“The Dose makes the Poison”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QSAR-based Prediction of Inhalation Toxicity Kendall B. Wallace, Eli Petkova, Gilman D. Veith University of Minnesota – Duluth Medical School & International.
Advertisements

PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Risk Assessment.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
Emissions Transport and Fate Concentrations Exposure Dose Dose-response Relationship Health Risk Schematic overview of a Health Risk Assessment.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Dose response relationships –A graph describing the response of an organism, population, or biological community to a range of concentrations of a xenobiotic.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment.
Ecological Risk Assessment Definition -Evaluates the likelihood that adverse ecological effects may occur or are occurring as a result of exposure to one.
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
RISK Targets: 1. Explain risk, toxicology, toxins and factors that affect chemical risks. 2. Explain how toxicity is measured and methods of determining.
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Chapter 17 Human Health and Environmental Risks. What is Risk? Risk: possibility of suffering harm from a hazard.
Introduction to Ecotoxicology Francesca Tencalla Beltox Seminar, Part 6.1.
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Risk Assessment Typically decomposed into four steps: –Hazard Identification –Dose-Response Assessment –Exposure Assessment –Risk Characterization.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Environmental Processes Partitioning of pollutants 3.iii Sorption in living media (bioavailability)
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 04 –
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Environmental Hazards & Human Health
TOXICOLOGY Trina Redford, Industrial Hygienist National Naval Medical Center Naval Business Bldg 615, 2 nd Fl. Philadelphia, PA.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Introduction to Toxicity and LD50 Based on How Toxic is Toxic
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
3. Method of inspection Requirements for the Method of Inspection We assume that k a is much larger than k el. That is, k a is at least five times greater.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Chapter 2 Using Science to Address Environmental Problems.
Chapter 17 Hazards and Risks. Questions for Today What is Risk and how do we handle Risk? What is a Hazard? What is Toxicology? What affects Toxicity?
Risk Assessment.
Unit 3 – Environmental Chemistry.  A pollutant is any material or energy that can cause harm to a living thing.  Pollution is a change to the environment.
EHS 507 Potential dose: the amount of chemical that is ingested or inhaled, or the amount of chemical contained in material applied to skin. Applied dose:
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY...a discussion of the fundamental means by which toxicological properties are determined.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Narcosis as a Reference Gilman Veith.
Criteria for Inherently toxic (iT) in CEPA, UNEP Proposed iT criteria for non-human organisms –aquatic acute effects levels of < 1 mg/L –above 1 mg/L.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Chemical concentration, activity, fugacity, and toxicity: dynamic implications Jon Arnot and Don Mackay Trent University McKim Conference Duluth, MN September,
FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL TOXICOLOGY
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
What are hazards in food system? Physical – Fish bones, nail, hair, etc… Chemical – Environmental pollutants Heavy metal Polymers – Pesticides – Antibiotic.
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Human Health & Aquatic Life Criteria
MID-COURSE REPORT Risk Assessment and Monitoring for Environmental Chemicals ( JICA HIC, 1st June 2007) MUCHLIS (INDONESIA)
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
04 – BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 04 – Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Environmental Toxicology
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Module 57 Toxicology and Chemical Risks
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health Chapter 11
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health
Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

“The Dose makes the Poison” Paracelcus (1567)

What is "Toxicity”?

Internal concentrationfor acute toxicity : 5 mmol/kg Fish-water Bioconcentration Factor : 0.04 8 105.5 = 12,600 Water Concentration needed : 5 / 12,600 = 4 .10-4 mmol/L Water Solubility : 1.7 .10-5 mmol/L

Ferguson cut-off Chemical concentration in the water that is required to produce the internal concentration in the organism that is needed to trigger the effect exceeds the chemical’s water solubility.

Toxic Effect = f(concentration at the active site, concentration at the active site required to trigger the effect) Toxic Effect = f(EXPOSURE, POTENCY) Toxic Effect = f(EXPOSURE, TOXICITY)

What is the difference? Dose makes the Poison Toxic Effect = f(concentration at the active site, concentration at the active site required to trigger the effect)

What is the difference? Dose makes the Poison Toxic Effect = f(concentration at the active site, concentration at the active site required to trigger the effect) External Internal

To agree or not agree? Chemicals that cause the same effect at the same internal concentration have the same potency / toxicity

Non-Polar Narcosis similarity with anesthetics: chloroform Lethality at an internal concentration: 3 to 6 mmol/kg All chemicals & all organisms mechanism unknown likely affect membranes: swells membranes causing a physical effect affects membrane proteins Narcosis is the most basic mode of toxic action. Chemicals will have at least this toxicity or they may have a greater toxicity.

