March 24, 2014 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Teachers Know Their Content And Teach Effectively: CAEP Standard 1 Stevie Chepko,
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
September 30, :00pm to 3:00pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Building on Strong Foundations: CAEP Standards 2 & 4 OCTEO Spring Conference,
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
September 15, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Meeting Minutes & Notes.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
Welcome to the Spring 2015 Student Teaching Workshop.
Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Transitioning from NCATE to CAEP November 10, 2014 Dr. Lance Tomei Retired (2013) Director for Assessment, Accreditation, and Data Management, University.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Accreditation and STEM Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Melanie DiLoreto.  Planning Committee ◦ Spring 2008 – Summer 2008 ◦ Internal & External Stakeholders – CAS, PCL, SoE, Academic Affairs, Supervising Teachers,
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
OCTEO April 1, 2016 Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Eastern’s Assessment System
Partnership for Practice
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Elayne Colón and Tom Dana
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
Standard Four Program Impact
Standard one: revisions
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes

CELEBRATION SUNY CORTLAND successfully submitted 24 Program Reports to the Specialized Professional Associations for National Recognition Review. Congratulations & thanks to all the folks who contributed to completing this important work.

CAEP Standards Overview The new Standards are framed to highlight new expectations in terms of teachers and do not include explicit references to education leaders or other school personnel. New focus and emphasis is on performance and outcomes rather than on resources or capacity factors.

Primary Focus In developing the new CAEP Standards the motives that have guided the Commission in their work have been “to foster innovation and rigor, to draw from research, and to create a performance-based, evidence-informed accreditation system.” Priority will be on measures of impact on student learning and development and candidate readiness to teach effectively at the completion of preparation.

By the numbers CAEP Standards Standard 1-Content and Pedagogical Knowledge Standard 2-Clinical Partnerships and Practices Standard 3 - Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity Standard 4 - Program Impact Standard 5 - Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement NCATE Standards Standard 1- Candidate’s Knowledge, Skills and Professional Dispositions Standard 2 – Assessment System and Unit Evaluation Standard 3- Field Experiences and Clinical Practices Standard 4- Diversity Standard 5- Faculty Qualifications, performance and development Standard 6- Unit governance and resources

CAEP Standard 1: Content and Pedagogical Knowledge Candidates demonstrate an understanding of the 10 InTASC standards at the appropriate progression level(s) in the following categories: the learner and learning; content; instructional practice; and professional responsibility. Providers must: Ensure completers use research-based practices in instruction and assessment of P-12 learners. Align completer outcomes with SPA standards Ensure completers can support P-12 students to meet national standards (CCLS, NGSS, etc.) Ensure completers can use technology appropriately

CAEP Standard 2: Clinical Partnerships and Practice The provider ensures that effective partnerships and high-quality clinical practice are central to preparation so that candidates develop the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary to demonstrate positive impact on all P-12 students’ learning and development. Partnerships for Clinical Preparation: Teacher Prep and Field Partners co-construct curriculum. Clinical Educators: Teacher Prep and Field Partners co-select and evaluate clinical educators Clinical Experiences: Teacher Prep and Field Partners co- construct field experiences and assessment of candidate performance.

CAEP Standards 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity The provider demonstrates that the quality of candidates is a continuing and purposeful part of its responsibility from recruitment, at admission, through the progression of courses and clinical experiences, and to decisions that completers are prepared to teach effectively and are recommended for certification. Provider responsibilities include: Recruitment of diverse candidates who meet employment needs Establishment of standards that indicate candidates have high academic achievement and ability Establishment of additional selectivity factors (dispositions) and means of maintaining selectivity during the program and at completion.

CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact The provider demonstrates the impact of its completers on P-12 student learning and development, classroom instruction, and schools, and the satisfaction of its completers with the relevance and effectiveness of their preparation. Provider is expected to: Document that program completers contribute to an expected level of student-learning growth (via state data). Demonstrates completers effectively apply the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions (via observations and student surveys). Demonstrate satisfaction of completers and employers.

CAEP Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement The provider maintains a quality assurance system using valid data from multiple measures, including evidence of candidates’ and completers’ positive impact on P-12 student learning. The provider uses the results of inquiry and data collection to establish priorities, enhance program elements, and continually improve. Providers are expected to: Employ multiple measures and methods to insure all CAEP standards are met. Ensure reliability and validity of measures used. Demonstrate continuous improvement. Ensure multiple stakeholders are aware of results and contribute to analysis.

The Big Question???? What data do we have (or would we need) to meet these standards? Divide into 5 small groups. Each group will discuss one standard and discuss what data we have and/or we would need to meet that standard.

Unit Wide Data Collection  We need to continue work on collecting unit-wide data.  dex.aspx dex.aspx  A tutorial will be developed in the next month to help folks enter data with a help session offered if needed.  Ideally, data will be entered by June 1.

TEC Bylaws Revisions CurrentProposed Preamble Role and Function TEC Chair and Function of the Chair and Unit Head for TEC Registration of Membership Voting Membership Meeting and Agenda Committees Ratification No Revision Revision No Revision Pending Revision Revision No Revision

DASA, CARR, SAVE Workshop Registration Process for Fall 2014  Students should sign up for workshops via the course registration process this spring – just as they would a course.  Workshops CRN’s and dates/times will be posted on the Field Experiences and School Partnerships Website.  A flyer with this information will also be sent out to campus this week.  On-line registration for workshops will be available through May 30th and then again during drop/add.  Paper registration for workshops will be allowed at the registrar’s office through the second quarter of each semester.  Encourage students to register early – workshops close out.  ALL THREE WORKSHOPS ARE NOW GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS!

UPDATES  Implementation of new NYS Teacher Certification Exams.  edTPA Updates  Other NYSTCE Updates

ANNOUNCEMENTS Two presentations tomorrow (Tuesday, 3/25) as part of our Inclusion 2.0 Conference. Both are free and open to the campus: "What is Universal Design For Learning?" 8:30 – 9:30 AM Corey Union Exhibition Lounge Jennifer Gondek, Inclusive Education Instructional Specialist at TST BOCES will present an overview of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and the use of technology to support multiple modes of engagement, expression, and representation for all students. "Believing in 'All Students Will Learn” Keynote Address by 2014 New York State Teacher of the Year, Ashli Skura Dreher. 2:00 – 2:45 PM Corey Union Exhibition Lounge