Iconicity, Frequency, and Sign length effects in TSL lexical processing Yi-Hsuan Chiu Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, National Yang-Ming University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methods Effective functional connectivity of phonological and semantic processing processing during word reading Cheryl M. Capek 1,2, Simandeep Poonian.
Advertisements

How Children Acquire Language
Why iconic gestures aren’t very iconic
1st Level Analysis Contrasts and Inferences Nico Bunzeck Katya Woollett.
Cognition, 8e by Margaret W. MatlinChapter 4 Cognition, 8e Chapter 4 Working Memory.
Modality-specific interaction between phonology and semantics Gail Moroschan & Chris Westbury Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Central Auditory Pathways, Functions, and Language Central Auditory Pathways, Functions, and Language.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 8 Aphasia: disorders of comprehension.
Notes: Assignment 4 due Fri December, 10 th Extra Credit – answer questions on the form.
Sign Language By: Shannon Chesna.
Evidence For Cortical Specialization And Cortical Plasticity In Early Human Language Development Professor Dan Levitin’s Class, April 3, 2001 Laura Ann.
1. Which color represents the frontal lobe?. 2. Which color represents the occipital lobe?
Regional Cerebral Blood Flow During Sign Language Perception: Deaf & Hearing Subjects with Deaf Parents Compared Jagoda Konarska, Maria Bak, Marina Kaneva.
THE EFFECTS OF EARLY FOCAL BRAIN INJURY ON LANGUAGE AND COGNITION: Plasticity and Development Newborn Adult Brodmann,1909.
Lecture 5: Interaction and Navigation Dr. Xiangyu WANG Acknowledge the notes from Dr. Doug Bowman.
REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW DURING SIGN LANGUAGE PERCEPTION DEAF & HEARING SUBJECTS WITH DEAF PARENTS COMPARED.
Brain and Language Where is it?. How do we study language and the brain? Neurolinguistics studies the neurological bases of language  Explores how the.
Wilson, “The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory” Wilson’s thesis: Items held in short-term verbal memory are encoded in an “articulatory” format.
Notes: 1. Exam corrections and assignment 3 due Thursday.
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Language and Speech of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Characteristics and Concerns Language Acquisition.
Neural processing of language in the absence of auditory input Naja Ferjan Ramirez In collaboration with Matt Leonard, Christina Torres, Marla Hatrak,
Liu, Perfetti, & Wang (2006) as summarized by Scott Hajek.
Despite adjustments to the Wernicke-Lichtheim model, there remained disorders which could not be explained. Later models (e.g., Heilman’s) have included.
1 Language disorders We can learn a lot by looking at system failure –Which parts are connected to which Examine the relation between listening/speaking.
An Electrophysiological study of translation priming in French/English bilinguals Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger 2 & Phillip J. Holcomb 1.
1 Linguistics lecture #9 November 23, Overview Modularity again How visual cognition affects language How spatial cognition affects language Can.
Language Acquisition.
Neuroimaging studies of normal aging The effects of normal aging on cognition Neuroimaging as a scientific tool The physiological basis of cognitive changes.
Task 3 conditions Participants decided whether two pictures both matched the cue or not. Event-related design, 40 trials per condition Items were presented.
Introduction Pinker and colleagues (Pinker & Ullman, 2002) have argued that morphologically irregular verbs must be stored as full forms in the mental.
Last Lecture Dichotic Listening Dichotic Listening The corpus callosum & resource allocation The corpus callosum & resource allocation Handedness Handedness.
Apraxia post Stroke Paul Morris Occupational Therapist GSTT.
Sign Language corpora for analysis, processing and evaluation A. Braffort, L. Bolot, E. Chételat-Pelé, A. Choisier, M. Delorme, M. Filhol, J. Segouat,
Chapter 10 - Language 4 Components of Language 1.Phonology Understanding & producing speech sounds Phoneme - smallest sound unit Number of phonemes varies.
Camille Blochet Language Brain areas implied in language analysis Oscillations related to language and cognitive skills.
Using PET. We ’ ve seen how PET measures brain activity We ’ ve seen how PET measures brain activity How can we use it to measure the “ mind ” that works.
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
SPED 537: ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities May 8-9, 2006 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge.
Understanding Action Verbs- Embodied Verbal Semantics Approach Pavan Kumar Srungaram M.Phil Cognitive Science (09CCHL02) Supervisor: Prof. Bapi.
Words in the brain Slide #1 김 민 경 Chap 4. Words in the brain.
N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts Manuela Friedrich and Angela D. Friederici J. of cognitive.
Summary of Part 1: Basic Mechanisms. Micro vs Macro scales Micro = basic mechanisms common across brain areas Macro = differentiation, organization, and.
Investigating the combined effects of word frequency and contextual predictability on eye movements during reading Christopher J. Hand Glasgow Language.
Modeling interactions between visually responsive and movement related neurons in frontal eye field during saccade visual search Braden A. Purcell 1, Richard.
COGNITIVE MORPHOLOGY Laura Westmaas November 24, 2009.
The brain at rest. Spontaneous rhythms in a dish Connected neural populations tend to synchronize and oscillate together.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
Heilmann, J., Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J. and C. Hollar. (2005). Utility of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory in Identifying Language.
Master ASL Unit Seven Student booklet.
Cerebral Cortex Thoughts and actions Frontal Lobe: Consciousness, what we do according to our environment, judgment, emotional response, language, gives.
Practice Quiz. A Lesson on Language One of the features that make language unique is the set of symbols that can be broken down into smaller parts.
Memory Systems: Implicit and Explicit M. Jay Polsgrove and Shannon Walden Q301, Fall 2000, Indiana University.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
1 LIN 1300 What is language? Dr Marie-Claude Tremblay.
VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION. What is Word Recognition? Features, letters & word interactions Interactive Activation Model Lexical and Sublexical Approach.
Differences in the Semantic Relatedness of Signs vs
‘Signed and Spoken Thinking‘?
The Minds Eye: Neuroscience in the Movies
PSYC 206 Lifespan Development Bilge Yagmurlu.
The Effect of Language Modality
PSYC 206 Lifespan Development Bilge Yagmurlu.
Today Myths vs. facts about sign language Structure of ASL.
Visual Stress and Cognition: An investigation of the impacts of visual stress on lexical decision making Joshua Gietzen, Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, John R. Hayes,
8th Annual Post-Graduate Research Symposium
45 points total for Brain Helmet
Utilizing Iconicity Azaria Brown.
Experimental Design in Functional Neuroimaging
Wallis, JD Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute UC, Berkeley
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Presentation transcript:

Iconicity, Frequency, and Sign length effects in TSL lexical processing Yi-Hsuan Chiu Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan Institute of Neuroscience, School of Life Science, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

An animal or a tool? DOGKEY

Iconicity of sign language The components of The components of Location Location Handshape Handshape Movement Movement constrain the meaning of the objects! Language Thought

Iconicity of sign language The components of The components of Location Location Handshape Handshape Movement Movement constrain the meaning of the objects! Language Thought iconicity

Iconicity of sign language The components of The components of Location Location Handshape Handshape Movement Movement constrain the meaning of the objects! iconicity Language --- Thought

The usage of Sign languages in Taiwan Sign language in Taiwan Sign language in Taiwan Nature sign language (Taiwan Sign Language) Nature sign language (Taiwan Sign Language) Arbitrary Arbitrary Iconicity Iconicity Vision-based Vision-based Manipulation-based Manipulation-based {the spatial information (location, handshape, movement) is meaningful} Chinese Character Sign Language Chinese Character Sign Language

Iconicity in Sign Language

Visuion-based Manipulation- based handshape All possible shape-for-shape iconicity GINGER Path-for-shape iconicity VACE Ease articulator shape-for-shape iconicity KITCHEN-KNIFEGLASS location body-for-body iconicity ELEPHANT Neutral: VACE Neutral: KEY, GLASS movement atemporal motion Fictive motion Path-for-path iconicity Factive motion

Sign lexical access Task: Picture signing, picture delay signing, picture naming, picture delay naming Task: Picture signing, picture delay signing, picture naming, picture delay naming Subjects: deaf signer, interpreter (hear signer), and normal (hear non-singer) Subjects: deaf signer, interpreter (hear signer), and normal (hear non-singer) Independent variables Independent variables Iconicity: manipulation, vision Iconicity: manipulation, vision Frequency: high, low Frequency: high, low Sign length: short, long Sign length: short, long Dependent variable: reaction time Dependent variable: reaction time +&$ Release button to sign/ name out RT

