Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 2o th November Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
Advertisements

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Explanation of slide: Logos, to show while the audience arrive.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Monitoring and evaluation of carers’ services and projects Dr Andrea Wigfield - Associate Professor of Social Policy Centre for International Research.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
New frontiers Evaluation methods Theory of change Project cycle and risk management Jesper Johnsøn, CMI, U4 Bergen, February 4, 2014.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
 Road Safety the European Union Policy Carla Hess European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport Road.
Possibilities of Business Support within the Operational Programme Enterprise and Innovation for Competitiveness May 2015.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Results-Based Management
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Basic Elements of Control Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.20–1.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Josefine Loriz-Hoffmann DG AGRI/G1 “Consistency of rural development“ “Stimulating regional economies through high speed internet access”, 07/05/2009 EU.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Lesson 8: Effectiveness Macerata, 11 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Slide 1 Monitoring & Evaluation of e-Government Projects, Performance Metrics for CM People Process Technology Outputs Outcomes Impact.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Indicators Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 16 December 2011.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Ministry of Healthcare & Nutrition Broader Approaches to Health Strategic Frame Work for Health Development.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Michael Campe U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command NDIA TID Technical Information Division Symposium Royal Sonesta Hotel, New Orleans, LA August 2003.
Lesson 8: Efficiency, Impact and sustainibility Macerata, 11 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies, Brussels, 30/11/2010 Evaluating the European Social Fund support to Roma inclusion: processes,
Improving Outcome Measurement Scottish Annual Statistics Users Conference 29/10/09 Dr Mark McAteer Director of Governance & Performance Management.
Lesson 7: Performance Macerata, 3 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Measuring benefits of European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Piloting of Typology 22 February 2011.
TBS 2008-H. Tata & M. Babaley Mapping and In-depth Assessment of Medicines Procurement and Supply Systems WHO Technical Briefing Seminar 17 th -21 st November.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
From Outcome To Output. Outcome  The intended or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an intervention’s outputs,  usually requiring the collective.
Lesson 7: Performance Macerata, 13 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Lesson 4: Evaluation Plan Macerata, 29 th October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
European Disability Strategy Disability Strategy Adopted EC - November main areas key actions / each area to meet general objectives.
SUMMARY Macerata, 8 th April Andrea Gramillano, t33 srl.
 ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Policy European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport «Road Safety.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Interreg Programmes Preliminary Conclusions May 2016.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Lesson 7: Performance Macerata, 28th October
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
ESF and IB New ESF priority which recognises the need to support the strengthening of institutional and administrative capacity in Convergence regions.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Tracking development results at the EIB
Performance Framework
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Lesson 2: Monitoring, evaluation and indicators
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Executive Director, Atkinson Review
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 2o th November Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl

Agenda  Monitoring  Definition and types of indicators  Quality of the indicator system

What do we need from the last lessons The Project / Program cycle IdentificationFormulationImplementation Evaluation and review The Chain of Public Interventions PolicyProgramProject (1)Project (2) Other delivery policy tools: law, tax, agency, campaign.

Monitoring, Auditing and Evalaution Monitoring: observing and collecting data form the project.  What time is it? 12,34  At what time is the train ? 11,50 Auditing: judgement against a rule/ standard  The train is at 11,50 and you missed it Evaluation: interpeting data to provide a subjuctive judgement for accountability and learning: You did not catch the train because of….. An alternative can be……..

Programs and projects Programme Project 1Project nProject …  Financial contribution from programmes to projects  Information (e.g. progress reports) concerning the status of implementation to the authorities responsible for the programme -> support the day to day management

Monitoring and Indicator Monitoring is the observation of project and program by measuremnts These measurements are the Indicators PROGRAM INDICATOR: a characteristic or attribute which can be measured to assess an intervention in terms of its outputs or results:  Output indicators are normally straightforward.  Result indicators may be more difficult to derive, and it is often appropriate to rely on indirect indicators as proxies. Indicators can be either quantitative or qualitative. CONTEXT INDICATORS relate to the environment for the programme

Indicators: what is it needed?  Definition  Unit of measurement  Source of information (going from internal to external)  Baseline (i.e. the initial value against which an indicator is subsequently measured) Refer to local context; or Refer to activities in previous programmes  Target (combined with baseline information, provides information concerning the importance of the planned interventions)  Current status

FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT INPUTOUTPUTRESULT DEFINITIONS INPUT: Financial, human, material, organisational and regulatory means mobilised for the implementation of an intervention. Monitoring and evaluation focus primarily on the inputs allocated by public authorities and used by operators to obtain outputs. OUTPUT: physical" product of spending resources through policy interventions. Examples are: the length, width or quality of the roads built; the number of hours of extra teaching hours provided by the intervention; the capital investment made by using subsidies. RESULT: The specific dimension of the well- being of people that motivates policy action, i.e., that is expected to be modified by the interventions designed and implemented by a policy. Examples are: the mobility in an area; the competence in a given sector of activity

Programme indicators - Output Output indicators: direct products of the programme Could require information from beneficiaries, or can be calculated directly at the programme level

Programme indicators - Result Result indicators: relate to the effect brought about by a programme. They provide information on changes for the well being of the people to, for example, the behaviour, capacity or performance of beneficiaries.

ROAD CONSTRUCTION Indicator typeIndicator NameUnit OutputLength of rehabilitated/modernized county roadsKM Result Increase passengers and freight traffic on the rehabilitated, constructed, modernized roads %

URBAN DEVELOPMENT Indicator typeIndicator nameUnit Output Inhabitants benefiting from the implementation of integrated urban development plans N Result Companies established in the “urban action zones” N

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE Indicator typeIndicator NameUnit Output Rehabilitated/equipped health care mobile units (total and by type) N ResultAverage response time of mobile unitsN

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Indicator typeIndicator NameUnit OutputMicro-enterprises created and supportedN Result New jobs created in the supported micro- enterprises N

TOURISM PROMOTION Indicator typeIndicator NameUnit Output Tourism infrastructure / accommodation projects implemented N ResultIncrease of overnights-staying%

Context indicators Context indicators: reflect the socio- economic conditions of a programme area they enable to assess local needs of the programme area, to assess how the general context of a programme is evolving Not just programme indicators…

Indicators – Physical, financial, procedural  Physical indicators: describe the concrete ‘products’ of the programme;  Financial indicators: provide a basic picture for usage of the available resources (i.e. how fast? which priorities?): Committed/spent; Year/Priority/Source of funding.  Procedural indicators: provide information on the current status of the operational level and forecasts for the next steps.

Quality - individual indicators SMART  Specific indicator, if it measures the relevant change at the specific objective level;  Measurable indicator, if it is possible to measure the baseline and the target and if necessary the milestones;  Attainable indicator, if the target is possible to be achieved;  Relevant indicator, if it measures the contribution to the change at a priority axis and programme level; Time – bound, if the indicator is available and updated in different periods

Quality – indicator system  Coverage: adequate coverage of expected allocation of financial resources;  Balance: among the different categories of indicators;  Selection: capacity of the authorities to absorb data and information is limited!  Relevance: advanced development for indicators related to the most significant themes and interventions.

WORKOUT

WHAT IS IMPORTANT TODAY? Observation of project / program Monitoring Measurable chareteristics CONTEXT / PROGRAM - PROJECT Indicator OUTPUT RESULT Project

See you