Instant Tomography of Active Regions Markus J. Aschwanden Jean-Pierre Wuelser, Nariaki Nitta, & James Lemen (LMSAL) STEREO Science Working Group Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masuda Flare: Remaining Problems on the Looptop Impulsive Hard X-ray Source in Solar Flares Satoshi Masuda (STEL, Nagoya Univ.)
Advertisements

RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
Science With the Extreme-ultraviolet Spectrometer (EIS) on Solar-B by G. A. Doschek (with contributions from Harry Warren) presented at the STEREO/Solar-B.
SJC 2/28/2002Steady Flows Detected in EUV Loops 1 Steady Flows Detected in Extreme-Ultraviolet Loops Winebarger, A.R., Warren, H., van Ballegooijen, A.
SH13A-2240 Automatic Detection of EUV Coronal Loops from SDO-AIA Data Alissa N. Oppenheimer¹ ( ), A. Winebarger², S. Farid³,
Jaroslav Dudík 1,2 Elena Dzifčáková 3, Jonathan Cirtain 4 1 – DAMTP-CMS, University of Cambridge 2 – DAPEM, FMPhI, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
MSU Solar Physics REU Jennifer O’Hara Heating of Flare Loops With Observationally Constrained Heating Functions Advisors Jiong Qiu, Wenjuan Liu.
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Joan T. Schmelz University of Memphis Monterey, Feb 2006 Limitations of TRACE/EIT Temperature Analysis for Coronal Loops UofM Student Workforce: K. Nasraoui.
Measuring the Temperature of Hot Solar Flare Plasma with RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department of Physics, University of.
Quiescent Loop Heating Profiles with AIA Henry (Trae) Winter, Kerry Neal, Jenna Rettenmayer, & Piet Martens Montana State University--Bozeman.
Coronal Loop Oscillations Seen in Unprecedented Detail by SDO/AIA Rebecca White and Erwin Verwichte University of Warwick, Centre for Fusion, Space and.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Fourier Modeling of DEM Distributions Henry (Trae) Winter Piet Martens Jonathan Cirtain (
Thermal Diagnostics of Elementary and Composite Coronal Loops with AIA Markus J. Aschwanden & Richard W. Nightingale (LMSAL) AIA/HMI Science Teams Meeting,
990901EIS_RR_Science.1 Science Investigation Goals and Instrument Requirements Dr. George A. Doschek EIS US Principal Investigator Naval Research Laboratory.
SXT Soft X-Ray Telescope Onboard the Yohkoh Satellite SXT.ppt.
Analysis of Coronal Heating in Active Region Loops from Spatially Resolved TR emission Andrzej Fludra STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1.
Observing the Sun. Corona: EUV; X-rays Chromosphere: H , UV, EUV Photosphere: near UV, Visible light, infra-red.
Solar-B/EIS high-cadence observation for diagnostics of the corona and TR S. Kamio (Kyoto Univ.) Solar-B domestic meeting.
1 Future solar missions (Based on the summary by R.A. Harrison) S. Kamio
Co-spatial White Light and Hard X-ray Flare Footpoints seen above the Solar Limb: RHESSI and HMI observations Säm Krucker Space Sciences Laboratory, UC.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
Solar eclipse, , Wendy Carlos and John Kern Structure of solar coronal loops: from miniature to large-scale Hardi Peter Max Planck Institute for.
Flares in and their associations with CMEs N.V. Nitta, J.P.Wuelser, M. J. Aschwanden, J. R. Lemen (LMSAL), D. M. Zarro (Adnet, Inc.)
Flare Thermal Energy Brian Dennis NASA GSFC Solar Physics Laboratory 12/6/20081Solar Cycle 24, Napa, 8-12 December 2008.
Looking for the heating function of solar coronal loops Miriam Ritchie 1 and Rahul Sharma 2 MSU Solar Physics REU – 2011 Petrus (Piet) Martens 3, Joseph.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Where is Coronal Plasma Heated? James A. Klimchuk NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Stephen J. Bradshaw Rice University, USA Spiros Patsourakos University.
3-D Perception of Coronal Loop Structures
Simulation of stereoscopic EUVI image pairs Markus J. Aschwanden David Alexander Nariaki Nitta Thomas Metcalf Richard Nightingale James Lemen (LMSAL) 2nd.
