The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Higher Education Update State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) Annual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing Performance Standards for PARCC Assessments Initial Discussion PARCC Governing Board Meeting April 3,
Advertisements

Alphabet Soup: Understanding policy change ICAP – PWR – HEAR – Endorsed diploma – Grad guidelines – PARCC – ASSET – Remedial policy – ASCENT – ISR – CAP4Kids.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 23,
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
Achievement Level Descriptors & College Content-Readiness Webinar 1 November 15, 2012.
Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Briefing for States January 28, 2015 EMBARGOED Not For Release Before Thursday, January 29, 2015.
High School Graduation Requirements Florida students entering their first year of high school in the 2011–2012 school year and thereafter may choose from.
PARCC Grade- and Subject-Specific Performance Level Descriptors Presented to the PARCC Governing Board and Advisory Committee on College Readiness June.
PARCC Higher Education Webinar: Reviewing State-Level Stakeholder Engagement Strategies and Feedback for the CRD and PLDs August 2012 Presented by: Allison.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
Fall 2011 Pilot Project Region 10 Module Four B College and Career Readiness Standards 1.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
College- and Career-Ready Determination (CCR-D) Policy and Policy-Level Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs) September 25, 2012 Zach Foughty, Director.
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
PARCC Overview Lee County School District January 2013.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013.
Lee County School District January 2012 Common Core State Standards: An Overview.
Why is Georgia Making the change to CCGPS? Why do we need common standards? Why now? Disparate standards Different skills Global competition Preparation.
Getting to Know the PARCC Assessment: A Workshop for Parents January, 2015.
College and Career Readiness: Measures/Aligning Instructional Materials Dublin Scioto High School March 2012.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) December
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013.
PARCC – Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Career Aundrea Kelley, Deputy Commissioner, P-16 Policy and Collaborative Initiatives.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
Oklahoma REAC 3 H Summit Laura McGiffert Slover April 4, 2012.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) AACRAO: Bridges to the Future San Francisco April 17, 2013 Allison Jones, Vice.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Creating a High School Diploma That Counts: What Should Higher Education Do? SHEEO Annual Meeting July 21, 2006.
Summary of Common Core Standards in Mathematics and Implications for Higher Education Math Faculty Conference September 20, 2012 University of Central.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Measuring High School Students’ College and Career Readiness Race to the Top Assessment Public Meeting United States.
Fall Preview for Higher Education Leaders Sue Lane, Senior Advisor to the Commissioner for P-16 Access and Alignment, Massachusetts Department of Higher.
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Achievement Standards.
Development of “College Path” Cut Scores for the Virginia Assessment Program Shelley Loving-Ryder Assistant Superintendent for Student Assessment and School.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
High School Graduation and Endorsed Diplomas in Colorado A Mastery Minded Approach.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Quantitative Reasoning Task Force
The New Illinois Learning Standards
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Common Core State Standards Initiative
Common Core State Standards Initiative
Presentation transcript:

The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Higher Education Update State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) Annual Meeting July 14, Allison G. Jones Vice President, Postsecondary Collaboration, Achieve

April 2012: – PARCC Governing Board voted unanimously to include Governing State members of the Advisory Committee on College Readiness (ACCR) during discussions and votes that touched on “key matters” of college readiness on the PARCC assessments. – PARCC holds a Postsecondary Multi-State Meeting in Nashville for higher education state leads to introduce outreach and engagement planning tool and communications tools. June 2012: – ACCR meets to discuss first set of college-ready documents, including the College-Ready Determination policy and the policy-level performance level descriptors. – First joint meeting of the Governing Board and ACCR to approve documents for public release. July 2012: – PARCC releases College-Ready Determination policy and the policy-level performance level descriptors for public and state review. September 2012: – Public and state review period closes. 2 Key Updates/Decisions

July 12 th - September 21 st : Public comment July 19 th : Webinar - Stakeholder engagement on CRD/PLDs July 24 th : National Higher Education Partners Briefing September 12 th : Present preliminary aggregated feedback to Joint ACCR/ GB Meeting September 21 st : End of public comment Public Review Timeline: Summer/Fall

College-Ready Determination 4

Sections of the Policy – Meaning of the Determination – Benefit of Earning the Determination – Criteria Used for Making the Determination – Maintaining the Determination – Setting Cut Scores for the Determination – Criteria for Validating the Determination College-Ready Determination Policy 5

PARCC intends to make two College-Ready (CR) Determinations – Students who earn a College-Ready Determination in ELA/literacy will have demonstrated the knowledge and skills necessary to enter into and succeed in entry-level, credit-bearing courses in College English Composition and Literature, and introductory courses requiring college-level reading in a range of disciplines, such as history and the social sciences. – Students who earn a College-Ready Determination in Mathematics will have demonstrated the knowledge, skills, and practices* necessary to enter into and succeed in entry-level, credit-bearing courses in College Algebra and Introductory Statistics. *The practices referred to here are the Standards for Mathematical Practice included in the Common Core State Standards. 6 Meaning of a College-Ready Determination

Students who earn a CR Determination will be exempt from having to take and pass placement tests designed to determine whether they are academically prepared to enter directly into entry-level, credit-bearing courses in English language arts and mathematics. The CR Determination is not intended to inform admission decisions or exempt students from taking tests designed to place them into more advanced courses than entry-level. Benefit of Earning a College-Ready Determination 7

CR Determinations will be awarded to students who achieve Level 4* on the designated PARCC high school assessments in ELA/literacy and mathematics. In order to achieve Level 4, students will need to demonstrate a solid command of the knowledge and skills embodied by the Common Core State Standards assessed on the designated PARCC high school assessments. Options for determining the specific PARCC high school assessments that will be used to make CR Determinations will be discussed at the September 2012 Governing Board meeting. *The proposal is to report the results of PARCC assessments using five performance levels, Level 5 being the highest. Criteria for Earning a College-Ready Determination 8

