Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? ADE Information Technology Division 1 Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex Jones Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Dennis M. Williams, Jr., Principal Dr. Susan Bitner, Assistant Principal Ralph Rapino, Assistant Principal William Miles, Assistant Principal Louis James,
Teacher & Principal Evaluation: As Easy as Doing the Hula.
Data Tracking for Teacher Student Data Linkage (TSDL) DATAG March 15, 2013 Jami Kogler and Marti Mauro.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES PART 1: AN OVERVIEW LEADING CHANGE 2014 VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT.
Mark T. Masterson for Superintendent John Huppenthal Pamela Smith Program Director Arizona Department of Education – IT
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
SLAM! CHARTER MIDDLE/HIGH 604 NORTHWEST 12 AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA MR. ALFONSO J. OTERO Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, AELAS Program Director Mark Svorinic, AZ-SLDS Program.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Developing an Online Course: A Road Map for the Process English Language Arts 3-5: Vocabulary.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Mr. Meacham’s Class Overview Chimacum Middle School
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Preparing Leaders for Florida’s Most Challenging Schools Florida Department of Education.
How Hard Can It Be? ADE Information Technology Division1 Business Systems Analyst: Janice Robinson Project Manager(s): Arthur Kenjora Program Manager:
Brownsville Independent School District Department of Curriculum and Instruction Presentation by Dr. Salvador Cavazos Tuesday, June 17, 2008 Dr. Salvador.
State Longitudinal Data System (AZ-SLDS) Project DRAFT v7 ADE SFSF K-12 Project Manager: David Plouff AZ-SLDS Program Manager: Mark Svorinic IT Programs.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
 BOCES DATA COLLECTION What Administrators Need to Know.
NC State University Center for Urban Affairs and Community Services.
Jr. ACE Advisory Board. 6th Grade Summer Institute Academic Enrichment 7 th Grade Academic Year College Readiness Retention Activities 7 th Grade Summer.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITATOR ORIENTATION August 15, 2011.
PUSD Evaluations for Governing Board Presentation May 14, 2015 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Visualize Math: Success for Every Student From Techno COOL to Techno Tool: From Techno COOL to Techno TOOL –
Mid-Year Formative Updates of the District CSIP and 5 SIPs Presented by Dr. Timothy M. McInnis, and the Administrative Team of Building Level Principals.
PVAAS Updates to PAIU Curriculum Coordinators February 2013 Kristen Lewald, Ed.D. PVAAS Statewide Director for PDE Lancaster-Lebanon IU13
1 Hunters Lane High School An International Baccalaureate World School Susan Kessler, Ed.D., Executive Principal April Snodgrass, Assistant Principal Brad.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary School Grades K – 3 Diane Brown, Principal January 12, 2012 Home of The CES Tiger Cubs.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Sayreville Public Schools Curriculum & Instruction Budget Presentation Dr. Marilyn Shediack Assistant Superintendent Curriculum & Instruction.
Arizona Framework for Teacher Effectiveness Governing Board Meeting May 1, 2012.
End of Course Examination Program (“EOCEP”). Why EOCEP exists State Board of Education Regulation states that students scheduled to complete.
2012 MEATA Conference Brad Erickson Academic Support Instructor WBL Specialist Capital Area Career Center Ingham ISD
Albert Gallatin School District Mr. Carl Bezjak - Superintendent.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
West Central Regional Service Center Race To the Top funding, important dates, forms and decisions.
Student Technology Update
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
Instructional Improvement System Why – How – What -- When
Traditional Project Management
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
Early Learning Video Project 2018
Curriculum Verification and Results Reporting Portal (CVR)
Presentation transcript:

Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? ADE Information Technology Division 1 Enterprise Data Architect: Dr. Alex Jones Project Manager(s): David Plouff Program Manager: Mark Svorinic IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 1535 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007

Overview Why it is hard to get the Student - Teacher connection The Work Effort Involved Possible Constraints at School Districts (Lessons Learned) Next steps IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 2

Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? To establish a teacher’s accountability with respect to his or her students’ academic achievement and progress in one or more content areas. ADE Information Technology Division3 Objective:

4 Math Reading Writing Science Algebra World History Mrs. Sanchez’ Homeroom Mrs. Parker’s and Mr. Johnson’s 3 rd Grade Class ? Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? ? Biology

Establishing the Student – Teacher Connection How Hard Can It Be? Making it Easier ADE Information Technology Division5 Adopt statewide common course codes that map each course to the appropriate assessment content area. Choose and use SMS software that accurately reflects the assignment of resources in today’s dynamic classroom. Adopt a common characterization of elementary school classes to include courses taught.

Costing for Deployment Strategy

IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 7 Cost Estimates Cont.

Possible constraints faced by each school district: IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 8 District administrative staff schedules – Assistant Superintendant – Curriculum Specialist – HR administrator – Data Manager for SIS / HR systems District IT staff schedules – Technical staff for SIS/HR systems Staff and IT skill sets Engagement with the partner districts – Engagement with the staff to determine their skill levels Districts level of technology – Do they utilize a SIS system (statewide scale)

AZ-SLDS ASU Next Phase 1 Milestones/Deliverables IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 9 March 28 th Osborn Pilot Engaged by ADE IT April 22 nd Osborn Logical Model Completed April 29 th Osborn Deployment Strategy Delivered to ASU May 20 th Osborn/ESP/ADE/ASU Approve Final Osborn Course Mapping Report June 1 st Round 2 of Deployment Strategy Model released to ASU

Short-Term - Next Steps: IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 10 Course Mapping Strategy for Statewide needs to be defined -Develop, maintain, support of Internal “AZ Course Mapping” Tool -Contract with 3 rd party vendor for Course Mapping best practices Define data to be extracted from the LEA -Storage of data -Where, who -Security of data -Data Policy as related to access, term of storage, SLA’s -Data Governance -Discussions on evaluations: teacher, principal etc on maintained at ADE State-wide common dashboard -Purpose of dashboards -Access -BI layers based on access and roles ADE IT Platform for Infrastructure and Software to support AZ-SLDS

Questions? IT Programs and Projects Dept. Arizona Department of Education 11