IMPRINT Pro Usability Assessment Pratik Jha, Julie Naga and Dr. Raja Parasuraman George Mason University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.
Advertisements

AIMSweb Progress Monitor Online User Training
Copyright 1999 all rights reserved The HCI Design Process n User Interfaces are not just built by sitting down and drawing up designs for them n Just like.
Técnicas de Calidad en el Software Sesión # 10. Good quality software Operations Transition Testing Portability Reusability Interoperability Maintainability.
Ch 11 Cognitive Walkthroughs and Heuristic Evaluation Yonglei Tao School of Computing and Info Systems GVSU.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues, Feb 25, 2003.
Human Computer Interface. HCI and Designing the User Interface The user interface is a critical part of an information system -- it is what the users.
CS CS 5150 Software Engineering Lecture 12 Usability 2.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Case study - usability evaluation Howell Istance.
COMP6703 : eScience Project III ArtServe on Rubens Emy Elyanee binti Mustapha Supervisor: Peter Stradzins Client: Professor Michael.
1 / 31 CS 425/625 Software Engineering User Interface Design Based on Chapter 15 of the textbook [SE-6] Ian Sommerville, Software Engineering, 6 th Ed.,
Heuristic Evaluation IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
1 of 6 Parts of Your Notebook Below is a graphic overview of the different parts of a OneNote 2007 notebook. Microsoft ® OneNote ® 2007 notebooks are digital.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues Feb 13, 2001.
1 of 6 This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. © 2007 Microsoft Corporation.
User interface design. Recap User Interface GUI Characteristics (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointing, Graphics) User Centered Design User Interface Design.
User Interface Evaluation CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
BoardMaker Ver 6 Creating Interactive Activities for the Classroom.
The role of eye tracking in usability evaluation of LMS in ODL context Mr Sam Ssemugabi Ms Jabulisiwe Mabila (Professor Helene Gelderblom) College of Science.
Working with SharePoint Document Libraries. What are document libraries? Document libraries are collections of files that you can share with team members.
Created by: Ian Osborn. Possibilities Of Movie Maker Windows Movie Maker allows users to organize and add effects to media clips that ordinarily would.
Usability Methods: Cognitive Walkthrough & Heuristic Evaluation Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
Heuristic Evaluation “Discount” Usability Testing Adapted from material by Marti Hearst, Loren Terveen.
Evaluation IMD07101: Introduction to Human Computer Interaction Brian Davison 2010/11.
In the Sandbox Playing with SkillPort 7 for the first time.
Overview of the Database Development Process
1 Lesson 6 Exploring Microsoft Office 2007 Computer Literacy BASICS: A Comprehensive Guide to IC 3, 3 rd Edition Morrison / Wells.
COPYRIGHT © 2008 – APEX SOFTWARE LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Human Resources COPYRIGHT © 2008 – APEX SOFTWARE LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Filter Functions Keyboard.
1 SWE 513: Software Engineering Usability II. 2 Usability and Cost Good usability may be expensive in hardware or special software development User interface.
Discount Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques Basis: – Observing users can be time-consuming and expensive – Try to predict.
1 InStar Studio Product Release December The AMS InStar Studio release results in a move to a more powerful and scalable platform for huge future.
Q Q Human Computer Interaction – Part 1© 2005 Mohammed Alabdulkareem Human Computer Interaction - 1 Dr. Mohammed Alabdulkareem
With Windows 7 Introductory© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall1 Windows 7 Introductory Chapter 2 Managing Libraries Folders, Files.
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
What’s New in SkillPort 7 Presenter Name Title. SkillPort 7 – a whole new look and feel! Complete redesign of the SkillPort User Interface –Both Student.
SEG3120 User Interfaces Design and Implementation
INFS 6225 Object-Oriented Systems Analysis & Design Chapter 10: Human Computer Interaction Layer.
Key Applications Module Lesson 21 — Access Essentials
Lesson 12: Creating a Manual and Using Mail Merge.
Final Presentation Red Team. Introduction The Project We are building an application that can potentially assist Service Writers at the Gene Harvey Chevrolet.
An Overview of Usability Evaluation #15 1. Outline  What is usability evaluation ?  Why perform usability evaluation ?  Types of usability evaluations.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2006.
FX Software. WHY? Why FX Software Because companies need a disciplined platform to account for and monitor the daily, weekly, and monthly actions that.
Fall 2003Sylnovie Merchant, Ph.D. ACCESS Tutorial Note: The purpose of this tutorial is to provide an introduction to some of the functions of ACCESS in.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 592 Spring 2005.
Heuristic Evaluation Short tutorial to heuristic evaluation
Isograph Reliability Software HAZOP+ V2.0 What’s New.
1 Terminology. 2 Requirements for Network Printing Print server Sufficient RAM to process documents Sufficient disk space on the print server.
Cognitive Walkthrough More evaluating with experts.
Introduction to Evaluation without Users. Where are you at with readings? Should have read –TCUID, Chapter 4 For Next Week –Two Papers on Heuristics from.
1 Evaluating the User Experience in CAA Environments: What affects User Satisfaction? Gavin Sim Janet C Read Phil Holifield.
Executive Summary - Human Factors Heuristic Evaluation 04/18/2014.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
1 Usability Analysis n Why Analyze n Types of Usability Analysis n Human Subjects Research n Project 3: Heuristic Evaluation.
Day 8 Usability testing.
Lesson 11 Exploring Microsoft Office 2007
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Building a User Interface with Forms
System Design Ashima Wadhwa.
Instructor Name Instructor Title Library Name
Thawatchai Piyawat Jantawan Noiwan Anthony F. Norcio
Usability Evaluation, part 2
DB Implementation: MS Access Forms
Unit 14 Website Design HND in Computing and Systems Development
Usability Techniques Lecture 13.
DB Implementation: MS Access Forms
Cognitive Walkthrough
Polytone Convey volume and emotion through text. By: A Team
Presentation transcript:

IMPRINT Pro Usability Assessment Pratik Jha, Julie Naga and Dr. Raja Parasuraman George Mason University

2 Introduction A “professional” (Pro) version of IMPRINT is currently under development + More Modular + Added Functionality + Greater Flexibility This has also resulted in series of User Interface changes + Multiple windows to simultaneously display information + Tree structure for navigation + Pallete to show common used functionality

3 Project Goals To Uncover Usability Issues of IMPRINT Pro –Does the new interface allow users to conduct their analyses as effectively as with older versions of IMPRINT? –Is the added functionality and flexibility understandable and usable? –Is the new system easy to learn for a user trained on earlier versions? –Does the IMPRINT Pro interface allow users to navigate through the space of modeling options in an effective and timely manner?

4 Method 2 step approach –Heuristic evaluation (first cut) –Usability walkthrough (confirmatory)

5 Heuristic Evaluation Methodology Familiarization phase –Team read product manuals and other background material –Conducted high level task analysis –Gathered information on user characteristics –Attended IMPRINT workshop and tutorial Review Phase –3 reviewers conducted independent usability evaluation –7 well established heuristics were used for evaluation –Several group meetings were held to discuss reviews and consolidate evaluation

6 Heuristics

7 IMPRINT Pro Areas Evaluated 1.Overall look and feel (windows, menu structure, legibility of text and icons etc.) 2.Analysis tree 3.Navigational tab 4.Properties window 5.Adding a mission from library 6.Adding warfighter 7.Adding mission 8.Adding equipment

8 Tasks 1.Add new analysis a. Add name of analysis b. Add brief description and purpose of the analysis 2.Add a warfighter a.Add name b.Select MOS c.Select workload strategy 3.Add a mission 3.Add mission name and description 4.Add task network (functions and task) 5.Add task parameters or change properties 4.Add a equipment a.Add equipment name and description b.Add or change parameters 5.Save an analysis 6.Add analysis from the library

9 Results 37 usability issues were uncovered from heuristic analysis Results suggest some major usability problems in IMPRINT PRO software that could lead to –Poor user experience –Increased training time and poor learnability –Negative training transfer effect because the software is inconsistent with the previous versions Majority of the usability issues are severe or moderate in nature

10 Results – Usability Issues by Severity

11 Results – Usability Issues by Heuristic Criteria

12 Results Ease of Navigation –Software does not lead the user to the next step –User options are not visible –Number of user clicks are not optimized –Analysis tree and navigational bread crump gets cluttered fairly soon Look and Feel –Display clutter due to multiple windows –Poor contrast between background and text

13 Results Functionality –Pane seems to be of limited use and adds to display clutter –Windows functionality in the view menu is not enabled –Parameters cannot be changed in the properties window Enabling user options –A new version is added instead of new analysis –Cant drag and drop missions from other analysis

14 Results Maximize Recognition –Excessive use of Acronyms –MOS categories and workload strategies are not defined Preventing User Error –Incorrect user input sort (for example user is asked to input probability in percentage)

15 Results Providing User Feedback –Navigational tab and analysis tree are not synchronized –No feedback provided to the user if the analysis is saved or not –Property windows are not labeled

16 Usability Walkthrough We conducted a usability walkthrough to validate results of heuristic analysis Methodology –Tested 4 participants on Pro (2 experts and 2 novice) –Participants performed a series of task –Participants were asked to think aloud –Session was video taped for future analysis

17 Task 1.Add new analysis –Name it NCops –Add brief description about the purpose of the analysis for reference 2.Add new Warfighter –Name the warfighter as soldier 1 –Select appropriate MOS category –Select appropriate workload management strategy 3.Add new mission –Name the mission Network Centric Warfighter –Add a brief description 4.Add task network –Add function and name it Gather Information –Add a task to above function and name it Situation Monitoring (task 1) –Add another task to above function and name it Scan Head Mounted Display (task 2) –Change the priority of task 1 to 1 (Priority can be changed from the Effects screen of task properties) –Change the priority of task 2 to 2 –Review the task properties in snapshot view 5.Save your analysis and exit

18 Data Collected Background questionnaire –IMPRINT usage –Experience –Others Subjective ratings –Overall reaction to the application –Screen –Terminology and system operations –Learning –System Think aloud data Comments

19 Results – Overall Reaction to Application

20 Results

21 Results – User Comments Feedback " It is very different than 7 and will require old IMPRINT users to have new training because it is vastly different“ “ There is no feedback on saving an analysis."

22 Recommendations 1.A detailed task analysis should be conducted to improve the navigation and refine the functionality of IMPRINT Pro 2.An analysis should be performed to investigate if the radically different interface of IMPRINT Pro from the previous versions could cause a negative transfer training effect 3.Functionality aimed at minimizing training time or to provide users help in conducting the analysis should be explored. For example, the efficacy of “wizards” that help users in building an analysis should be evaluated.

23