICH WILL BE DESCRIBED UP TO 0.5 M AND FURTHER MANUALLY-AUGERED.

The pilot area approach as a basis to develop a network Meeting on Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC Ispra 1-2 July 2004 Ialina Vinci and.

Quiz 3 - Answers 1.) T F Conservation tillage refers to methods of preparing the soil for planting that are more likely to disturb or move soil than conventional.

PROCESSING, ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION OF DATA

1 Miskolc, 1 st Digital Soil Mapping WG Danube basin profile Database Beata Houšková Jean Dusart Luca Montanarella Soil & Waste Unit Institute for Environment.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.

CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information Edoardo.

The “Ecopedological project of the Alps”: general description Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC, Ispra1 – 2 July 2004 Francesca Ferraro,

Improving the visualisation of statistics: The need for an SDMX-based visualisation framework Xavier Sosnowska Luxembourg, 6 May 2008.

The site specific variables that correlate with the distribution of the Pacific Golden Chanterelle, Cantharellus formosus Sarah E. Bergman and David L.

1 Slide 1 Soil Atlas of Europe. 2 Slide 2 What are we trying to produce? Topical and Timely Publication  Soil protection legislation  Enlargement of.

Problem No. 5 Problem No. 5 p.38 A 100’ 1000’ FILL ROADWAY 1.0’ Dry clay fill 100% density Use table p minutes for calculation Volume to be trucked.

GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002 GLC 2000 land cover map of the desert locust recession area First results E. Bartholomé,

Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit Incontro tecnico su Indicatori e metodologie a supporto della strategia tematica per il suolo: Studi Pilota in.

Field Trip Sites: (Field Report due next Wednesday?) Tuesday:Upland = Site A Lowland = Site B Report: Introduction (briefly summarize methods used), Results.

 Vocabulary  Soil: Well weathered rocks and minerals mixed with decaying organic matter which covers much of earth’s land surface.  Humus: Soil containing.

Stefano Barbieri Sara Zanolla Giuseppe Michelutti

Statistical Data Analysis - Lecture /04/03

The ecopedological map of the alpine territory the pilot area of the Veneto Region Ispra February 2005 Ialina Vinci and Silvia Obber Agency for.

Pilot Area of Veneto Region (Italy)

TOPIC 1: SITE INVESTIGATION FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN

Accuracy vs. Precision K. Culbertson 2010.

Integration of Territorial And Land Information

CANADA and SWITZERLAND

Sampling results 5 (10%) 74% 10 (20%) 25 (50%) 45 (90%) Sample Size

Integration of Territorial And Land Information

STEPS Site Report.

Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.

Neil Sims, Glenn Newnham, Jacqui England, Carly Green & Alex Held

Plastic packaging Agenda item 8 Working Group meeting on waste statistics 25 March 2019.

Presentation transcript:

VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra - February 6-7, 2006

The first to fill in the exchange format in order to provide an example Austria-Veneto pilot areas are not crossborder LACK OF HARMONISATION POSSIBILITIES

Austria-Veneto: very different environments. High interest but low correlation possibilities Humus forms could have been discussed more, during all excursions (important for OC) Friuli-Slovenia: good examples of harmonisation. A single pilot area, already harmonised. EXCURSIONS

Similar interpretations of pedogenetic processes (es: Bs/Bw horizons in Lombardy or Switzerland) This should lead to similar classifications, with few problems of different soil classifications on the borderline (U. Wolf) EXCURSIONS

Italy seems confident using WRB classification (no national classification) Countries with national classifications tend to translate their classifications to WRB (single WRB adjective) CLASSIFICATION

STU-TOT (pixel table) Total STU coverage (%), sum of all STUs coverage. STU-TOT+NON SOIL should be 100%, exept for border pixels. Was the interpretation of the parameter the same for everyone? Is it coherent with the 1:1M DB? Problem: NON SOIL ( SUR-BARE+SUR-URB+W-BODY ) and STU_TOT come from different DB PIXEL TABLE

SUR-BARE+SUR-URB+W-BODY: Should everybody use Corine 2000 to have the same definition of NON-Soil or should they use local sources and describe them in metadata? Which is the source for non-soil for the 1:1M DB? PIXEL TABLE

PX-CFL: Confidence level of pixel description PX-AVLB: Soil data availability PX-OBS: Number of total observations in the pixel N-PROF: Number of profiles in the pixel There is no reason not to fill in these parameters. PIXEL TABLE

CO-HUM: organic carbon content of holorganic layers in the pixel (t/ha) Is the value 0 of some pilot area for missing data or for no holorganic layers presence? (es: agricultural sites, vineyards, ecc..) PIXEL TABLE

S-LOSS: Actual soil loss in the pixel (t/ha/year) some pilot areas have filled the DB with the interval of the classes of t/ha (ES: 10-40) PIXEL TABLE

STU-DOM Dominant STU coverage (%). It should have been calculated as percentage of the STU-TOT Was the interpretation of the parameter the same for everyone? Is it coherent with the 1:1M DB? DOMINANT STU TABLE

TOP-DEPTH : depth of topsoil (cm) It gives precision and accuracy to the data, it helps to characterise mountain and agricultural soils Should bulk density and organic carbon content of TOP-DEPTH be added to check the data of 1:1M DB? DOMINANT STU TABLE

Very important to be filled in. Has it been filled by all partners? If not, why not? METADATA TABLE