Picture signing / picture naming +&$ Release button to sign/ name out RT Picture delay signing / picture delay naming +&$ Release button to sign/ name out RT * 1s

Behavior study

Picture naming/ signing Language modality Language modalityNamingSigning Visual processing/ Concept 0-150ms  Lexical access ms (lemma)  ms (Phonological encoding) Phonetic/Articulation ms 

Picture naming/ signing NamingSigning Concept Iconicity: no difference (all noun) Lexical access Sign length: Rt (Short < Long) Frequency: Rt (High < Low) Articulation RT

Picture delay naming/ signing Delay Naming Delay Signing Concept Iconicity: no difference (all noun) Lexical access Sign length: Rt (Short = Long) Frequency: Rt (High = Low) Articulation RT Language modality

Subjects DeafInterpreterNormal Signing Naming? Hearing ability  Dif.: Hearing lossDif.: Language experience However, what is the interpreter’s mother tongue?

Deaf signing (n=24) All subjects learned TSL before their puberty, and took TSL as their daily language. All subjects learned TSL before their puberty, and took TSL as their daily language. M=14, F=10 M=14, F=10 Mean age= years-old (19-57ys) Mean age= years-old (19-57ys)

Deaf and normal (N=24) Deaf and normal (N=24)D/SN/Np* Subject (deaf/ normal) ** Task (signing/delay signing) ** Interaction0.0000**

Deaf and normal (N=24) Deaf and normal (N=24) p* Interaction0.0000** sign-de. sign ** name- de. name ** sign-name ** de. sign- de. name ** Iconicity Articulation

N=24DeafInterpreterNormal Signing/GesturingIconicity*** Frequency****** Sign length ****** Delay signing Iconicity Frequency Sign length NamingIconicity** Frequency**** **** Delay naming Iconicity Frequency Sign length *

ERP study

Picture naming/ signing Iconicity: (verb < noun)~ (manipulation < vision) N400 Iconicity: (verb < noun)~ (manipulation < vision) N400 Frequency: ms (High < Low) Frequency: ms (High < Low) ms (High < Low) N ms (High < Low) N400 Sign length: ms (Short < Long) Sign length: ms (Short < Long)

Time window Window (ms) IconicityFrequency Sign length

Location (channel) Brain areas ChannelsIco.Fre.Leng. Frontal cortex F1, FCz, F2 M>VM<VH<L Inferior frontal (44)/ premotor cortex (6) FC5, FC6 M>V Motor cortex C3, C4 M>V Occipital cortex O1, Oz, O2 M<VS<L

Deaf Signing (N=8) and Normal naming (N=12)

Nouns and verbs Federmeier et al Federmeier et al Noun Verb N400: N>V

Deaf signing (Iconicity: M/V) (N=8)

Frequency (H<L) : H<L : H<L : H<L : H<L Muente et al Muente et al. 2001

Deaf signing (Fre.: H/L) (N=8) ms ms:H<L

Sign length (S< L) ms: S<L ms: S<L Assadollahi et al MEG Short word Long word

Deaf signing (Leng.: S/L) (N=8) ms ms:S<L

ERP data summary IconicityFrequency Sign length N400 N>V class V>M ico H<L60-120S<L Deaf signing *** Normal naming * Interpreter signing * S>L ? Interpreter naming *

Summary Frequency, sign length effects in TSL lexicon~ Frequency, sign length effects in TSL lexicon~ Chinese lexicon (spoken language lexicon) Sign language Iconicity ~ semantic Sign language Iconicity ~ semantic RT: signing< naming, delay signing~ delay naming RT: signing< naming, delay signing~ delay naming ERP: , ms, signing< naming ERP: , ms, signing< naming Normal gesture: RT: M<V Normal gesture: RT: M<V Iconicity: Iconicity: ERP: Manipulation/Vision~ Verbs/Nouns ERP: Manipulation/Vision~ Verbs/Nouns