College and universities may impose additional requirements to maintain college-ready determination – For example, continuous enrollment through graduation from high school in: Courses offered through dual/concurrent enrollment; or High school courses that build on the standards used to make the College-Ready Determination. 9 Maintaining a College-Ready Determination

The following statement will be used to inform standard-setting (determining cut scores for PARCC performance levels) and to conduct future studies to validate the efficacy of the CR Determinations. – At least 75 percent of the students who earn a College-Ready Determination by performing at level 4 in ELA/ literacy should earn college credit by attaining at least a grade of C or its equivalent in College English Composition or Literature, or introductory courses in disciplines requiring college-level reading, such as history and the social sciences. – At least 75 percent of the students who earn a PARCC College-Ready Determination by performing at Level 4 in Mathematics should earn college credit by attaining at least a grade of C or its equivalent in College Algebra or Introductory Statistics. Standard-Setting/ Validation Studies 10

Proposed PARCC Performance Levels 11

Performance Level Components Number of Levels General Definition of Each Level Policy Claims General Content Claims Proposed PARCC Performance Levels 12

Each of the proposed performance levels includes: – A general definition – Policy claims o That describe the educational implications for students at a particular performance level. – General content claims, o That describe the academic knowledge and skills students across grade levels performing at a given performance level are able to demonstrate. * *Once general content claims are adopted, grade/course-specific content claims will be developed (e.g. grade 4 ELA/literacy, Algebra I) Components of Performance Levels 13

Five performance levels are proposed – No names for the levels have been proposed at this time. – However, Level 4 represents the level of rigor currently described by NAEP’s Proficient Level (solid command of the content). o It is also the proposed level for earning a CR Determination. – Reasons for Five Levels (rather than four) o PARCC assessments will support the accurate classification of student performance into five levels that will --- – help schools target assistance to students; – provide states with options for using performance levels in various accountability mechanisms; and – provide increased opportunities for students, schools and districts to demonstrate growth. Proposed Number of Performance Levels 14

Level 5: – Superior command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the CCSS assessed at the grade level/ course. Level 4: – Solid command … Level 3: – Partial command … Level 2: – Limited command … Level 1: – Very Limited command … General Definition of Each Level 15

How Performance Levels Will Be Used To report the results of assessment(s) used to make College- Ready Determinations To report the results of high school end-of-grade ELA/literacy assessments and end-of-course math assessments (grades 9 and 10) To report the results of end-of-grade assessments for grades 3-8

Performance Level Descriptors for Reporting Results of Assessments used to make College-Ready Determinations Level 5 – Superior command of the knowledge and skills contained in the CCSS assessed – Academically well prepared to engage successfully in entry-level credit bearing courses in ….. – Exempt from having to take and pass placement tests designed to determine whether they are prepared for entry-level, credit bearing courses without need for remediation Level 4 – Solid command … – Academically prepared … – Exempt … Level 3 – Partial command … – Will likely need academic support to engage successfully in entry-level, credit-bearing courses – Not exempt … Level 2 – Limited command … – Will need academic support … – Not exempt … Level 1 – Very limited command … – Will need extensive academic support … – Not exempt …

PLDs for Reporting Results of Grades 9 and 10 Assessments Level 5 – Superior command… – Academically well prepared to engage successfully in further studies in the content area – On-track to become academically prepared to engage successfully in entry-level, credit bearing courses in … Level 4 – Solid command … – Academically prepared … – On-track … Level 3 – Partial command … – Will likely need academic support to engage successfully in further studies … – Will likely need academic support to become prepared to engage successfully in entry-level …. Level 2 – Limited command… – Will need academic support to engage successfully in further studies … – Will need academic support to become prepared to engage successfully in entry-level … Level 1 – Very limited command … – Will need extensive academic support to engage successfully in further studies … – Will need extensive academic support to become prepared to engage successfully in entry-level …

PLDs for Reporting Results of End-of-Grade Assessments for Grades 3-8 Level 5 – Superior command … – Academically well prepared to engage successfully in further studies in the content area Level 4 – Solid command … – Academically prepared … Level 3 – Partial command – Will likely need academic support to engage successfully … Level 2 – Limited command … – Will need academic support … Level 1 – Very limited command – Will need extensive academic support

In ELA/literacy, general content claims at each level describe how well students are able to – Read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex text independently – Write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources – Build and present knowledge through the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas – Use of context to determine the meaning of words and phrases In Mathematics, the general content claims at each level describe how well students are able to – Solve problems involving the major content with connections to the practices – Solve problems involving the additional and supporting content with connections to the practices – Express mathematical reasoning by constructing viable arguments – Solve real world problems, engaging particularly in the Modeling Practice – Demonstrate fluency (grades 3-6) 20 General Content Claims

Compile comments, revise CR Determination policy and performance levels as needed Present revised CR policy and performance levels to the full Governing Board for discussion and adoption at a meeting in fall 2012 Begin development of grade- and course-specific content claims 21 Next Steps

PARCC is taking the following actions to support states: – Regular communication and check-ins with members of the Higher Education Leadership Team (HELT) to ensure states are comfortable and on-track with the use of their individual state outreach and engagement plans – Implementing a new state visit protocol that will help each state advance its outreach and engagement plan, including Building stakeholder networks and buy-in; Conducting issue-specific meetings around Key Matters; and Connecting state postsecondary policy issues with PARCC decisions – Policy- and issue-specific webinars to support in-state engagement activities and provide opportunities for cross-state sharing and collaboration State Outreach and Follow-up 22

Allison G. Jones Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers 23