FISH 1 FISH 2 Volume Total (m3) 1 1 Volume Water (m3) 0.9 0.5 Volume Lipid (m3) 0.1 0.5 Concentration in water 1.10-6 1.10-6 (mol/m3) ZW 1 1 fW 1.10-6 1.10-6 fL 1.10-6 1.10-6 ZL 104 104 Cw 1.10-6 1.10-6 CL 1.10-2 1.10-2 VW.CW 0.9 . 10-6 0.5 . 10-6 VL.CL 0.1 . 10-2 0.5 . 10-2 Vi.Ci ~0.1 . 10-2 ~0.5 . 10-2 Ci ~0.1 . 10-2 ~0.5 . 10-2

Toxic Effect = f(fugacity at the active site, fugacity at the active site associated with the effect) f(f at the active site, f at the active site associated with the effect)

Toxic Effect = f(fugacity at the active site, fugacity at the active site associated with the effect) f(f at the active site, f at the active site associated with the effect)

Acute vs. Chronic Toxicity

So what?? You want to protect all aquatic life by setting a water quality criterion for chemical X, i.e. a water concentration that should not be exceeded. So, what do you do?

So what?? You want to protect all aquatic life by setting a water quality criterion for chemical X, i.e. a water concentration that should not be exceeded. So, what do you do? This WQC is derived from a study of LC50 or NOAEC derived in the lab, and you take the lowest LC50 divide it by a safety factor (e.g. 10), and this becomes your criterion.

So what?? You want to protect all aquatic life by setting a water quality criterion for chemical X, i.e. a water concentration that should not be exceeded. So, what do you do? This WQC is derived from a study of LC50 or NOAEC derived in the lab, and you take the lowest LC50 divide it by a safety factor (e.g. 10), and this becomes your criterion. Then you manage environmental quality by a monitoring program that measures water concentrations & compares them with the WQC.

Tissue Residue Approach for Characterizing Toxicity Merits: eliminates transport/bioaccumulation from the external environment (Exposure), including: bioavailability dietary uptake and biomagnification metabolism accumulation kinetics

If Shared Mode of Toxic Action: Mixtures of Chemicals If Shared Mode of Toxic Action: Toxic Effect = f(SCinternal, Potency)

Species Differences Toxic Effect = f(fugacity at the active site, fugacity at the active site associated with the effect)

Dose - Response Relationship

Application of Toxicity Data to conduct Hazard and Risk Assessment General Problem: The Concentration of Trichlorobenzene in River Water is: 5.10-6 mmol/L LC50 in guppies (48 hr) : 5.10-4 mmol/kg What is the hazard and/or risk to rainbow trout?

Application of Toxicity Data to conduct Hazard and Risk Assessment General Problem: The ingested dose of Trichlorobenzene by (humans or sea otters) in food items is: 5.10-2 mg/kg/day LD50 in rats (14 days) : 50 mg/kg/day LOAEL : 5 mg/kg/day What is the hazard and/or risk to humans or sea otters?

Potential for a toxicological effect occurring Hazard : Potential for a toxicological effect occurring

Assessment of Hazard

Reference Dose Is an estimate of the daily dose to a population that is unlikely to produce an appreciable risk of adverse effect during a life time. Similar to an acceptable daily intake. Reference Concentration Is an estimate of the concentrations to a population that is unlikely to produce an appreciable risk of adverse effect during a life time. Similar to an acceptable concentration.

Hazard Index H = dose / Rfd < 1.0 There is no hazard > 1.0 There is a hazard

Hazard Index Rfd = 5 mg/kg/day(LOAEL)/1000 = 5.10-3 H = 5.10-2 / 5.10-3 = 10 There is a hazard > 1.0 There is a hazard

Probability of a toxicological effect occuring Risk Probability of a toxicological effect occuring

Single-Point Exposure and Effects Comparison

Quotient-Method Cexposure / Ceffect Ceffects can be: LC50, LD50, EC50, NOAEL, LOAEL, LC5 etc. Sometimes combined with a safety-factor

Example: LC5 = 50 ng/L Exposure Concentration : 30 ng/L Cexposure/LC5 = 60%

Example: LC5 = 50 ng/L Exposure Concentration : 30  15 ng/L (normal) 8.3%

Example: LC5 = 50 ng/L Exposure Concentration : 30  15 ng/L (log-normal) 22%