3. PEFA Update Conclusion/Recommendations: –Comment clearly in repeat assessments on changes in performance –No adjusting of earlier scores even when grounds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why would you want to do a CPEIR and how might you benefit?
Advertisements

Measuring Health Policy Development Capacity in Nigeria Allison Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Columbia University.
Scaling-up the UNDP-UNEP Poverty and Environment Initiative January 2007 environment for the MDGs.
European Commission experience with environment mainstreaming: lessons for green economy Thibaut Portevin DG DEVCO, European Commission.
1 John Rwangombwa Permanent Secretary and Secretary to Treasury Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Republic of Rwanda 1 Challenges and opportunities.
MDG based national development strategies and plans in Africa: the role of the Integrated Package of Services Presentation by BDP/BRSP at RBA Workshop.
Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with: Aga Khan Foundation BearingPoint Bitrán y Asociados BRAC University Broad Branch Associates Forum One Communications.
1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
The Future Approach to EU Budget Support October 2011.
Implementation of Democracy Support 20 June 2013
EuropeAid Entry points and models for parliamentary development EC support to governance in partner countries – with a focus on the African continent –
EuropeAid ENGAGING STRATEGICALLY WITH NON-STATE ACTORS IN NEW AID MODALITIES SESSION 1 Why this Focus on Non-State Actors in Budget Support and SPSPs?
Governance and Political Conditionality Case of Zambia Francesca Di Mauro BESA - March 2010, Nairobi.
1 PRSp Alignment Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop May 2003.
Experience on GM in the SWAp on Education in Kyrgyzstan Sagipa Djusaeva Programme Specialist, UN Women in EECA sub-region.
BUILDING BLOCK FOR HLF-4 PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES ON TRANSPARENCY FOR BETTER PREDICTABILITY, ENGAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY Alma Kanani, World Bank, IATI.
1. Key issues 2. Child rights in governance assessments2. Child rights in governance assessments 3. Strategies3. Strategies 4. Regional examples4. Regional.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Module 5.3 Measuring the performance of PFM systems.
BANGLADESH EXPERIENCE PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND PR OCUREMENT A presentation for Concurrent Session on Public Financial Management and Procurement.
Public Financial Management Architecture in Central Asia: International Reform Advice and Domestic Reform Practice: Case of Tajikistan Ismoil Khujamkulov.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Support – September 2008.
1 UNISDR Secretariat Asia and Pacific IAP meeting 25 March Learning from the HFA progress review.
Module 5.2 Measuring the performance of PFM systems
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
1.Resourcing the response to climate change is a global challenge. 2.The proposed framework will develop evidence, and structure lesson learning, within.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
1 Fostering Aid Effectiveness: Program-Based Approaches and What it means for Procurement? Presented by Jocelyn Comtois May International Conference.
1 S trengthening accountability for gender equality To learn more visit
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach PEM reforms in PRSP countries from Europe and Central Asia Warsaw, February 6-9, 2005 David Biggs DFID.
SEVEN KEY ASSESSMENT AREAS. 1. The 5 Main Elements of a Sector Programme 1. A sector policy and strategy; 2. The sector budget and its medium term perspective;
EXPERIENCE SHARING ON LOCAL PFM & CURRENT REFORM INITIATIVES Babu Ram Shrestha, MOFALD.
1 Harmonisation and Alignment: Challenges for US and European donors Alex Wilks, European Network on Debt and Development GMF, 18 th December
“Procurement Reforms and Capacity Building: Embedded in Public Financial Management” HLF on Public Procurement Reforms in Africa: Tunis Nov 2009.
Budget support training Module 4 Assessment of PFM (Third eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.
Budget support training Module 5 Transparency and oversight of the budget (Third eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.
Budget support training Module 2 Public policies (national/sector development strategy) (First eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
The World Bank PREM Public Sector Governance Page 1 Follow-up Actions by Donors and Countries ~ The case of PEFA ~ Session: “What Governments are Doing.
MTEF/Joint Programming : update and current issues DPG MTEF/Joint programming workshop 25 July 2006.
EuropeAid Financing Instrument for Development Cooperation (DCI) Thematic Programme “Non State Actors and Local Authorities in Development” Markus Pirchner.
EuropeAid 1 Update on development of the PPCM Guidance.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Governance Partnership Facility (GPF) Overview and Application Process Presented by: Piet Hein van Heesewijk Senior Operations Officer GPF Secretariat.
Baseline Indicators and Performance Measurement Framework for Procurement Regional Workshop on Procurement Capacity Development Lima, Peru April.
ADE’s 25 th anniversary Economic Governance: Key to Development ? Introduction Bruxelles – Bibliothèque Solvay – 5 October 2015.
PRS – Budget linkages in Tanzania Making Budget Reform Matter for Poverty Reduction 27 April 2006 Allister Moon.
PFM reform – change management Module 3.2 Preparing and managing a PFM reform programme 1.
The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.
Country Level Programs
Budget Transparency in Cambodia
Africa Region Accra High Level Forum Preparatory Consultation Workshop Summary of Group 3 Discussions on Harmonisation and Alignment April,
Macroeconomic Support Unit Europe Aid
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
Somaliland PFM Reform Programme
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS FACILITY FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC A framework for promoting lesson learning on the use of country systems.
(Further) Improving Development Cooperation
Measuring Health Policy Development Capacity in Nigeria
Presentation transcript:

3. PEFA Update Conclusion/Recommendations: –Comment clearly in repeat assessments on changes in performance –No adjusting of earlier scores even when grounds for doing so –Refrain from annual PEFA, better 3-5 years to demonstrate change –PEFA indicators as disbursement triggers should be discouraged, but some pressure in this direction –No PEFA-like assessments as they undermine the brand PEFA –EC position on any PEFA+ assessments: yes, as long as core PEFA tool is applied –For decentralised settings utilise PEFA e.g. for regions, city government Future work: –DAC PFM Task Force to work on reform sequencing by –DFID to work on how/whether to integrate Sector PFM issues; –IMF/NORAD to lead on tax administration tool; –PEFA Secretariat to explore on-line self assessment tool

3. PFM Reporting Conclusions/Recommendations –DAS 2006 and 2007: introduce baseline requirements and minimum standards; and stronger analysis of eligibility grounded in evidence and clearly documented –EC committed to CoA: (i) strengthen initial baseline assessments of PFM at formulation and (ii) revise the PFM Annual Monitoring Report Include an explicit risk assessment in initial programme –New format not yet endorsed by Asia, Latin America, etc. –Delegations to wait with annual PFM report until new format is finalised by (hopefully) April 2010 –Revised guidance: more clearly specified baselines and explicit reform expectations; and use of other performance information in a clearly structured way to present a more complete picture –Frequency of reporting: 12 months; if there are significant changes during the year Del to provide an update (1-3 paragraphs sufficient) –Timing of reporting: to be aligned with budget cycle and/or other important reviews/reports

3. Success of PFM Reforms Conclusion that success of PFM reforms is assessed by their progress in implementation. No concrete conclusion on how/whether to include (i) assessment of l ess corruption cases vs. more exposure/ follow up of corruption cases; and (ii) improved service delivery (poverty reduction?) Conclusion that success depends on: –Organisation of DPs around PFM Reform Programmes (including financing modalities) –DPs work with Govt (Lesson givers vs participatory processors) –Carefully phrase PFM reform requirement in FA (progress in PFM reforms vs successful implementation of specific actions/components) –Lack of a single voice on DP side in assessing PFM reforms –Commitment by Govt and DPs

3. Fighting Corruption Conclusions/Recommendations –Mushrooming of international indices, which rank countries very differently because of different approaches/focus; even trends over time can be different across indices –Del should unpack component questions / indicators when using international indices –Be specific (e.g. Uganda indicators/actions on specific corruption cases; specific procurement/PFM reforms, etc.) –Complement international indices with country own research/data –Measure opposite of corruption, i.e. resistance to corruption (e.g. NIS, CPAR, PEFA) –Mainstream anti-corruption measures in projects and programmes (including BS operations) to build institutional capacities

3. Domestic Accountability Conclusions/Recommendations –Include checks and balances in budget support operations --> involve civil and political society (NSA, Parliament) –CoA and European Parliament call for increase in cooperation with control bodies and oversight mechanisms –Areas for involvement: budget allocation and M&E of budget execution at local level –Constraints due to capacity and limited agenda of some NSA; even if information and space for involvement is provided, NSA not as active as possible (e.g. Uganda) –Support links and alliances between various actors + support media