Newark, Wiegelmann et al.: Coronal magnetic fields1 Solar coronal magnetic fields: Source of Space weather Thomas Wiegelmann, Julia Thalmann,
Standard DEM: Consider a imaging instrument with M EUV filters (for the EUVI Fe bands M = 3). The measured intensity in one image pixel is given by DEM.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
Cross-Sectional Properties of Coronal Loops 1. Abstract In this work we present some preliminary results from an assessment of coronal loop cross sections.
Using potential field extrapolations of active region magnetic fields, observed by SOHO/MDI, as a representation of a real active region, we apply hydrostatic.
3-D Imaging with STEREO STEREO Science Working Group Meeting, Dec 15-16, 2003 Space Science Laboratory (SSL), University of Berkeley Markus J. Aschwanden.
Modelling the radiative signature of turbulent heating in coronal loops. S. Parenti 1, E. Buchlin 2, S. Galtier 1 and J-C. Vial 1, P. J. Cargill 3 1. IAS,
Measurement of the Reconnection Rate in Solar Flares H. Isobe 2004/12/6 Taiyo-Zasshikai.
Lessons Learnt from SOHO: CME Onsets CME Properties: to kg km/s Average span 45 o Significance: - Coronal evolution - Space weather.
I. INTRODUCTION Gas Pressure Magnetic Tension Coronal loops are thin and bright structure of hot plasma emitting intense radiation in X-ray and EUV. (1)
Forward-Modeling for 3D Reconstruction from STEREO Observations Markus J. Aschwanden & LMSAL team FIRST STEREO WORKSHOP, Carre de Sciences, March 18-20,
1 Solar stereoscopy - where we are and which developments do we require to progress? Thomas Wiegelmann, Bernd Inhester, Li Feng, Judith de Patoul.
2007 March 51 EUVI Early Observations Jean-Pierre Wuelser James Lemen Markus Aschwanden Nariaki Nitta.
2004 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, 3-5 Nov 2004 STEREO/SECCHI Simulations of CMEs and Flares Using TRACE images Markus J. Aschwanden Markus J. Aschwanden.
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
“ HINODE workshop” Zhanle Du & Huaning Wang 杜占乐 王华宁 中科院国家天文台 (NAOC) December 9, 2007 Problem of coronal temperature diagnostics 2007 年 12 月 8-10 日北京九华山庄.
Emission measure distribution in loops impulsively heated at the footpoints Paola Testa, Giovanni Peres, Fabio Reale Universita’ di Palermo Solar Coronal.
Flare Prediction and the Background Corona Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer Wolter-Schwarzschild Type 2 telescope Two separate spectrometers- the Normal.
2005/11/15STEREO/Solar-B Workshop1 Solar-B X-ray Telescope (XRT) R. Kano (NAOJ) and XRT Team XRT.
Centre for Astrophysics Space- and time-dependent heating of solar coronal loops S. W. Higgins & R. W. Walsh
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
Flares and Eruptive Events Observed with the XRT on Hinode Kathy Reeves Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
2 nd Solaire Network Meeting Catania, January 2009 Investigating the characteristics of coronal loop heating by 1D hydrodynamic simulations R.
Measurements of the altitudes of solar filaments Guy Artzner Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay ftp://ftp.ias.u-psud.fr/gartzner/ftp_projet/Secchi/
Using STEREO/EUVI to Study Active Region Magnetic Fields Anne Sandman (Rice/LMSAL) Markus Aschwanden, Jean-Pierre Wuelser, Marc DeRosa (LMSAL), David Alexander.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA; Thessaloniki University) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
The Role of Spacecraft Pointing Jitter & Photon Statistics, in 3D-Reconstruction of EUVI/SECCHI Stereo Images Markus J. Aschwanden Jean-Pierre Wuelser.
Zurab Vashalomidze (1) In collaboration with
Emission measure distribution from plasma modeling
The Loop Width Distribution – Are we Hitting Rock Bottom
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Chromospheric and Transition Region Dynamics
N. Nitta1, J.-P. Wuelser1, J. Lemen1, M. Aschwanden1, G. Attrill2
Presentation transcript:

Instant Tomography of Active Regions Markus J. Aschwanden Jean-Pierre Wuelser, Nariaki Nitta, & James Lemen (LMSAL) STEREO Science Working Group Meeting Old Pasadena, CA, February 3-5,

Content of talk : 1)Stereoscopic reconstruction of 3D geometry of coronal loops 2)Electron density and temperature measurements 3)Instant stereoscopic tomography of active regions (ISTAR) Relevant Publications: -Aschwanden, Wuelser, Nitta, & Lemen 2008: “First 3D Reconstructions of Coronal Loops with the STEREO A+B Spacecraft: I. Geometry (2008, ApJ 679, 827) II. Electron Density and Temperature Measurements (2008, ApJ 680, 1477) III. Instant Stereoscopic Tomography of Active regions (2008, ApJ 694, Apr 1 issue)

STEREO A-B separation angles (2007 is prime phase for small-angle stereoscopy) DateB (deg East)A(deg West)A-B(deg separation) 2007-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan May 2007Nov 2007

2007 May 9, 20:40:45 UT, 171 A, STEREO-A, EUVI Target AR in A

2007 May 9, 20:41:30 UT, 171 A, STEREO-B Target AR in B

Coaligned STEREO image pair A+B with FOV of AR Highpass-filtered STEREO image pair A+B

Image Highpass-Filtering and Loop Definition Unfiltered image (100% flux)Higphass filter (w<21 pixel) Highpass filter (w<7 pixel) Highpass filter (w<3 pixel; 4% flux) Best S/N ratio, but widest loops Lowest S/N ratio, but narrowest loops

Image Preprocessing: (1) Multi-scale filtering

Image Preprocessing: (2) Image stacking

Simultaneous images recorded in EUV in near-identical temperature filters (e.g., TRACE 171 A vs CDS Mg IX, ~ 1.0 MK) reveal that a loop system observed with CDS (with a spatial resolution of ~4” pixel) is composed of at least 10 loop strands when imaged with TRACE (with a pixel size of 0.5” and spatial resolution of ~1”). Concept of elementary loop strands and composite loops: With a highpass filter we enhance the finest loop strands, but EUVI has a spatial resolution of 3.5” (2.2 EUVI pixels = 2500 km), and thus the finest structures seen with EUVI probably correspond to “composite” loops. TRACE found elementary (isothermal) loops for w<1500 km

The fact that all analyzed loops in EUVI have a diameter close to the spatial resolution of EUVI indicates that they are unresolved and have smaller real diameters: d<2.5 Mm

Observables: d A, d B,  A,  B,  A,  B,  sep Trigonometric relations: Calculated parameters: x, y, z, r, h

Stereoscopic 3D Reconstruction - Manual clicking on 4-8 loop positions in STEREO-A image (x A,y A ) - Manual clicking on 4-8 loop positions in STEREO-B image (x B, y B ) - Calculating (x,y,z) 3D coordinates from stereoscopic parallax - Calculate stereoscopic error for each loop point z  z - Weighted polynomial fit z(s) (2nd-order) with s’ the projected loop length coordinate s in [x,y] plane Stereoscopic error in z-coordinate: Error=1/2 pixel in NS direction infinite in EW direction z y x

Highpass filter: subtract image smoothed with 3x3 boxcar Highpass filter: subtract image smoothed with 5x5 boxcar

3D projections of loop geometries: [x,y] --> [x,z],[y,z] Color: blue=short loops red=midsize loops yellow=long loops white=longest loop

View in NS projection with errors of heights

View in EW direction with stereoscopic height errors

Circularity ratio: C(s) = R(s)/r curv Coplanarity ratio: P(s)=y perp (s)/r curv

Hydrostatic Modeling The true vertical scale height can only be determined from proper (stereoscopic) 3D reconstruction of the loop geometry: --> Tests of hydrostatic equilibrium vs. super-hydrostatic dynamic states

Entire loops are only visible because of the large inclination angles:  ~ 51 … 73 deg so that their apex is in an altitude of less than about a hydrostatic scale height.

The height limit of detectable loops is given by the dynamic range of the (hydrostatic) emission measure contrast:

Density and Temperature Measurements The determination of the density and temperature of a loop can only be done after background subtraction. The finest loop strands have typically a loop-related EUV flux of < 10%, and thus suitable background modeling in all 3 temperature filters is required.

Loop cross-section profiles are extracted from image. Background modeling with cubic polynomial interpolation.

Temperature response functions of EUVI, A+B Filter ratios for Gaussian DEM distributions: Triple-filter analysis: forward-fitting of EM p, T p,  DEM :

Example of simulating 3 iso-thermal (T i =1.0, 1.4, 2.0 MK) loop cross-sections EM(x) with Gaussian profile, scaled with the TRACE response functions R w (T) that yields in each case the profiles F w (x)=EM(x) * R w (T i ) seen in the three filters ( w=171, 195, 284 A ).

Input: background-subtracted loop flux profiles Output: Electron density and temperature profiles

The advantage of STEREO is that a loop can be mapped from two different directions, which allows for two independent background subtractions. This provides an important consistency test of the loop identity and the accuracy of the background flux subtraction. AB F a F b x x Consistency check: Is F_a = F_b ?

Consistency test between STEREO A+B: Two independent background subtractions from identical loop seen from two different angles: Do we arrive at the same loop widths, densities, and temperatures ?

A colored temperature map of 30 loops with temperatures in the range of T= MK The hottest loops tend to be the smallest loops, located in the center of the active region.

The density profiles n(h) are consistent with the gravitational stratification of hydrostatic loops, n(h) = n base exp(-h/ T ) defined by the temperature scale heights T and stereoscopically measured from the height profiles h(s).

RTV pressure p/p RTV =1 Overpressure p/p RTV > 1 The observed densities are not consistent with hydrostatic equilibrium solutions, but rather display the typical overpressures of loops that have been previously heated to higher temperatures and cool down in a non-equilibrium state, similarly to earlier EIT and TRACE measurements.

Hydrodynamic simulations of impulsively heated loops reveal : (i) an underpressure (compared with the RTV hydrostatic equilibrium solution) during the heating phase, (ii) an RTV (energy balance) equilibrium point at the density peak, and (iii) an increasing overpressure during the cooling phase, approximately following the Jakmiec relation T(t)~n(t) 2

EUV loops are generally observed during the non-equilibrium cooling phase, where they exhibit a high overpressure. The previously hotter temperature during the heating phase can be detected in soft X-rays. (see Winebarger, Warren, & Mariska 2003).

Image Preprocessing: (3) Multi-filter loop tracing 171 A 195 A 284 A

3D Reconstruction of 100 loops (T= MK)

3D Field Interpolation Skeleton field = triangulated 3D loops 3D field vector = weighted 3D- interpolation

Skeleton field of 100 triangulated loops with polarity assignment according to proximity to photospheric dipole config. 3D field interpolation

Tomographic volume rendering

Observations: 3 filter images Model: ~7000 loops (forward-fitting of fluxes)

Consistency of modeled (forward-fitted) vs. observed fluxes

3 different views

Statistical distributions of forward-fitted physical parameters

Differential emission measure distribution of forward-fitted AR model (with & without tapering of loop footpoints)

Forward-fitted AR model yields super-hydrostatic loops for T<3 MK

Density modelTemperature model of forward-fit

Conclusions (1)2007 is the prime mission time for classical stereosocopy with small separation angles (<40 0 ). SDO will be launched when STEREO has very large separation not suitable for stereoscopy. (2)The stereoscopic triangulation provides the 3D loop coordinates [x,y,z], the inclination angle of loop planes that is important for modeling the (hydrostatic) gravitational stratification, the LOS angle and projected loop widths for inferring the electron density. (3)The dual stereoscopic view provides two independent background subtractions which yields a self-consistency test for the inferred physical loop parameters (4)The 3D (x,y,z) coordinates of loops provide the the most accurate geometric constraints for magnetic modeling of active regions. (5)Using stereoscopically triangulated loops as a skeleton, a 3D field can be interpolated and filled with plasma to produce a volumetric rendering of an active region, aiding forward-fitting in other wavelengths.